Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#141 - sagedivinity
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
That's why I can't stand watching Football.
#144 to #141 - Darianvincent
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Right? People think i'm weird around here when I say I don't like it.
#145 to #144 - sagedivinity
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Same here
#115 - thelocksmith
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
is nobody else noticing the 0.00%?! it has to be a percentage above that ffs
#122 to #115 - noblexfenrir
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
It means it's a negligible percent. Such as 0.004 or 0.0004 which would round down to 0.00%.
#129 to #122 - thelocksmith
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
fair i see your guys point, however i guess it just rattles my brain. i would have rather seen 0.004. meh. good post regardless.
#130 to #129 - noblexfenrir
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
I see what you mean, and for accuracy sake I agree. But this post was going for "shock factor" and 0.00% catches more eyes than 0.004%. It's used in marketing all the time, no product outside of water actually has 0 calories, it's such a low amount (Anything under .5) that legally they are allowed to put 0.

and 0 calories certainly sells better than 0.345 calories.
#132 to #130 - thelocksmith
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
very good point! however do you sometimes think that seeing 0% is so blatantly a lie that it makes you somewhat doubt the product? i think personally i would still actually rather see the proper percentage but maybe i'm just a picky person. cheers for pointing that out anyway, makes sense!
#135 to #132 - thelocksmith
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
sorry, not a lie, more of a hidden percentage
#134 to #132 - noblexfenrir
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
It doesn't make me as much doubt the product as it makes me remember that the product saying this isn't as much for me as it is for the bumbling idiots who take everything for face value.
#136 to #134 - thelocksmith
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
haha yeah! fair one!
#125 to #115 - lindow
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
According to Google the population on N Korea is roughly 24760000 (24 million)
Meaning that roughly 0.0024% of them have internet access.
#104 - rawfulz
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Must Be Hard To Hide The Tree
#111 to #104 - schneidend
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Not in hundreds of miles of trackless wilderness.
#94 - include
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#85 - travrob
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
**travrob rolled a random image posted in comment #4117840 at Friendly ** fishes' faces when RDJ dumped his drugs in the ocean
#58 - palindromia ONLINE
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
I attend Western Michigan University which is in Kalamazoo. There is no anonymous donor paying for anyone that I know of. (certainly not paying for me) That statement is not legit at all.
#81 to #58 - endospore
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
It's for students FROM Kalamazoo, not for ones that go there. Apparently, you need to attend Kalamazoo public high school for 4 years and you get 65 percent of your tuition paid, and if you went to public school there since kindergarten, you get 100 percent of college tuition paid. As of 2010, it has paid out 18 million USD. Also, as a small point of order, it's a group of donors, not a single guy.

Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalamazoo_Promise
#57 - lawerancearm
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
The Bryan Cranston one is legit, He voiced the villains Twin Man and Snizzard in the MMPR first series.
#51 - anon
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but surely it can't be 0.00%, that would be zero people. Shouldn't it have to be at least 0.01% or 0.001% or some ****?
#53 to #51 - thesovereigngrave
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
You could still technically write 0.001% as 0.00% if you're rounding to the closest hundredth.
#54 to #51 - norville
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
the number is actually 0.002%
#71 to #51 - kidwithballsonchin
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
0,00 % means an error margin of 0,005 %, which is why writing 10,00 is more accurate than writing 10
#34 - prepared
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Can someone explain the Prince one?
#43 to #34 - jokeface
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Prince is such a snobby jackass that he got mad that someone used his song on Youtube without his consent, even though the song wasn't even his.
#44 to #43 - prepared
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Thanks
#45 to #44 - jokeface
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Yea that guy is crazy. You should look up Kevin Smith's story about the time they worked together. Pretty funny.
#46 to #45 - prepared
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Everytime prince comes up all I can think of is Dave Chappelle's basketball skit.
Don't know **** about Prince yo
#48 to #46 - jokeface
Reply +1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Me neither. All I know is that they had him on that episode of Animaniacs.
#156 - anon
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
As a Western Michigan university student, the Kalamazoo one is ********.
#154 - monswine
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
The Olsen Twins are not identical twins despite their amazing resemblance.
#107 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
100% of those restaurants would have been shut down if it weren't for Kitchen Nightmares. At least 33 of them are still running and most were able to sell their business probably for good amount of money just because it was on the show.
#100 - spamalope
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Wait... 0.00% doesn't make since
#112 to #100 - schneidend
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
It does if you don't round up and only go to a two decimal places.
#76 - pottslande
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
My dog got congenital kidney disease, we found out when he was 1

We considered the idea of the stray dog thing but we just couldn't take another animal with our living situation at the time. We had another dog of his size but was apparently too old to qualify. He passed away just a month shy of his 2nd birthday, about a year ago. RIP Gerard.
#67 - datswag
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
One of my best friend lives in Kalamazoo, that one isn't true, I can't speak for the credibility of the other ones, though
#72 to #67 - riccostar
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Yeah, there apparently is a donor but the donations affect only a small group of children and college destinations
#83 to #72 - porksammich
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
It depends on how many years you have been in the Kalamazoo school system, apparently
#61 - anon
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
comment about michigan.. random Anon swells with pride
#30 - aasherknight
Reply -4
(10/25/2013) [-]
The twin part is for both male and female twins, not just female twins.

source: my dad and uncle are twins and me and my cousin are often confused for siblings.
#65 to #30 - justmedude
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
I think you may need to reread that part, because it seems you missed something. ;)
#70 to #65 - aasherknight
Reply -3
(10/25/2013) [-]
No it doesn't have to be twins with twins was what I was saying. I did partially misread it though haha.
#73 to #70 - justmedude
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
Oh right, I see what you're saying now.
And ye, if they aren't twins you may still look like each other, but the fact above meant that it would be impossible to tell which child belongs to which twin couple purely based on their DNA.
If the couples weren't identical twins, DNA could probably point out which child belongs to which couple.
#75 to #73 - aasherknight
Reply -1
(10/25/2013) [-]
Yeah genetically my cousin and I are half brother/sister because our dads are identical twins.
#17 - anon
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
ok robert just pollute the ocean with your **** you ******* asshole
#15 - ebontopaz
Reply 0
(10/25/2013) [-]
If that tree is really that big, couldn't you just see it from a long distance?