x
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#178 - ifuhq (10/02/2013) [-]
You have no idea how long I have waited to use this.
User avatar #113 - twofreegerbils (09/30/2013) [-]
>the only reason why gay marriage is illegal is because some people think it's disgusting

Thank you for showing me right off that bat that you know literally nothing about the debate over marriage equality whatsoever.
User avatar #84 - doubleretard (09/30/2013) [-]
It should say make fish illegal because the bible clearly says not to eat it several times whereas homosexuality is referenced maybe twice. THE MORE YOU KNOW
User avatar #93 to #84 - roflcopterkklol **User deleted account** (09/30/2013) [-]
The bible says you should kill midgets and there are several parts that talk about how rape is alright and women deserve no rights, why listen to any part of it?

User avatar #112 to #84 - raamageddon (09/30/2013) [-]
Being fair, the reason why a lot of stuff in the Bible was outlawed in terms of the food stuff was because it was unclean. Anything with hooves was also banned. So, cows and pigs? Nope. No steak or porkchops for anyone. Seafood? Nope.

Most of these things are riddled with parasites of some kind, so unless properly made, will make you sick. I don't believe the Bible has specific punishment listed for breaking said rules, but they were there for sanitary reasons. It also said to go bury your **** and bodies, for the same reason.

Nowadays, we understand these dangers, and can circumvent or mitigate them. In fact, at one point after God lays down the ground rules, he later on comes out and pretty much says "Alright, half the **** I said before? **** it, it's cool now, go for it. You still can't do this other stuff, but that's fine." Like pigs. Pigs went from no-go to okay. Fish might have as well, especially since now we have that **** figured out.

Obviously, this had nothing to do with the Fish and Gays argument, so let me kinda swing it back that way.

The Bible does say that gays are meant to be put to death. According to God, to "lay with a man as one does with a woman" is a "detestable thing." Almost word for word. The main factor here is because back then, women were, in fact, property. To sleep with a man was to claim him as your property, which was considered wrong. Like it or not, men were better than women back then according to most cultures.

But this is the same Bible that claims that a woman who isn't a virgin ought to be put to death, and a marriage isn't valid. Man got killed on the spot for "pulling out." By God himself. If a woman gets raped and doesn't call for help, she gets put to death. I dunno about you, but I know for sure that first one happens a lot, and sure as **** know that second one does...

So. All in all? We do plenty of **** nowadays that the Bible says not to do, and we definitely don't adhere to the rules.
User avatar #169 to #112 - doubleretard (09/30/2013) [-]
Don't forget the bible is also a work of fiction
User avatar #173 to #169 - raamageddon (09/30/2013) [-]
... I guess I don't why why I was expecting a somewhat more mature response than that, but, alright, I guess blatantly shoving Atheism into people's faces is fine too.
User avatar #176 to #173 - doubleretard (10/02/2013) [-]
You say Atheist, I say unless I see a proven DNA sample its a story. Facts must be proven, religion is a farce. So is science nowadays.
User avatar #177 to #176 - raamageddon (10/02/2013) [-]
Which had anything to do with what I said originally... How? I gave you simple facts and quotes. Eating those animals was forbidden because they were dirty and could make you sick. That's true still today. Go kill a pig and eat it without cleaning it or cooking it, and it could kill you. Go fishing and eat a raw fish, you might have a tapeworm throwing a party in your colon.

Whether or not God said it or Joebilly McHebrewson is entirely irrelevant to the point. The point was that the rules changed. You can't discredit that as truth. Many cultures still don't eat pigs because they're dirty animals. Just because something was written in the Bible doesn't make it untrue. King Solomon was, historically, a real man. Whether or not the Bible accounts of him are true is not relevant, because accounts of him elsewhere exist. He does not magically stop existing due to his presence in the Bible.

Whether or not Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt with the aid of God or by himself is irrelevant. **** happened. There's a ******* of Egyptian chariots at the bottom of a sea that date with the same timeframe. It's not the sea named in the Bible, but the name is damn close to it, and so is the location. And hey, what do you know, they made it to Israel, which is a real place, and have recorded history that's pretty much the same as it is in the book-- Killing ******** of people in their neighboring lands until they got their **** handed to them and lost their homeland.

Is that to say it all happened exactly as it was written? No, but this **** didn't not happen just because it has religious significance. You discredit simple facts that had nothing to do with religion because I cited the Bible. I'm not super-religious. But I'm not so dense as to say "Pics or it didn't happen" about the **** that's historical, not religious.

