dead horse. . arm. rnc! It and it wir, In MB','. Pretty sure people in Tf2 will start hitting every spray they come across mitt romney team fortress 2 tumblr
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #4 - fezzo (01/25/2014) [-]
Pretty sure people in Tf2 will start hitting every spray they come across
#72 to #4 - asftrooper ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
Same in Counter strike
User avatar #94 to #72 - popnotes (01/26/2014) [-]
User avatar #54 to #4 - redwrench (01/25/2014) [-]
As a people in TF2 I can confirm.
#92 to #6 - John Cena (01/26/2014) [-]
Sounds like a rap name.

#1 - zeusx (01/25/2014) [-]
#42 to #1 - plaruti (01/25/2014) [-]
i never understood this...   
clearly someone that has earned a lot of money, is smart with money...   
and should probably know how it works
i never understood this...
clearly someone that has earned a lot of money, is smart with money...
and should probably know how it works
#74 to #42 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
Most rich people are already rich from inheritance. Not very hard to earn money if you have a lot of money to invest already.
#103 to #74 - John Cena (01/26/2014) [-]
except Mitt Romney had given away all of his inheritance. All of his wealth came from his own financial experiences.
User avatar #71 to #42 - jmmora (01/25/2014) [-]
just now i notice he has the night vision goggles that came with COD MW special edition i too have those
#36 to #1 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
democrat fiscal policy in a nutshell

democrats in congress are actually richer than republicans
#39 to #36 - stalini (01/25/2014) [-]
just vote Obama or you are racist
User avatar #125 to #39 - unncommon (01/26/2014) [-]
Are you implying that Obama is black? And you yourself are not black?
You bigoted piece of **** .
#60 to #1 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
"Why don't F2P buy more hats?"
#9 - zleagh (01/25/2014) [-]
Who the 			****		 uses Pyrovision these days. It hurts my eyes.
Who the **** uses Pyrovision these days. It hurts my eyes.
User avatar #11 to #9 - DeathOne ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
Maybe he was using the rainblower
User avatar #17 to #11 - zleagh (01/25/2014) [-]
That's still Pyrovision, I didn't say Pyrovision Goggles
User avatar #18 to #17 - DeathOne ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
That is correct
User avatar #70 to #9 - yisumad (01/25/2014) [-]
Lollichop *****
#79 to #9 - rdobet (01/25/2014) [-]
User avatar #146 to #9 - ipartywithpedobear (01/26/2014) [-]
whats the difference?
User avatar #5 - harbingerwolf (01/25/2014) [-]
Furry servers are always funny and provide tonnes of easy kills, you'll often find the majority of the players staring intently at a porn spray encrusted wall.
User avatar #83 to #5 - psykobear (01/26/2014) [-]
That's not spray encrusting the wall.
User avatar #28 to #5 - darkangeloffire (01/25/2014) [-]
I want to find one of these servers and go full Spy on them. I don't hate furries, I just love using the Spy to annihilate a team
#8 to #5 - theburningbaguette (01/25/2014) [-]
Id like to join one of those servers.
But then id be caught up in the porn and be an easy target
User avatar #10 to #8 - harbingerwolf (01/25/2014) [-]
They seem to be ok, some decent people pop in. I usually just constantly bitch about how horrifically ****** i am at TF2. It gets **** when a couple of fags start RPing in the ******* chat box.
#34 to #10 - RipperMan (01/25/2014) [-]
i just love how furs will start an RP anywhere.   
i just love how furs will start an RP anywhere.

#56 - include ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
#37 - seniorawesomesauce ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
From the looks of it, it seems like they were really panning him for his policies.
From the looks of it, it seems like they were really panning him for his policies.
#87 - DisgruntledTomato (01/26/2014) [-]
This happened yesterday on a completely random server, no planning it just happened.
User avatar #153 to #87 - strangemoo (01/26/2014) [-]
Don't you just love it when a plan comes together?
#84 - fagnut ONLINE (01/26/2014) [-]
Sit back and watch the americans argue
Sit back and watch the americans argue
#49 - yuukoku (01/25/2014) [-]
I wonder what would happen if you sprayed Ron Paul on the wall.
User avatar #85 to #49 - DiabloStrawhat (01/26/2014) [-]
You would have to bow before it each time you pass by it.
#47 - blackholedragon (01/25/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
#45 - manofbeardliness (01/25/2014) [-]
If people were a little less ignorant to how economics work, they'd realize he was a lot better of a candidate than they thought..... Instead they flip't **** over the "47% not paying taxes and the wealthier are carrying more than their weight" thing (which is very ******* true). The man knew business, far more than Obama, yet people look more at the candidates social opinions other than their ability to "run" a country.

Don't get me wrong, I do not feel at all bad for him or his Billions of dollars. I just think a lot of people who hated on him need a helmet strapped onto their head.
User avatar #98 to #45 - Shiny (01/26/2014) [-]
Yes, putting the anti-competitive corporate leader in public office has never led to wrongdoing. Just look at Cheney.
User avatar #160 to #45 - completeaddiction **User deleted account** (01/26/2014) [-]
Why does it matter how good the president is in business? What good does that do him?
#48 to #45 - spacereptar (01/25/2014) [-]
What does economics have to do with the president? Does the president set monetary policy? No he does not. Does the president set fiscal policy? No he does not. To be fair the president does get a say in fiscal policy to an extent but never the final word. These powers are delegated elsewhere.
#63 to #48 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
Dude, just about every power the President has isn't really his. Almost all his power comes from the ability to convince other people to his point of view. It is this way that his power would be exercised, not through direct control of the fiscal/monetary policy.
#61 to #48 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
The President isn't suppose to have half the powers he does. The position was created with a very limited set of powers, that have been expanded greatly over time.

