Copyright?!

#12 - funnyordiezio

Reply+40

(04/25/2012)[-]

Learn you history before you speak false

#9 - thatkiddonovan

Reply+14

(04/24/2012)[-]

Adding to other people's arguments, you can't give a mi tape to 600 million people at once.

#10 to #9 - thegamegestapo#326 on commentsRank#326

Reply+20

(04/24/2012)[-]

#43 - dubgrungestep

Reply+19

(04/25/2012)[-]

#69 to #43 - roytmustang

Reply+1

(04/25/2012)[-]

FFUUU. I was gonna post that. But thumb for Dave.

Gif unrelated.

#47 to #43 - robskul

Reply+1

(04/25/2012)[-]

I love that man, he never cease to amaze me

#77 - boomdady

Reply+14

(04/25/2012)[-]

Too bad back then, artists probably deserved the money for the music they made. And today half the music industry is owned by people with no ******* musical talent at all. I don't know how half these ***** become "artists"

#78 to #77 - bazilball

has deleted their comment [-]

#62 - burtdog

Reply+13

(04/25/2012)[-]

We should bring that back just to mess the bills regarding the issue. You can regulate our internets, but not my bitchin' mix-tapes.

#67 to #62 - roytmustang

Reply+9

(04/25/2012)[-]

The only set back: Rewinding and Fast Forwarding is gonna be a bitch.

Damn you modern day society, you made me lazy.

Other then that, I'm actually all for it. Just because.

#59 - nopresident

Reply+12

(04/25/2012)[-]

False

It was considered copyright infringement, and illegal, to dub cassettes at home in many parts of the world in the 1980s.

#70 to #59 - ludislavonac

Reply-5

(04/25/2012)[-]

So what? Nobody could regulate it, the chance of getting cought was 0%

#76 to #70 - captaincabinet**User deleted account**

has deleted their comment [-]

#75 to #70 - boomdady

Reply+2

(04/25/2012)[-]

And how is that different from the internet today?

#84 to #75 - hazzmatmogre

Reply0

(04/25/2012)[-]

you're right.. people **** me in the ass over the internet every day.

#81 to #70 - anon id: c537d1a3

Reply0

(04/25/2012)[-]

That's why all of the large lobbyist companies tried to ban recordable tapes.

#50 - SilentStranger

Reply+12

(04/25/2012)[-]

I'll probably be red thumbed like a bitch for this, but meh...

I couldn't really give a **** about downloading music.
The artists/companies make more in a year than my whole family will in our entire lives, so I can't say I give a **** about someone not being able to buy a new Ferrari when I need to do my grocery shopping.

#68 to #50 - roytmustang

has deleted their comment [-]

#53 to #50 - TheFixer

Reply0

(04/25/2012)[-]

honestly i dont see what the big deal is with free downloads copyright laws dictate that if you re sell the bootlegged material thats the wrong part but if you give it out for free than there should be no problem at all.

#54 to #53 - SilentStranger

Reply0

(04/25/2012)[-]

I've similar idea with Youtube taking down songs.
It's like your mate playing a song on his iPod and you being charged for listening to it xD

#55 to #54 - TheFixer

Reply0

(04/25/2012)[-]

yep