Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1067 - Rascal (03/28/2012) [-]
The media says the night watcher in florida killed a teen under suspicion, emphasizing that the man was a "CAUCASIAN-mexican" and that the boy was and "AFRICAN"...Implying that it had something to do with race. Also, the media showed a picture of the teen as a 13 year old, making the boy look more innocent. But, in fact, he was 17 years old... That's one side of the story... But, what the media failed to inform, was the police reports from the night watcher. A police man has reports of the man having a bruised up face and that the night watcher was only defending him self after the teen attack HIM. Of course, the night watcher was following the teen under suspicion, but he didn't kill him where he stood. The teen turned around and said some thing like " What do you want?" and attacked him.... There are two side of the story.
User avatar #1144 to #1067 - szymonf (04/02/2012) [-]
you forgot about the part where video surveillance from the police station shows the guy had no visible bruises despite police reports
#1070 to #1067 - Rascal (03/28/2012) [-]
I'm on no side of the story...but there are idiots who have no full comprehension of the situation wearing hoods and carrying around skittles and green tea, representing a teenage boy they don't know.. People just want a reason to be pissed and the media is what fuels the hatred. Idiots believe any ******** that the media produces out their asses.
 Friends (0)