dumb starbucks. .. Judge's face when this comes up in court
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

dumb starbucks

  • Recommend tagsx
+1683
Views: 52794
Favorited: 218
Submitted: 02/10/2014
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to mrmojito E-mail to friend submit to reddit

Comments(167):

[ 167 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - anonymous (02/10/2014) [+] (31 replies)
stickied by mrmojito
lets create dumbfunnyjunk
User avatar #7 - wretchedlarva (02/10/2014) [+] (23 replies)
This can't be legal. Someone please prove me wrong.
User avatar #8 to #7 - lordgeneral (02/10/2014) [-]
lawschool student here. it's legal.
#57 - Jesusnipples ONLINE (02/10/2014) [-]
Judge's face when this comes up in court
User avatar #24 - gammajk ONLINE (02/10/2014) [+] (3 replies)
Gee, thanks for completely abusing fair use.
User avatar #85 - inanimateobject (02/11/2014) [-]
I'm excited for ******* stupid cunt Subway's
#88 - Indubidubly (02/11/2014) [-]
I like the parody law.
I like the parody law.
User avatar #48 - Blargosnarf (02/10/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Able to change anything they want and they're still calling the small cup a "tall" cup...
User avatar #52 to #48 - ThatFuckingGuy (02/10/2014) [-]
Excuse you, it's a DUMB Tall.
#68 - ragingflamingos (02/11/2014) [-]
Guys lets do this to Disney. That mouse has been copyrighted for far to long.
Guys lets do this to Disney. That mouse has been copyrighted for far to long.
#80 - upyoursnumbnuts (02/11/2014) [+] (1 reply)
So, how long until Stupid McDonald's and Idiotic Wendy's?
#14 - anonymous (02/10/2014) [+] (6 replies)
create dumb apple
with dumbiOS
then sell it at apple prices

become rich beyond your wildest dreams
User avatar #65 to #14 - maxismahname (02/11/2014) [-]
Sorry but that already exists, it was made by a guy named Steve Jobs
#18 - flnonymousseven (02/10/2014) [+] (2 replies)
this actually makes me furious.
User avatar #56 - wargeneralwest (02/10/2014) [+] (1 reply)
Michael Jackson helped Weird Al write the lyrics to "Eat it" though...
#77 to #56 - miwauturu (02/11/2014) [-]
Weird Al always gets permission for his parodies, but according to the law he doesn't have to. He's just polite enough that he does anyways.
#153 - flutterbye ONLINE (02/11/2014) [+] (2 replies)
Open poutine shop, call it Vladimir Poutine, and decorate the store exclusively with portraits of Vladimir Putin.
Then struggle to evade Russian assassins for the rest of your life, all whilst serving up fresh homemade poutine, with a hearty taste that can thaw the frozen heart of Judo master dictator.
User avatar #1 - charagrin ONLINE (02/10/2014) [+] (14 replies)
Yeah. That's not how parody law works against the system and business practise of a franchised for profit location. They will be sued under the table within the month. Good idea though.
#138 - joshkx (02/11/2014) [+] (2 replies)
I still like my idea for a coffee shop named "TsarBucks" better.   
Pic related, it's my employees!   
   
 Theres no coffee only vodka
I still like my idea for a coffee shop named "TsarBucks" better.
Pic related, it's my employees!

Theres no coffee only vodka
User avatar #133 - moistnuggests (02/11/2014) [+] (2 replies)
So my business model for "Retarded Apple" store chain that sells mePhones and mePhone accessories is actually viable?

User avatar #181 - Yardie (02/11/2014) [-]
"Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors."

They're still gonna get sued and lose to Corporate Lawyers.
#160 - swagbot (02/11/2014) [+] (4 replies)
Too many butt-hurt fools in the comments.

> Would you visit a ripoff store? Do you purchase knockoff products? No.
> Do a bunch of other people (with lower standards than yourselves) purchase knock-offs? Yes. Are they perfectly happy doing so? Yes.

Okay then.

> You go to 'Real' Starbucks, and be happy.
> They go to 'Fake' Starbucks, and be happy.

I'll never give "Dumb Starbucks" my business (because it's a snot-nosed knockoff), so my Johaneses remain Unwrinkled. So... what's the problem?
User avatar #164 to #160 - ryapr ONLINE (02/11/2014) [-]
they were actually giving the coffee and biscuits away, and are only taking money for donations.
#114 - landonGUNGUY (02/11/2014) [+] (10 replies)
We all know what has to be done? Right?

Make a dumb-dumb starbucks.


With this guy affiliated some how.
User avatar #147 to #128 - uzimaker (02/11/2014) [-]
Can I get in on this?
User avatar #81 - cormy (02/11/2014) [+] (1 reply)
If Starbucks asks them to close, they will have to close.
Although it isn't against the law to parody things like this, the copyright holders still retain the rights to their property even if it's used under the parody law. I mean... All they'd have to do is change the logo and name and they'd be safe but Starbucks can demand that of them.
User avatar #93 to #81 - chieflongnap (02/11/2014) [-]
Right now Starbucks is actually arguing arguing that they can't use the "starbucks" name. The owner refuses to close because he believes he isn't breaking copyright law (which through legal loopholes, he's kind of right, as I state at the end)

The owner has also stated that he plans on opening a second location in Brooklyn, New York due to how popular this one is (people have reportedly been known to stand in line for several hours just so they can get a drink with a cup that's identical to Starbucks', except it says "dumb" on it).

Here's just a sample article:
www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/10/dumb-starbucks-parody-coffee-store

Based on the last few paragraphs, all the owner needs to do is make it a little more clear that they aren't affiliated with Starbucks and he'll pretty much be golden.
[ 167 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)