gender equality. via not mine.. I argue with coworkers all the time about women hitting men. If a woman has the balls to punch a guy, she sure as better have the balls to take a punch back. I  gender equality via not mine I argue with coworkers all the time about women hitting men If a woman has balls to punch guy she sure as better have take back
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (834)
[ 834 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
129 comments displayed.
#3 - methodicalmadness
Reply +417
(04/16/2012) [-]
I argue with coworkers all the time about women hitting men. If a woman has the balls to punch a guy, she sure as **** better have the balls to take a punch back. I knew a guy who got arrested and spent the night in jail because his wife hit him with a frying pan and then tried to hit him again and he grabbed her wrists to stop her and it left marks on her wrists. Never mind the bleeding gaping hole in his head.
#18 to #3 - lesbianlover
-5
has deleted their comment [-]
#64 to #18 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Oh, shut the **** up. That sounds like ********, and if they did believe that she did it to herself then there was probably good reason to believe it. Otherwise he'd be in jail without a fair trial.
#73 to #64 - lesbianlover
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#254 to #73 - somepervert
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
#30 to #3 - lolzinyourmouth **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#241 to #3 - BroadSword
Reply +4
(04/17/2012) [-]
#559 to #241 - mrsiimhere
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
Grabbing some feels
#463 to #3 - raptorfacerumble
Reply +8
(04/17/2012) [-]
Amen to this! In Australia, if you get hit by a girl, you're allowed to her back but to a certain extent. Like if she hits you once, you can't hit her back 10,000 times. But yes, I quite agree with this!
#29 to #3 - kirokan
Reply +18
(04/17/2012) [-]
for the girl you mentioned
for the girl you mentioned
#79 to #3 - fifthwheel
Reply +28
(04/17/2012) [-]
Thats the kind of **** that rustle my jimmies
#909 to #79 - pistro
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
#42 to #3 - seeggul
Reply +104
(04/17/2012) [-]
if a woman has balls...she's not much of a woman
#430 to #42 - methodicalmadness
Reply +14
(04/17/2012) [-]
Touche...
#5 to #3 - jakeattack
Reply +177
(04/16/2012) [-]
that kind of unjust **** makes me so mad......i feel your pain
#12 to #5 - methodicalmadness
Reply +76
(04/16/2012) [-]
The stupidest part was that the police officers were guys. I can fathom a woman pulling ******** like that but you'd think the guys would have had at least some integrity. Probably afraid of a lawsuit for being sexist or some ****.
#39 to #12 - pukingrainbows
Reply +40
(04/17/2012) [-]
The cops are probably afraid of the political backlash. Those guys lose their jobs if the do the right thing as opposed to what they're told.
#902 to #39 - burnoutlegend
Reply +5
(04/17/2012) [-]
I want to be a cop just so I can stop **** like this happening :/
#260 to #12 - roldysauras
Reply -64
(04/17/2012) [-]
I am totally against any kind of abuse, but why would you be with someone who has the tendency to **** you up with a frying pan? Its never right to hit a woman, so don't be around women that will fight you.
#673 to #260 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
What? So a woman can beat the **** out o me but if I hit them by accident I go to jail
#341 to #260 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
"BUT OFFICER, LOOK AT WHO HE WAS WITH! SHE LOOKED EXACTLY LIKE SHE'D HIT HIM IN HER PERFECT PINK APRON! AND HE DESERVED IT FOR BEING A SLIMY MALE ANYWAYS. HE COULD HAVE HURT HER."
#555 to #341 - roldysauras
Reply +7
(04/17/2012) [-]
I can see what you're saying, and I realize that didn't come out the way I wanted to, oh well.
#290 - deltadeltadelta
Reply +208
(04/17/2012) [-]
I can't tolerate feminists. They're fine with the father staying at home and raising the children, but if it's the mother, she's ostracized for not being independent.

I feel bad for the Scandinavians that have to tolerate ridiculous feminist laws. Such as Sweden's sexual misconduct laws (which punish men for things like a condom break during consensual sex), and Iceland's gender quotas, where every business and service (private and public) must have a certain percentage of women. I imagine this is problematic for fields such as construction and policing.

