Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#7 - wretchedlarva
Reply +29
(02/10/2014) [-]
This can't be legal. Someone please prove me wrong.
#84 to #7 - timelordjam
Reply +1
(02/11/2014) [-]
I am starbucks brother and laws cousin. is very real
#30 to #7 - rollmeanddie
Reply +9
(02/10/2014) [-]
I am Manuela's fourth leg and I can confirm this is legal.
#31 to #30 - wretchedlarva
Reply 0
(02/10/2014) [-]
I wish I could give you 100 thumbs up.
#33 to #31 - rollmeanddie
Reply 0
(02/10/2014) [-]
I wish we could be together, but alas, I am but a lowly manwhore.
#34 to #33 - wretchedlarva
Reply +1
(02/10/2014) [-]
please add my on skype i want to love you. message me <3
#38 to #34 - rollmeanddie
Reply 0
(02/10/2014) [-]
I fear I am in the middle of moving and have only my phone, but I shall return for thee!
#39 to #38 - wretchedlarva
Reply +1
(02/10/2014) [-]
please do, i love you 5ever lets get married pls
#42 to #39 - rollmeanddie
Reply +1
(02/10/2014) [-]
I must finish my quest, my sweet, but I swear that once I have slain the dragon of Bonecap Mountain, we'll be wed that day's morrow, and the beast's head will hang above our mantle!
#8 to #7 - lordgeneral
Reply +242
(02/10/2014) [-]
lawschool student here. it's legal.
#95 to #8 - pkrbarmovie
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
How could someone discredit that argument? I wonder how come a "lawschool" student can not know what "prove" means...
#82 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
NO IT ISN'T THAT IS ******** NO COURT WOULD CONCLUDE THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY USING THE LOGO AS A PARODY AND EVEN IF THEY WERE YOU CAN'T USE PARODIES LIKE THAT. YOU CAN'T JUST SAY IT'S A PARODY AND HAVE A JUDGE OR JURY BELIEVE YOU. THIS IS ******** STOP THUMBING IT UP YOU IDIOTS.
#71 to #8 - iamundecided ONLINE
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
How can you be in law school AND be on fj at the same time?
Lawyered
-Aspiring law student.
#64 to #8 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
Another law student: actually, this specific case probably isn't. this document is pretty damning. It clearly shows that their actual intent isn't a parody. while parody use in general is legal, you have to meet certain standards of proof and this clearly cuts against it. if anyone is actually interested there's a case about vanna white and a parody robot likeness of her. You need to login to view this link
#25 to #8 - robotekk
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#50 to #25 - kuchikirukia
Reply +7
(02/10/2014) [-]
As someone who comes from anywhere on the internet, I can confirm I'm a moron.
#9 to #8 - wretchedlarva
Reply 0
(02/10/2014) [-]
What about when Apple sued all those people for "copying"? What about Flappy Bird and Nintendo? How is this different? I know it's "parody" but it sounds like an excuse.
#112 to #9 - dangaddy
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
flappy bird thing is wrong, you ******* retard
#10 to #9 - lordgeneral
Reply +2
(02/10/2014) [-]
the apple suit wasn't presented as parody, and flappy bird is owned by nintendo. any further questions?
#12 to #10 - wretchedlarva
Reply 0
(02/10/2014) [-]
Pretty sure Flappy Bird was sued because of the Mario pipes.
#62 to #13 - anon
Reply 0
(02/11/2014) [-]
They didnt own nor buy it, they just didn't care - but the creator got affraid that if he had too much success he would be facing them later in life
#11 to #10 - wretchedlarva
Reply +5
(02/10/2014) [-]
Flappy Bird is owned by Nintendo? wut
#23 to #11 - tubaplayah
Reply +6
(02/10/2014) [-]
Actually the the creator of Flappy bird deleted it. He was based in Korea With no affiliation to any major Gaming corporation.