Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'Justice!' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (283)
[ 283 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#213 - lorkhan
Reply +2
(09/06/2013) [-]
Just because someone is famous doesn't make me care about their love-life or anything about them. Why is this such a big deal?
#206 - mrhazzy
Reply +4
(09/06/2013) [-]
he's clearly got a good head on his shoulders now...

he clearly didn't when he started dating her...
#205 - dafunkad
Reply +14
(09/06/2013) [-]
people care so much
people care so much
#220 to #205 - taurusguy
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
I guess you cant say this when it is still a "hot" subject, got hated on like **** on FJ when i said i didnt care when it was the next day from the VMA or so.
#209 to #205 - herbolifee
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
^ This exactly. Seriously, who the **** cares.
#183 - Gigsta
Reply +2
(09/06/2013) [-]
MFW Miley Cyrus is mentioned
MFW Miley Cyrus is mentioned
#230 to #183 - fullmetaloptimist
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Miley Cyrus
#235 to #230 - Gigsta
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
#182 - brawlmaster
Reply +11
(09/06/2013) [-]
boyfriends face when
boyfriends face when
#164 - demandsgayversion
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
Maybe it was a joke. Just hear me out. So she was booked for this dude to dance around in her underwear on the VMAs for this guy - a pretty ****** up proposition. So instead of saying no and leaving it to some other whore to jiggle around on stage, she decides to sabotage the performance. She does whatever the **** that is with her hair, dresses in nasty yet comfortably supportive underwear, and proceeds to make a fool of herself. But for some reason the opportunity to reveal that it was a joke never came out.

Unlikely, but an alternative. Her being on any amount of drugs, I still wouldn't think the PR people or security would let her go out there like that unless it was a joke.
#254 to #164 - jockothecrock
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
explain the brittney's comeback fiasco then
#282 to #254 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Idk what that is. I was simply giving an alternate explanation of this situation, I don't believe it or think it's more likely than she's just a druggy whore. But come on, NOBODY could find that underwear sexy. That's the one thing everyone overlooks. If it was some lacy thong and pasties, maybe this could be taken as seriously as everyone has been, but between her old person underwear, weird hair, stupid tongue face, and the fact that she's rubbing her ass on a referee, I really can't take this situation seriously at all.
#285 to #282 - jockothecrock
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
have you seen what was Britney spears's comeback perfomance on the vma's? here is a link
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGtxxNrHHnE

she was so ashamed of this performance, she called herself a fat pig on stag, but she did bounce back. however, compare this to the miley cyrus thing. the thing is, these perfomances are run by tv executives, and the only thing they want is ratings and money. it doesn't matter if miley cyrus was doing drugs or not, there was nothing to prove that she did or didn't unless she announces the news to the public but she did went up onstage in a state that was unfit for a performer to be, whether emotionally, mentally, or physically. however, she did went up onstage because, you know, "the show must go on!" she must be in that period in her life where she believes that acting out is the way people will change they view her from adorable teen princess to adult "ratchet" queen.
#162 - internetknight
Reply +2
(09/06/2013) [-]
Yall mother ******* need to go watch, God Bless America
#155 - fairyprincess
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
She's a feral
#214 to #155 - jumytime
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
******* ferals, man
******* ferals, man
#236 to #214 - teranin
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
South Park Sacrifice Song
#287 to #236 - jumytime
Reply 0
(09/07/2013) [-]
Wat
#145 - jaraandrew
Reply +4
(09/06/2013) [-]
What I think is a reasonable argument against that night - Here's why her "performance" was gross to me: It wasn't that she was a Disney channel sweetheart, it wasn't that she's trying to make a statement, it's not that I think she's some whore for being sexual on stage - that performance was disgusting to me because it was just plain awful! I recently watched her on Youtube singing old country songs in a modest dress and just a guitar and her voice and it was great. She could just stand there and I'd listen to her sing old school country ballads. She actually earned some respect. But this? This was awful. Tasteless, tacky, messy, and sexual yet not at all sexy. It's a shame she feels she needs to resort to that to make a statement. It would have been more amazing and worthy of respect had she just sung a beautiful song. IDK. Just my opinion.
#168 to #145 - stevenrm **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
i just looked up these videos you were talking about, she is a good singer
#157 to #145 - konradkurze
Reply -3
(09/06/2013) [-]
it wasnt a statement, it was her blackmailed by the system to do that **** and distract people from usa wanting more war

sad she had to be the sacrificial lamb
#196 to #157 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
That's a pretty far out guess you have there
#199 to #196 - konradkurze
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
well why else would an american sweetheart turn into a tramp overnight, unless whe was either blackmailed or bribed to do it

#222 to #199 - elyiia
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Over night? The VMAs have just been the latest low point on the ever descending spiral that is Miley Cyrus post Disney.
#224 to #222 - konradkurze
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
idk i havent given a **** to pay attention to her to see how she fell
all i knew was she was supposed to be a good girl hannah montana
#201 to #199 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
I'm just saying it's a bit out there to assume she did it to distract people from an upcoming war
#204 to #201 - konradkurze
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
well usa has played the terror threat card too much, the boston bombing was just far too convenient and obvious....so they had to turn to something outrageous in a different way to distract peoples attention