Recently feminists attacked wikipedia because most contributors/editors are men. The internet is dominated by men because men aren't as social as women. Men in general are more introverted than women.

Feminists would have us stick women on the front lines, despite this already being tried by Israel and failing miserably. It failed because the men would go out of their way to protect the women, jeopardizing their objective. A woman's scream was also severely demoralizing for the men. This is why women are only allowed in supporting roles.

Feminists think they can override human biology with social engineering.
#461 to #290 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Feminists only want women to have what they have been denied throughout human history: equality with males. The sane, intelligent ones aren't aiming for men to be second-class citizens, they just want the two genders to be treated with complete equality. Those who want more than that aren't feminists, they're just insane and shouldn't be listened to.
#474 to #461 - deltadeltadelta
Reply +6
(04/17/2012) [-]
Third wave feminism isn't about equality.

Feminism was originally about challenging traditional gender roles. Throughout history is was men which brought home the bread, and the women which raised the next generation.

The first wave feminists were about the vote, and second wave feminists were about equal opportunity. Men didn't fight the changes, there was little commotion. Now come third wave feminists, who have no real goal.

Third wave feminism shames women for their femininity, and demeans men. It isn't just a philosophy either, it's a political ideology entrenched in Marxism. Take a Gender/Women's Studies course and you'll learn all about the evils of Capitalism and the "Patriarchy". It's all steeped in misandry and women that don't subscribe to it are labeled as anti-women, self-hating women, traitors, slaves, etc.

Today, nearly all feminist leaders are lesbians. It's such a stereotype, but it's a very true one. Just look at Sweden's Feminist Initiative party. It's Sweden's resident lesbian party.
#577 to #290 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
It's okay when a woman can actually DO the work

i've met women on the internet who are perfectly fine people, I hate when FJ says that "all women do this" and say it seriously. No. That's like saying all christians are nutjobs, and not as a joke.

I also know a woman who is more of a beast than a woman, who is in one of my school's mechanics classes and is definitely going to make a great mechanic one day. And women who can man the **** up in battle, whether on the front lines or at home.

The thing is, not ALL women are meant to be construction workers, mechanics, cops, soldiers, or other places in which men tend to prevail.

So while equality for all means women should be allowed in those fields and a business should not refuse to hire because it's a female applying, it does NOT mean that feminists should go around and throw women who are clearly not suitable for a job into that job.

/rant
#1009 to #290 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Theres 8 countries who stick their women out on the front lines, and they're doing great.
Not all women are pussies, deltadeltadelta and scream like little girls.
#1041 to #1009 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
No, there are not. There are countries that allow women in the army in supportive roles, but not in direct combat.
#1062 to #1041 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Yes, there are.
#1064 to #1062 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Where are these mythical countries?
#1065 to #1064 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Germany
#1066 to #1065 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
None of these countries permit women in the front lines. Only men are allowed in direct combat operations.

FYI, I'm Canadian.

If you want to continue this conversation, you could source me where you got your information.
#1067 to #1066 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Are you an idiot? I'm a Canadian too.
Women ARE permitted in the front lines, they all have the exact same jobs.
My source of information is my dad who's an Officer in the Canadian Forces.
#1068 to #1067 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
What do you not understand that women in the army are not permitted in direct combat roles?

If your dad told you that, then he's a liar.
#1069 to #1068 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
I know what I'm talking and you don't. Women have the same roles as males in the CF.
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about so I bid you adieu, I don't have time for you.
#1070 to #1069 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
No, you don't know what you're talking about, nor did you even ask your father (who likely isn't in the Canadian Army). Your feminist nonsense is clouding the reality of things.

Women aren't permitted to serve in direct combat roles because of the effect they have on men. Every army segregates their soldiers by gender as well. The military isn't subject to the peoples' whims when its counterproductive to military doctrine. The military is realistic, not idealistic.
#1071 to #1070 - kneesocks
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Yes, Yes I do know what I'm talking about.
I'm a cadet, and my dad IS in the Canadian Forces and is an Officer.
You know NOTHING.
You are an imbecile.
#1072 to #1071 - deltadeltadelta
Reply 0
(04/18/2012) [-]
Which branch, which rank?

