Explaining evolution to creationists. via /r/atheism.. Before this starts the regular most athiesm channel posts starts, this is against creationism, not christianity. so calm down and dance your rustled jimmies awa


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - remsaman (02/27/2013) [-]
Before this starts the regular ********* most athiesm channel posts starts, this is against creationism, not christianity. so calm down and dance your rustled jimmies away
#6 to #2 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
what if you are a creationist...
User avatar #7 to #6 - remsaman (02/27/2013) [-]
then why are you looking at posts about athiesm?
#181 to #7 - anon (03/20/2013) [-]
Because you want to get so mad that you stick your dick into your pooper
#81 to #7 - coldactill has deleted their comment [-]
#11 to #2 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
In my experience it's when they say this kinda stuff and put 'christianity' in there somewhere that people get annoyed, so we should be good (except for maybe a few trolls)
#51 - pukki (02/27/2013) [-]
Stop trying to create a 			****		 storm
Stop trying to create a **** storm
#108 to #86 - brinden (02/28/2013) [-]
Despite the fact that this is in the atheist channel there is nothing actually about the content of the post which is about religion. It's about accepting science vs pseudo-science.
Yes its an atheist channel but no where is it shoving the idea of atheism down our throats
#100 to #86 - treborsivad (02/28/2013) [-]
#1 - tyranidcarnifex **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#67 - commentorman ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#21 - jamacanmon (02/27/2013) [-]
Can we stop russlin jimmes and causing ********** for a sec and talk about the real points of interest?

Where is this from?
User avatar #23 to #21 - marinaa (02/27/2013) [-]
From a Croatian tv show called school hour.
User avatar #59 to #23 - eklipsbrate (02/28/2013) [-]
why did she faint?
User avatar #178 to #59 - marinaa (02/28/2013) [-]
Apparently she was sick because the room was stuffy, and she's pregnant if that matters.
#117 - sniffalot (02/28/2013) [-]
Atheism and science are not the same thing. I'm Christian and I don't yell that God curse down the witchcraft of chemistry and I totally believe in evolution. It makes the most sense. Religion and science coexist fine.
User avatar #128 to #117 - secretdestroyers (02/28/2013) [-]
But, you can't really rely on one side too heavily. Even with science, there are a great many theories that can be disproven, as so many have already.

But, I still think there should be a restraining order between religion and government, that just ***** up a lot of things!
#134 to #128 - creepyunclebob (02/28/2013) [-]
I don't think you understand what a scientific theory is. If one is disproven, it's just readjusted so it works again. At any given moment, scientific theories are as correct as it is humanly possible to be.
User avatar #139 to #134 - secretdestroyers (02/28/2013) [-]
I was actually thinking more in terms of schools of thought, particularly in Psychology. For example, how most Freudian theories were disproven by the Humanistic school of thought. They were alrered, but the some original theories of Freud sort of left the field of Psychology.
#171 to #139 - creepyunclebob (02/28/2013) [-]
Freud was pretty damn unscientific, honestly. He came up with whatever ******** sounded good and then fudged his results to fit it.
User avatar #172 to #171 - secretdestroyers (02/28/2013) [-]
Probably sounded legit at the time, until everyone realized that at no point in their lives were they ever, EVER in love with their mother!
User avatar #167 to #117 - scrapiron (02/28/2013) [-]
I'm with you. Most science professors I have met are religious because you get to a point where you find out that things just happen. That doesn't mean there is no explanation, but there is no justifiable reason (yet). Example: Einstein was very religious, but did not dispute science or base it off of his religion.
User avatar #118 to #117 - thelastamerican ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Shhhh. Don't let them know the secret.
User avatar #131 to #117 - gibroner (02/28/2013) [-]
well he did say creationist not christian which would denote they don't believe in evolution
User avatar #53 - ireallylikepotatoe ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Science =/= Atheism.

Christians can believe in evolution you know.
#160 to #53 - anewerbeggining (02/28/2013) [-]
Creationalists =/= Christianity
User avatar #179 to #160 - ireallylikepotatoe ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Yeah I know that, but this is in the Atheist channel. Implying that only Athiests can believe it.
#72 to #53 - prettyfire (02/28/2013) [-]
Christians, yes. Creationists, it would probably be really hard to fit both of those concepts in your head, both as truths.
#40 - adambubba (02/27/2013) [-]
This channel is so cool and is totally run by awesome nice people.
User avatar #116 - mostlyshits (02/28/2013) [-]
Hey, atheistfag here
can we stop with all the ******* athiest posts on the front page?
really putting a damper on my viewing experience
#68 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
since everything is so easy to come by with science-
soon enough the average layman wont know how to perform simple mathematics without a calculator, whilst eels shock enemies with electricity and snakes inject venom into prey. it is the obstacles in life which makes us truly grow strong

