C-c-c-combo breaker. .. A family could have just boys for generations and generations, as long as you can reproduce outside of the family ( of which I know, OP isnt used to) all the ot C-c-c-combo breaker A family could have just boys for generations and as long you can reproduce outside of the ( which I know OP isnt used to) all ot
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (66)
[ 66 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
29 comments displayed.
#12 - fogschmog
Reply +25
(03/18/2012) [-]
A family could have just boys for generations and generations, as long as you can reproduce outside of the family ( of which I know, OP isnt used to) all the other families your family ***** with had girls....and if you wanna go back all the ******* way, we are probably all related about 500 times interbreeding of the big family called human species, so NOPE not the first one, neither the last.
#13 to #12 - anon
Reply 0
(03/18/2012) [-]
"In an unbroken line of women". If your son is a woman, I have bad news for you.
Those sons would breed with women from other families, thus, continuing their lineage.
#16 to #13 - fogschmog
Reply 0
(03/18/2012) [-]
But seeing it as a strict linear happening (and thats the point that is ******* my mind) is just wrong. Its more of a wibbly woobly breedy wreemy stuff.
#19 to #16 - stubop
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
I would consider it as keeping the family name on the man's side. Once you have a daughter, they'll lose their name at marriage. But if they don't marry, then the blood line would stop anyways. Same thing for women, but in the sense of keeping the "family genes" alive
#20 to #12 - Welshhobo
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
Yes thats true. BUT. This scenario would be true to the sons' wives and daughters, because they would all of had to have mothers. The line breaks and stops when they have only sons.

A mother has a son, and only one son. That line is now broken. The son marries some woman and they have a daughter. The daughter and woman both come from unbroken lines of having a mother.

You have to have to a mother to exist.
#24 to #20 - anon
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
^would all *have* had
#37 to #12 - cjklefty
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
So...What happens when she has a son and that son has only daughters....???
#29 - beardedtoads
Reply +21
(03/19/2012) [-]
wut.
#30 to #29 - BOOOGAH **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#41 - mtandy
Reply +15
(03/19/2012) [-]
Not sure if I'm stupid.
Or this really isn't that mind-blowing...
#43 - jacobdl
Reply +10
(03/19/2012) [-]
Holy **** read it and think really hard it takes a minute but its mind blowing because everyone has a mother your mother if she has a boy and no daughters break that change of women leading back to the beginning of time
#44 to #43 - lordoflore
Reply +3
(03/19/2012) [-]
if you are an only son, your mom had a mom, she had a mom, and so on and if you have a kid they will have a mom so the chain continues, because you dad might not have a sister
#48 - linklime
Reply +9
(03/19/2012) [-]
Kinda like this?
#11 - chris chris
Reply +8
(03/18/2012) [-]
#50 - lemonademonday
Reply +6
(03/19/2012) [-]
Eitther im ******* retarded, or this is really hard to understand
#57 to #50 - anon
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
Too lazy to log in.
It's like this. Your mom has a mom, who has a mom, who has a mom, who has a mom... which means that there is at least one line of women in her family who have had at least one daughter since the beginning of our species. Now if you are/were born male, and had no sisters, this means that this line of women that has been going on forever has finally come to and end because there is no daughter to carry on.

#68 to #57 - lemonademonday
Reply +1
(03/26/2012) [-]
I UNDERSTAND!!!
********......
#69 to #57 - nigglettt
Reply 0
(04/02/2012) [-]
Thank you, I could not comprehend what it was saying for the life of me.
#65 to #57 - obliquezombie
Reply 0
(03/20/2012) [-]
Great explanation, I finally got this.

... now I'm ******* weirded out, man.
#35 - runici
Reply +6
(03/19/2012) [-]
uhh...so?
#28 - masterbob
Reply +5
(03/19/2012) [-]
okay, someone ******* explain this **** right now. spell this **** out.
#31 to #28 - jlyoung
Reply +6
(03/19/2012) [-]
So you have a girl, who has a mother, who has a mother, who has a mother, and it goes on like that to the first woman. You have an unbroken line of women who had at least one daughter, and the woman we're looking at has only boys.She is the first woman in the genetic line she got from her mother to not have a daughter.
#36 to #31 - onkii
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
but... the sperms decide the sex of the child
#38 to #36 - jlyoung
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
One X comes from the mother.
#39 to #38 - onkii
Reply +1
(03/19/2012) [-]
and the X or the Y comes from the father, so regardless of the X of the egg, the sperm still decides..
#47 to #39 - twinklyturtles
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
it doesnt matter. all of the previous women didn't have a break in the chain
#56 to #47 - wolvesbrickwall
Reply +1
(03/19/2012) [-]
and this is mind blowing how?
#60 to #56 - rachaelturtle
Reply 0
(03/19/2012) [-]
Yeah, I don't find it mind blowing either. You've (normally) got a 50/50 chance of being male or female so its bound to happen like, what, half of the time? Waht.
#9 - gizmobox **User deleted account**
+6
has deleted their comment [-]