Evolution of F1 vehicles

Reply +112 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

here it is smoother and without that crappy "sh3dy" watermark

#48 to #12 - anon id: b1ddedce

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

The recent ones are able to produce down force more than twice their own weight. They can literally drive upside down. Of course, there are other factors, but nobody is willing to test it out.

#8 - chaossniper

Reply +45 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

then there is this mofo

#29 to #8 - theturkeyburger

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

I really hope these ******* are in gt6

#59 to #29 - redwrench

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/26/2013) [-]

It was in GT5.

#60 to #59 - theturkeyburger

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/26/2013) [-]

I know. I also want them in gt6 because I'm getting a ps4 and gt5 is not on ps4

#38 to #8 - Xyhpon

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

That's a sexy car, a really sexy car.

#52 to #8 - anon id: 35ce07e8

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

The X2011 kinda looks like Caparo T1, don't you think?

#54 to #52 - chaossniper

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

yeah the reversed wing but i think it looks more like a speed boat

#9 to #8 - cryojoker

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

How do you steer it with the wheels covered like that?

#10 to #9 - chaossniper

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

i dont know they get rmoved or something
its not real its aconcept of what could an f1 car be today without limitation and ristrictions (google red bull f1 concept)
what i liked the most is the turbine that drains air from underneath the car so it creates a depression just like the chaparal and theorically let you take turns at +300 km/h

#11 to #10 - burnoutlegend

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

There is a real one. And it turns just the same, there is quite a bit of room in between the wall of the front wheel and the actual tire. Its just covered like that to make it aerodynamic

#5 - mechagodzilla

Reply +25 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

Race cars are ******* badass

#3 - awesomeruben

-13 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#6 to #3 - isbak

Reply +25 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

Old gif?

#22 - mattdoggy

Reply +16 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

#27 to #22 - navadae

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

what the unholy flaming blue balls is this!?

#30 to #27 - Shitthatscrazy

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

He's the first WERECAR

#31 to #30 - navadae

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

here i was thinking the first werecar was Bender but..

apparently not

#28 to #22 - yuukoku

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

His body is ready.

#45 to #22 - lisreal

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

#57 to #45 - yuukoku

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/21/2013) [-]

#26 to #22 - wallacewells

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

dat ass doe.

#1 - radtroll

Reply +7 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

dude this seriously made my day
I love cars

#24 - thehans

Reply +3 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

can anyone tell me why they changed engines so much over the years?
its like. I8, I4, I8, V8, I4, V12, I8, V8, I4, V6, V8 over the years
nascar has always been V8's as far as i know.

#43 to #24 - thascomrad

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

They forgot to show if there were turbos in them or not
<Pic related, turbo v6 from cosworth

#33 to #24 - spcginger

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

it had a lot to do with not only the speed of the motors but the space needed for the motors is dependent on the body style as well as new advancements in the motors along with weight and a lot of different stuff

#25 to #24 - lukewarmpigeon

Reply +6 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

a combination of not being fast enough for spectators, fairness among the drivers ease of maintenence, and safety

#46 - tamu

Reply +5 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

we need to make them faster

#47 to #46 - thereclaimer **User deleted account**

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#55 to #47 - threadz

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

No such thing

#4 - SlowpokeForever

Reply +4 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

A better a look at 1984.

#13 - Firenter

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

Too bad they don't allow those insanely huge engines any more, they look so cool!

#44 to #13 - thascomrad

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

Small engine can go fast aswell. This is a 1.5 liter v6 from cosworth. Made from 850 to 1 000 bhp

#14 to #13 - dedaluminus

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

The engine size restriction has led to some amazing technical advances, though. Go back to 1950 and tell them that you're going to have a car with 750 horsepower, and that the engine will only be 2400cc. They'll die laughing.

#15 to #14 - Firenter

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

Very true, but that can be said about pretty much any technology

#16 to #15 - dedaluminus

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

Then why does my graphing calculator look like it's from the 80's and cost 200 dollars?

#17 to #16 - Firenter

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/20/2013) [-]

If you told a person from the 50 that you have a calculator that has the ability to make complex mathematical equations in a split second and also draw graphs at the size of a small notebook they would think it's impossible...