Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#181 - drainbramage
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
I really don't understand how people can say it looked better in 1997, sure it actually fits the style of Pokemon a lot more, but it certainly isn't better.
#176 - byzantinian
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
Not that I have anything against pokemon,but what is this doing on this site? This site is supposed to be for putting funny or at least ,,feel,, pictures or something,this is just totally pointless..
#168 - mrparkinglot
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#167 - laxwarriord ONLINE
Reply -7
(10/12/2013) [-]
Hey look. its still the same with a graphical re-work, aint that funny
Hey look. its still the same with a graphical re-work, aint that funny
#171 to #167 - anon
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, "graphical rework." Like the background, more trees, a darker ground with no rocks, charmander's on-screen position, Jesse + James being visible in the flamethrower effect, redrawn smoke effect.

The scene looks to be redrawn entirely, not just reworked.
#172 to #171 - laxwarriord ONLINE
Reply -3
(10/12/2013) [-]
Dude calm down, was a joke, well done for spotting they added some trees, jeez
#174 to #172 - anon
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
It's ok, you made a stupid and someone caught it. No need to pretend you were joking.
#177 to #174 - laxwarriord ONLINE
Reply -1
(10/12/2013) [-]
Ahhhhhhhhhhh just no winning with fanboys
Ahhhhhhhhhhh just no winning with fanboys
#154 - mycatislookingatme
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
I was watching some recent episodes, and the only thing that irked me was the fact that Prof Oak has a new ******* voice actor, and the new guys sounds like a twat.
#148 - beezox
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
i laughed my as off when i saw we had a holocaster in our backback
#133 - doctorfetus
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
I like the old one better
#129 - simbasa
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#106 - Benka
Reply 0
(10/12/2013) [-]
I don't get it? Is this supposed to be an improvement or something?
#130 - simbasa
Reply -1
(10/12/2013) [-]
**simbasa rolls 230**
#131 to #130 - simbasa
Reply -1
(10/12/2013) [-]
**simbasa rolls 927**