Anonymous comments allowed.
#151 - iamnebula (12/31/2011) [-]
I made this yesterday for the original post but no one saw it. It's a professional take on a watermark for the site. Something that might actually look good.
User avatar #221 to #151 - Snack Pack (12/31/2011) [-]
You just had to put your username on the left, didn't you?
#232 to #221 - iamnebula (12/31/2011) [-]
I did that because Im going to be using this myself on my content. I'll upload a load of different versions as actual content tomorrow without my name. + it's not hard to cut off, it's just an example
#174 to #151 - falseslidereturns (12/31/2011) [-]
i m using that good sir
#158 to #151 - dildoan (12/31/2011) [-]
User avatar #153 to #151 - richardastley ONLINE (12/31/2011) [-]
The only problem is the two Zs in the middle of the background don't really apply. You should somehow work FJ back in there as well.
#348 to #153 - lecommentingderp has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #154 to #153 - iamnebula (12/31/2011) [-]
Wait, are you referring to the original post logo?
User avatar #155 to #154 - richardastley ONLINE (12/31/2011) [-]
Oh I was just assuming the logo that you made was the exact same as this one. Did I confuse something?
User avatar #157 to #155 - iamnebula (12/31/2011) [-]
This image ^^, I made yesterday as a comment on the content about a watermark which got top spot. It didn't get seen. So I'm posting it again to hopefully get a better response. I did not make anything else concerning watermarks but THIS one. O_O
#156 to #155 - iamnebula (12/31/2011) [-]
I'm so confused right now.
User avatar #345 to #156 - richardastley ONLINE (01/02/2012) [-]
Okay, I finally figured out that I'm ******* retarded and got entirely the wrong idea from your original comment. I like the watermark though!
User avatar #346 to #345 - iamnebula (01/02/2012) [-]
Check my uploads, I uploaded it.
 Friends (0)