Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#164 - demideus (09/30/2013) [-]
delicious gays
User avatar #159 - hankmccoy (09/30/2013) [-]
aesthetically pleasing to the senses, especially to sight or smell: a homolicious sweater-vest; a homolicious fragrance.
very gay; fabulous: a homolicious sense of fashion.

Tom Ford's fall collection is the most beautiful, vibrantly colorful, and keenly set clothing collection this year, it's simply homolicious
#151 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #132 - rosetheturk **User deleted account** (09/30/2013) [-]
**** peas, id rather eat randy.
#108 - anonymous (09/30/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i hate how all tumbl faGS SUDDENLY BURST INTO FULL CAPS
User avatar #106 - krasisisback (09/30/2013) [-]
It may just be the booze talking but i find this funny.
i literally just loled
User avatar #64 - clownsplosion ONLINE (09/30/2013) [-]
[SFM] Eat Your Peas (Game Grumps Animated)
#34 - royrogersmcfreely ONLINE (09/30/2013) [-]
**royrogersmcfreely rolled a random image posted in comment #34 at Pls kill me! ** mfw I am eatING PEAS
User avatar #27 - ilovemyguns (09/30/2013) [+] (3 replies)
It's not that people dislike gay marriage, it's that it was a founded rule that was ordered by the surpreme court already. While they can repeal it, bigamy and polygamy were based on almost a copy of the ruling on gay marriage, so unless they make that legal too, it'll be considered an "errorous misuse of the court's time", and "force all constitutional laws frowned upon simply due to being against the common sense of a Christian nation to be reconsidered".

Civil rights laws that may seem unconstitutional simply for being against the common sense of a christian and civil nation (how this country was founded according to the surpreme court) envelopes 86 different laws, all which would have to be discussed and looked over again. Otherwise, they'll get case after case on these laws (probably from people against gay marriage) simply out of spite, and once you get a case so many times you kind of have to take it (surpreme court rule of the majority, if the majority of cases ask for a certain law to be looked over again, they must go with the majority of requests, as the people have the power to say what the surpreme court looks at).

This is a long process they're already in, and has to be done between actual surpreme court cases.
#35 - thevsamoviessecond (09/30/2013) [-]
 Friends (0)