Every single religion comic on Funnyjunk. teapot. statement of faith protagonist of atheist comic C) ( Impossibly obtuse Christian . ktf c) antagonist increduli
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

Every single religion comic on Funnyjunk


statement of faith
protagonist of
atheist comic
C) ( Impossibly
obtuse *
Christian . ktf
c) antagonist incredulity*
Unneccesarily verbose and Contradictory
condescending speech that Bible verge
in the author' s imagination
long after supposed encounter
C) ' rehashing of common C) Witty reposte
1000 year old anti-
i theist argument c) "9’
never actually took place, save
immediate raged
sadness/ frustration
and/ or complete
collapse of belief
Views: 1611
Favorited: 2
Submitted: 02/08/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to genicide E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#7 - antareswolf (02/08/2012) [-]
After reading this comic i realized how bad i am at English.
I don't know half of the words.
Can some1 describe whats going on there?
User avatar #8 to #7 - phoenixforger (02/08/2012) [-]
It's saying that some atheists use cliche' anti-religion come backs and a lot of Christians rely too heavily on the Bible for information. Also which ever side loses the argument is going to have a rage fit.
#9 to #8 - antareswolf (02/08/2012) [-]
thank you good sir. i really couldn't understand **** from that comic/
User avatar #2 - OperationValkyrie (02/08/2012) [-]
ChristLamar Smith
User avatar #1 - phoenixforger (02/08/2012) [-]
The truth is there is no way to prove the existence or nonexistence of God.
User avatar #3 to #1 - OperationValkyrie (02/08/2012) [-]
Science and simple logic.
#4 to #3 - phoenixforger (02/08/2012) [-]
If you knew anything about science you would know that nothing can be proved nonexistent. The logic YOU are using is that anything that has not been proven existent does not exist. With this logic you are saying anything that has yet to be discovered is not real. There are vast areas in the universe that have not been discovered and therefore do not exist. Many sections of the ocean haven't been explored, so they don't exist either. With your mindset anything under a rock doesn't exist until the rock is flipped over, if you are not looking at it, it disappears. Just because something hasn't been proven doesn't mean it isn't real.
User avatar #5 to #4 - OperationValkyrie (02/08/2012) [-]
#6 to #5 - anonymous (02/08/2012) [-]
>someone on the internet beat me in an internet argument
>better play it off like I'm to lazy to respond

Yeah nah, your a **** .
 Friends (0)