Getting real tired of your ****

Reply+380

(06/20/2013)[-]

Look, I don't care what you're protesting, you can't just ******* go around blocking traffic. Some people have **** to do, like go to work, or take someone to the hospital.

#25 to #18 - sinonyx

Reply+115

(06/20/2013)[-]

...or put someone in the hospital

#36 to #18 - mmajunkie

Reply+20

(06/20/2013)[-]

Well he could've picked up a few of these guys and taken them to the hospital as well...

#58 to #18 - baaltomekk

Reply+11

(06/20/2013)[-]

Yeah but this was a bit harsh. I would drive at a steady pace so they have time to get out of the way. If not, that's natural selection.

#74 to #58 - tarquinist

Reply+3

(06/20/2013)[-]

He didn't speed up while he was approaching them though, just maintained his speed.

#125 to #74 - EdwardNigma

Reply+8

(06/20/2013)[-]

And a bunch of them actually looked like they went in the way on purpose.

#134 to #125 - baaltomekk

Reply+3

(06/20/2013)[-]

Those are the most ****** up ones. Luckily in both ways, because there is a video of them jumping in front of the car.

#148 to #74 - anon id: cc5f5f8a

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

you can see him speed up pretty clearly dude

#187 to #148 - shadsword

Reply+2

(06/20/2013)[-]

You are seeing his angle change. from the looks of it, he was stuck behind the other car in the gif and decided to go around him. i would guess he making somewhere between 5-10 mph from when he enters the frame to when he hits the line.

#169 to #18 - Zaxplab

Reply+3

(06/20/2013)[-]

Or get to their jobs at the hospital

#7 - Nightelfbane

Reply+67

(06/20/2013)[-]

if i could edit gifs, i would edit "TO THE FRONT PAGE" into this one and then post it in this content's comment section.

#15 to #7 - aerr

Reply+307

(06/20/2013)[-]

The best I could do.

#16 to #15 - Nightelfbane

Reply+20

(06/20/2013)[-]

awesome

like daffydills

#34 to #15 - skaffanl

Reply+10

(06/20/2013)[-]

#91 to #15 - zorororonoa

Reply+5

(06/20/2013)[-]

awesome

#152 to #15 - punnybutsofunny

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

damn, why did your gif loaded faster than the post and looped more than once

#137 to #15 - mashedbacon

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

could you give it starpower as well?

#82 to #15 - rainbowrush

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

Yes

#56 to #15 - Nlulloff

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

you should of added OC to the stopped car and repost to the moving one

#10 to #7 - jimimij

Reply+3

(06/20/2013)[-]

hypnotoadtrance!!! we know you're unemployed and have nothing better to do.

#4 - Sockopolis

Reply+118

(06/20/2013)[-]

You know what? Kudos to him. Those ******* deserve it.

Holding up traffic? What the hell. Some people have **** to do, you stupid hippies.

#57 to #4 - anon id: ab9439b6

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

It's all very well to give some flower-wanking douche a bitch slap or a broken nose, but im not sure about attempted murder... imo

#20 to #4 - rhetoricalfunny

Reply-15

(06/20/2013)[-]

If people just sit silently on the sidelines like an obedient dog no one will listen, cause they have no reason to.

To be heard, you need to scream.

#23 to #20 - foelkera

Reply+34

(06/20/2013)[-]

Those people were probably screaming a lot after they got run over

#22 to #20 - RootBeerLover

Reply+21

(06/20/2013)[-]

then scream on the ******* sidewalk like a normal protester

#39 to #20 - ColorfulPenguin

Reply+6

(06/20/2013)[-]

Yes, because all protesters are supposed to keep the infrastructure from working, because they disagree with something?

#30 to #20 - organiclead

Reply+4

(06/20/2013)[-]

The best way to be heard is to get an innocent bystander fired and associate your cause with annoyance.

#1 - LSone

Reply+105

(06/20/2013)[-]

Needs star power

#21 to #1 - lieutenantshitface**User deleted account**

has deleted their comment [-]

#88 to #21 - sentryram

Reply+3

(06/20/2013)[-]

#38 - johananas

Reply+90

(06/20/2013)[-]

I can't believe this ****!

#2 - doigboiger

Reply+82

(06/20/2013)[-]

that split-second glimpse of an angry old man just makes this better

#3 to #2 - ibishotel

Reply+22

(06/20/2013)[-]

#14 to #3 - nightdude

Reply+14

(06/20/2013)[-]

#19 to #14 - viscerys

Reply+2

(06/20/2013)[-]

A busload?

#26 to #14 - betesta

Reply-2

(06/20/2013)[-]

**betesta rolls 20** And this is where the dubs used to be.

#59 - darthblam#345 on commentsRank#345

Reply+61

(06/20/2013)[-]

#52 - adu

Reply+47

(06/20/2013)[-]

Silly people, red rover is a game you play with humans, not cars!