No, you haven't a clue what you're talking about. Everything you're saying is nonsense and disconnected from reality.
#349 to #290 - skorpius
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
To the front page!
#436 to #290 - preshmilk ONLINE
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#770 to #290 - bloodyspy
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
That was an awesome post, and you are awesome

...but...
*ahem*
Iceland isn't a scandinavian country.

That's all.
#958 to #770 - geraldbostock
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Culturally it is though.
#960 to #958 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Still only nordic. Scandinavia consists only of Norway, Denmark and Sweden.
#966 to #960 - geraldbostock
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Yeah, I know. You're right, of course, but I mean that since it was part of Denmark until relatively recently it shares quite a bit with them, so it's not that unreasonable to include it when talking about Scandinavia.
#969 to #966 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Mmmh, theoretically. I usually prefer to stick to clean, pure facts. It is the closest non-scandinavian country to scandinavia for many reasons of course. Still should not be put under "scandinavia".

Let's not argue about this, though. We're on the same side really.
#971 to #969 - geraldbostock
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Yeah, it was a kind of pointless argument. Just out of interest, are you a reader of SATW comics?
#1045 to #971 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Indeed I am!
(Sorry for saying this after 3 hours, I was doing something else.)
#777 to #290 - givehimthemulk
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Really Sweden? You've changed....
#451 to #290 - lebanonymous
Reply +4
(04/17/2012) [-]
Anons = u don't know their face, their reactions, their color, their race , their gender which is why they are perfect

bringing facts and objectivity to arguments
#484 to #451 - nimdajf
Reply +3
(04/17/2012) [-]
isnt that the same for ppl with accounts?
#332 to #290 - camerel
Reply +6
(04/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#466 to #290 - finni
Reply +19
(04/17/2012) [-]
You forgot to mention that Sweden also has a new term. "Hen". It's supposed to make it all gender neutral. There aren't going to be any more boy names or girl names. A boy can be named Hanna and a girl can be named Sven. They also try to gender neutralize toys so that there are no girl toys or boy toys, which fails of course because you can't control a child's mind.
Boys will turn anything into a gun, and girls will turn things into softer toys and not be as wild as boys are.

I'm half Swedish and I say, just as this Finnish guy says : SWEDEN SUCKS!
#746 to #466 - yoper
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
That **** made me mad. Why is it called Hen? Should be called "Hey let's **** with youth's minds!"
Let's give guns and cars to little girls that want barbies to make them lesbians!
Let's give barbies to little boys that want cars and guns to make them gay!
#769 to #746 - finni
Reply +3
(04/17/2012) [-]
I don't know what to tell you. Sweden is not the country it once was.
I find it hard to be proud of being Swedish. I love Sweden's culture. I like the old stuff, but now it's a political correct, Islamic, feministic **** hole that is to be left to rotten.

Swedes don't have a say in Sweden any more. If you vote for the wrong parties then you can lose your job or perhaps risk getting killed, if people find out.

I live in Norway and I often criticize Sweden and when they ask why hate Sweden so much I answer "Oh I don't hate Sweden. I love Sweden, I just don't like the Swedes"
Of course I am pretty categoric when I say this, but it's true. It's mostly the Swedish Media and politicians I don't like. Sweden is a really ****** up country in so many ways.

Here for example is a video of something called "SCUM" showing a video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tQSOlF9ZZM

Scum stands for Society for cutting up men.
#1005 to #769 - Galante
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
This might sound like I'm an idiot since I'm not good a discerning true from fake. But is that video ******* real? Holy **** thats crazy.
#1023 to #1005 - WhiteyMcCrakrHonky
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Naw it's fake, read the description
#867 to #466 - swedz
Reply -5
(04/17/2012) [-]
**** off you fag
#876 to #867 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
You might tell me to **** off. You may call me anything you like, but that won't change anything. Sweden is a **** hole no matter how much you don't like it.

I am just telling what's happening, if you tell me to **** off because of that is like getting angry at the messenger for telling you that your army has been crushed. No matter how much you don't like what I have to say, this is true and you should rather think about changing that and think about what kind of reputation your country is getting.
#931 to #876 - swedz
Reply -2
(04/17/2012) [-]
Faggot gotta be racist. You dont know **** and can´t make judgements :) Queer
#1034 to #931 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
I know ****, I can tell you. I don't know why you're attacking me. It's not like I want these things to happen, but ignoring them won't make them go away.

