troll logic comp. OMG FRONT PAGE THANK U SO MUCH!. Make portal gun Put portal on table CD and wall Put table in wall Problem, mindfck?? Adquire windmill Put Win fap
x

troll logic comp

 
troll logic comp. OMG FRONT PAGE THANK U SO MUCH!. Make portal gun Put portal on table CD and wall Put table in wall Problem, mindfck?? Adquire windmill Put Win

OMG FRONT PAGE THANK U SO MUCH!

Tags: fap
Make portal gun Put portal on table
CD and wall
Put table in wall Problem, mindfck??
Adquire windmill
Put Windmills on car
Drave.
Wand = Energy
mm to ring a
Hover shoes =
Profit???
AL: nuuh nu»; stuns on ya:
OF vow
Sn. THAT nuns mu
mam nus nuns raoe
Aquire some
solar panels ‘ _
mom " in Thank you ,
Thumb up 101
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+3979
Views: 72182
Favorited: 313
Submitted: 12/22/2011
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to tianhuifan submit to reddit

Comments(638):

[ 638 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#103 - turlesrfun (12/23/2011) [-]
why the first one won't work.
why the first one won't work.
User avatar #528 to #103 - gangjaman (12/23/2011) [-]
>make the portals on boxes
>put box in portal with its portal facing out, not to the side
>feel like your mind should be in a porno
#534 to #103 - anon (12/23/2011) [-]
if the portal is small enough to fit on the table and both portals are the same size, then the table cant fit coming out of the other portal... still hurts my damn head
#498 to #103 - thepsycho (12/23/2011) [-]
Well **** me, its logical.
#683 to #103 - petagriffeenisafag (12/23/2011) [-]
Why the first one won't work.

Portals aren't real.
#126 to #103 - opchow (12/23/2011) [-]
But......what i-............i don't even...............
But......what i-............i don't even...............
#460 to #103 - ghosthunta (12/23/2011) [-]
And also, portals can't be on moving surfaces, so as soon as the table moved it'd break the portal.
User avatar #497 to #460 - rainbowtetsuo (12/23/2011) [-]
There was one situation where portals were one moving surfaces when you destroy the neurotoxin machine in Portal 2. But yeah, you're right.
User avatar #632 to #460 - lolzzman (12/23/2011) [-]
...portals dont exist, dont act like a know-it-all.
User avatar #670 to #460 - dylanweber (12/23/2011) [-]
There is a source engine command you can put into the console of Source to make portals go on any moving surfaces.
User avatar #177 to #103 - jetthunder (12/23/2011) [-]
table: oh yeah you like that don't you
#31 - doctrine (12/23/2011) [-]
That awkward moment when you don't understand why some of these wouldn't' work.
User avatar #32 to #31 - nevergetsdubs (12/23/2011) [-]
tell me which ones and ill kindly explain
-(college student)
User avatar #33 to #32 - doctrine (12/23/2011) [-]
With the wind powered car one, not the exact way said in the post, but it seems like something along those lines could be engineered. The only problem would be you could never stop moving..
User avatar #35 to #33 - nevergetsdubs (12/23/2011) [-]
tldr, the turbines make a PATHETIC amount of electricity, which is balanced out by the fuel loss on your car anyway..

any other one you wonderin about?
User avatar #140 to #35 - oldirtybatarde (12/23/2011) [-]
Why wouldn't the light one work?
User avatar #667 to #140 - slayzo (12/23/2011) [-]
Because first of all, light weakens. If he turned off the light, the light would still disappear, due to no source to supplement more light.

If he kept the light on, he'd still be paying for the electricity, and it would only light up that one spot.
User avatar #34 to #33 - nevergetsdubs (12/23/2011) [-]
The reasons windmills arent used pretty much AT all except by environment hippies are because they are INSANELY inefficient... it takes an hour of strong wind for one wind turbine to charge an AA battery. So a few windmills on your car, yeah you could charge your phone...

But you'd also lose alotta speed because theyre not very aerodynamic on a car...

