Cute Purple Devilsaur. Well . CUTE PURPLE DINOSAUR 1. In Latin, they had no letter "U" so at used a "V'' instead: CATE PARPLE 2, Cross out all the letters that  taaaaaags
x

Cute Purple Devilsaur

Tags: taaaaaags
CUTE PURPLE DINOSAUR
1. In Latin, they had no letter "U" so at used a "V'' instead:
CATE PARPLE
2, Cross out all the letters that are not Roman numerals,
3. You are : CV DIV
4. Let' s refresh year brain.
5. Math:
100
5 And there , it,
53 proof that
500 tthe Dinosaur, IS Satan.
Mam ruined em I Mel 10: 11:;
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1013
Views: 21029
Favorited: 273
Submitted: 09/25/2011
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to trollgasmic submit to reddit

Comments(85):

[ 85 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#57 - kittydestroyer (09/26/2011) [-]
ITS A SIGN
ITS A SIGN
+15
#20 - bedinthehead **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#46 to #20 - anon (09/26/2011) [-]
Congraturation*
Onry*
#71 - juzin (09/26/2011) [-]
666 isn't the mark of the beast.
And it doesn't signify anything to do with Satan.
That's a common misconception.
User avatar #79 to #71 - taternutz (09/26/2011) [-]
So Iron Maiden is lying to me? D:
User avatar #73 to #71 - shugudugs (09/26/2011) [-]
yea, 616 is.
#29 - turretbuddy (09/26/2011) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #2 - dovakiin (09/25/2011) [-]
...so...uh.... when was the first time math ruined our childhood? just wondering
User avatar #3 to #2 - TheEntertainer (09/25/2011) [-]
When we went to school.
User avatar #4 to #3 - dovakiin (09/25/2011) [-]
oh alright
+3
#10 to #3 - WASSAAAAAAAAAAAAP **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#82 - grimmwaters ONLINE (09/26/2011) [-]
#68 - lacrossekidxxx (09/26/2011) [-]
If you could actually add roman numerals you would know the answer is 654....
User avatar #69 to #68 - TonHyukOTP (09/26/2011) [-]
IKR, that was my first thought on it too.
#58 - ShroudeD (09/26/2011) [-]
Who the **** sat there and figured all this **** out?
+5
#1 - theskidkid **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #11 - appleanonymous (09/25/2011) [-]
THe devil's number is 616
#41 - grarg (09/26/2011) [-]
false. if you had an understanding or roman numerals you would realize that
CV= 105
VL= 45
DIV= 504
105+45+504=654
that being said. YES, Barney is Satan.
User avatar #43 to #41 - narufreak (09/26/2011) [-]
he counted the numerals as individuals, not as numerals together to form a different number
#44 to #43 - grarg (09/26/2011) [-]
understood still if its grouped together it should be counted in proper roman format as this entire explanation was based off roman characters.
User avatar #45 to #44 - narufreak (09/26/2011) [-]
true, true.
why somebody would make a post without understanding roman numerals, while the post is about roman numerals, is a mystery to me, not to mention that this is a terrible repost
#48 to #45 - grarg (09/26/2011) [-]
was trying to avoid the tragedy of the repost but alas I can't always hide behind logic. Some occasions just call for the yelling of "repost!" and spamming of hate.
User avatar #49 to #48 - narufreak (09/26/2011) [-]
once again true, but i did not spam, i said it once, in a friendly tone, as this was originally posted so long ago i doubt many will remember
#50 to #49 - grarg (09/26/2011) [-]
I'm am glad you did not spam, if there was any confusion in the matter i was not calling you out about yelling "repost!" or spamming. I was simply stating that sometimes it is needed.
#51 to #41 - paradoxpoetic (09/26/2011) [-]
The only reason he grouped them was to make sure you understood which letters were coming from which word. Then he added them individually. It does not take a strong sense of logic to understand that much.
#52 to #51 - grarg (09/26/2011) [-]
if you were to read the rest of the comments you would understand that there was no lack of logic just quizzical pondering to the fact that a parody of barney and the roman system wouldn't you the roman system correctly as it is the "punch line" per-say of the post.
#56 to #52 - paradoxpoetic (09/26/2011) [-]
Your lack of grammar bothers me. Putting aside the blatant generalization of your intelligence based on your spelling and grammar, I would like to point out that saying "false. if you had an understanding or roman numerals you would realize that..." is less of a "pondering" and more of a "disproving OP".

