How To Explain Gay Rights To An Idiot. Found on and it made me laugh. So I thought I would share with funnyjunk... that toaster is just using him to get citizenship gay rights Idiots toasters
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (131)
[ 131 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
48 comments displayed.
#88 - harryboom
Reply +48
(11/12/2011) [-]
that toaster is just using him to get citizenship
#94 to #88 - testtoasterown
Reply +1
(11/12/2011) [-]
**testtoasterown rolled a random image**
lol'd
#119 to #88 - fuckle **User deleted account**
+5
has deleted their comment [-]
#103 to #88 - Zeigh ONLINE
Reply +8
(11/12/2011) [-]
That toaster is such a whore.
#101 to #88 - themrvofak
Reply +13
(11/12/2011) [-]
well it probably was made in China
#124 to #101 - hawaiianhappysauce
Reply +2
(11/12/2011) [-]
Dude I saw that movie, It also is the reason why I hate clowns.
#31 - daentraya
Reply +21
(11/12/2011) [-]
#41 to #31 - Berserkleon
Reply -9
(11/12/2011) [-]
All six adults on that pic are men.
#49 to #31 - SlayArg
Reply +32
(11/12/2011) [-]
Pimpin' ain't easy
#23 - diamondminer
Reply +30
(11/12/2011) [-]
Dear Bigoted, right wing, Christians.


Not everyone reads your ******* book, not everyone needs to follow your ******* rules.

Sincerely,
The Sane people.
#120 to #23 - nois **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#134 to #120 - diamondminer
Reply +2
(11/12/2011) [-]
With what i say i do not mean the whole of christianity. I have nothing against organized religion. I do however, have a bone to pick with Radical religion.

Simply put, the United States is a secular nation, religion should have no say in the way people in a country live, mostly because not everyone follows the said religion, Its everyone's right to a pursuit of happiness, is it not?

A Democracy is not similar to a Theocracy, thats mostly what i'm trying to say. i'm not labeling the whole of christianity as Small minded and bigoted.
#168 to #134 - nois **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#169 to #168 - diamondminer
Reply +1
(11/12/2011) [-]
i suppose.
#28 to #23 - scorpiogary
Reply +9
(11/12/2011) [-]
anyone else mad that when ever people mention interatial it is always black guy and white girl, like can it be opposite for once
#33 to #28 - Hydrocircuit
Reply +4
(11/12/2011) [-]
I remember seeing a black girl and a white guy on the Today show make a cake.
#46 to #33 - scorpiogary
Reply +14
(11/12/2011) [-]
i remember seeing the lockness monster, but your story sounds much more far-fetched
#175 to #46 - wecanworkitout
Reply 0
(11/24/2011) [-]
yeah it's weird because I know three black women who have white boyfriends, but only one couple that's the other way around... I don't mean that that is how it is in most cases (I don't know those statistics) I'm just saying, it should be more 50/50 on this...
#71 - pedobeahr
Reply +22
(11/12/2011) [-]
if a priest can rape a child i the house of god, then why can't two men get married in one?
#2 - iceicebaby **User deleted account**
+14
has deleted their comment [-]
#3 to #2 - akoya [OP]
Reply +7
(11/11/2011) [-]
Thank you. I love you too. Continue being an awesome person.
#4 to #3 - iceicebaby **User deleted account**
+11
has deleted their comment [-]
#34 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(11/12/2011) [-]
#35 to #34 - iceicebaby **User deleted account**
+3
has deleted their comment [-]
#10 - theqk
Reply +12
(11/12/2011) [-]
**** you I can love my toaster/alarm clock if i want
#37 to #10 - captainbackslash
Reply +1
(11/12/2011) [-]
#100 - MasterManiac
Reply -26
(11/12/2011) [-]
Man and toaster cannot reproduce.
Man and dog cannot reproduce.
Man and corpse cannot reproduce.
Man and man cannot reproduce.
Man and woman can reproduce.

Case dismissed.


#122 to #100 - MasterManiac
Reply -3
(11/12/2011) [-]
I like how I've stated facts and people are disagreeing.
Also to clarify man and woman can generally reproduce (of course there are some medical conditions that may not allow it sometimes) and for the others replace cannot with can never if you're in any doubt.
Finally as I said in http://funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/2866295/How+To+Explain+Gay+Rights+To+An+Idio t/108#108 this is the logic as I understand it, so stop hatin'.
#135 to #122 - anon
Reply 0
(11/12/2011) [-]
1. I'm hating because you are a retarded asshole
2. you are assuming that the objective of marriage is reproduction which isn't always the case.
3. Your argument for sterile people being allowed to be married is that the majority of heterosexual couples can reproduce, so it doesn't make sense to deny those who are sterile. If gay couples were allowed to marry in all states, than the majority of married couples would still be able to reproduce, as the great majority of people are heterosexual.

