Religion in a nutshell. Feel free to say anything you would like in the comment section. I don't intend to offend anyone's beliefs, but this is how I feel about Religion in a nutshell Feel free to say anything you would like the comment section I don't intend offend anyone's beliefs but this is how feel about
Upload
Login or register

Religion in a nutshell

 
Religion in a nutshell. Feel free to say anything you would like in the comment section. I don't intend to offend anyone's beliefs, but this is how I feel about

Feel free to say anything you would like in the comment section.

I don't intend to offend anyone's beliefs, but this is how I feel about religion.

I found these puzzle pieces laying here next
to this box. Want to help me put it together?
No. It' s a picture of a duck.
There' s no point doing all the work.
The box already told me what it is.
Some of these pieces don' t
seem to match the picture.
I' d like to figure out why.
how ‘accurate.
trees' Mer here.
It' s beginning to look nothing like I
the box. Are you sure you don' t
want to help?
How can you say that?
There' s still a lot of missing pieces.
it' s a duck. The box wouldn' t lie.
but I can see trees, water;
So far, ho duck,
Look, it' s almost done and it' s definitely
not a duck. It looks more like Winnie the
Pooh. I haven' t found tbe: l* yet,
ATC- but" it’ s certainly not ‘a duc ,
...
+408
Views: 27247 Submitted: 02/09/2012
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (226)
[ 226 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
28 comments displayed.
#2 - simonthedigger **User deleted account**
+45
has deleted their comment [-]
#55 - I Am Monkey
Reply +27
(02/10/2012) [-]
The box says 25 pieces, but the puzzle is 4x6.
They are clearly two different puzzles.

What if this comic is actually a deep social commentary about people looking to argue one against the other, while they are two separate entities that do not conflict. Perhaps science is the answer to how and not the answer to why.
#61 to #55 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2012) [-]
What if somebody has watched south park and pretends he is deep...
#65 to #61 - I Am Monkey
Reply +16
(02/10/2012) [-]
South Park didn't invent the idea of "how and not why", they quoted it.
Thank you for exposing yourself as a 12 year old.
#27 - ragingbrony ONLINE
Reply +21
(02/10/2012) [-]
This image has expired
IT'S A JACKAL!!
#92 to #27 - pandak
Reply +1
(02/10/2012) [-]
A JACKAL!! A JACKAL!! IT'S A JACKAL!!
#79 - bosshogoutlaw
Reply +18
(02/10/2012) [-]
Every time....
#34 - iamnotstevenhooper ONLINE
Reply +14
(02/10/2012) [-]
And here I've been worshipping a duck this whole time.
And here I've been worshipping a duck this whole time.
#3 - uuuuiiiii
Reply +14
(02/09/2012) [-]
HOLY **** its not a duck
HOLY **** its not a duck
#121 - toilettank
+12
has deleted their comment [-]
#74 - kuraithevision
Reply +10
(02/10/2012) [-]
Forget references to religion, look at those cute little bunnies. Those are the cutest ******* bunnies I've seen.
#132 to #74 - stefanovic
Reply +1
(02/10/2012) [-]
#52 - I Am Monkey
Reply +2
(02/10/2012) [-]
You can't prove a negative without knowing everything there is to know.   
If you could somehow become omniscient, the you would be God.   
Therefore you can never disprove God.
You can't prove a negative without knowing everything there is to know.
If you could somehow become omniscient, the you would be God.
Therefore you can never disprove God.
#54 to #52 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2012) [-]
nor can you disprove fairies
#58 to #54 - I Am Monkey
Reply +4
(02/10/2012) [-]
My point was that it's a paradox.
To disprove God you would have to become God.

Possessing all knowledge wouldn't make you a fairy as far as I know.

#59 to #58 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2012) [-]
if you possessed all of the possible knowledge then you can become a fairy, because you know how to do so.
#60 to #59 - I Am Monkey
Reply +2
(02/10/2012) [-]
Knowing all the things doesn't mean you can do anything.
If there is no way to do so, you would only know that it's impossible.
#62 to #60 - lolollo
Reply +10
(02/10/2012) [-]
Anon is being a troll.
Stop trying to reason with it.
It is Anon.
Anon cannot be reasoned with for anon cannot be reasoned with.
And also Anon is being a troll.
#64 to #62 - I Am Monkey
Reply +8
(02/10/2012) [-]
Yea, but it's fun trying to be philosophical with troll logic.
#63 to #60 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2012) [-]
Science is progressing so fast, it revealed new fields of science, just you wait couple of million years and see.
#66 to #63 - I Am Monkey
Reply +2
(02/10/2012) [-]
You completely miss the point.
This is the last time I try to discuss a complicated idea with the children of funnyjunk.
#67 to #66 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2012) [-]
of coure, of coure. Yes, very convincing, bravo. You see, science is very progressive and you just can't defeat that fundemental fact. It was fun arguing before you got owned, hmm? Well done for 'missing the point'
of coure, of coure. Yes, very convincing, bravo. You see, science is very progressive and you just can't defeat that fundemental fact. It was fun arguing before you got owned, hmm? Well done for 'missing the point'
#68 to #67 - I Am Monkey
Reply +1
(02/10/2012) [-]
This whole argument went completely over your head.
You're not very good at trolling.
#98 to #68 - bertyhell
Reply +2
(02/10/2012) [-]
scientist believe the fairy transformation to be achieved within a time span of 20-30 years.
#164 to #68 - anon
Reply 0
(02/10/2012) [-]
Faced with a fact ? why not accuse of trolling ?
#56 to #54 - I Am Monkey
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#118 to #52 - hellygator
Reply +2
(02/10/2012) [-]
Your logic is flawed:
"If you could somehow become omniscient, then you would be god."
Care to explain? This clearly depends on one's definition of God. Also, there is a solid logic error in this statement: Knowing how to grow crops doesn't make you a farmer. Actually growing them makes you a farmer and you could accomplish that by accident without prior knowledge.

tl, dr:OH PEEreasons like ****.
#41 - vishnapalm
Reply +10
(02/10/2012) [-]