Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+1
#176 to #101 - secius **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#166 to #101 - TheWafflecopter (01/24/2012) [-]
i still havent a clue what this is from
i still havent a clue what this is from
#153 to #101 - grimmwaters ONLINE (01/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

User avatar #171 to #147 - shitshitshit (01/24/2012) [-]
oh god my ribs hurt
User avatar #173 to #171 - warlockrichard (01/24/2012) [-]
well then you shouldn't have hit the train so hard now should you
User avatar #174 to #173 - shitshitshit (01/24/2012) [-]
its just the way he gos limp after words, hahaha pain
User avatar #178 to #174 - warlockrichard (01/24/2012) [-]
I know I can only hope that wherever he was trying to get to allows concussions as an acceptable excuse missing out
#134 to #101 - cupcaketroll (01/24/2012) [-]
dont guess anyone knows Das Boot, do they?
dont guess anyone knows Das Boot, do they?
#133 to #101 - realyboredguy (01/24/2012) [-]
Its dead, but its alive. Its alive, but its dead.
Its dead, but its alive. Its alive, but its dead.
User avatar #196 to #133 - IleDile (01/29/2012) [-]
The whole thing is full of **** and everything that tries to prove it wrong or right is made by either a troll or an idiot because the theoretical cat wouldn't be able to live no matter what happens inside the described box, because there would be no air in the ******* box.
#197 to #196 - realyboredguy (01/29/2012) [-]
Did you ever heard of, I don't know not, holes (in the opposite direction of the observer)? Seriously, you're a moron, or somebody full of himself, to think you're smarter than one of the world greatest physicist. I would like to ask you why this experiment was visualized and by who to see your level of knowledge, but I know you can search it on the internet.
User avatar #198 to #197 - IleDile (01/29/2012) [-]
When Schrodinger came up with the idea, he wasn't trying to explain something, he was trying to mock the idea. The explanation is gibberish and everybody obviously knows that, and just assumes that it's a scientific explanation that they just don't understand and skip directly over to the fascinating part, then share it with their friends and pretend to have a full understanding of it so that they look intelligent. The situation Schrodinger describes only occurs at the atomic level. If you actually lock a cat in a box , nothing magical happens. The cat just dies, and you're just a dick.
#200 to #198 - realyboredguy (01/29/2012) [-]
Lol, you are too retarded to come up with an argument so you drop the debate? Lol.
#199 to #198 - realyboredguy (01/29/2012) [-]
Actually you are the one being the dick. YOU think you know more then everybody. Yes, like I said, it explains something, to an atomic level, but it explain the fact that a particle is a atom and a sound wave at the same time, like the cat is alive and dead at the same time, until you give an observation. And why would it necessarily be dead? It can be breath, if there is holes. Yes, after a certain quantity of times the cat will die. But for the first minutes, its possible that the radioactive element (not radioactive an-of to release radiation that go threw skin) don't release a particle that will go in direction of the particle detector, and the mechanism that break the jar of poison wont activate. Please explain why the cat would still die.
#125 to #101 - pizzaeater (01/24/2012) [-]
Made dis one myself.
#129 to #125 - AllTheSmallThings **User deleted account** (01/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#123 to #101 - anon (01/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

#119 to #101 - darkeco (01/24/2012) [-]
really hard to find a place for this
really hard to find a place for this
User avatar #124 to #117 - tippidyt (01/24/2012) [-]
Try to rewind that, and writeOH PEEon it. :b
User avatar #128 to #113 - theerector (01/24/2012) [-]
Someone should put retoast on the little white guy and OC on the big one
#121 to #113 - xmdignx (01/24/2012) [-]
da fuq? ROFL XD
#110 to #101 - cupcaketroll (01/24/2012) [-]
anyone? anyone like Miguel?
anyone? anyone like Miguel?
#122 to #110 - anon (01/24/2012) [-]
YES
#106 to #101 - sausageskin (01/24/2012) [-]
And just for the w.t.f. I'm not sure how this happened.
And just for the w.t.f. I'm not sure how this happened.
#104 to #101 - cpawsome ONLINE (01/24/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

+4
#103 to #101 - iamtheboat **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)