So in exchange for charging your phone you lost 10 mpg , wasting fuel and making your engine work harder... IT DOES MAKE ENERGY, BUT SOOOOOOO NOT worth it...
User avatar #36 to #34 - doctrine (12/23/2011) [-]
Thanks for the explain.
I assumed there would be something wrong with it along the lines of what you said.
thumb for you sir.
User avatar #510 to #33 - Chuckaholic (12/23/2011) [-]
Sorry just read further on that you meant a different smaller turbine and not the big ones. My bad
User avatar #508 to #33 - Chuckaholic (12/23/2011) [-]
Actually no. Portuguese wind turbines produce 2MWhours of electricity or simply put 2 MW per hour. My dad is head of portuguese renewable energy companies and unless you have a massive AA battery you'll destroy them.
User avatar #42 to #32 - reLAXINelmo (12/23/2011) [-]
WHOA BADASS OVER HERE.jpg..... sorrry had too
User avatar #44 to #42 - nevergetsdubs (12/23/2011) [-]
0.o? me being nice and sharing knowledge is being a badass?
User avatar #46 to #44 - reLAXINelmo (12/23/2011) [-]
nah i just meant the initial statement it came off to me as I GOT THIS IM A COLLLEGE STUDENT... i know you were just tryin too help i didn't mean to have it be like that just poking fun is all :)
#93 to #44 - patronsaintofyou (12/23/2011) [-]
Also college student (not that that means anything) but what about the lightbulb one? I'm thinking that some of the energy would be lost as heat.
User avatar #95 to #93 - nevergetsdubs (12/23/2011) [-]
read #....89

lol this comment section is a mess
coudlnt find it for a second..
User avatar #83 to #32 - drowningfish (12/23/2011) [-]
why wont the one with the lightbulb and solar panels work?
User avatar #89 to #83 - nevergetsdubs (12/23/2011) [-]
Same reason, solar panels are extremely inefficient.
It takes a 4 ft by 4ft solar panel under maximum sunlight (desert/equator) just to power a small toaster.

2nd of all... a lightbulb produces only physical light and heat......
It wont charge a solar panel 1%...

Solar panels absorb radiation from sunlight such as UV, IR, MW, and RW which are beyond visible light. Thats where they get their energy from , not the actual light itself...
+4
#300 to #83 - kvent **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #509 to #300 - ville (12/23/2011) [-]
also the portal one wouldnt work because portals dont exist
#11 - angrywords (12/22/2011) [-]
I believe you mean infinite.
#223 to #11 - anon (12/23/2011) [-]
**anonymous rolls 065**
User avatar #12 to #11 - tianhuifan (12/22/2011) [-]
yush. i do.
+61
#183 - afrotreetrunk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #194 to #183 - nuuuuuuuuu (12/23/2011) [-]
ikr his MSpaint skills are off the charts!
User avatar #186 to #183 - Theemannification (12/23/2011) [-]
Lmfao
#307 - trollingonfj (12/23/2011) [-]
>Go to the middle of New York  
>Hold up a random Lotto Ticket *makes sure it's not worth anything*  
>Scream: "I WON 25 MILLION"  
>Get gang beat for the lotto ticket  
>Sue the people for assaulting/injuring you  
>Repeat for Infinite Money!  
>Problem douchebags?
>Go to the middle of New York
>Hold up a random Lotto Ticket *makes sure it's not worth anything*
>Scream: "I WON 25 MILLION"
>Get gang beat for the lotto ticket
>Sue the people for assaulting/injuring you
>Repeat for Infinite Money!
>Problem douchebags?
User avatar #334 to #307 - uwbymannen (12/23/2011) [-]
I am going to ******* try that.
User avatar #668 to #307 - slayzo (12/23/2011) [-]
die on second go

Money is now worthless.
#544 - dtcrawl (12/23/2011) [-]
I'm gonna be honest, I thought about the "we both make $10" for awhile...