Your logic sucks
#110 to #100 - kpl
Reply -2
(11/12/2011) [-]
sadly, man and dog could reproduce
sadly, man and dog could reproduce
#105 to #100 - anon
Reply 0
(11/12/2011) [-]
there are marriages that cannot reproduce should they not be able to get married? gays can adopt and help change a small child's life for the better, gays would also respect marriage much more then straights do.
#111 to #100 - fuckle **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#155 to #100 - cancerousiguana
Reply +1
(11/12/2011) [-]
so the sole purpose of marriage is to reproduce?

also, gay/lesbian couples can adopt kids. So when the orphanages are overpacked with kids from the ever-so-sacred man/woman relationships who too ******* irresponsible to raise their own children, maybe legalization can be justified in that right.
#160 to #155 - anon
Reply 0
(11/12/2011) [-]
Orphanages are full of defective children. Healthy Children get adopted asap.
#125 to #100 - LoveAmorAi
Reply +4
(11/12/2011) [-]
I noticed you neglected man and child...
Because they actually CAN reproduce...

You're okay with pedophilia?
#129 to #125 - MasterManiac
Reply -4
(11/12/2011) [-]
Oh ffs read comment 122 before you talk any more ********
#132 to #129 - LoveAmorAi
Reply +2
(11/12/2011) [-]
I am just saying, you ignored the child and man aspect. Thus, this makes the argument incomplete. And suggests that you're okay with children and men marrying.
#115 to #100 - tommynt
Reply +7
(11/12/2011) [-]
according to your logic sterile people shouldn't be allowed to marry as well.
#107 to #100 - akoya [OP]
Reply +10
(11/12/2011) [-]
The ability to reproduce has nothing to do with being allowed to marry the consenting adult you love. A sterile woman and virile man can't reproduce but they can still marry because they love each other. Two woman will be able to reproduce together in the near future but they still can't marry even though they love each other. Any two consenting adults should be able to marry if they love each other.
#118 to #107 - Deathicator
+4
has deleted their comment [-]
#106 to #100 - dustdevil **User deleted account**
+11
has deleted their comment [-]
#108 to #106 - MasterManiac
Reply -7
(11/12/2011) [-]
This is the logic behind not allowing gay marriage as I see it.

Just saiyan.
#113 to #108 - fuckle **User deleted account**
-1
has deleted their comment [-]
#38 - trollsnrainbows
Reply +10
(11/12/2011) [-]
I was gonna make a gay joke, butt **** it.
#43 to #38 - turbomullet **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#21 - thedumbledore
Reply +10
(11/12/2011) [-]
I am living in Scotland and the government are seriously considering legalising gay marriage, although churches will only have to participate in the ceremony's if they so wish. The catholic church says that it will 'make Scotland a joke in the the eyes of the world' and have started a petition to stop the gay marriage movement. My only problem with this is that they are not forced to marry gay couples, the catholic church could simply opt out. but instead they wish to prevent all gay marriage in Scotland. Here 60% are for gay marriage and 17% against. the rest are undecided. I don't understand why one church believes its will should come before everyone else's. Why can't some people accept love is love?
#58 - Aiwatcher
Reply +5
(11/12/2011) [-]
Ever consider there are arguments other than that of religion? I am by no means opposed to gay marriage, but people have other reservations against it than it just being "a sin".

Foremost of them being that marriage is the bond in a nuclear family- to further the development of society via children. Not saying gays can't adopt, but adopting gays are in the minority. A marriage has been throughout history a way to protect the children produced in said marriage. While this may be in some peoples eyes an archaic definition, its still a definition, and a lot of people forget that many who are opposed to gay marriage aren't raging Fundamentalist Christians.

And again, I don't have any issue with gay marriage, its just you people dont seem to like seeing the other side of the fence.
#65 to #58 - puggles
Reply +9
(11/12/2011) [-]
but then you have couples like my wife and I. i have a daughter from a previous relationship, but i had a vasectomy years before we were married and have no desire to adopt, so that now we're married without children or any potential of having them. the whole nuclear family thing doesn't apply to us, but society recognizes our marriage as valid.

also, not arguing for or against, just pointing out a different view.