Evolution of F1 vehicles. .. here it is smoother and without that crappy "sh3dy" watermark asdasdasdasdasd
Anonymous comments allowed.
#12 - thedandude (07/20/2013) [-]
here it is smoother and without that crappy "sh3dy" watermark
here it is smoother and without that crappy "sh3dy" watermark
#48 to #12 - anon (07/20/2013) [-]
The recent ones are able to produce down force more than twice their own weight. They can literally drive upside down. Of course, there are other factors, but nobody is willing to test it out.
#3 - awesomeruben has deleted their comment [-]
#6 to #3 - isbak (07/20/2013) [-]
Old gif?
#22 - mattdoggy (07/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #27 to #22 - navadae ONLINE (07/20/2013) [-]
what the unholy flaming blue balls is this!?
User avatar #30 to #27 - Shitthatscrazy (07/20/2013) [-]
He's the first WERECAR
User avatar #31 to #30 - navadae ONLINE (07/20/2013) [-]
here i was thinking the first werecar was Bender but..

apparently not
User avatar #28 to #22 - yuukoku (07/20/2013) [-]
His body is ready.
#45 to #22 - lisreal (07/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#57 to #45 - yuukoku (07/21/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #26 to #22 - wallacewells (07/20/2013) [-]
dat ass doe.
#8 - chaossniper (07/20/2013) [-]
then there is this mofo
User avatar #29 to #8 - theturkeyburger ONLINE (07/20/2013) [-]
I really hope these ******* are in gt6
User avatar #59 to #29 - redwrench (07/26/2013) [-]
It was in GT5.
User avatar #60 to #59 - theturkeyburger ONLINE (07/26/2013) [-]
I know. I also want them in gt6 because I'm getting a ps4 and gt5 is not on ps4
#38 to #8 - Xyhpon (07/20/2013) [-]
That's a sexy car, a really sexy car.
#52 to #8 - anon (07/20/2013) [-]
The X2011 kinda looks like Caparo T1, don't you think?
User avatar #54 to #52 - chaossniper (07/20/2013) [-]
yeah the reversed wing but i think it looks more like a speed boat
#9 to #8 - cryojoker (07/20/2013) [-]
How do you steer it with the wheels covered like that?
User avatar #10 to #9 - chaossniper (07/20/2013) [-]
i dont know they get rmoved or something
its not real its aconcept of what could an f1 car be today without limitation and ristrictions (google red bull f1 concept)
what i liked the most is the turbine that drains air from underneath the car so it creates a depression just like the chaparal and theorically let you take turns at +300 km/h
User avatar #11 to #10 - burnoutlegend (07/20/2013) [-]
There is a real one. And it turns just the same, there is quite a bit of room in between the wall of the front wheel and the actual tire. Its just covered like that to make it aerodynamic
#5 - mechagodzilla ONLINE (07/20/2013) [-]
Race cars are 			*******		 badass
Race cars are ******* badass
User avatar #24 - thehans (07/20/2013) [-]
can anyone tell me why they changed engines so much over the years?
its like. I8, I4, I8, V8, I4, V12, I8, V8, I4, V6, V8 over the years
nascar has always been V8's as far as i know.
#43 to #24 - thascomrad (07/20/2013) [-]
They forgot to show if there were turbos in them or not
<Pic related, turbo v6 from cosworth
#33 to #24 - spcginger (07/20/2013) [-]
it had a lot to do with not only the speed of the motors but the space needed for the motors is dependent on the body style as well as new advancements in the motors along with weight and a lot of different stuff
User avatar #25 to #24 - lukewarmpigeon (07/20/2013) [-]
a combination of not being fast enough for spectators, fairness among the drivers ease of maintenence, and safety
#46 - tamu (07/20/2013) [-]
we need to make them faster
we need to make them faster
#47 to #46 - thereclaimer **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #55 to #47 - threadz (07/20/2013) [-]
No such thing
#1 - radtroll (07/20/2013) [-]
dude this seriously made my day
I love cars
#4 - SlowpokeForever (07/20/2013) [-]
A better a look at 1984.
User avatar #19 - xXneoXx (07/20/2013) [-]
Anybody play F1 2012? That games freaking hard, its like driving a pickup truck on a race track that goes 200mph
User avatar #42 to #19 - fonestig (07/20/2013) [-]
yes and i find it to not be that hard, i do have a wheel though
User avatar #13 - Firenter (07/20/2013) [-]
Too bad they don't allow those insanely huge engines any more, they look so cool!
#44 to #13 - thascomrad (07/20/2013) [-]
Small engine can go fast aswell. This is a 1.5 liter v6 from cosworth. Made from 850 to 1 000 bhp
User avatar #14 to #13 - dedaluminus (07/20/2013) [-]
The engine size restriction has led to some amazing technical advances, though. Go back to 1950 and tell them that you're going to have a car with 750 horsepower, and that the engine will only be 2400cc. They'll die laughing.
User avatar #15 to #14 - Firenter (07/20/2013) [-]
Very true, but that can be said about pretty much any technology
User avatar #16 to #15 - dedaluminus (07/20/2013) [-]
Then why does my graphing calculator look like it's from the 80's and cost 200 dollars?
User avatar #17 to #16 - Firenter (07/20/2013) [-]
If you told a person from the 50 that you have a calculator that has the ability to make complex mathematical equations in a split second and also draw graphs at the size of a small notebook they would think it's impossible...
#2 - anon (07/20/2013) [-]
reminded me of the intro to wipeout 2048
#51 - addurn (07/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#49 - antigravitycake has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #20 - mrfishie (07/20/2013) [-]
Well at least the wheels stayed round.
User avatar #18 - anonymouzss (07/20/2013) [-]
Has anyone see this new bad boy? Its the lamborghini egoista. Only one is being made.
#7 - anon (07/20/2013) [-]