User avatar #548 to #544 - alexisbeast (12/23/2011) [-]
The person who buys the box is down ten dollars
User avatar #549 to #548 - dtcrawl (12/23/2011) [-]
I mean, I get it now. It just really stumped me...
User avatar #552 to #549 - alexisbeast (12/23/2011) [-]
I did maths to figure it out, because I was stumped too.
User avatar #570 to #548 - TheUsername (12/23/2011) [-]
No, he get's ten dollars. It said that they EACH put $20; 20+20=40. Sell for 30; 40(What's in the box)-30(how much he paid for the box)=10
User avatar #572 to #570 - alexisbeast (12/23/2011) [-]
down twenty for both, plus thirty for one, ten dollar profit. The other one is now down thirty more, -50 profit, plus 40$. He lost ten bucks
0
#596 to #570 - alexisbeast has deleted their comment [-]
#583 to #570 - anon (12/23/2011) [-]
The man who buys the box put 20$ in and payed 30$ for the box. He got 40$ in return.
User avatar #446 to #433 - Trrave ONLINE (12/23/2011) [-]
lol! You just made my day!
Thank you.
Merry Christmas!
#656 - FightClub (12/23/2011) [-]
This image has expired
"infant power" <<
#104 - CookieKing (12/23/2011) [-]
I tried the one where we put money in the box with a friend. I explained it to him and we could see no flaw in the plan. so we repeated the process for 10 minutes until i realize my friend was losing 10 dollars each time. Best part is that he never found out LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
User avatar #367 to #104 - iisammehii (12/23/2011) [-]
How could that work? It'd get to the point where he would have no money left, any idiot would notice they were losing money rather than gaining it.
0
#419 to #367 - iisammehii has deleted their comment [-]
#371 to #367 - CookieKing (12/23/2011) [-]
My friends an idiot then. I don't care i got money
+18
#181 to #104 - afrotreetrunk **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#242 to #181 - CookieKing (12/23/2011) [-]
I did too for the first 10 minutes....
awkward
#187 - anon (12/23/2011) [-]
#45 - darthmaulman (12/23/2011) [-]
INFANT POWER
#17 - anon (12/22/2011) [-]
im still trying to figure out this one
#29 to #17 - anon (12/23/2011) [-]
The guy you sold the box to put $20 into the box, loss of 20 dollars, so he's at -20. He then gives you $30, so he's now at -50. He then gets 40 dollars, so he's now at -10. He loses $10, you gain $10. Took me a while to figure it out as well =P
User avatar #143 to #29 - isaacturner (12/23/2011) [-]
20 30 50 303 020 DEBT INCOME 30 50

thats what i got from this
User avatar #18 to #17 - thatbrownkiid (12/23/2011) [-]
left guy puts in 20$

right guy puts in 20$

right guy then gives another 30$ to left guy in exchange for 40$

left guy gives 20$ and gets 30$ = 10$ profit

right guy gives 50$ and receives 40$ = 10$ debt
#19 to #18 - GIJorge (12/23/2011) [-]
Thank you my good man.
User avatar #27 to #19 - thatbrownkiid (12/23/2011) [-]
any time
User avatar #191 to #18 - zionsype ONLINE (12/23/2011) [-]
I still don't get it.
Iamnotacleverman.jpg
User avatar #250 to #191 - thatbrownkiid (12/23/2011) [-]
left guy has 20$, right guy has 50$

both put 20$ in left guys box

left guy has 40$ (in box), right guy has 30$

right guy gives 30$ for left guys box

left guy has 30$ right guy has 40$

left guy went from 20$ to 30$ and right guy went from 50$ to 40$



get it?
User avatar #306 to #250 - zionsype ONLINE (12/23/2011) [-]
but then right guy isn't getting +10 dollars. so it doesn't work :P
User avatar #309 to #306 - thatbrownkiid (12/23/2011) [-]
exactly

thats why its troll physics
#383 to #306 - anon (12/23/2011) [-]
It's troll physics, ******** .
User avatar #20 to #18 - maid (12/23/2011) [-]
Nope.

Left guy pays $20+$30=$50, However $20 of the dollars is his, so he gets $20-$30 = Loss of $10

Right guy $20 and recieves 30 = +$10

BADUM!
User avatar #21 to #20 - maid (12/23/2011) [-]
Oh... Missed the $10 "DEBT" >_>
User avatar #26 to #21 - thatbrownkiid (12/23/2011) [-]
thats fine man
#657 - smokingman (12/23/2011) [-]
das is 			********
das is ********
#180 - thed (12/23/2011) [-]
Infinate gas, problem land Richard Simmonss
#616 - datkiid (12/23/2011) [-]
Meanwhile in reality
[ 638 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)