Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#142 - nocnovus
Reply +25
(08/07/2012) [-]
mmm tanks
#187 to #142 - archosaurusrev
Reply 0
(08/07/2012) [-]
Those are BTR's.

APC's, not tanks.
#205 to #187 - nocnovus
Reply 0
(08/07/2012) [-]
well...i feel a bit silly now....
#176 to #142 - urghseventysix
Reply +1
(08/07/2012) [-]
One more, but would be flagged: tinyurl.com/9chaah6
#171 to #142 - urghseventysix
Reply +2
(08/07/2012) [-]
#181 to #171 - wastelandgunner
Reply +16
(08/07/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, but I thought that was a baby getting ********** for a good three minutes.
#168 to #142 - urghseventysix
Reply +1
(08/07/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#158 to #142 - artyommetro
Reply +15
(08/07/2012) [-]
#215 to #158 - npfortytwo
Reply +6
(08/07/2012) [-]
American army, under-equipped?
MFW
#189 to #158 - archosaurusrev
Reply +1
(08/07/2012) [-]
Its ironic because even the Gulf War M1 couldn't be completely taken out by anything, who knows how strong they are now.

Even the M1A1 HA, which is old, is super armored.
#242 to #189 - insaneguy
Reply 0
(08/07/2012) [-]
t-90.... just sayin'   
   
also, bacon
t-90.... just sayin'

also, bacon
#244 to #242 - archosaurusrev
Reply 0
(08/07/2012) [-]
I doubt the T-90 could take on an M1A2.

Now, a T-80 with some modernisation...