And if I'm a racist then you're homophobic with your comment.

Sweden is getting a really bad reputation throughout Europe. It is first place in Europe with the country with most rapes, second place in the world, Jews are driven out of cities like Malmö because of extreme leftist and Extreme-Muslims, trying to neutralize genders and force women to work when they want to stay home with their children, people who criticize Sweden's policy is shouted down by the Media, disturbed while trying to demonstrate against racism towards swedes or even killed.

And you have this **** going on: www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rCK6zvWEN_Q

Don't kill the messenger. All I'm doing is telling the truth. But of course if you want your country to be a ******, anti-democratic, extreme femenistic country then fine, but don't expect me to like it.
#1037 to #1034 - swedz
Reply -1
(04/17/2012) [-]
See, now you´re upset as well. damn faggot stop be so butthurt and dont make judgement about a country you´re not from.
#1038 to #1037 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
I'm half Swedish, I would have loved being it, if I were allowed to.
All you're being here is a troll, or perhaps you think I'm lying.
I can see that you don't like what I have to say then fine, but I wouldn't say it if it wasn't true.
#1039 to #1038 - swedz
Reply -1
(04/17/2012) [-]
LOL! Suddenly I´m a troll for giving my point of view of assholes like you? You´re speaking in the language of racism as a fact for sure. Faggots like you are less welcome than any other. You got some invalid points there, faggot.
#1040 to #1039 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Well it seems like you are troll. Calling me a faggot all the time and not answering to any of my statements. Not sure what it was I said that was directed to any race though.

The only thing you come up with is things like calling me a faggot and a racist and not responding to my arguments, how is that not a troll?
#1043 to #1040 - swedz
Reply -2
(04/17/2012) [-]
I skipped all that racist rambling about false **** and so on. The fact is though that you´re a faggot for hating your own part-country. Just a faggot are what you are, and a pathetic one.
#1044 to #1043 - finni
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
1. You say I am incorrect at my statements, yet you don't read them or prove them wrong .
2. Criticizing your own part-country's policy does not make you a faggot or racist. That's called freedom of speech.
3. You call me pathetic, yet you're the one shouting words that doesn't mean anything. It's like a creationist in the Middle Ages calling you a blasphemer and anti-theist for claiming that the world is round, yet in the end the world is round, no matter how many words the creationist throws at him.
4. You're probably not even going to read this and just continue calling me a faggot and racist. I can play that game as well, but yet I don't. In my opinion and I think everyone else who reads your comments, you're the pathetic one.

Come on! Call me a racist! Call me a faggot! I don't give a flying **** about it!
#1059 to #1044 - swedz
Reply -1
(04/18/2012) [-]
Now you´re just being silly. Faggots like you dont deserve this imagination speech of *******. You´re being pathetic in many different ways and also a faggot. And that is todays fact.
#312 to #290 - conorpadraic
Reply +33
(04/17/2012) [-]
#338 to #290 - mmajunkie
Reply +40
(04/17/2012) [-]
so... do I like... give you my body now, or what?
#302 to #290 - lukedempsey **User deleted account**
+50
has deleted their comment [-]
#68 - lilin
Reply +88
(04/17/2012) [-]
Trust me, I'm a girl, and I hate **** like this. People need to stop being so ******* uptight. Like seriously? A guy looks at a girl, and suddenly he's staring at her breasts. I've had guys openly tell me they were staring at my boobs. Yes, that is sexual harrassment. Do I care? No. I understand that men are basically programmed to ****. It's instinctual. Why does everyone have to freak out, just because a guy does something that isn't even relatively sexual? And about the abuse thing. Yes, abuse is wrong. It's wrong no matter who does it. I saw this show, and this woman shot her husband to death, "in self defense". She became famous. Like seriously? Anybody else would get put in jail. There is no excuse to injure or kill someone (except of course with genocidal people such as Hitler and Osama). I don't even get sexism. We're all humans. And the same goes for racism.
Inb4 "who let you out of the kitchen?" "cool story, bro" "tl;dr"
#94 to #68 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
...Am I seriously the only straight guy here who doesn't stare at a woman's chest? I just think it's rather rude.
#118 to #94 - mcstorms
Reply +18
(04/17/2012) [-]
No your not I will glance over occasionally but never stare.
#476 to #118 - ravvo
Reply +3
(04/17/2012) [-]
you guys are missing out on so much fun
#457 to #94 - lebanonymous
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
nope , i also not look at women at all , because i zone out when i thinking , who knows where i could be looking at
#763 to #94 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
...I only stare at them when I am sure nobody notices, if that counts.
#137 to #68 - gryx
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
I agree. I look at boobs, even though I'm a straight female. It's kinda hard not too. People need to shut the **** up and be thankful for all they have.
#143 to #137 - lilin
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
That is very true. I tend to stare at girls' boobs and asses all the time, without even realizing. But of course, since I'm a girl, nobody cares. But if were a guy, I would get in a lot of trouble for it, and called a perv.
#146 to #143 - gryx
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Meh, I still get called a perv/lesbian.
#148 to #68 - commontroll
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
I disagree with the killing part, but otherwise I agree. I think that if anybody is being abused, they have a right to fight back, not kill the person for it, or severely wound them. But fighting back is fine. And in other situations (being attacked) I think it's acceptable.

