Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - DmOnZ ONLINE (01/22/2013) [-]
For christ's sake... it's not an insane law. What's insane is you people in the US vouching for the possession of weapons with high capacity mags and rounds that are specifically designed for killing PEOPLE. I own several guns and I agree that removing all firearms would be ******* retarded, but if you would just sit and listen to the things being proposed, and didn't shove your fingers in your ears shouting "la, la, la I can't hear you" every time the topic of gun CONTROL (not prohibition) was brought up, you'd see it's just what America needs to curb the uprising of violent assaults with guns. You do NOT need a 100 round magazine that holds NATO rounds. You do NOT need the right to purchase a fully automatic rifle (you can do so pretty easily via grandfathering) and you most certainly do NOT need the right to go out and purchase a firearm without an intense and scrutinous background check. I agree that the previous laws about assault weapons are screwy and should be revised... but honestly? You guys who vouch for the civilian possession of military grade munitions are a disgrace to gun owners, sports men and hunters not just around the world, but also in your own country. Pull your head out of your ass and act like grown ups.
User avatar #97 to #32 - sketchE ONLINE (01/22/2013) [-]
i buy military style weapons shooting military grade rounds because its fun. i go out to an unmanned range int the mountains set up a target and destroy it. its fun as hell. 22s are only fun for so long before you want something with a little more kick in your shoulder. and theres nothing like taking a thompson with 45 acps and lighting an old abandoned car up
#90 to #32 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
You're absolutely right and I agree with you. These 12 year-old rednecks make us look retarded.
User avatar #33 to #32 - donthepotato (01/22/2013) [-]
What round isn't designed for killing other than less than lethals?
User avatar #35 to #33 - donthepotato (01/22/2013) [-]
Side note I'm not agreeing with banning guns/hi-cap mags because you can carry more than one magazine. I was just asking for a round designed not to kill.
User avatar #36 to #35 - DmOnZ ONLINE (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm specifically talking about rounds that were designed to kill PEOPLE. NATO rounds are made to effectively kill people.
User avatar #61 to #36 - thatguywhohasbacon ONLINE (01/22/2013) [-]
So a .50 cal is good then? It wasn't made to kill people, it was made to punch through engine blocks. We should all use those for hunting!
#39 to #36 - anon (01/22/2013) [-]
all rounds are made to kill things....
if it can kill a deer it can kill a ******* human there is no difference guns can kill anything.
You can kill someone with a beanbag gun you just have to know how.
User avatar #37 to #36 - donthepotato (01/22/2013) [-]
Effectively as in powder loads the actual round and not the casing right?
 Friends (0)