Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #6 - morbidman
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(02/15/2013) [-]
They say it was a 10m-ish rock that exploded 40-50km up in the sky with the same intensity as a small nuclear device...

Man, I would **** a ******* snowman if my breakfast was interrupted by all the windows exploding in my ******* face... ****...
User avatar #8 to #6 - thisspaceexists
Reply -63 123456789123345869
(02/15/2013) [-]
Just what Russia needs. More radiation.
User avatar #10 to #8 - fosforgasxiii
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(02/15/2013) [-]
Because he said that the meteor exploded with the same intensity as a small nuclear device doesn't mean that there is radiation coming from the meteor. It just produced the same amount of energy.
User avatar #147 to #10 - friendlysniff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
Objects that are in space for long periods of time accumulate large amounts of radiation.
#94 to #10 - anon id: 5abbe820
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
Actually, it produced a lot of radiation, its just that nearly all of it was infrared and visible light.
User avatar #11 to #10 - thisspaceexists
Reply -63 123456789123345869
(02/15/2013) [-]
It was a joke. Calm down Mr. Literal.
#46 to #11 - nosauceforyou
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#15 to #11 - newcoolusername
Reply +66 123456789123345869
(02/15/2013) [-]
"Oh no, I said something stupid. Better tell them I was joking."
User avatar #101 to #15 - defensive
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
It was clearly told as a joke. You know, making fun of Chernobyl. Because no one on the internet ever makes jokes right.
#131 to #101 - hillbillypowpow
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
no need to be so defensive of this guy
User avatar #132 to #131 - defensive
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
Oh ****, twice on one comment.
#133 to #132 - hillbillypowpow
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
I only realized it after i had typed it.
You knew what you were getting yourself into when you made this account
User avatar #134 to #133 - defensive
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
I knew people would say defensive, but not on this magnitude
User avatar #111 to #101 - xplosevdiarrhea
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
No need to be...defensive.
User avatar #113 to #111 - defensive
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
Oh boy, never heard that one before.
User avatar #118 to #113 - xplosevdiarrhea
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
Your account is only six days old and I'm sure you're already tired of it. And that's before all the mention notifications you probably get.
User avatar #119 to #118 - defensive
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/16/2013) [-]
I get it at least 3 times a day.