x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#178 - ifuhq (10/02/2013) [-]
You have no idea how long I have waited to use this.
#128 - squeejee (09/30/2013) [-]
I really hate it when people just say "lets let gays get married and anyone who opposes it hates gays".
User avatar #113 - twofreegerbils (09/30/2013) [-]
>the only reason why gay marriage is illegal is because some people think it's disgusting

Thank you for showing me right off that bat that you know literally nothing about the debate over marriage equality whatsoever.
User avatar #84 - doubleretard (09/30/2013) [-]
It should say make fish illegal because the bible clearly says not to eat it several times whereas homosexuality is referenced maybe twice. THE MORE YOU KNOW
User avatar #93 to #84 - roflcopterkklol **User deleted account** (09/30/2013) [-]
The bible says you should kill midgets and there are several parts that talk about how rape is alright and women deserve no rights, why listen to any part of it?

User avatar #112 to #84 - raamageddon (09/30/2013) [-]
Being fair, the reason why a lot of stuff in the Bible was outlawed in terms of the food stuff was because it was unclean. Anything with hooves was also banned. So, cows and pigs? Nope. No steak or porkchops for anyone. Seafood? Nope.

Most of these things are riddled with parasites of some kind, so unless properly made, will make you sick. I don't believe the Bible has specific punishment listed for breaking said rules, but they were there for sanitary reasons. It also said to go bury your **** and bodies, for the same reason.

Nowadays, we understand these dangers, and can circumvent or mitigate them. In fact, at one point after God lays down the ground rules, he later on comes out and pretty much says "Alright, half the **** I said before? **** it, it's cool now, go for it. You still can't do this other stuff, but that's fine." Like pigs. Pigs went from no-go to okay. Fish might have as well, especially since now we have that **** figured out.

Obviously, this had nothing to do with the Fish and Gays argument, so let me kinda swing it back that way.

The Bible does say that gays are meant to be put to death. According to God, to "lay with a man as one does with a woman" is a "detestable thing." Almost word for word. The main factor here is because back then, women were, in fact, property. To sleep with a man was to claim him as your property, which was considered wrong. Like it or not, men were better than women back then according to most cultures.

But this is the same Bible that claims that a woman who isn't a virgin ought to be put to death, and a marriage isn't valid. Man got killed on the spot for "pulling out." By God himself. If a woman gets raped and doesn't call for help, she gets put to death. I dunno about you, but I know for sure that first one happens a lot, and sure as **** know that second one does...

So. All in all? We do plenty of **** nowadays that the Bible says not to do, and we definitely don't adhere to the rules.
User avatar #169 to #112 - doubleretard (09/30/2013) [-]
Don't forget the bible is also a work of fiction
User avatar #173 to #169 - raamageddon (09/30/2013) [-]
... I guess I don't why why I was expecting a somewhat more mature response than that, but, alright, I guess blatantly shoving Atheism into people's faces is fine too.
User avatar #176 to #173 - doubleretard (10/02/2013) [-]
You say Atheist, I say unless I see a proven DNA sample its a story. Facts must be proven, religion is a farce. So is science nowadays.
User avatar #177 to #176 - raamageddon (10/02/2013) [-]
Which had anything to do with what I said originally... How? I gave you simple facts and quotes. Eating those animals was forbidden because they were dirty and could make you sick. That's true still today. Go kill a pig and eat it without cleaning it or cooking it, and it could kill you. Go fishing and eat a raw fish, you might have a tapeworm throwing a party in your colon.

Whether or not God said it or Joebilly McHebrewson is entirely irrelevant to the point. The point was that the rules changed. You can't discredit that as truth. Many cultures still don't eat pigs because they're dirty animals. Just because something was written in the Bible doesn't make it untrue. King Solomon was, historically, a real man. Whether or not the Bible accounts of him are true is not relevant, because accounts of him elsewhere exist. He does not magically stop existing due to his presence in the Bible.

Whether or not Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt with the aid of God or by himself is irrelevant. **** happened. There's a ******* of Egyptian chariots at the bottom of a sea that date with the same timeframe. It's not the sea named in the Bible, but the name is damn close to it, and so is the location. And hey, what do you know, they made it to Israel, which is a real place, and have recorded history that's pretty much the same as it is in the book-- Killing ******** of people in their neighboring lands until they got their **** handed to them and lost their homeland.

Is that to say it all happened exactly as it was written? No, but this **** didn't not happen just because it has religious significance. You discredit simple facts that had nothing to do with religion because I cited the Bible. I'm not super-religious. But I'm not so dense as to say "Pics or it didn't happen" about the **** that's historical, not religious.

Either way, the original point that I was trying to make is that food rules changed. Why are the rules about gays are necessarily unchanged?
#164 - demideus (09/30/2013) [-]
delicious gays
User avatar #159 - hankmccoy (09/30/2013) [-]
homolicious-
adjective
1.
aesthetically pleasing to the senses, especially to sight or smell: a homolicious sweater-vest; a homolicious fragrance.
2.
very gay; fabulous: a homolicious sense of fashion.

Tom Ford's fall collection is the most beautiful, vibrantly colorful, and keenly set clothing collection this year, it's simply homolicious
User avatar #127 - jalthelas (09/30/2013) [-]
Apparently I thumbed up sexual content around 7:30 PM.

I wasn't even online then.