The Rimac electric super car.

To everyone who thinks that that electric cars aren't awesome, I have one thing to say to you... **** OFF
User avatar #23 to #7 - dedaluminus (07/20/2013) [-]
Electric cars are not awesome. For one thing, that car hasn't been tested by anyone. All the claims about it come directly from the manufacturer, and a startup car company has every reason to lie to attract better investors. But let's take a look at the electric cars we already have. With pure electrics, there are several problems.
1: Battery capacity. Currently, there is not a rechargable energy storage medium that is both energy-dense enough to give an acceptable range and light enough that it doesn't hamper the efficiency of the car just by existing.
2: Charge time. Batteries are not instantly rechargable, and the amount of time it takes to fully charge an electric car ranges between 8 and 24 hours on a wall circuit. There are faster charging methods, but the faster you charge a battery, the more the life of the battery is diminished.
3: Cost. Large battery packs such as those in electric cars use an inordinate amount of batteries. Why, the battery pack in a plug-in prius, when it goes bad, costs 8500 dollars to replace. And it goes bad in 8 years or less. Electric cars are much more expensive, for that reason.
4: Environmental impact: The battery packs contain minerals that are, most commonly, strip mined in china. Strip mining involves literally blowing off the face of a mountain or plateau. Or blowing up a significant section of ground. It's more damaging to the environment than the entire process of drilling for oil, refining it into gas, and burning it in a car, not to mention that the energy that goes into electric cars comes from coal and nuclear plants.
The proper way forward is with cars that use electric motors, but get their power from an on-board hydrogen fuel cell. The only waste product is water, it can be refilled in less than ten minutes, it's no harder to produce than oil, and it's much more energy-dense.
#39 to #23 - jikill (07/20/2013) [-]
UMMM have you heard of Tesla?
User avatar #53 to #39 - dedaluminus (07/20/2013) [-]
I have heard of Tesla. All of the problems listed here apply to the Tesla Roadster, Model S, and Model X as well. They may say that the maximum range is 245 miles, but that's under best-case scenario. Top Gear tested it and came up with about 140 miles on a single charge, and it still took 12 hours to charge after.
 Friends (0)