Religion in a nutshell. Feel free to say anything you would like in the comment section. I don't intend to offend anyone's beliefs, but this is how I feel about Religion in a nutshell Feel free to say anything you would like the comment section I don't intend offend anyone's beliefs but this is how feel about
Upload
Login or register

Religion in a nutshell

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
 
Religion in a nutshell. Feel free to say anything you would like in the comment section. I don't intend to offend anyone's beliefs, but this is how I feel about

Feel free to say anything you would like in the comment section.

I don't intend to offend anyone's beliefs, but this is how I feel about religion.

I found these puzzle pieces laying here next
to this box. Want to help me put it together?
No. It' s a picture of a duck.
There' s no point doing all the work.
The box already told me what it is.
Some of these pieces don' t
seem to match the picture.
I' d like to figure out why.
how ‘accurate.
trees' Mer here.
It' s beginning to look nothing like I
the box. Are you sure you don' t
want to help?
How can you say that?
There' s still a lot of missing pieces.
it' s a duck. The box wouldn' t lie.
but I can see trees, water;
So far, ho duck,
Look, it' s almost done and it' s definitely
not a duck. It looks more like Winnie the
Pooh. I haven' t found tbe: l* yet,
ATC- but" it’ s certainly not ‘a duc ,
...
+408
Views: 27272 Submitted: 02/09/2012
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (226)
[ 226 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#2 - simonthedigger **User deleted account**
+45 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #55 - I Am Monkey
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
The box says 25 pieces, but the puzzle is 4x6.
They are clearly two different puzzles.

What if this comic is actually a deep social commentary about people looking to argue one against the other, while they are two separate entities that do not conflict. Perhaps science is the answer to how and not the answer to why.
#61 to #55 - anon id: c6371e7d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
What if somebody has watched south park and pretends he is deep...
User avatar #65 to #61 - I Am Monkey
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
South Park didn't invent the idea of "how and not why", they quoted it.
Thank you for exposing yourself as a 12 year old.
#27 - ragingbrony
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
This image has expired
IT'S A JACKAL!!
#92 to #27 - pandak
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
A JACKAL!! A JACKAL!! IT'S A JACKAL!!
#79 - bosshogoutlaw
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Every time....
#34 - iamnotstevenhooper
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
And here I've been worshipping a duck this whole time.
And here I've been worshipping a duck this whole time.
#3 - uuuuiiiii
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/09/2012) [-]
HOLY **** its not a duck
HOLY **** its not a duck
#121 - toilettank
+12 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#52 - I Am Monkey
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
You can't prove a negative without knowing everything there is to know.   
If you could somehow become omniscient, the you would be God.   
Therefore you can never disprove God.
You can't prove a negative without knowing everything there is to know.
If you could somehow become omniscient, the you would be God.
Therefore you can never disprove God.
#54 to #52 - anon id: 48c0e0fd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
nor can you disprove fairies
User avatar #58 to #54 - I Am Monkey
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
My point was that it's a paradox.
To disprove God you would have to become God.

Possessing all knowledge wouldn't make you a fairy as far as I know.

#59 to #58 - anon id: 48c0e0fd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
if you possessed all of the possible knowledge then you can become a fairy, because you know how to do so.
User avatar #60 to #59 - I Am Monkey
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Knowing all the things doesn't mean you can do anything.
If there is no way to do so, you would only know that it's impossible.
User avatar #62 to #60 - lolollo
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Anon is being a troll.
Stop trying to reason with it.
It is Anon.
Anon cannot be reasoned with for anon cannot be reasoned with.
And also Anon is being a troll.
User avatar #64 to #62 - I Am Monkey
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Yea, but it's fun trying to be philosophical with troll logic.
#63 to #60 - anon id: 48c0e0fd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Science is progressing so fast, it revealed new fields of science, just you wait couple of million years and see.
User avatar #66 to #63 - I Am Monkey
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
You completely miss the point.
This is the last time I try to discuss a complicated idea with the children of funnyjunk.
#67 to #66 - anon id: 48c0e0fd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
of coure, of coure. Yes, very convincing, bravo. You see, science is very progressive and you just can't defeat that fundemental fact. It was fun arguing before you got owned, hmm? Well done for 'missing the point'
of coure, of coure. Yes, very convincing, bravo. You see, science is very progressive and you just can't defeat that fundemental fact. It was fun arguing before you got owned, hmm? Well done for 'missing the point'
User avatar #68 to #67 - I Am Monkey
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
This whole argument went completely over your head.
You're not very good at trolling.
#98 to #68 - bertyhell
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
scientist believe the fairy transformation to be achieved within a time span of 20-30 years.
#164 to #68 - anon id: 32cb506f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Faced with a fact ? why not accuse of trolling ?
#56 to #54 - I Am Monkey
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#118 to #52 - hellygator
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Your logic is flawed:
"If you could somehow become omniscient, then you would be god."
Care to explain? This clearly depends on one's definition of God. Also, there is a solid logic error in this statement: Knowing how to grow crops doesn't make you a farmer. Actually growing them makes you a farmer and you could accomplish that by accident without prior knowledge.

tl, dr:OH PEEreasons like ****.
#41 - vishnapalm
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
#26 - pineapplepeople
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
first, retoast
second, It's a little presumptuous saying that we have 90% of the universe figured out. We used to "know that the earth was flat and we used to "know that the sun circled the earth.
User avatar #31 to #26 - mcstorms
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
I do feel you are right we do not have the universe 90% figured out if anything it is less then 10%. However view this as one thing we understand 90% of. There are surely many more puzzles in the world then just that one right? However if you have 90% of one puzzle then you can probably hypothesis what it is. However there a religious people who would still say we are wrong. For instance there are still religious people who don't believe in gravity.
#44 to #31 - buckaww **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#142 to #44 - icedman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
scientists have recently discovered the evidence of the higgs boson particale, which is what gives mass the protons and electrons
#191 to #142 - buckaww **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#196 to #191 - icedman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
it is another piece of the scientific picture filled in, and bit in the explanation of the universe
#200 to #196 - buckaww **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#201 to #200 - icedman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
in reference to gods, what can be insinuated without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. in reference to higher planes of existance, possible but i really doubt it.
#203 to #201 - buckaww **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#207 to #203 - icedman
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/11/2012) [-]
i always figured when you die and the neural-chemical processes in the brain that form conciousness ends, it will be like what you experienced before you were born (nothing)
#28 to #26 - gladiader
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/10/2012) [-]
Your quotations....
Your quotations....