C-c-c-combo breaker. . File: -( 64 KB, 495x384, jpg) Cil " Considerings: ifa woman has only male children, she is the first woman in an unbroken line going back
Click to expand

C-c-c-combo breaker

File: -( 64 KB, 495x384, ************** jpg)
Cil " Considerings: ifa woman has only male children, she is the first woman in an unbroken line going
back to the origin of humans to not have a daughter. The reverse is true with fathers having only daughters.
I I Anonymousity: ) () 21: 03: 05 E co
File: 13320_ KB, 410x623, impressiveness)
rune "
Cl Anonymous (ID: Ril. Minsk) (WI TPI 2{ Sat} 2' l :06: 20 E co
mind blown
File: ( 325 KB, 382x417, )
I turned off my music to think bout this. Serious ******* **** .
  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 14652
Favorited: 83
Submitted: 03/18/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to evilfederation Subscribe to 4chan submit to reddit


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #12 - fogschmog (03/18/2012) [+] (6 replies)
A family could have just boys for generations and generations, as long as you can reproduce outside of the family ( of which I know, OP isnt used to) all the other families your family ***** with had girls....and if you wanna go back all the ******* way, we are probably all related about 500 times interbreeding of the big family called human species, so NOPE not the first one, neither the last.
#29 - beardedtoads (03/19/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#41 - mtandy (03/19/2012) [-]
Not sure if I'm stupid.
Or this really isn't that mind-blowing...
#43 - jacobdl (03/19/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Holy **** read it and think really hard it takes a minute but its mind blowing because everyone has a mother your mother if she has a boy and no daughters break that change of women leading back to the beginning of time
#48 - linklime (03/19/2012) [-]
Kinda like this?
#11 - chris chris ONLINE (03/18/2012) [-]
User avatar #50 - lemonademonday (03/19/2012) [+] (4 replies)
Eitther im ******* retarded, or this is really hard to understand
User avatar #35 - runici (03/19/2012) [-]
User avatar #28 - masterbob (03/19/2012) [+] (7 replies)
okay, someone ******* explain this **** right now. spell this **** out.
User avatar #31 to #28 - jlyoung (03/19/2012) [-]
So you have a girl, who has a mother, who has a mother, who has a mother, and it goes on like that to the first woman. You have an unbroken line of women who had at least one daughter, and the woman we're looking at has only boys.She is the first woman in the genetic line she got from her mother to not have a daughter.
#9 - gizmobox **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#25 - tippytiptip (03/19/2012) [-]
it sounds like it makes sense but then again it doesnt, waaaaaat

<------ My thinking face
#62 - anonymous (03/19/2012) [+] (2 replies)
why this person is dumb:

let's assume this is true, that somehow, a family has always had daughters, up until now. Now she only has sons. Take these sons, they have children, and let's say they're all girls. This chain was broken by the sons, but was reestablished by the girls. The thing is, this could happen at any point in history, so they're wrong.
User avatar #64 to #62 - OJxJACKSON (03/19/2012) [-]
No the line is broken. The sons wives line is still intact
#46 - nosebird (03/19/2012) [-]
the only reason why this is somewhat difficult to understand is because the grammar of almost every person who tries to explain it is awful. use commas, whores.

#42 - anonymous (03/19/2012) [+] (1 reply)
That didn't take very long to figure out. Either I'm a genius or you are all retarded.
User avatar #45 to #42 - theshinypen ONLINE (03/19/2012) [-]
why so anon?
User avatar #21 - everyoneandnoone (03/19/2012) [-]
i almost get it, but then i dont. my brain hurts and my mind is full of **** .
User avatar #8 - beanfuckingfarrell (03/18/2012) [-]
I paused Cat in the Hat to think about this. ******* CAT IN THE HAT. This **** is serious.
#61 - holyshizzle **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#55 - McGoogle (03/19/2012) [-]
MFW thinking about this..
#4 - usernameerror (03/18/2012) [+] (3 replies)
This theory cannot work though. Because for instance if a mother had all sons and then those sons had all daughters there would be a break in the lineage because then they would be continuing from the DNA of the partner. So technically yes there is a constant line of mothers or sons but there is no son of a son or daughter of a daughter.

The reason why I know this is that my family has the tradition of having an eldest son that dates back to pre-records in Sparta. And if the wife has daughters, they keep having children until there is a son. That would be a true lineage
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)