Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#91 - stizz **User deleted account**
+150
has deleted their comment [-]
#111 to #91 - commontroll
Reply +142
(02/19/2012) [-]
**commontroll rolls 86**
#112 to #111 - commontroll
Reply +142
(02/19/2012) [-]
**commontroll rolls 86**
#179 to #112 - mindlessmindless
Reply +1
(02/20/2012) [-]
I'm pretty sure the chances of that are 1/10000
#186 to #179 - reinmar
Reply +8
(02/20/2012) [-]
actually it's 1/100. Doesn't matter what's the first roll. He just needed to roll the same number hence 1 out of 100.
(if he said 86 then rolled 86 twice it would be 1/10000
#292 to #186 - LuckyNinja
Reply 0
(02/20/2012) [-]
actually it is 1/10000. there's a 1/100 chance of a two-digit number being rolled. 23 and 32 both have a 1/100 chance of being selected, but they're different numbers. Imagine it as if he'd rolled four and got 8686, which is 1/1000 chance, but it had been split in to two rolls of 2. 1/100 * 1/100 = 1/10000
#300 to #292 - meganinja ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/20/2012) [-]
it depends on your point of view. It could be argued that rolling 86 twice, is yes, 1/10000, but the chances of rolling a 2 digit number, and then rolling the same number a second time would only be 1/100. Since the guy was not trying to get 86 the first time (or the 2nd time for that matter) it was only a 1/100 chance.
#318 to #300 - LuckyNinja
Reply 0
(02/21/2012) [-]
Ah, I see what you mean. Does make more sense, but it does depend upon the point of view I guess. Maybe he intended on getting 86? :P
#299 to #292 - anon
Reply 0
(02/20/2012) [-]
It's 1/100 getting the same numbers twice in a row
It's 1/10000 of getting 86 twice in a row
The first roll could have been anything, 0-99, then the second roll has a 1/100 chance of being that number again
#191 to #186 - mindlessmindless
Reply +2
(02/20/2012) [-]
Hmm.. Probability has always been so confusing to me.
#131 to #112 - denbaby
Reply +1
(02/19/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#122 to #112 - wibez
Reply +5
(02/19/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#121 to #112 - commontroll
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#113 to #112 - commontroll
Reply +42
(02/19/2012) [-]
Dafuq? Same roll in a row?
#118 to #113 - laughstoohard
Reply +74
(02/19/2012) [-]
Double non-doubles?
Double non-doubles?
#110 to #91 - thegerbal ONLINE
Reply -1
(02/19/2012) [-]
**thegerbal rolled a random image posted in comment #243 at Owned. ** damn your good
#232 to #110 - liteware
Reply +2
(02/20/2012) [-]
you're*