Fourth dimension. Part 2. Tesseract... isn't fourth dimension supposed to be time?
x
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - kirkbot (03/18/2012) [-]
isn't fourth dimension supposed to be time?
User avatar #2 to #1 - boneknight (03/18/2012) [-]
yes and no
#5 to #2 - anon (03/18/2012) [-]
**anonymous rolled a random image posted in comment #11264 at Roll a picture, draw it ** sadly no one can comprehend a dimension above our own thereby turning any study of said dimension into a paradox
User avatar #3 to #1 - electrozz (03/18/2012) [-]
Based on some theories, yes. Based on other theories, we live in the third dimension. Based on yet other theories, we are in the sixth. There is no way to know for sure, but I like to go with the ones that say we live in the third.
The more you know.png
User avatar #4 to #3 - kirkbot (03/18/2012) [-]
well if we conclude time as fourth dimension, i would say we live at least in fourth
based on theories i am familiar with i would also say we are in fifth or sixth dimension
but then again that doesn't really matter at all ^^
#6 to #4 - electrozz (03/18/2012) [-]
Comment Picture

User avatar #18 - chiefmartinbrody (05/23/2012) [-]
Hey, looky there, a 4-cube
User avatar #19 to #18 - electrozz (05/23/2012) [-]
tesseract.
User avatar #20 to #19 - chiefmartinbrody (05/23/2012) [-]
Yes, also known as a 4-cube, or a 4D hypercube. This simple rotation is nice, but you should see rotations about multiple orthogonal planes.
User avatar #21 to #20 - electrozz (05/23/2012) [-]
I have. They are very cool.
User avatar #14 - newmitch (03/19/2012) [-]
this is not 4D because it was made by..... guess what? a 3D computer modeling program and the fourth dimension cannot be observed by anything living in a 3D world as it cannot comprehend or freely move within said dimension ie. we can't move along a 2D plane because we cannot truly perceive it as we can replicate how a 2D plane would look and how points and laws of geometric 2D shapes would be but 2D shapes cannot exist in a 3D world. If we evolved into a 2D world instead we would perceive the 3rd dimension and we do the fourth AKA TIME and so on as each dimension slowly fills the gap between the last as we are trying to do with "time travel" but as someone had posted before me said would lead to paradoxes and would not work, like meeting your self, you would be replicating your atoms into a different time which would be not creating but adding mass leading to your past/future self to not exist but this woud nearly be impossible. Another example (if you already didnt break time lol joke btw) if you go back in time to stop yourself from going back in time what would happen? if you read thank you and sorry grammer nazi's i know ive done you wrong by this post (lol no period)
User avatar #15 to #14 - newmitch (03/19/2012) [-]
the "and" after the "3rd dimension" should have been "as"
User avatar #16 to #14 - electrozz (03/19/2012) [-]
No **** Sherlock homeless
User avatar #17 to #16 - newmitch (03/19/2012) [-]
just because my names sherlock doesnt mean im.....oh i guess i am never mind...
#12 - futamoocao (03/18/2012) [-]
As seen on Adventure time.
User avatar #13 to #12 - electrozz (03/18/2012) [-]
It's called a tesseract. Whoever the writer was, he read my black hole theory.
#7 - anon (03/18/2012) [-]
its cool, but its not 4D, a 4D object travelling through our 3D world will look like nothing > small weird object warping to many unfamiliar shapes > big weird object warping to many unfamiliar shapes > small weird object warping to many unfamiliar shapes > nothing.
 Friends (0)