New face detection in iOS 5.1. when you see it..... Auto r, Op illa. Because it detects faces, not feces
x

Comments(203):

[ 203 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+62
#73 - ponyboyi **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#16 - bjartur (03/11/2012) [-]
Because it detects faces, not feces
#237 to #16 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account** (03/12/2012) [-]
Here's your badge.
#137 to #16 - anon (03/12/2012) [-]
**** you.
#238 to #137 - anon (03/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#30 to #16 - mclevin (03/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

User avatar #120 - garuda (03/12/2012) [-]
hmmmm....must have been a white iphone.....
+25
#81 - alxih **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#188 - thealpharogue (03/12/2012) [-]
**thealpharogue rolls 92**
#190 to #188 - thealpharogue (03/12/2012) [-]
**thealpharogue rolls 77**
#200 to #190 - anon (03/12/2012) [-]
#192 to #190 - thealpharogue (03/12/2012) [-]
It works!
It works!
-15
#196 to #192 - hoborowboat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #211 to #196 - singingfreak (03/12/2012) [-]
u mad bro
User avatar #193 to #190 - tdthebg (03/12/2012) [-]
impressive sir.
#142 - anon (03/12/2012) [-]
i bet it was the white one too...
-36
#145 to #142 - lelelele **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#147 to #145 - anon (03/12/2012) [-]
lying ****
-27
#149 to #145 - lelelele **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #151 to #149 - pedrophile (03/12/2012) [-]
mfw comments only gonna get like 10 thumbs either way...
User avatar #94 - regulardude (03/12/2012) [-]
**regulardude rolls 11** Dubz?
#2 - anon (03/11/2012) [-]
I don't understand the whole concept of face detection technology. How could anyone be so retarded in that they need to faces pointed out to them? Or is it a focus thing.
I don't understand the whole concept of face detection technology. How could anyone be so retarded in that they need to faces pointed out to them? Or is it a focus thing.
#99 to #2 - tropius (03/12/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

User avatar #3 to #2 - iRetaliate (03/11/2012) [-]
It's so that it will maintain focus on the faces, yes.
User avatar #4 to #3 - thedarkdefender (03/11/2012) [-]
Why doesn't it just enhance the focus on the whole picture instead?
User avatar #9 to #4 - iRetaliate (03/11/2012) [-]
Because that makes pictures look horrible...

Have you ever heard of depth of field?
#47 to #9 - isocket (03/12/2012) [-]
A shallow depth of field would be useless for this sort of picture though, plus face detection is mainly just a way to increase the prices.
#46 - deletedmyaccount (03/12/2012) [-]
That man's face is hardly in the shot. Most of it is cut off by that silver bar.

Jeez, it's not that big of a deal.
-14
#48 to #46 - isocket has deleted their comment [-]
#50 to #48 - deletedmyaccount (03/12/2012) [-]
Who?
#51 to #50 - isocket (03/12/2012) [-]
You should have used a meme to go along with it.
#53 to #51 - deletedmyaccount (03/12/2012) [-]
You mean a rageface? Or really, just any old picture?

Rage comics, as a whole, are a meme. I don't consider each individual rage face a meme. Nor are the "meme template" things really memes.

I think, as a nation of the interwebs, we have forgotten what a meme really is.

Also, seriously, who the **** are you talking about?
#55 to #53 - isocket (03/12/2012) [-]
Not sure if you are trying to be funny about not seeing the black guy...

And all ragefaces are memes, yet not all memes are ragefaces, as quoted a billion times on this site.
#58 to #55 - deletedmyaccount (03/12/2012) [-]
No, I just seriously don't see a black guy. Are you trying to troll me?
#67 to #65 - deletedmyaccount (03/12/2012) [-]
Yeah, you're trying to troll me.

I'm not an idiot, man. Try to be at least a little more elaborate.
#86 - staticenhance (03/12/2012) [-]
I can avoid being seen if I wish, but to disappear entirely, that is a rare gift.
#141 - Jelaqua (03/12/2012) [-]
Feels bad man.
#62 - kabizus (03/12/2012) [-]
Oh I get it, it didn't detect FACEBOOK
User avatar #68 to #62 - ihasthepancakemix (03/12/2012) [-]
ohhhhhh i see what you did thar. very clever
#1 - nikkasaur (03/11/2012) [-]
Who would want to see them anyway?
User avatar #119 - lostxprophit (03/12/2012) [-]
Why.....MY IPODS CAMERA DOESN'T DO FACE RECOGNITION! PLUS, IT'S ON iOS 5.1!!! DA FUQ APPLE!?
User avatar #234 to #121 - lostxprophit (03/12/2012) [-]
I....just ******* lol'd -- thnk u dear ma'am/sir!
[ 203 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)