Am I going to get banned? I got mail about it, but I can't reply.
User avatar #145 to #127 - warioteam (09/30/2013) [-]
Faggots often flag **** they dont like, cuz theyre faggots.
#108 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
i hate how all tumbl faGS SUDDENLY BURST INTO FULL CAPS
#111 to #108 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
I love how all funnyjunk fags suddenly burst into pointless rage.
User avatar #106 - krasisisback (09/30/2013) [-]
It may just be the booze talking but i find this funny.
i literally just loled
User avatar #80 - lilmisspinkamena (09/30/2013) [-]
Game Grumps Animated - Eat The Peas
skip to 53 seconds in if you wanna get straight to the point
User avatar #74 - TittyCinnamon (09/30/2013) [-]
literally every ******* tumblr post they put their caps lock on during the middle of a ******* WORD. like, why in the middle of writing a motheR ******* WORD. jesuS CHRIST.
#107 to #74 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
And every time there's some goddamn funnyjunker whining about it. We get it, you don't like when they do that stuff on their own website, now go tell someone that actually cares.
User avatar #166 to #107 - TittyCinnamon (09/30/2013) [-]
log in and say that bitch.
User avatar #68 - antzell (09/30/2013) [-]
By gay i hope they mean a golden gaytime.
User avatar #64 - clownsplosion (09/30/2013) [-]
Peas.
[SFM] Eat Your Peas (Game Grumps Animated)
#62 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
Imagine how different the world would be without the bible... Maybe other religions would have over ruled it anyway but just imagine...

I believe in God but maybe not so much the bible.
Seriously what God would be like "Lets create something and then tell everyone that we hate them for no reason what so ever other than 'because you can't!"
#70 to #62 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
I'm not saying it's right, but that's not how it works. Free will.
User avatar #82 to #70 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
What does free will have to do with it?
Do you think that being gay isn't genetic?
#97 to #82 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
And for the record, just how "genetic" homosexuality is still has not been proven. It is believed to be the result of both genetic predisposition and life experiences (like a large amount of other human qualities). Now that doesn't mean that it's a "choice" or that it's wrong. Even if it WAS a choice I believe that people should have every right to make that choice. But saying that it's purely genetic would be making some serious assumptions.
User avatar #100 to #97 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
Yeah i know, nothing has been proven to say what makes someone gay straight or bi. Exactly what i think. Choice or not who cares let them be who they want to be without judgement. However i don't think that the ''without judgement'' part will ever come to pass...
#102 to #100 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
Yep. That sort of relates to why I think the search for a "gay gene" is a bad idea. So many things could go wrong if they found one. First, there's the possibility that parents might screen for the gay gene and do something get rid of their children if they have it. Second, what if someone doesn't have the "gay gene" but they feel they are gay (or vice-versa)? Those people would be ostracized and called liars even if they really are gay and there's more to it than people think. People are still going to hate whether it's genetic or not. There was no doubt whether race was genetic when slavery was still around.
User avatar #135 to #102 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
And that there is the sad truth!
Its also something i haven't thought about before.
#99 to #97 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
And don't forget how the environment in the womb may affect sexuality as well.
#95 to #82 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
*They think
I'm clearly talking about the point of view of Christians. That's why I said "I'm not saying it's right".
They think that being gay is a choice, so therefore God did not "create" people to be gay.
User avatar #98 to #95 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
yeah, i guess...
#34 - royrogersmcfreely (09/30/2013) [-]
**royrogersmcfreely rolled a random image posted in comment #34 at Pls kill me! ** mfw I am eatING PEAS
User avatar #27 - ilovemyguns (09/30/2013) [-]
It's not that people dislike gay marriage, it's that it was a founded rule that was ordered by the surpreme court already. While they can repeal it, bigamy and polygamy were based on almost a copy of the ruling on gay marriage, so unless they make that legal too, it'll be considered an "errorous misuse of the court's time", and "force all constitutional laws frowned upon simply due to being against the common sense of a Christian nation to be reconsidered".

Civil rights laws that may seem unconstitutional simply for being against the common sense of a christian and civil nation (how this country was founded according to the surpreme court) envelopes 86 different laws, all which would have to be discussed and looked over again. Otherwise, they'll get case after case on these laws (probably from people against gay marriage) simply out of spite, and once you get a case so many times you kind of have to take it (surpreme court rule of the majority, if the majority of cases ask for a certain law to be looked over again, they must go with the majority of requests, as the people have the power to say what the surpreme court looks at).

This is a long process they're already in, and has to be done between actual surpreme court cases.
User avatar #48 to #47 - ilovemyguns (09/30/2013) [-]
America
User avatar #21 - skubasteve (09/30/2013) [-]
Not gonna lie. I don't enjoy seeing two guys kiss. I find it disgusting.

That being said, I absolutely love when two girls kiss, and I don't think it should be illegal for two gay men to do so or get married.

User avatar #22 to #21 - heartlessrobot (09/30/2013) [-]
I don't mind watching people make out regardless of gender, but I honestly think the people making out mind if theres someone intensely staring at them.
User avatar #23 to #22 - skubasteve (09/30/2013) [-]
We should make that a thing in our society. Any and all PDA should be watched / followed up with applause.
User avatar #69 to #23 - childofnephilim (09/30/2013) [-]
Treat them as performance art? We can throw money at them when they get done. Could we carry around score cards and rate the quality of the PDAs?
User avatar #24 to #23 - heartlessrobot (09/30/2013) [-]
Though, come to think of it, I didn't really care when people commented on me biting my ex's neck and leaving a huge hickey and teeth marks.
It was her idea don't judge me.
User avatar #67 to #24 - childofnephilim (09/30/2013) [-]
You lost me at "I was biting my ex."
#18 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
I wonder if I can get peas outlawed.
-1
#66 - iamstoopid has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #76 to #66 - bobburrito (09/30/2013) [-]
nobody cares
-1
#77 to #76 - iamstoopid has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)