When there's 9gag watermark on a picture. Sry for long Title and misspelling 9fag. .. I thought we stopped hating on 9gag a year ago. We're starting to become just like them. When there's 9gag watermark on a picture Sry for long Title and misspelling 9fag I thought we stopped hating year ago We're starting to become just like them
Upload
Login or register
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (53)
[ 53 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
26 comments displayed.
#2 - anon
Reply 0
(05/06/2013) [-]
"sry for....misspelling of 9fag"

Hahaha omfg what an original and thought provoking joke! You clever bastard!
#3 to #2 - newfaggotry [OP]
Reply -33
(05/06/2013) [-]
Had to think something witty in the description ;) But my jokes are usually bland and stupid.
#13 to #3 - flixoe
Reply +25
(05/07/2013) [-]
Just do what your Captain says.
Just do what your Captain says.
#55 to #3 - derpycheezenizle
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
username
#23 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
im not sure if you're doing it purposely, but you are the essence of newfaggotry
#29 to #2 - kingsombra
Reply +6
(05/07/2013) [-]
To be honest, this shouldn't be thumbed down.
#7 - shadowfj
Reply +22
(05/06/2013) [-]
I thought we stopped hating on 9gag a year ago. We're starting to become just like them.
#6 - anon
Reply 0
(05/06/2013) [-]
Sad part is, funnyjunk is become more and more similar to 9gag.
#10 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
That's fairly true, but funnyjunk has something 9gag will never have: a kickass comment section
#14 to #10 - flixoe
Reply +15
(05/07/2013) [-]
Have you seen the comments below you? They don't seem too "kickass"
#45 to #14 - admiralen ONLINE
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
probably cause this is one of the worse contents, the good thing about funnyjunk is that if the content is decent or atleast interesting the comment have a big chance to be aswell, more then often the comments are better then the content
#19 to #14 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
We will never get the same kind of population as 9gag has. Where the majority is kids and "leleXDXDXDxDXDXDX:PÖPÖPPPPPP" type of people, unless of course we go mainstream. That is however highly unlikely as there is no reason for the people on 9gag to change unless the site goes down or something.

And if they were to emigrate here it would probably mean they were tired of said "leleleXDXD" humor, and they would not practice it as much anyway. But then again, this site will be the more unknown one until it closes down, just they way i like it.
#27 to #19 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
My god....

Stupidity+clichés+arrogance.
#49 to #6 - limb
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
I wouldn't know i've never been to 9gag...
#11 - moofinbanana
Reply +12
(05/07/2013) [-]
Has watermark: "this is a repost go die in a fire faggot op!!!"   
   
No watermark: "nice job removing the watermark faggot!"   
   
I don't understand anymore...
Has watermark: "this is a repost go die in a fire faggot op!!!"

No watermark: "nice job removing the watermark faggot!"

I don't understand anymore...
#30 to #11 - anon
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
Imo it depends on what kind of watermark you remove... removing watermarks from websites that just steal their content from others is fine with me, but removing an artists watermark is just being an asshole.
#18 - feedmynoob
Reply +5
(05/07/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#38 - niggernazi
Reply +4
(05/07/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#15 - fightforfate
Reply +3
(05/07/2013) [-]
i don't hate the website, just the users
#9 - fireyvoidence ONLINE
Reply +3
(05/07/2013) [-]
Here, this one's better
Here, this one's better
#28 - zorororonoa
Reply +2
(05/07/2013) [-]
MFW people care more about a ******* watermark than the actual quality of the content.
MFW people care more about a ******* watermark than the actual quality of the content.
#43 to #28 - megashot ONLINE
Reply +1
(05/07/2013) [-]
people don't like it because 9gag allways put watermarks on everything,
just the fact that it came from 9gag means it doesn't deserve thumbs and not because of the quality of the content
#31 to #28 - missing
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#24 - emergence **User deleted account**
+2
has deleted their comment [-]
#25 to #24 - gimlithedwarf
Reply 0
(05/07/2013) [-]
None of those sites have watermarks...
#26 to #25 - emergence **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]