#40 - lolfire

Reply+41

(06/20/2013)[-]

If that was me in the car I'd do the same thing.

If you're going to stand on the road, you're going to get run down.

#63 to #40 - mynameiskeanu

Reply+12

(06/20/2013)[-]

I lol'd so hard when he knocked the bucket off and there was another one under it

#78 to #63 - topperharly

Reply+3

(06/20/2013)[-]

me too, that was the funniest thing that happened to me today.

#80 to #40 - bullbrigade

Reply+1

(06/20/2013)[-]

Except you wouldn't have the balls, pathetic keyboard lion

#118 to #80 - lolfire

Reply+1

(06/20/2013)[-]

Well, it would involve learning how to drive. Which I should have started last year.

And yeah, I'm pretty confidant if when faced with that prospect that I'd do exactly the same as the guy in the content. You need to stop generalizing everybody on the internet as some autistic 12 year old.

#209 to #118 - bullbrigade

Reply-1

(06/21/2013)[-]

Yeah ok, I'm looking forward to your murder trial.

#210 to #209 - lolfire

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

When it's my safety against the safety of others. I will always choose my safety.

#211 to #210 - vatra

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

The law will see it as choosing to hit people, as the safest action for you would be to sit there. I do think they deserved that though.

#212 to #211 - lolfire

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

The law only requires subjective recklessness.
If I saw my action as self defense due to my knowledge of people getting dragged out of cars and beaten half to death at protests then that would have to be taken into account.
I don't feel a jury would be sympathetic to the protesters if they understood that my reaction was proportionate to the level of threat I was feeling.

#213 to #212 - vatra

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

What you are talking about is called preemptive action, it is considered a baseless defense in court. The prosecutor would ream you in to next Tuesday mercilessly and you'd be found guilty of attempted murder, reckless endangerment and assault with a deadly weapon.

#214 to #213 - lolfire

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

What are you talking about ?
Pre-emptive striking is fully legal;

"There is no rule in law to say that a person must wait to be struck first before they may defend themselves, (see R v Deana, 2 Cr App R 75). "

#216 to #214 - vatra

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

No, but, there has to be probable cause for defense. "Some people get pulled out of cars" is not probable cause. It is a paranoid assumption and will be treated as such. Now If someone was heading towards your car in an aggressive manner, by all means, defend yourself. But without probable cause, you will be considered the aggressor.

#217 to #216 - lolfire

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

Palmer v R 1971 AC 814);

" It will be recognised that a person defending himself cannot weigh to a nicety the exact measure of his defensive action. If the jury thought that that in a moment of unexpected anguish a person attacked had only done what he honestly and instinctively thought necessary, that would be the most potent evidence that only reasonable defensive action had been taken ...

#218 to #217 - vatra

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

You just proved my point for me, thanks mate. "a person attacked" not a person assuming the could be attacked. Anyone can assume the can be attacked at anytime. I could assume the person walking past my house right now is planning to break in and steal my stuff at gun point, that doesn't give me the right to run out there and beat him ********. There has to be proof that you were actually under threat.

#219 to #218 - lolfire

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

That's where the subjective recklessness is concerned.
As long as I had knowledge of people being dragged from cars then that will be taken into account. That's a qualifying trigger for self defense.

#220 to #219 - vatra

Reply0

(06/21/2013)[-]

It really doesn't though, like I said, it is a paranoid assumption which will quickly get you convicted. Proof of that, The case about the murder of travon Martin, the man that killed him, assumed he was up to no good and when Travon tried to get away when contronted, he killed him because he assumed Travon would do something against him, that dude (I can't remember his name) is in prison now. Now back to the scenario we are talking about, the protestors are just walking back and forth in the way of traffic (annoying as ****, but not a danger), none of them are even paying attention to they guy that hit them until he pulls up to run his way through. The only anguish in that situation is coming from the two people being ran over.

#113 to #40 - areuserious

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

>MFW double bucket action

#92 - zorororonoa

Reply+23

(06/20/2013)[-]

everyone is saying how they would have done the same thing. Yeah ******* right, none of us have the balls, admit it

#121 to #92 - anon id: dd3f5388

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

I would do it again you mean..
I hit a few protestors with my four wheeler they were trying to protest infront of my house on the side walk.
My aunt grabbed her hunting rifle but my grandfather stopped her and ripped the gun out of her hands. She was gonna shoot someone, again..

#204 to #121 - anon id: 4f765437

Reply0

(06/20/2013)[-]

i never said this in my life because i think it's stupid and immature, but this time i'm dieing to say it...

'murricah