Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#2 - crazyolitis
Reply +69
(11/10/2013) [-]
We can never all be equal, but I think that we should all at least be given equal chances.
#15 to #2 - anon
Reply 0
(11/10/2013) [-]
given by whom? the government?
should the people who don't need the government's help also be forced to have their chances reduced for the sake of equal chances?
#18 to #15 - crazyolitis
Reply 0
(11/10/2013) [-]
No, chances as in being given the chance to prove that you can handle, let's say education. Those that are smarter will go to the higher levels, while those that are not as smart are going to the lower levels. However, it should not be predetermined where a child will go to.
#4 to #2 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -5
(11/10/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#5 to #4 - crazyolitis
Reply 0
(11/10/2013) [-]
...What's so funny?
#8 to #5 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -7
(11/10/2013) [-]
Your comment.
#9 to #8 - crazyolitis
Reply 0
(11/10/2013) [-]
What is funny about it?
#12 to #9 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -8
(11/10/2013) [-]
What you said.
#13 to #12 - crazyolitis
Reply 0
(11/10/2013) [-]
...
#14 to #13 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -8
(11/10/2013) [-]
Oh well, you will learn some day.
#23 to #14 - atomicman
Reply +7
(11/10/2013) [-]
I sure hope he won't learn. Because nothing is clever about you as far as im concerned.
I sure hope he won't learn. Because nothing is clever about you as far as im concerned.
#24 to #23 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -7
(11/10/2013) [-]
Are you trying to insult me?
Are you trying to insult me?
#25 to #24 - atomicman
Reply +4
(11/10/2013) [-]
Trying to make you realise you're not witty.
#26 to #25 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -8
(11/10/2013) [-]
Well, you are not doing a good job.
#27 to #26 - atomicman
Reply +3
(11/10/2013) [-]
I can't possibly I suppose, for you're not clever enough to realise much in first place.
Am I trying hard enough?
#29 to #27 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -6
(11/10/2013) [-]
Tell me young god of wisdom, what is my mistake?
#30 to #29 - atomicman
Reply +3
(11/10/2013) [-]
I thought you meant that you can't achieve total equallity anyway-and you started kind of making a fool of crazyolitis. Which I think is stooped as you can at least try instead of thinking 'aint gun work anyway'.
#31 to #30 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -5
(11/10/2013) [-]
My gosh, I shure don't know why?
I've got a folder full of these.
#32 to #31 - atomicman
Reply +4
(11/10/2013) [-]
niga u srs. That has more to do with the fact that they live in environments less suited for raising childeren than anything else.

There aint no criminal-gene or something
#37 to #32 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -4
(11/10/2013) [-]
#72 to #37 - anon
Reply 0
(11/11/2013) [-]
And yet the LSAT scores for Puerto Ricans are higher for middle than for upper-middle and higher, so maybe intelligence and LSAT scores don't have a linear correlation?

Also, using LSAT scores to prove intelligence? Why don't you use a more standardized test like IQ (and use a more recent set of IQ scores please, nothing from the early 1900s) or even college GPAs?

And statistically significant differences usually only matter that much when we're talking at least 2 SDs away from the mean (or in this case, the white mean). In fact, in your LSAT example, you really only have a case if the distances between white scores and black scores are statistically significant in difference

I think you might be one of those folks who likes to find charts on the internet to prove your bias, instead of those actually interested in the facts.
#188 to #72 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#172 to #72 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#171 to #72 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#35 to #32 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -4
(11/10/2013) [-]
#105 to #35 - alltimetens
Reply +1
(11/11/2013) [-]
You obviously have never heard of the 1980s crack epidemic. There's a reason why certain races commit more crime than others. I suppose thick-skulled and ignorant people are unable to comprehend that.
#187 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#186 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#185 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#184 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#191 to #184 - dandyhandycandy
+1
(11/11/2013) [-]
www.cdc.gov/nchs/datawh/statab/pubd/2319_69.htm

It would appear that link needs nowhere.
#183 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#182 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#181 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#180 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#179 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#178 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#177 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#176 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#175 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -2
(11/11/2013) [-]
#174 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -3
(11/11/2013) [-]
#173 to #105 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -3
(11/11/2013) [-]
I like alltimetens. Especially the way you edit videos.
#34 to #32 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -4
(11/10/2013) [-]
Explain your stupid comment please.
#36 to #34 - atomicman
Reply +2
(11/10/2013) [-]
Oh I missread the graph. Thought it said criminal rates or something.
Done talking to you though, you're more annoying than my stuck zipper which I've still not fixed because I forget about it everytime
#38 to #36 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -5
(11/10/2013) [-]
Run little liberal, run while you can.
#244 to #38 - excentric
+2
(11/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#33 to #32 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -5
(11/10/2013) [-]
>top kek
#28 to #27 - schnizel ONLINE
Reply -6
(11/10/2013) [-]
hueuheuheuheuheuh
hueuheuheuheuheuh