do want. I do agree, that skyrim is an awesome single player game. My point is that if you could play such a masterpiece with other people, it would be beyond b skyrim multiplayer
x
Click to expand

Comments(845):

[ 845 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#27 - platapus (11/29/2011) [-]
how would they explain that everyone else is also the last of the dragonborn?
User avatar #230 to #27 - davilaa (11/30/2011) [-]
how about, it has a separate storyline, where everyone is a regular person.
User avatar #277 to #27 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (11/30/2011) [-]
Edit the storyline a tad for a co-op campaign.
#625 to #27 - John Cena (11/30/2011) [-]
Actually it can work you have people choose Gray-Mane or Battle-Born and in turn have them in rounds fighting for control of places using weapons and magic depending on the person you have chosen
User avatar #36 to #27 - realoader (11/29/2011) [-]
You know how fable 2 did their multiplayer buy having other players as floating orbs and not actually in your world. But you could interact and what not and can invite them into your own world. This might work if they integrated it some how.
#364 to #27 - Scyth (11/30/2011) [-]
The greybeards never say your the last dragon born, they say there could be more.

Then again I haven't finished the game so I could be wrong.
User avatar #461 to #364 - darkfuzion (11/30/2011) [-]
Holy **** , this guy is going places.
User avatar #480 to #364 - ilovehitler (11/30/2011) [-]
Or you could just be a graybeard...
User avatar #35 to #27 - xshadeeisafag (11/29/2011) [-]
1: They don't HAVE to interact with NPCs.
B. Only the host would be the Dragonborn.
Tres; The non-hosts can't shout?
User avatar #44 to #35 - swiiftninja (11/29/2011) [-]
But imagine 10 people, 1 of each race, Fus Roh Dah-ing at the same time
#47 to #44 - xshadeeisafag (11/29/2011) [-]
Or... Yol Toor Shul x10
User avatar #100 to #47 - theonlykarma (11/29/2011) [-]
I know this sounds stupid, but how can I upgrade my fire shout?
User avatar #104 to #103 - theonlykarma (11/29/2011) [-]
I feel incredibly stupid. Five minutes ago literally i was on that wiki looking up on followers. thumb for you anyways.
User avatar #102 to #100 - xshadeeisafag (11/29/2011) [-]
I got one word from the main quest of course and another from the companions questline, not sure about the rest.
It's easily my favorite shout >.>
#639 to #35 - John Cena (11/30/2011) [-]
what? are you an idiot?
User avatar #50 - rightbehindyou (11/29/2011) [-]
nope. 12-year olds would automatically want it. they see 'multiplayer' and they're off.
User avatar #33 - cowmoose (11/29/2011) [-]
would consist of 50 people with baskets on their head, while one person steals everything.
User avatar #1 - chuckbillrow ONLINE (11/29/2011) [-]
it would be awesome just to co-op with someone
#810 - theratman (11/30/2011) [-]
multiplayer (pvp and such) wouldn't work, because someone would be an overpowered killingmachine and loot all the good stuff and make the server their kingdom

But if you consider cooperative, with 3 - 5 players, that would be actually a good idea in my opnion, but places like the dungeons it would be to many people at once, and the difficulty should be raised to expert at least so it wouldn't be too easy for a group of players to just do one hit at each enemy

this is all just my opinion ofcourse

#849 to #810 - pyroblem (11/30/2011) [-]
It would be better if they preserved the singleplayer mode but would add a multiplayer mode with another map that would be specifically be designed t support the carnage of 2-4 or perhaps more players. And i would prefer if they added a harder difficulty. :3
+5
#814 to #810 - turbomullet **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#182 - domlol (11/30/2011) [-]
That would ******* destroy world of warcraft.
#54 - berrabuz (11/29/2011) [-]
**berrabuz rolled a random image posted at comment #578918 by tehgaem at My Little Pony ** how it would look like
#532 - flashcache (11/30/2011) [-]
**flashcache rolls 00**
User avatar #535 to #532 - abazzi (11/30/2011) [-]
**abazzi rolls 57** and dubs are not one of them.
#511 - kaotic (11/30/2011) [-]
Imagine, FunnyJunk without Skyrim.
#525 to #511 - mrfartypants (11/30/2011) [-]
Imagine chamber of secrets without the basilisk.
#290 - pretzelz (11/30/2011) [-]
people would just pickpocket each other
User avatar #76 - sargasm (11/29/2011) [-]
christ you people dont get it... not an MMO... just cause its online doesnt mean mmo right away. In my opinion it would work amazingly with a system like borderlands has.
#529 - theepicbassman (11/30/2011) [-]
I remember seeing a video somewhere about how, at Bethesda, they always consider multiplayer but never see it working out. I for one think it's great that we can have a game sell millions of copies, recieve countless bids for game of the year, and NOT have a multiplayer. Multiplayer is great, but it doesn't go with everything. It's good to see companies like Bethesda that give you all the content you need in one package instead of short changing single player and extending playtime with multiplayer or a bunch of DLC.
User avatar #813 to #529 - seratyo ONLINE (11/30/2011) [-]
What are you talking about? Bethesda ALWAYS has DLC, though it is always well made.
#969 to #813 - theepicbassman (11/30/2011) [-]
I never said Bethesda didn't make DLC. I'm saying they don't have DLC that feels like they just withheld parts from the full game in order to make more money later. And I agree, the DLC is well made.
User avatar #971 to #969 - seratyo ONLINE (11/30/2011) [-]
Fair-point, though I didn't mean all was well-made... honest hearts wasn't too great, but it kept with the theme...
#261 - shatonyourface (11/30/2011) [-]
Remember fable 2 multiplayer... may i go on....
#269 to #261 - panana (11/30/2011) [-]
I agree.
User avatar #274 to #261 - JNAtheDUDE (11/30/2011) [-]
But Fable III improved it in almost every way. :D
User avatar #108 - moooossseeee (11/29/2011) [-]
Skyrim multiplayer...I see massive armies of players running around and beating the hell out of each other in middle-age-esk battles.

And that one douche bag on top of a near by mountain sitting there with popcorn watching the carnage.
#856 - KrazyShark (11/30/2011) [-]
OH LORD
#446 - Mozos (11/30/2011) [-]
I think it should only be 2player online, because then there would be to many trolls killing you and looting your corpse.... you and a friend, able to trade items and gold.
User avatar #449 to #446 - kyledp (11/30/2011) [-]
i second this.
User avatar #457 to #449 - Mozos (11/30/2011) [-]
It'd be awesome to share quest objectives, and there be a certain set of 2player quests.
User avatar #465 to #457 - kyledp (11/30/2011) [-]
Then there should be quest where you can kill or save your friend.
User avatar #459 to #446 - blergle ONLINE (11/30/2011) [-]
So like Borderlands...?
User avatar #466 to #459 - kyledp (11/30/2011) [-]
except better.
User avatar #494 to #466 - blergle ONLINE (11/30/2011) [-]
YES!!! Also I recommend that they do a real men of genius about you
User avatar #912 to #889 - dunworbouit (11/30/2011) [-]
mmm my ding ding dong
User avatar #801 - bigdoda (11/30/2011) [-]
Do not want. Co-Op, sure why the **** not.

PvP Multiplayer? **** NO.
[ 845 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)