And yes, I judge people based on their grammar and spelling. Partly because I am concerned about effectively utilizing language and communication skills, and partly because I'm an asshole.
User avatar #59 to #41 - zaccc (09/26/2011) [-]
thanks. was just about to point this out :3
User avatar #22 - PoisinSandwich (09/26/2011) [-]
666 refers to nero around 70~90 ad.
User avatar #32 to #22 - wildra (09/26/2011) [-]
how? n
User avatar #33 to #32 - PoisinSandwich (09/26/2011) [-]
Alright. it has ties to religion and history. so the book of revalations and the book of mark were made around the same time. the book of mark is the book of suffering in the bible. (went to catholic school) and the book of revalations was misunderstood about the world ending but its really just a bunch of weird language. (like gang signs. we dont understand but gangsters do) so thats how they talked about nero during the times he was persecuting christians and jews in rome. hope that clears it up. and if i confused you i will try and clear it up better.
User avatar #35 to #33 - wildra (09/26/2011) [-]
holy **** ! that actully makes sense! haha! thanks both of you guys!
i knew it had to do with nero and i knew the number was actully wrong. so yea. that cleard that up like crazy!
User avatar #37 to #35 - PoisinSandwich (09/26/2011) [-]
Thank you for the open mind. though someone has red thumbed me i am very glad to help you. have a good day and night.
#34 to #22 - anon (09/26/2011) [-]
hes right. there was actually a translation error a long time ago. its 661 or 616, not 666. When it says number, it refers to what the letters a persons name corresponds to. It's refering to Emperor Nero, who was notoriously cruel.
User avatar #36 to #34 - PoisinSandwich (09/26/2011) [-]
i know you might not read this. but yes anon thanks for supporting me.
+1
#77 - holycrapitscooper **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#80 to #77 - anon (09/26/2011) [-]
Barney was the **** . So was Thomas the Tank Engine and Jayjay the jet plane
0
#81 to #80 - holycrapitscooper **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+1
#72 - aceofthemspades **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#70 - midnightdove (09/26/2011) [-]
That's ok. I never liked Barney anyways.  
Gir unrelated.
That's ok. I never liked Barney anyways.
Gir unrelated.
User avatar #67 - thefriendlyhobo (09/26/2011) [-]
me and math were cool and all, til he hooked up with that whore alphabet.
User avatar #65 - ScruffytheJanitor (09/26/2011) [-]
One problem though, you can't half translate something. If you're going to translate something, translate it all the way.
#63 - thesmartatheist (09/26/2011) [-]
Interestingly enough, the newest version of the bible says that it's actually 616, not 666. Just another example of how unreliable the past of the bible really is.
Interestingly enough, the newest version of the bible says that it's actually 616, not 666. Just another example of how unreliable the past of the bible really is.
User avatar #86 to #74 - thesmartatheist (09/26/2011) [-]
Falsifying a certain religion is completely ignorant unless you have background knowledge. I've read the bible twice and I still read today. Therefore, 'Thesmartatheist" - I am solid in my decision, yet thoughtful knowing of the other. (:
User avatar #89 to #86 - thegingermancan (09/27/2011) [-]
i was unaware that being an atheist required falsifying christianity, so i assume you're just doing it out of spite? i myself am an atheist, but haven't read the bible, quran, or any other religious text fully. i don't understand the need to put down or find flaw in other's beliefs to justify my own. just sayin' X)
User avatar #90 to #89 - thesmartatheist (09/27/2011) [-]
I'm an atheist because of Christianity, didn't specify that before. I don't think becoming an atheist would be fair unless I had the evidence. As for other religions, well that's irrelevant to my life, atm. I feel the need to justify the Christians who tell me I'm and abomination, or telling me I'm going to hell (Judgmental much?) I don't study for the sole reason to attack that religion, it's more like self-defense.
User avatar #91 to #90 - thegingermancan (09/27/2011) [-]
fair enough. i'm more used to the in-your-face kind of atheist telling the christians they're abominations, believe it or not... thank you for your time though, good sir, and have a few thumbs
User avatar #85 - schlickchick (09/26/2011) [-]
actually, Satan's number was translated wrong. it is actually 616
[ 85 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)