Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#15 - GraffnTrix (02/26/2013) [-]
No need to put Celcius in the title. Minus 40 degrees Celcius is the same as Minus 40 degrees Fahrenheit; this is the only temperature where that happens.
#286 to #15 - exarzero (02/27/2013) [-]
**exarzero rolled a random image posted in comment #3287899 at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. **

My face when SCIENCE!
User avatar #282 to #15 - johnsmithington ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
It might've been -40 Kelvin though. Y'know, due to the windchill factor.
User avatar #341 to #282 - johnsmithington ONLINE (02/28/2013) [-]
Nobody gets me anymore :(
User avatar #327 to #282 - JasonBourne (02/27/2013) [-]
As stupid as you just sounded I'm thumbing you up anyway because that made me nearly laugh myself unconscious.
#317 to #282 - XanicLyoka (02/27/2013) [-]
0 degrees Kelvin is absolute zero. There is no negative on the Kelvin scale.
#329 to #317 - garnykins ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
Didn't someone create a gas that goes below absolute zero, effectively creating a 'negative' Kelvin?
User avatar #332 to #329 - glasgowrangers (02/27/2013) [-]
Im not an expert but i doubt it

Everything needs energy to exist, if you have something at zero kelvin it ceases to exist. So to be below Kelvin, i would find that rather extraodinary. Although if you found a source i'd be interested in reading it
User avatar #330 to #329 - ningyoaijin (02/27/2013) [-]
Not exactly sure how they did it, but I think it was an imaginary temperature. Like, they were able to induce an electron to leave its place within a substance, and the resulting hole has a small proportion of the temperature, but since it's a hole and not a real particle, its properties are considered the opposite of those of the particle, hence the negative temperature. Or something like that.
User avatar #316 to #282 - bigbeaufort (02/27/2013) [-]
-40 Kelvin would ******* kill you in a fraction of a second. To put it into perspective: 0 degrees Kelvin is equal to -273 degrees Celsius
#241 to #15 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
What about Kelvin, also you do need to specify the unit of measurement, or it could be -40 elephants.
User avatar #315 to #241 - sefyu (02/27/2013) [-]
Kelvin can't be negative bro
#227 to #15 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
**** your **** bitch
#199 to #15 - luquaz (02/27/2013) [-]
Indeed. However, Celsius is far superior in every way, shape and form so people should start using it cross the board.

pic related. it's anders celsius..
#294 to #199 - taurusguy (02/27/2013) [-]
Why not use Kelvin? That is a good way to measure **** . (jk though Celsius is fine...)
#190 to #15 - ishotthedeputy (02/27/2013) [-]
What if he meant -40 Kelvin? Then there'd be a whole different point of the content
What if he meant -40 Kelvin? Then there'd be a whole different point of the content
User avatar #206 to #190 - suponion (02/27/2013) [-]
-40 degrees Kelvin doesn't exist
#267 to #206 - nengcaste **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #318 to #267 - brenton (02/27/2013) [-]
That makes no sense whatsoever. 0K means the molecules are perfectly still. The molecules can't go any slower than complete stillness, so negative Kelvin can't exist.
#337 to #318 - nengcaste **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #340 to #337 - brenton (02/28/2013) [-]
I just graduated with a Bachelor's in Cellular Biology and a minor in Public Health. I was also just accepted into Pharmacy school, so I think I would know my physics and my chemistry. Temperature is a measure of the amount of energy a substance has, measured by the movement of particles.