Either way, the original point that I was trying to make is that food rules changed. Why are the rules about gays are necessarily unchanged?
#16 - ochsderp (09/29/2013) [-]
I just want some Gay-torade.
#164 - demideus (09/30/2013) [-]
delicious gays
0
#151 - alZii has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #132 - rosetheturk **User deleted account** (09/30/2013) [-]
**** peas, id rather eat randy.
User avatar #129 - mrgoodlove (09/30/2013) [-]
I ******* hate peas
User avatar #127 - jalthelas (09/30/2013) [-]
Apparently I thumbed up sexual content around 7:30 PM.

I wasn't even online then.

Am I going to get banned? I got mail about it, but I can't reply.
User avatar #145 to #127 - warioteam (09/30/2013) [-]
Faggots often flag **** they dont like, cuz theyre faggots.
User avatar #119 - lawander **User deleted account** (09/30/2013) [-]
Is tumblr sometimes posting stuff from FJ comment section as we do with their site?
#125 to #119 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
no, the majority of them really ******* hate us, or havent heard of us.
User avatar #126 to #125 - lawander **User deleted account** (09/30/2013) [-]
why would they ha-

okay
#108 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
i hate how all tumbl faGS SUDDENLY BURST INTO FULL CAPS
#111 to #108 - anon (09/30/2013) [-]
I love how all funnyjunk fags suddenly burst into pointless rage.
User avatar #68 - antzell (09/30/2013) [-]
By gay i hope they mean a golden gaytime.
#62 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
Imagine how different the world would be without the bible... Maybe other religions would have over ruled it anyway but just imagine...

I believe in God but maybe not so much the bible.
Seriously what God would be like "Lets create something and then tell everyone that we hate them for no reason what so ever other than 'because you can't!"
#70 to #62 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
I'm not saying it's right, but that's not how it works. Free will.
User avatar #82 to #70 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
What does free will have to do with it?
Do you think that being gay isn't genetic?
#97 to #82 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
And for the record, just how "genetic" homosexuality is still has not been proven. It is believed to be the result of both genetic predisposition and life experiences (like a large amount of other human qualities). Now that doesn't mean that it's a "choice" or that it's wrong. Even if it WAS a choice I believe that people should have every right to make that choice. But saying that it's purely genetic would be making some serious assumptions.
User avatar #100 to #97 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
Yeah i know, nothing has been proven to say what makes someone gay straight or bi. Exactly what i think. Choice or not who cares let them be who they want to be without judgement. However i don't think that the ''without judgement'' part will ever come to pass...
#102 to #100 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
Yep. That sort of relates to why I think the search for a "gay gene" is a bad idea. So many things could go wrong if they found one. First, there's the possibility that parents might screen for the gay gene and do something get rid of their children if they have it. Second, what if someone doesn't have the "gay gene" but they feel they are gay (or vice-versa)? Those people would be ostracized and called liars even if they really are gay and there's more to it than people think. People are still going to hate whether it's genetic or not. There was no doubt whether race was genetic when slavery was still around.
User avatar #135 to #102 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
And that there is the sad truth!
Its also something i haven't thought about before.
#99 to #97 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
And don't forget how the environment in the womb may affect sexuality as well.
#95 to #82 - myshipsailedwoutme (09/30/2013) [-]
*They think
I'm clearly talking about the point of view of Christians. That's why I said "I'm not saying it's right".
They think that being gay is a choice, so therefore God did not "create" people to be gay.
User avatar #98 to #95 - mrcocoabeans (09/30/2013) [-]
yeah, i guess...
User avatar #46 - organicglory (09/30/2013) [-]
i always switch to caps becAUSE THATS WHEN THE DICK GETS SHOVED UP MY ASS
#42 - jbrk (09/30/2013) [-]
**jbrk rolled user darnhaz ** hasn't finished eating his gay's yet.
User avatar #41 - priestoftheoldones (09/30/2013) [-]
Oh god I hate peas, cauliflower master race.
User avatar #37 - threeeighteen (09/30/2013) [-]
Peas are extremely important in Australia, they're used in the pie eating rituals.
#15 - thebeatlesfan (09/29/2013) [-]
Mashed potatoes and Gay-vy
-1
#66 - iamstoopid has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #76 to #66 - bobburrito (09/30/2013) [-]
nobody cares
-1
#77 to #76 - iamstoopid has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)