Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#294 - crutos ONLINE
Reply +6
(11/11/2013) [-]
I think what the OP means is that we should stop with the ******** kind of equality where a business has to put X% of women in the top positions because of "equality", whether or not they are actually the best qualified candidate.

Same goes for hiring blacks over whites even if they are under-qualified because the job needs more "diversity" and "equality".
#305 to #294 - Shiny
Reply 0
(11/11/2013) [-]
This is already completely illegal, and has been for a long time, at least in the US.
#309 to #305 - crutos ONLINE
Reply 0
(11/11/2013) [-]
well I believe that here in Denmark we actually have a law which states that women has to have x% of all top positions.. And it is a progessive trend here in the west that if you a business doesn't hire enough blacks they're accused of racism, or is afraid to be labeled racist.
#311 to #309 - Shiny
Reply 0
(11/11/2013) [-]
Well, can't speak for you, then. I'd imagine it's pointless since if the business owners actually are prejudiced, they'll intentionally hire underqualified women and minorities so they can remain in charge.