Oh, and **** you for deleting your account for fear of being wrong. Pussy.
#232 to #206 - anonymous (02/27/2013) [-]
Actually, molecules have been found that have a temperature below absolute zero.
User avatar #313 to #232 - thatguyuknowtheone (02/27/2013) [-]
there is no point in measuring temperature below 0 K because the net kinetic energy is so low its essentially like the particles aren't moving all or it is inadmissible
User avatar #262 to #232 - infamoustrapper (02/27/2013) [-]
...no. because that doesnt make any sense. like its not even that its like hard to obtain, you just cant. thats not how kelvin work. good job going anon on that one though
#209 to #206 - jmillenium (02/27/2013) [-]
I believe that's the point... I believe
User avatar #202 to #190 - rectophobia ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
> -40 kelvin
User avatar #182 to #15 - waaw (02/27/2013) [-]
What if it was measured in Delisle?
User avatar #44 to #15 - creyap (02/27/2013) [-]
well you never know, it could've been measured in kelvin
User avatar #94 to #44 - greenthegunstar (02/27/2013) [-]
Kelvin doesn't go below zero...That's what we call absolute zero.
#50 to #44 - khazix (02/27/2013) [-]
User avatar #46 to #44 - novren (02/27/2013) [-]
negative Kelvin degrees. of course. you must be a genius.
#328 to #46 - madebynorwegians (02/27/2013) [-]
Must be damn cold then, lets see... -313 celsius if it is -40 kelvin, daaamn
User avatar #215 to #46 - coolcalx (02/27/2013) [-]
it bothers me that you said "Kelvin degrees"

it's just Kelvin. There's no "degrees"
User avatar #323 to #215 - novren (02/27/2013) [-]
you're right, I didn't realize then. sorry.
User avatar #326 to #323 - coolcalx (02/27/2013) [-]
it's okay
#197 to #46 - pheonixinstinct (02/27/2013) [-]
it came to me in a dream
#208 to #197 - hentailovers (02/27/2013) [-]
and it left me in another dream
#129 to #46 - gargman (02/27/2013) [-]
While I do agree with you that Creyap is retarded,
Scientists have indeed been able to induce negative kelvin temperatures
#141 to #129 - fractalius (02/27/2013) [-]
That's not possible. The author is misusing terms to claim "negative" temperature in Kelvin.

0K (Zero Kelvin) is ABSOLUTE ZERO. There is no heat energy whatsoever. You cannot have negative quantities of anything, Kelving is a measure of heat energy. Zero kelvin means that the molecules are not moving at all, if there truly was negative degrees kelvin, that would mean negative energy, which would mean the Law of Conservation has been disproven, which would cause probably the biggest scientifical ********* since the heliocentric theorey.
User avatar #49 to #46 - creyap (02/27/2013) [-]
must be pretty cold
User avatar #54 to #49 - novren (02/27/2013) [-]
nah, I can handle it in shorts and a shirt. cold is just a mental state.
User avatar #60 to #54 - bagguhsleep (02/27/2013) [-]
Especially because shorts are so comfy and easy to wear.
#63 to #60 - novren (02/27/2013) [-]
I was actually expecting that someone would say that.
I was actually expecting that someone would say that.
User avatar #28 to #15 - kallebanan (02/26/2013) [-]
Which goes to show how retarded Fahrenheit sounds too me. Might you know why it is exponential in shape?
#324 to #28 - thelegitmetalhead has deleted their comment [-]
#130 to #28 - airforceman ONLINE (02/27/2013) [-]
Fahrenheit was created based on the human body. But, when it was created, the measurements were off by a couple of degrees. This is why the medical field is really the only field to still use Fahrenheit, at least in America.
User avatar #78 to #28 - ickalanda (02/27/2013) [-]
It's not exponential in shape. The difference between two degrees in Fahrenheit is smaller than the difference between two degrees in Celsius. So while they are two linear lines, they are not parallel and must intersect at a point.
User avatar #18 to #15 - TarnRazor (02/26/2013) [-]
Why the hell were you thumbed down? You're absolutely right
User avatar #224 to #18 - rockamekishiko (02/27/2013) [-]
a bunch of retards. as soon as you say that people thumbed him up.
User avatar #263 to #224 - jetpistol (02/27/2013) [-]
That was probably because #1 said the same
 Friends (0)