since they cant blow up more americans without digging themselves deeper, they picked using a much-loved celebrity who till now had a clean record of being a little darling to the american people and turning her into a skank knowing that would hit america right in the apple pie heart
#207 to #204 - thebrownydestroyer **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
I guess there is a slight possibility
#143 - sofunnyso
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
She's terrible, but that doesn't justify being terrible towards her. He has the right to dump her but isn't dumping by text a little bit too much? especially since they're freakin engaged!
#144 to #143 - thirdjess
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
Nah, they'd had an on and off relationship for a looong time. Because of her behaviour.
#152 to #144 - sofunnyso
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Oh, I didn't know that. I'm not much into celebrity news and stuff.
#153 to #152 - thirdjess
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
Me neither, really. I wouldn't know this tidbit at all if it weren't for my Mum reading all those gossip mags!
#142 - schmitty
Reply +3
(09/06/2013) [-]
Sweet, so she's back on the market.
#250 to #142 - Thunderrr
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#179 to #142 - anon
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
go ahead you can have her chicken ass
#159 to #142 - konradkurze
Reply +3
(09/06/2013) [-]
you'd have less social issues if you dated amy winehouse's dead body than dating a sell-out slut
#149 to #142 - fizzor
Reply +41
(09/06/2013) [-]
...   
You'd bang that?
...
You'd bang that?
#225 to #149 - squeejee
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
maybe if backed up a year or 2.
#216 to #149 - anonymoose
Reply +4
(09/06/2013) [-]
Don't pretend you wouldn't. One unflattering photo of her ass and Funnyjunk pretend she's ugly as ****. She's still hot.
#212 to #149 - anon
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
half of funnyjunk would bang anything willing. Hell I'd **** her.
#156 to #149 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Well yes.
And let me tell you, if i was five years younger, twice as handsome, much much richer and very famous she would totally be into me!
#191 to #156 - cubanwhiteman
Reply -1
(09/06/2013) [-]
Well if I were three years older, way more handsome than I need to be, actually had enough money to afford an appartment, moved out of my parents basement, had the courage to talk to a woman, actually start working out, became famous (not by singing, I cant sing.)and if I were the queen of England...
I'd still think you're a faggot.
#253 to #191 - angelusprimus
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
I love when baby losers try to insult me online, its absolutely adorable!
Do another! Do another!
#284 to #253 - cubanwhiteman
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
First off, baby losers? really?
Second off, it's called sarcasm. I wasn't insulting you with that comment, ********. There's the insult.
#151 to #149 - schmitty
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
Yes, yes I would. Because despite what everyone is currently saying about her being a whore and all that ****, all she really did was dance like a moron at the VMAs. She didn't go out and blow 20 dudes in a row. Besides, when she's not acting like a ******* weirdo I think she's kind of hot.
#189 to #151 - generalwatergate
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
not yet.
#154 to #151 - fizzor
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, okay, whatever floats your boat. I've never found her attractive so yeah.
#165 to #154 - grandogger
Reply -1
(09/06/2013) [-]
I think she's pretty, as in nice face features and physically nice to look at. But then she dresses like a freak and makes an ass of herself and now I wouldn't want to be in the same room as her. So yeah there's a difference between pretty and attractive
#137 - anon
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
like she won't find somebody else in 5 minutes.
#136 - daboomee
Reply +2
(09/06/2013) [-]
You know, WW3 is just about to break out...there's a MASSIVE amount of nuclear waste spilling in to the ocean from Japan...The human race probably wont survive the next 50 years...oh we're just gonna keep talking about Miley Cyrus twerking? Oh okay then.
#188 to #136 - anon
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
50 years? LAWL get real.
#160 to #136 - konradkurze
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
that was the whole point
she was blackmailed into doing that **** so mainstream public dont give a **** about the real world
#146 to #136 - anon
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
You seem to underestimate the survivability of human beings.
You'd have just an easy time killing off all of humanity in 50 years as you would ants.
#139 to #136 - sexyhimself
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
so the wordl will be like fallout?
except we will all be dead when the cool **** happens
#135 - xXRockerXx
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
I think you confuse this site with facebook... Nobody gives a **** about miley. The moment she takes her clothes off though let us know.
#130 - rainytrain
Reply +1
(09/06/2013) [-]
People should look at themselves in the mirror instead of using celebrities as scapegoats for their own problems.
#127 - ShockedNazi
Reply +65
(09/06/2013) [-]
#161 to #127 - konradkurze
Reply -5
(09/06/2013) [-]
will smith proved hes still a black man wanting to tap a slutty white woman
#138 to #127 - darnhaz
Reply +2
(09/06/2013) [-]
Can someone edit it to her dad dissapointed?
#166 to #138 - RobotSox **User deleted account**
Reply +13
(09/06/2013) [-]
#125 - gwynn
Reply +12
(09/06/2013) [-]
#118 - lamarsmithgot
Reply +7
(09/06/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Wow, I really couldn't possibly give less of a ****.
#112 - spankyy
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Is this true though? I know there a lot of gossip magazines that spread false rumors. Did he actually break things off with her for that?

Also, he's still a douche for doing it via text, regardless of how embarrassing her performance was.
#131 to #112 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
why do you even care?
#133 to #131 - spankyy
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Ehh, I don't really, but since it was brought up I was curious. Unless you mean me saying he's a douche for doing it through text. That's just me commenting that he's a douche.
#105 - asillytractor
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
Did someone already point out the fact; who ******* cares? If she was just some random chick, no one would care, but because she's "famous" and does this **** on TV people talk about it ad nauseam. Once again I reiterate who the **** cares?
#134 to #105 - spankyy
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
In response to him saying I care, it's kind of just curiosity since it was mentioned. I would not care at all normally (unless I knew her and actually cared about her in a personal sense). I however read this and was informed regardless, so i'm curious whether it's true or not.
#132 to #105 - fuzzyballs
Reply 0
(09/06/2013) [-]
spankyy cares