Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'Extremist' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (335)
[ 335 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#164 - Jeff C
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
I remember walking home late at night a few weeks ago, and you ever get the feeling that you're not alone? .. Well, I quickly turned around to find a .44 magnum on the ground, and it began to mug me with no human input.

Oh, wait, you mean to say PEOPLE kill people? Oh well now I just feel silly
#160 - perseeus
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
I can't believe that there's actually a gofuckyourself.com
#150 - therealtjthemedic
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
#152 to #150 - largeheadphones
Reply -2
(08/23/2013) [-]
I don't think you can use rockets on your own property. someone would notice that...
#154 to #152 - therealtjthemedic
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
IM SORRY, I THOUGHT THIS WAS AMERICA
#157 to #154 - largeheadphones
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
NOT ANYMORE! ******* DEMOCRATS! PLACING RULES ON EVERYTHING!
#132 - erpetrich
Reply +2
(08/23/2013) [-]
I don't drink Starbucks, I tried it once, tasted like ****, never going again
#277 - maxismahname
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I thought it was Zach Galafanakis and I was expecting something funny at the end
#275 - foelkera
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
Fun fact: Starbucks sometimes has promotions where you get a free coffee if you bring a gun to the store
#273 - flaminggodzilla
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
>Diffferent opinion
>**** YOU! GO DIE ASSHOLE!
#258 - aahrg
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
this whole hating starbucks because they allow guns is ridiculous.

everywhere guns are legal, the coffee shops allow them.

dunkin donuts allows guns.
tim hortons allows guns.
krispy kreme allows guns.

even if these retards did get starbucks to ban guns, all the gun owners would just go down the street to the next place
#220 - parttimezombie
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
>first time open carrying
>get iced coffee at Starbucks
>barrista looks at gun, asks what i'm carrying
>respond, Beretta Px4 Storm full size 9mm
>barrista: right on, I'm a Sig Saur fan myself
#222 to #220 - drewbridge
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
We have a Px4 in .45, they're nice.

9mm master race is better.
#245 to #222 - azumeow
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
9mm master race.

Ummm...wut?
#278 to #220 - Onemanretardpack
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Carried my Steyr m9 into my local starbucks. Glockfags were jelly
#196 - theonemica
Reply -1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I'm not really pro-gun or anti-gun, I just think it should be harder to get one. But, you have to realize that guns are made for one purpose and one purpose only - to hurt/kill someone/something. There is no other use for them. I mean at least knives can carve wood and stuff.
#253 to #196 - esmebuffay
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
You can carve wood with a gun, it's just really inefficient.
#326 to #253 - theonemica
Reply 0
(08/24/2013) [-]
LOL that was really funny xD
#155 - acksl
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Guns don't kill People, people kill people
Guns don't kill People, people kill people
#156 to #155 - acksl
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#172 to #156 - beerterror
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Wait who let the ogres outta swamps?
#187 to #156 - aasherknight
Reply -3
(08/23/2013) [-]
No, they will just use a knife instead (or some other weapon)
#205 to #187 - lyphowut
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
all those mass stabings
#133 - thedutchs
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I think people should have the right to own guns provided there are many background checks, psychological evaluations and mandatory gun safety lessons.
#145 to #133 - themastermorris
Reply -1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I agree, also to add to that, keep better track of who has a gun. Here in the US, we have the background checks and all but we kinda suck at keeping track of who is actually purchasing these firearms.
#147 to #133 - superunclesam
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
As an enthusiast this seems reasonable. Just no stupid ******* mag limits
#125 - elyiia
Reply -3
(08/23/2013) [-]
I don't particularly care about this argument, however I do want to put one thought to everyone. Not having a gun in the house has been proven to signifigantly reduce the likelyhood of someone commiting suicide.
#178 to #125 - lazorman
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
A person who wants to commit suicide WILL commit suicide.
No suicidal person ever has said "boy I think im gonna off myself today. wait, i dont have a gun! OH WELL I guess I'll go to work instead!"
#181 to #178 - elyiia
Reply -1
(08/23/2013) [-]
You're wrong, someone who has time in between the moment of sucidial thoughts and the actual moment of suicide is signifigantly less likely to actually follow through. It's been scientifically proven that, in general, the longer in between the decision and the action the less likely they are to go through with it.

With a gunshot it's almost immediately after the decision, you have no time to process it. Trying to hang yourself for example, requires a strong enough rope and a location to hang it which takes far longer.

It's also incredibly unlikely to survive a sucide by gun, whereas someone who regrets their decision to OD for example can go to the hospitol for a high chance of survival.
#122 - jackassalope
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
More guns = Less crime. Its a pretty clear correlation once you start looking at actual data.
#118 - lesrin
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
your right guns kill people, im sry i forgot that wars were fought with machine guns back in the 1400's my bad, carry on good sir
#108 - thewowpimp
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
My brother acutally has the best arguemewnt I've heard in a long time for gun rights.

