silly bible humpers. . IS A SIN IT SAYS 80 TAMEST WE MINT READ THE OLD TESTAMENT so SHUT LIP ABOUT STANING. THE NEW TESTAMENT SAYS WRONG FIRST DEEP VERSE HERPIT
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

silly bible humpers

IS A SIN IT SAYS 80
TAMEST WE MINT READ
THE OLD TESTAMENT so SHUT LIP ABOUT
STANING. THE NEW TESTAMENT SAYS
WRONG FIRST DEEP
VERSE HERPITY
I do net permit a woman to teach
or to assume authority ever a man;
she must be quiet."
...
+1183
Views: 38707
Favorited: 157
Submitted: 02/02/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to bilbotbaggins E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(230):

[ 230 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#39 - sosyourmom (02/03/2012) [+] (7 replies)
#27 - OHSdude (02/02/2012) [+] (5 replies)
Only applies when in Church but whatever...
#35 to #27 - ApolloXYZ (02/03/2012) [-]
if christians have taught us anything, it is that you should only take passages from the bible that would benefit yourself.. true story..
if christians have taught us anything, it is that you should only take passages from the bible that would benefit yourself.. true story..
#57 - mollzbollz (02/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
The fact that a-lot of things in the bible about reproduction and homosexuality being a sin had to do with needing to raise the population. Now that we're getting rapidly populated a-lot of those things aren't necessary or relevant anymore....
#16 - anonymous (02/02/2012) [+] (4 replies)
Can we please just get an Atheist channel that the rest of us can turn off so you kids can stew in your own butthurt without cluttering the front page with your irrational hatred of religious people.
+15
#115 - belligerentchris **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (10 replies)
+11
#73 - thebludrew **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#195 - anonymous (02/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
funnyjunk is dead.
#165 - anonymous (02/03/2012) [-]
The Biblizzle is not foshizzle.
The Biblizzle is not foshizzle.
+9
#20 - heyjudewatsup **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#218 - xxkillionarexx (02/03/2012) [-]
I lost it at "First derp verse herpity."
#206 - kindofcool (02/03/2012) [-]






Whats wrong with butt secks?
User avatar #179 - vunguard (02/03/2012) [-]
First off, retoast.

(Skip to bottom for tl;dr)

Second, Timothy technically has no right to be in the Bible. You see, amongst several other of the Apostle Paul's letters, some of them were forged letters in the name of Paul by people to either A) help their community, B) attempt to help Paul in his job, or C) serve their own purposes. 6 of the 13 letters of Paul are believed to be in this family of forgeries, or are at least plausibly such, the Timothy's being more or less proven beyond all reasonable doubt to be fakes. Therefore, his argument is invalid.

However, hers is also invalid, not by the statement that homosexuality is a sin, because TECHNICALLY it is, but she isn't much better. Jesus didn't condemn homosexuals any more severely than, say, liars, thieves, adulterers, etc. It was another sin, and therefore its hypocritical to go after that one while others are just as bad. What's more, with the exceptions of the "holy men" who were about as holy as Justin Bieber, Jesus never got truly angry, and therefore her anger counteracts her own beliefs.

TL;DR Timothy's a bad choice of arguments, but she shouldn't be complaining about it either, so they're both idiots, although I praise the man's brilliance.

And yes, I am Christian, but not one of those people who let the literal translation distract me from the spirit in which it was written.
#86 - diespitris ONLINE (02/03/2012) [+] (3 replies)

There seems to be a lot of tension in these comments. Here's a funny, Pokemon-related picture to cheer everyone up.
#85 - brometheus (02/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Except when homosexuality isn't actually discouraged by the bible. Homosexuality isn't discouraged, love is as love is and many Christian people accept gays into their churches. The only thing that they don't like is sex that can't potentially create life, which is why anal sex and condoms are discouraged.

TL:DR Love the sinner, Hate the sin
#60 - whamaclabam (02/03/2012) [+] (8 replies)
im christian, and my friends are gay, im bi   
i hate how everybody looks at the, maybe fourth of christian's that act like that and make it look like we all are crazy psycho bitches but really the truth is NOBODY FUKING CARES   
(westboro is just a buch of Lamar Smithgots who cant have sex)   
mfw i see stuff like this
im christian, and my friends are gay, im bi
i hate how everybody looks at the, maybe fourth of christian's that act like that and make it look like we all are crazy psycho bitches but really the truth is NOBODY FUKING CARES
(westboro is just a buch of Lamar Smithgots who cant have sex)
mfw i see stuff like this
User avatar #6 - paelaer (02/02/2012) [+] (11 replies)
Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination." This means two men cannot fornicate, which is a fancy way of saying "premarital sex".
The Old Testament says nothing about two men getting married.

Corinthians 6:9-10: "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
Still. It says nothing about marriage.

Romans 1:26-28: "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper."
Still, nothing about marriage.

There you have it. Homosexuals can be married, but can't have sex according to Christianity and Judaism. I'm not even touching what Islam says.
However, the Bible also states that sex should only occur during marriage, so the Bible actually undermines itself when referring to homosexuals.

Religion: 0
Internet: 1
User avatar #8 to #6 - kafudamapla (02/02/2012) [-]
Well actually, in one of your quotes it states that homosexuals cannot inherit the kingdom of God. So it's saying married or not, fornication or not, being homosexual is not permitted by God.
Btw I'm completely against religion and gay-bashing, I just see a flaw in your argument. Don't hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong :)
#224 - Majestical (02/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
A Religious shitstorm is brewing! Quick, everyone hold on to your fucks!
#118 - funkmasterflex (02/03/2012) [+] (6 replies)
I don't get why atheists feel the need to point out every last flaw of the bible, why try and ruin ones beliefs and shit just because you don't agree. live and let live.
+7
#4 - awesomefacepalm **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#211 - Majestical (02/03/2012) [-]
Basically sums everything up...
Basically sums everything up...
[ 230 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)