Now though, Mr. Pres does have a good amount of control over laws, and a whole lot more sway in Congress than he should. (Note: not being specific to Obama here, just the position in general). The Presidents social views should not matter half as much as they do, and far too many people vote solely on that. In the long run, does it matter if we decide to legalize abortion, or if we legalize gay marriage now instead of next year? Not really. But an economic collapse can have far more lasting consequences. More so, the president is Commander in Chief, meaning his role shouldn't be legislation, it should be war and ending/winning the ones we have chosen to take part in.
User avatar #62 to #45 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
The people want a leader, not a boss. Just because you know business, does not mean you know politics.

My red flag with him was when he sailed into the National Convention in a yacht flying the flag of the Cayman islands. But his personality, his attitude, and his history of putting Americans out of work for profit through Bane capital made him unelectable.

The GOP made a mistake in making him the front runner, their only idea was to find someone who could beat Obama, not find a good leader, which was a failing strategy.

What was Romney's strategy for recovery? Lower Taxes and De-regulation? We have been living under trickle down economics since the Early days of Bush (arguably since Reagan), and the Economy only got worse, because Trickle Down Economics is a novel concept, but can not function in a real world scenario, like communism.

Over taxation does not work either. There needs to be balance, and neither side can achieve it. If taxes are too low, your deficit grows and business won't want to set up shop in your country. Taxes are too high and they won't want to then either.

Balance. We need a centrist in office, not someone swinging extreme right or left. Some could argue that Obama is center, but he lacks a spine and caves to the extreme right (the ones who call you a RINO or a communist if you don't agree with everything they say) without getting his back scratched in return.
User avatar #140 to #62 - manofbeardliness (01/26/2014) [-]
I agree there needs to be equilibrium, but the truth of the matter is until the younger, more moderate generations become more powerful than it's going to remain the same. You have to weigh your options in the fact that, Yes, neither party has a solid solution.... but which one is better? Republicans are too pompous, and democrats are too idealistic.

Personally I lean more to the right because their business models are usually more realistic, but that's all a matter of opinion.
Here's a fun video my macro professor showed my class when I took it.
#67 to #62 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
Almost forgot to address your "he caves" thing...Do you not remember the many "We will not negotiate" things, such as the one with the government shut down? Hardly caving. The fact that you think he is "caving" makes me think you are part of the reason why gridlock is such a problem. We need both sides to "cave" so that we can hit the center as you say. Neither side is caving though.
User avatar #68 to #67 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
Neither side wants to negotiate, when the GOP won the House in 2010, they made it a point to obstruct Obama in any way possible to ensure he is a one term president.

Politics in America have de-evolved to the point it is senseless bickering to lick the feet of the rich so that they get more money for the next election.
#64 to #62 - John Cena (01/25/2014) [-]
Really? He caves to the extreme right? Just so you realize this, there is almost never a candidate that swings to far either way. You simply can't win that way. Instead, they pretend to swing way far out for the primaries and then try and get as close to the middle as they can in the relatively short time after the primaries. This includes Romney.
#20 - baitdoesnttalkback (01/25/2014) [-]
just reminds me of this picture honestly
#27 - economic has deleted their comment [-]
#29 to #27 - lamarsmithgot (01/25/2014) [-]
could be better, but even then he works out about 1000x better than what the other option would be.
#33 to #29 - economic has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #65 to #33 - thatguyontheright ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
There hasn't been a fiscal conservative since Ike.
#66 to #65 - economic has deleted their comment [-]
#121 to #66 - swagbot (01/26/2014) [-]
Our parents and grandparents.

But with TONS of work, we can fix their mistakes.

Don't look to a president or leader for solutions - the more power is concentrated, the more it is wielded for evil. Consensual relationships between communities is the only option for a peaceful, non-coercive life.
#100 to #66 - John Cena (01/26/2014) [-]
Yours, because you apparently wanted the corporatist wingnuts.
User avatar #81 - arnolddusk (01/26/2014) [-]
mitt Romney should be president right now :\
User avatar #86 to #81 - rheago (01/26/2014) [-]
I agree friend! Lol getting to -400 is hard isn't it?
these guys keep thumbing us up it's like they know or something

Boi oh boi i really wish i got -400 aswell

I wish I had an account even more! because trying to get -400 is super duper great and kewlio!

Ha ha, let's get these bozo's to thumb us down right?
User avatar #104 to #86 - arnolddusk (01/26/2014) [-]
I wasn't trolling there. mitt Romney would have been a better president than Obama.
#19 - crazyeyedbioll ONLINE (01/25/2014) [-]
Huehue, I hate that guy cuz he's rich, rich people suk, right guise? guise?
User avatar #107 - mirrorsarentreal (01/26/2014) [-]
Banned for wall hacking
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)