The only weapon in the history of man made for killing other humans

is the sword. Yep, only thing a sword can do is kill humans, so why have we not banned swords?
#109 to #108 - hansjob
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
you can also parry with a sword. or use it as a cutting tool
#110 to #109 - thewowpimp
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
you gonna use a longsword to chop some wood? And have it break?

No, the sword was made with the express purpose of fighting with human beings.

A gun can be used to hunt animals, not a sword.
#113 to #110 - thewowpimp
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
You can't hunt with a sword is the point.

You have to imagine that a weapon's purpose is purely violent in this scenario.

Also the first guns could still have been used in theory, it just was financially practical.
#123 to #113 - elyiia
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
If you're not hunting with a sword, you're just not doing it right.
If you're not hunting with a sword, you're just not doing it right.
#129 to #113 - hansjob
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
sure, I'll give you that. But for the sake of arguing, I have another point. There are different types of so-called melee weapons and different types of firearms or guns. The different types have or had different uses. So you could use a gun for both hunting and murdering, but guns are usually made for either hunting or "protection". Same with melee weapons (spears, swords).
tl; dr, swords and guns are not comparable, gun is a vague term, you wouldn't use a cannon or an assault rifle to hunt, you wouldn't use a hunting spear to kill a man
#130 to #129 - thewowpimp
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
well when people talk about gun rights, we often hope they refer to a glock and not a cannon.

And melee weapons are more than often swords if they are not knives.
#131 to #130 - hansjob
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
clearly, but who uses a glock to hunt? besides, swords as weapons have been replaced with firearms specifically made to wound or kill.
#134 to #131 - thewowpimp
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
but not only humans.

Swords can't be used sensibly to hunt, but guns can.
#135 to #134 - hansjob
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
as i said, guns and swords aren't coparable categories. there are guns that are made to kill people, there are melee weapons that are made for hunting
#138 to #135 - thewowpimp
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
what melee weapons can you hunt with?

Besides, the idea is that swords have a far greater percentage of use as a murder weapon than guns.
#140 to #138 - hansjob
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
people hunted with spears, both throwing spears and otherwise.
if you compare swords and battle rifles, you'll see that both are made for murdering. It's not fair to compare a military weapon (sword) with the whole category of guns which include both hunting firearms and military firearms.

coming back to the original point of your brother, who has or uses a sword anyway these days. also, i'm pretty sure that most places do have restictions on sword owning
#111 to #110 - hansjob
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
I'm not saying you should use a sword to cut wood (I was thinking meat). But if I only had a sword and a gun, I would use the sword as a multi-purpose tool. Also, the first guns were definitely made for fighting humans, not hunting animals.
#124 to #111 - thewowpimp
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Sorry my comp must have lagged out and I replied to myself, see above for my response.
#116 to #108 - trevcars
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Swords are also made so you can look really cool.
#117 to #116 - thewowpimp
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
that's not really a purpose, but yes they do.
#95 - Schwarzenegger
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
Sounds like he attended a community college.
#67 - bokkos
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
The issue with guns is there are far too many out there with the opposite extremist views. I personally only own rifles and shotguns (Canada, eh?), but I understand that there are those wary of guns and I respect that. It's not unhealthy to be afraid of a tool who's purpose is to kill or maim, but don't throw all gun owners under the bus.
The issue with guns is there are far too many out there with the opposite extremist views. I personally only own rifles and shotguns (Canada, eh?), but I understand that there are those wary of guns and I respect that. It's not unhealthy to be afraid of a tool who's purpose is to kill or maim, but don't throw all gun owners under the bus.
#68 to #67 - bazda
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
There is no reason to be afraid of an inanimate object. You should respect them, but to fear them is simply illogical.
#69 to #68 - bokkos
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
There are a great many inanimate objects to be afraid of, and if people choose to be wary of firearms, I can't blame them especially if they were never brought up around them.
#65 - becefalus
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
"A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand." - Seneca
In this case it would be guns.
#18 - GodofTV
Reply -16
(08/22/2013) [-]
MOTHER ****** HAS A DIFFERENT OPINION THEN THAT OF THE AVERAGE FUNNYJUNKER GOD DAMN ASSHOLE NEEDS TO GET A PEICE OF OUR MIND.
#19 to #18 - xturboxx
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
You are literally too stupid to insult.
#21 to #18 - nefariouspickle
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
Are you not being sarcastic?
#41 to #18 - hanabro
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
COMPANY HAS A DIFFERENT OPINION THEN THAT OF MINE GOD DAMN ASSHOLES NEED TO GET A PIECE OF MY MIND.
#48 to #41 - lesterthered ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
ahaha nicely put
#107 to #48 - loganhusted
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
COMPANY DOESN'T AGREE WITH MY OPINION OR THE OPINION THAT I OPPOSE. THEY MUST BE AGAINST ME.
#22 to #18 - dashgamer
Reply +1
(08/22/2013) [-]
It's called being wrong, not having a different opinion.
#25 to #22 - commit
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
"I'm not angry, I'm just RIGHT." -Egoraptor
sorry, I had