what will be of us when our biggest obstacles are how to reach a bus stop in the morning without getting so tired

science is double edged, just like everything else in life
User avatar #74 to #68 - retardxatxlarge (02/28/2013) [-]
I think you've misunderstood your terms. You say science, but I think what you meant was technology.
User avatar #83 to #74 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
hmm maybe I have. those two terms are very interdependent though arent they.. i may as well be saying 'science'
User avatar #90 to #83 - retardxatxlarge (02/28/2013) [-]
I see what you mean. I guess you could say that science must be present in technology, but technology isn't always necessarily present in science.
User avatar #84 to #68 - Jimminycracker (02/28/2013) [-]
along with your obvious confusion between science and technology I think you;e confusing "layman" with " ******* retard".
User avatar #89 to #84 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
no no, think about it. my brother's not a retard, but he much prefers to have things done for him than for him to do things himself.
it is natural.
our body actually finds the most efficient ways to get **** done naturally.
however, letting someone else (or someTHING else in this case) do all the work means youre not actually gaining anything, possibly by the end we will all be ' ******* retards' unless we assume control of ourselves
User avatar #91 to #89 - Jimminycracker (02/28/2013) [-]
allow me to replace " ******* retard" with "lazy cunt". Math is half my job but most of the time I'd rather work it out myself than use a calculator.
User avatar #98 to #91 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
same with me. i enjoy walking everywhere instead of driving/taking a bus.
it doesnt make other people lazy if they dont enjoy walking... i think?

its just, that is life, people need to deal with things instead of having the choice, thats the way we actually discover things we didnt know about ourselves and improve/evolve in general
User avatar #103 to #98 - Jimminycracker (02/28/2013) [-]
evolution isn't necessarily improvement or vice versa.
User avatar #106 to #103 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
i dont know about you, but i would rather be a fit, fast and healthy than fat, slow and diseased. not necessarily evolution but surely you finally get where im coming from!!!!!!?
#140 to #89 - workitout (02/28/2013) [-]
That's natural selection working. His lazy nature and tendencies can lead to health issues like diabetes and heart disease. Because of our advancement in medicine and technology, we can keep people like this alive long enough to procreate. This wouldn't be the case 2,000 years ago. If you were lazy and careless, you died.
User avatar #147 to #140 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
no one wants to die. if you were lazy back in those days you would change that **** .
User avatar #150 to #147 - workitout (02/28/2013) [-]
How could you know your lazy tendencies were dangerous to you until you were already facing death?
User avatar #152 to #150 - lolzordz (02/28/2013) [-]
cos lazy tendencies come from being given the choice to be lazy. as i explained earlier..

if there is no way to be lazy then no one would be lazy. this is my whole point from the start.
User avatar #153 to #152 - workitout (02/28/2013) [-]
There are always ways to be lazy. No matter what you are doing there is always the choice to do something half-assed or just not at all.
#54 - weenieandthebutt (02/28/2013) [-]
Seriously, science /= atheism. Science and religion do mix actually.
Seriously, science /= atheism. Science and religion do mix actually.
#63 to #54 - anon (02/28/2013) [-]
I think mix is a bad way to put it, because that assumes that empirical and non-empirical practices are the same thing. I would say "co-exists peacefully" is a better way to describe such a relationship.
User avatar #76 to #63 - shaddz ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
gotta agree with the anon here, just because you can put up with both does not make it any more right mate
User avatar #158 - rmoran (02/28/2013) [-]
>via /r/atheism
I knew this channel was maintained by those *******
#157 - frienderman (02/28/2013) [-]
I love this gif.   
It's from Carl Sagan's TV series from the 80's called "Cosmos"   
Wonderful show; I highly recommend it.
I love this gif.

It's from Carl Sagan's TV series from the 80's called "Cosmos"
Wonderful show; I highly recommend it.
#66 - thebronykindthree **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #28 - HungrHungryNomad (02/27/2013) [-]
She looks like she just had the best orgasm ever
#5 - anon (02/27/2013) [-]
She looks like the chick from neds declassified I dont remember her name though
#9 to #5 - mezzjuc (02/27/2013) [-]
Moose, her name was Moose.
#10 to #9 - mezzjuc (02/27/2013) [-]
Or was it Mouse? I'm uncertain now!
User avatar #12 to #10 - melontwilight (02/27/2013) [-]
#97 to #12 - hillbillypowpow ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
No, that'd be ridiculous.
User avatar #30 - filozof (02/27/2013) [-]
She's a Croatian show host. This is a kids/teen show about science and urban culture.
The doctors say she had low blood sugar and that's why she fainted. There was no injury and her baby is fine, too

>insert themoreyou_know.jpg
#85 to #30 - prettyfire (02/28/2013) [-]
who's a croatian show host? AH SSO CONFUS
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)