Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'hi' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (152)
[ 152 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#154 - anon
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
wait a minuet the life of pi didnt have a real tiger? it looks so real! wait, THE LIFE OF PI DIDNT HAVE A REAL TIGER! why didnt they just get an animal trainer? why did it have to be CG!
#149 - protomanrulez
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I think the first picture is scarier with Davy Jones.
#141 - cinematicbrix
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
****** I didn't realize Bill Nighy played Davy Jones
****** I didn't realize Bill Nighy played Davy Jones
#131 - moghulking
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I really hate thinking about movies this way anyone else agree with me?
#125 - anon
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
Seeing pictures like this ruins the magic for me. For example, when I saw The Hobbit, I was totally immersed in the fantasy. Now that I see the picture, I remember it's all fake. I want to believe!
#122 - anon
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
they should release effects-free workprints as a separate release
they'd make more money for less work and I'd enjoy that so much more
#116 - dracomancer
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I hate to be the bearer of bad news guys but the guys hired to do the special effects for life of pi went bankrupt because of the heavy stuff they had to do for that tiger and such. That ****** expensive.
#136 to #116 - Neodude
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
yep, and then the producer/director(can't remember whom it was) commented that they wish they could have paid the studio less.
#111 - ishotthedeputy
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I was in the middle of this and just started thinking, "What the **** am I doing with my life." Long story short, I guess I'm here to stay. Is there a welcoming ceremony?
#100 - natanhiel
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I don't watch them WITH visual effects
#96 - jinapayne
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
The point of this post is saying "This is how dull movies would look without VFX artists"
I doubt they would use greenscreens if VFX artists werent around and would use practical effects
But it still shows how much VFX artists do
#91 - twofreegerbils
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
They are commonly referred to as plays
#54 - TurtleOnItsBack
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
Would watch 'Life of Pi' if there were no special effects and it was a real tiger.
#67 to #54 - seriouslyblack
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
except some of the **** the tiger does in the movie would require some serious animal training
#47 - anon
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
respect old movies*** a lot of that stuff can be done but they use visual effect to cut costs. so go **** yourself when it comes to the opinion that these modern movies are better and watch bladerunner. everything is real. one of the best pieces of modern cinema there is. and its 100% real
#39 - xgrandmoffx
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I would still watch films. The cinematographic works which I consume are valued by me for their stories, not their blasting.
#36 - anon
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
yeah it's called musicals
#34 - trogdorrules
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I love watching behind the scenes stuff, so yeah I would totally watch a full movie with no special effects.
#29 - fuckthehabs
Reply 0
(08/08/2013) [-]
I just gained much more respect for actors/actresses
#11 - kuroryuuhime
Reply 0
(08/07/2013) [-]
Am I the only one who thinks it'd make for an awesome extra feature to have a version of the movie on Blu-Ray or whatever with all the special effects removed? Like just watch The Avengers, then right after watch Low-Budget Avengers with green screens and sound stages galore?
#17 - scrumdillyicious
Reply -1
(08/08/2013) [-]
As long as the story was good, then yeah. Not having visual effects would force the writers to come up with some damn good stories rather than just a movie filled with special effects
#10 - soulkiller
Reply -1
(08/07/2013) [-]
Yes. Yes I would.