Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
8 comments displayed.
#45 - kettz
Reply +37
(02/26/2013) [-]
I don't get why they chose Seth MacFarlane for this and expected him to be this sophisticated man who'd make it great, they know what he stands for and what he loves to do.

It's like they chose him just for the pure **** of it so they could write **** about him in the news later.
Seth MacFarlane is a great man, in his own way, they even said that before they even let him have the job, he was pretty 'unfunny' to them, so why!? I actually regret not watching the oscars just to watch Seth MacFarlane be awesome.
#62 to #45 - mruserfj
Reply +2
(02/26/2013) [-]
They wanted to combine the formality of the oscars with a sleek edginess that would attract a wider audience and provide a different kind of humour. Hence, a man in a tuxedo insulting everyone
#49 to #45 - sabdoor ONLINE
Reply +1
(02/26/2013) [-]
Because he's the only "comedian" who would work cheap enough
#48 to #45 - lordbrutaleddie
Reply +5
(02/26/2013) [-]
It's the same with British awards.

They hired Ricky Gervais to host it, And he just tore all the actors to shreds.
#64 to #48 - hansaya **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#72 to #64 - lordbrutaleddie
Reply +1
(02/26/2013) [-]
Not the Brit awards, I just meant some awards ceremony in Britain.

I don't know which one though
#74 to #72 - hansaya **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#47 to #45 - anon
Reply 0
(02/26/2013) [-]
its pretty obvious he was asked to do it to attract a new younger demographic and somewhat reinvent the oscars