Why didn't the sock make the cut?. .. I spent a really long time looking for a sock before I thought to check her actual foot. God damn it.
x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#18 - donglewotsit (07/29/2013) [-]
I spent a really long time looking for a sock before I thought to check her actual ******* foot. God damn it.
+64
#1 - hinedodmansmith **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - jinkazama (07/28/2013) [-]
They're two different pictures, check the hand.
User avatar #6 to #2 - SuperSixONE (07/29/2013) [-]
Tits don't get bigger in between pictures
User avatar #4 to #2 - AngusFTW (07/28/2013) [-]
They fixed the hand to make it more photogenic.
User avatar #23 to #1 - anonymoose ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Well, he tits were about 1cm too low for me to find her in any way sexual.
#13 - freetoplay (07/29/2013) [-]
They even shopped her boobs... They were fine to begin with...   
   
   
NOW THEY ARE FULL OF LIES!!!
They even shopped her boobs... They were fine to begin with...


NOW THEY ARE FULL OF LIES!!!
User avatar #22 - pulluspardus (07/29/2013) [-]
they made her right thigh lose the curve, I'm guessing the person who did this is a straight woman because slight curves are better than stick-like legs.
#20 - eclecticparadigm **User deleted account** (07/29/2013) [-]
It looks like they are bouncing.
It looks like they are bouncing.
User avatar #32 - ooooooooooo (07/29/2013) [-]
Her hand is completely different, it's weird
User avatar #14 - austone (07/29/2013) [-]
The original looks better. Also when it changes to the bad (shopped) version, the high pitched ringing noise in my ear changes too, higher and lower and louder pitches and volume.
User avatar #19 to #14 - crowd (07/29/2013) [-]
Same here, it's freaky.
User avatar #11 - luthervonappledorf (07/29/2013) [-]
I prefer the original...
User avatar #24 to #11 - anonymoose ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
They're both pretty much exactly the same. How can you have a preference between the two?
User avatar #26 to #24 - luthervonappledorf (07/29/2013) [-]
She looks more natural. There doesn't seem to be a lot of make up and she doesn't look like she's trying too much. Just looks more attractive to me.
#27 to #26 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
and then THIS phanact exists "oh I prefer natural women, I'm so sensitive, sit on my dick"
User avatar #29 to #27 - luthervonappledorf (07/29/2013) [-]
Or, maybe, just maybe, I just like women who look nice naturally.
#31 to #29 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
nah shut the **** up, both those pictures look almost identical, the biggest change is the lighting, I know a ton of guys like you, really grinds my gears when you don't speak your mind, you speak what women want you to speak, thats ******
User avatar #36 to #31 - nowardspls (07/29/2013) [-]
This noble anon speaks the truth. luthervonappledorf obviously is an idiot, however anon should have logged in.
#41 to #36 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
What if no account?
User avatar #39 to #31 - luthervonappledorf (07/29/2013) [-]
So by actually speaking my mind, I'm not speaking my mind? How am I supposed to defeat that logic? What if I actually prefer it? What if I think that some women actually look better without make up?
User avatar #40 to #39 - luthervonappledorf (07/29/2013) [-]
Oh silly me, what am I saying. Logic on the internet? Impossible.
#42 to #40 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
Logic? ***** please, you call that ******** logic? You must have a fetish for women in slightly dimmer rooms than normal rooms
#21 - lifeiscool **User deleted account** (07/29/2013) [-]
I gotta agree with some people here, she does look better unshopped.
User avatar #28 - bobthedilder (07/29/2013) [-]
Now, would anyone happen to have a decent sized version of the first image without the bad shopping and whatnot, y'know...for science and stuff.
#5 - winternetz (07/29/2013) [-]
lol why didn't the lazy ******* photographer take a better picture to start with? almost all of those changes could have been done for the picture.
#16 to #5 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
Often times after the photoshoot, the company sends the pictures to be retouched and mark what they want redone.

The photographer just snaps the shots they are told to do.
#7 to #5 - lesmiserables (07/29/2013) [-]
I work as an assistant photographer (I'm the low-paid guy who holds the mirrors for light reflection etc.) and I see about one thing or two he could have done better.
Dunno wat you are referring to.
#8 to #7 - winternetz (07/29/2013) [-]
i mean, she could have worn a more supportive bra to make her breasts look more perky.

(i'm not a photographer obviously, i'm just guessing here) but wouldn't more light with the right kind of bulb make her skin look more colorful?

and the sock, why not get her to take it off before taking the picture?!?

sitting up a little more would have made her look more busty and also would have gotten rid of the wrinkles on her unshopped picture.

they could have taken **** out of that little nightstand bowl instead of digitally removing it as well.

it would have been quicker and cheaper to do those changes for the original photo i bet.
#10 to #8 - lesmiserables (07/29/2013) [-]
I don't know about the bra and the sock, but I guess you are right.

About the light; I don't think they wanted to make her more colorful.

The photographer probably wanted a contrapposto, which creates a more dynamic photograph and makes the model look more relaxed.

Wrinkles are never a problem when doing professional photo shoots, because they are incredibly easy to photoshop away.

I think they actually ADDED more filling to the nightstand bowl, but I might just be retarded.
#9 to #8 - winternetz (07/29/2013) [-]
i mean, the wrinkles on her stomach at least.
#12 to #7 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
r u also a lesbina? lol.
#43 - caramelfox (08/03/2013) [-]
**caramelfox rolled a random image posted in comment #3 at Its Simple, You Vend the Sweetie Belle **
Why did they change her hand?
User avatar #37 - yougotpunched (07/29/2013) [-]
if you look you can see all the shopping ... easily.
User avatar #35 - noimnot (07/29/2013) [-]
That isn't even her body, the face has been photoshopped on
User avatar #33 - terebellum (07/29/2013) [-]
The boobs just go up and down and up and down...
User avatar #30 - slendermanshadow (07/29/2013) [-]
I don't see a problem with the color enhancement but the other changes were just unnecessary
#25 - Rascal (07/29/2013) [-]
Look at het fingernails. Something's not right.
User avatar #15 - Hashenmier (07/29/2013) [-]
Did they make her less skinny in the 'shopped version?
It seems that way
User avatar #17 to #15 - egosumproxi ONLINE (07/29/2013) [-]
Looks like they added more tit at least...
 Friends (0)