But yeah, even if a guy doesn't act on those thoughts, they still come up. People shouldn't get pissed because I guy slipped up on where his eyes were looking.
#121 to #68 - smallhorses **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#129 to #68 - neoexdeath ONLINE
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Beautiful post! *Applauds*
#131 to #129 - lilin
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Thanks. Just speaking the truth, I guess.
Thanks. Just speaking the truth, I guess.
#111 to #68 - electrozombie
Reply +3
(04/17/2012) [-]
I love you. You are awesome.
I love you. You are awesome.
#93 to #68 - MaidenMacabre **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#160 to #93 - dogsbane **User deleted account**
+6
has deleted their comment [-]
#162 to #160 - MaidenMacabre **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#164 to #162 - dogsbane **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#166 to #164 - MaidenMacabre **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#181 to #166 - xemobvbfanx
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
I respect the fact that you didn't pussy out and delete your in-the-red comments. Like the one's about guys not having to deal with anal, I agree with you to some extent, like if guys CONSTANTLY annoy you by asking over and over, then they really deserve something to be shoved up their ass, but at the same time, guys can feel pleasure from having anal with someone, yet girls feel no physical pleasure from sticking something into someone's ass. It all depends whether you're okay with anal or not.

Also, I would very much like to add you as a friend.
#182 to #181 - MaidenMacabre **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#185 to #182 - xemobvbfanx
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
Yeah but some people delete comments with like 2 red thumbs, for fear of ruining their 'perfect' account which has probably already been thumbed down into oblivion....
#170 to #166 - dogsbane **User deleted account**
-2
has deleted their comment [-]
#174 to #170 - MaidenMacabre **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#177 to #174 - dogsbane **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#82 to #68 - dogsbane **User deleted account**
+37
has deleted their comment [-]
#89 to #82 - lilin
Reply +4
(04/17/2012) [-]
Exactly.
#455 to #82 - lebanonymous
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
u spoke my thoughts

i often ask racist/feminists : what if all mankind had Anon-masks , wore the same robe , how can u categorize them , only then we start to not " judge the book by it's cover"
#554 - amoussa
Reply +55
(04/17/2012) [-]
This image has expired
1) There are feminists who fight for the right cause such as gender discrimination in Middle Eastern (the strong, independent women) and then there are the feminists who just love to complain that every little thing is sexist in first world countries (i.e. the bitches). They even remark that beauty pageants are just a way to objectify women for their looks, seriously WTF!?

2) My view is that both genders are equal but DIFFERENT, simply because of human physicality. Some women get denied top jobs for the one simple reason: Paternity leave. In a fight between a man and a woman, a man will automatically get done by the law if he hits a woman.

Women can get guys easily, all they have to do is just stand there and look slightly pretty. A man has to be completely confident, very socially eloquent and has to make the first move. Women can get away with liking Twilight, Drake or ****** things but if a man likes Pokemon, My Little Pony or anything slightly obscure, then he's ******.

