Upload
Login or register
Back to the content '(Untitled)' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (242)
[ 242 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#214 - blacktomcruise
Reply +1
(09/11/2013) [-]
just gonna go ahead and not read any comments and go on to say that no one is talking about invading anywhere
#237 to #214 - sageofbattleon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Why is it so difficult for people to understand that? Like the US government is proposing missile strikes. Like with MISSILES from boats in the OCEAN. Also, if I see one more person say Obama wants to do this I'm gonna snap. The president is a fancy spokes person, not that his opinion doesn't have some weight, he doesn't make these kinds of decisions on his own
#114 - nubcase
Reply +1
(09/11/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure that one of the factors in maintaining a "super power" status for a country is continuous warfare/ invading other countries

don't kill me
#105 - sasquatchjc
Reply +1
(09/11/2013) [-]
While I agree, I believe many people don't really understand exactly WHY we butt our noses into other country's business; money. When we go to war with another country, factories constantly produce weapons which skyrocket the economy a **** ton. While some might argue more than others on the morality of this like "but are american lives worth it?", it's just the cold truth that war is actually really good for our economy.
#110 to #105 - stupilycouragus
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
isn't war why we're in 13 trillion or so in debt?
isn't war why we're in 13 trillion or so in debt?
#113 to #110 - iftheshoefits
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
it is a big factor but not the soul problem
#112 to #110 - sasquatchjc
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Nope, our government just likes to use "deficit spending" to hold the economy up BECAUSE there are no wars. It's a stupid system and needs to be heavily reworked, but that's basically why. Not to mention all of the outsourcing that goes on with our major corporations paying pennies to overworked people overseas *coughchina*
#122 to #112 - trystanvierra
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
*cough* ******* chinks *coughcough*
#123 to #122 - trystanvierra
Reply +1
(09/11/2013) [-]
Does anybody have a Hall's?
#117 to #112 - stupilycouragus
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#68 - xkronusx
Reply +1
(09/11/2013) [-]
ahem America FUCK YEAH!
#51 - uzbekistan
Reply +1
(09/10/2013) [-]
Imagine if your country was using chemical weapons on YOU. Would you want someone to help or not?
#66 to #51 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
If Al Qaeda affiliated militants were using chemical weapons on me in an effort to force an international intervention, I would probably say stay the **** out please.
#79 to #51 - thebestpieever
Reply +1
(09/11/2013) [-]
By throwing white phosphorus at my general area and then going off home celebrating that they caused about 10 casualties to the government for every 30 to my friends and neighbours? No...
#210 - spacemasterfive
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
but... weapons of mass destruction...
#193 - qwertywtf
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
We obviously aren't invading Syria because of "chemical warfare".
We just want their Dethcones.
#186 - Zaxplab
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
I thought the US invaded syria because they were using chemical weapons, and that is not allowed in the Geneva Convention.


I don't know much about politics, correct me if I'm wrong.
#238 to #186 - sageofbattleon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Geneva convention and several (several being a double digit number here) treaties that compel prettymuch every developed nation to act if a country uses chemical weapons.

Another point is that we aren't "punishing" them like some people are saying, we are removing their ability to make another strike of this type.
#185 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
But war is how we can distract the citizens from out own problems
#183 - srskate
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
So what you're saying is, you want the army to straighten out America.
#98 - BIGSEXYISBACKAGAIN
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
I don't get why so many people are against it. We're not proposing putting boots on the ground, no ongoing war, just a precise strike to take out the chemical weapons and deter use of them in the future by Assad and others. On top of that, the president has delayed the vote from congress to see if we can work out a diplomatic solution with Assad. Tell me again how this is a bad thing?
#145 to #98 - teenytinyspider
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Because Russia is sending some of their naval forces there? China has also pledged to support Syria and they're our economic overlords.
#97 - tiredofthis
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Here here...
#89 - roflsaucer
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Except, you know, we're probably not going in to Syria the way things are going.
#85 - shinyarmor
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Read the news. Obama just gave a speech.
it explained alot.
#67 - xkronusx
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#56 - steil
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
#35 - anon
Reply 0
(09/10/2013) [-]
I'm a pretty easygoing guy but it really bothers me that this says "invade".
We wouldn't be invading it, we'd just be ******* it up with some explosions n' **** from the sky
'merica
#27 - restfullwicked
Reply 0
(09/10/2013) [-]
the US Invades other countries to distract people from doing that. Britain did the same thing. im fairly sure thats how we ended up with an empire. "so yeah, can we do something about all this slavery and **** now?" "we COULD do that, but we just found out that India has some even BIGGER diamonds"
#26 - anon
Reply 0
(09/10/2013) [-]
It's not an invasion, it's strikes.
With missiles.

There might be ground troops, but without congress they can't stay there for more than 60 days.
#62 to #26 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Pearl Harbor wasn't a declaration of war, it was limited military strike with no boots on the ground.
#178 to #62 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
military strike to a nation that was staying out of the war. It's like if America out of the blue send a missile to India.
#12 - anon
Reply 0
(09/10/2013) [-]
Tell that to half of the world asking for military aid.
#65 to #12 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
Please.

No one can be this deluded.

You do realize literally no-one but America wants military involvement? Even Britain has rejected it. Pull your head out of your ass you ******* retard.
#77 to #65 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
**** you, France is going in too. And they'll probably puss out the second **** gets hot.