3) It's often chivalry if the woman likes it (paying for her meal) or sexism if the woman hates it.

4) As for sexual objectifying: If you don't want a guy to be looking at your boobs, cover your cleavage, it's that simple. If you want to avoid trouble, stop prancing around leaching guys off for free drinks and then going off with the douches.
Worst is when they complain about men are sexually enticed by women on TV where as if they watch Twilight or something, they'll be like "Jacob Black is so fit, he should never walk around with a shirt on".

5) They get so anal about small kitchen jokes yet they're allowed to rant about how men are emotionless slobby pigs. Whenever women say bad things about men, I can honestly sometimes laugh or agree with it. If I make even the smallest sexist joke about a woman, they go all ******* on me.

6) Yes you get douchy men and bitchy unclassy women so yeah, both genders suck!


#573 to #554 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
tldr. enough said.
#629 to #554 - theshinypen
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
all I can say
#642 to #554 - wwlllmyfault
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
I will cherish this post for the rest of my life!
#603 to #554 - CapnInterwebz
Reply +10
(04/17/2012) [-]
#562 to #554 - dobbelganger
Reply +37
(04/17/2012) [-]
#568 to #562 - amoussa
Reply +17
(04/17/2012) [-]
This image has expired
When it comes to gender inequality and those bigoted feminist bitches, it's hard to condense my views into a few sentences. I at least broke it down into paragraphs and subsections to making reading easier.
#617 to #568 - zombierageface
Reply +4
(04/17/2012) [-]
I applaud you sir, for your insight and intelligence.... and your wit :)
#615 to #568 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
Unlike everyone else I acctuly read it
#355 - wittyuser
Reply +33
(04/17/2012) [-]
im a woman and i approve of this message
im a woman and i approve of this message
#367 to #355 - gweetle
Reply +51
(04/17/2012) [-]
I'm a message and I approve of this woman.
I'm a message and I approve of this woman.
#422 to #367 - prisonerofreality **User deleted account**
+7
has deleted their comment [-]
#404 to #367 - ravarshi
Reply -2
(04/17/2012) [-]
should have been a sexy gif.
#1076 to #404 - wittyuser
Reply 0
(04/23/2012) [-]
you mean to say that that gif ISNT sexy?!
#115 - skuser
Reply +47
(04/17/2012) [-]
Women: Our equality ends where my feeling begin.

MFW.
#431 - Roundup
Reply +46
(04/17/2012) [-]
When a man pees standing up, it's "normal," but when a woman does it, it's "weeeird."
And, like, when men shave their balls it's fine, but when a woman does it she's "straaange."
#446 to #431 - loutfryou
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
Wow, I´ve never heard that women shaving is strange.
#453 to #446 - problematique
Reply +27
(04/17/2012) [-]
well if a woman is shaving her balls, yea, it's kinda strange...
#532 to #453 - APUPPY
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
this deserves more thumbs
#462 to #453 - loutfryou
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
ohh well then indeed
#454 to #446 - jasonfhk ONLINE
Reply +2
(04/17/2012) [-]
it meant women shaving their balls lol
#499 - purplez
Reply +13
(04/17/2012) [-]
**purplez rolled a random image posted in comment #4023576 at FJ Pony Thread **
**purplez rolled a random image posted in comment #4023576 at FJ Pony Thread **
#542 to #499 - anon
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
im so lost at what is happening in that GIF.
#610 to #542 - comexx
Reply 0
(04/17/2012) [-]
by the looks of it applejack found a double sided dildo and you can see the rest (it took me 5 minutes to see that she was holding a dildo)
#564 to #499 - scarydino
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#606 to #499 - comexx
Reply +1
(04/17/2012) [-]
#614 to #499 - wolfblackfire **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#502 to #499 - koforeme
Reply +42
(04/17/2012) [-]
**koforeme rolled a random image posted in comment #58 at Decaf ** ... i know the feel of rolling something like that
#353 - Becomanotherperson **User deleted account**
+41
has deleted their comment [-]
#363 to #353 - lanabanana
Reply +10
(04/17/2012) [-]
We can piss while standing too...... it would jut be super messy and idiotic.
#512 - holololland
Reply +39
(04/17/2012) [-]
Comment Picture