Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'True' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (317)
[ 317 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
#247 - Jormundar
Reply +2
(07/29/2013) [-]
none of these are sexist or racist...
context needed
D-
#280 - tmdarby
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#266 - junkmanrs
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
Yea it's so rough being a white person
#254 - fuzzyballs
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
but they're both opinions.....
#232 - takesomemorewater
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
You forget that this is funnyjunk.
#223 - Nightelfbane
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
there'd be no racism if everyone was white
#218 - thegamerslife
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
My state just enacted a law that makes everyone... "gender neutral" and I think it's ******* retarded that it's a law. Just respect eachother without prejudice, how ******* hard is that?! apparently so hard it has to be made into a law. :/
#181 - deergod **User deleted account**
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#178 - coastalhobo
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
It seem to me like alot of the people calling racism or sexism are the ones bringing race and sex into the equation when the topic isn't even related to any of that.
#166 - organiclead
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
Because this is what tends to happen.
#224 to #166 - Nightelfbane
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
you just butchered the meaning of that comic and i ******* hate you
#230 to #224 - organiclead
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
Might have been more of a knee jerk reaction to some of the other reactions in the comments than to the content itself. I agree with the main comic's view that we should stop being dicks to each other and start being nice human beings. I don't agree with the comments below that claim people shouldn't be offended when people say offensive things in public to strangers because they were "just joking".
#164 - pankikilord
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
Somewhat on the same topic. I always dislike it when people take MAJOR offense to a joke because it's "Racist" or whatever.

The whole point of humor is to NOT take it seriously. I don't give a **** what the joke is about, or whether or not it touches on a subject I take seriously or not. Jokes are meant to make you laugh, regardless of the subject. If you find it offensive, or don't find it funny, just put up with it.

Sure, take offense if the person MEANS something they said. Or if they're ACTUALLY racist or sexist. But just because you joke about something, doesn't mean you are against or for it. I'll laugh at black jokes, WITH my black friends, and it wont mean I'm a racist.

If you are taking something that's not meant to be take seriously so damn seriously, you're clearly doing life wrong.
#110 - DrPeppir
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
So, disregarding both Trayvon's race and Zim Zam's race...   
I don't see why Zim Zam wasn't charged with anything. I understand he shot out of self defense, but isn't actually killing the kid a bit much? Wouldn't shooting the kid in the knee would have been enough?   
   
inb4 ****** lover
So, disregarding both Trayvon's race and Zim Zam's race...
I don't see why Zim Zam wasn't charged with anything. I understand he shot out of self defense, but isn't actually killing the kid a bit much? Wouldn't shooting the kid in the knee would have been enough?

inb4 ****** lover
#125 to #110 - demandsgayversion
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
I guess he thought Trayvon felt the gun during the struggle. I thought that too, but I guess Zimmerman said during court that it was either Trayvon or himself, someone was gonna use the gun. Might be true, might not, but I'm okay with it.
#137 to #110 - certifiedidiot
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
I think the true problem of the this case is the crazy ass laws in the sunshine state, the problem is that this was legal under the law when it is such a moral and legal grey area.
#184 to #137 - anon
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
Florida's self defense law that was used in the Zimmerman case is a mirror image of every other state. If you're talking about stand your ground it didn't apply to the trial.
#140 to #110 - ryderjamesbudde **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#143 to #140 - ryderjamesbudde **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#141 to #110 - thatoneiranianguy
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
Because he didn't do anything illegal because evidence didn't support any valid justification for charging him with anything.

The negroids that went crazy for a few days though did not seem to care about the jury's decision though.
#185 to #110 - anon
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
Because shooting someone in the leg implies you don't completely fear for your life. Zimmerman would be in jail right now if he had done that.
#221 to #110 - anon
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
Why do people say stuff like this? You have a huge artery behind your knee. Shooting him in the knee isn't a big improvement over shooting him in the chest. There's basically no place to aim that can't be fatal. You can try shooting people in the feet or hands, but that too can be fatal.

As far as Zimmerman, he could have shot at Martin's knee, but I'm not sure that would have been any better for Martin than aiming at his chest, and if he did try and fire at Martin's knee, he may have shot himself.
#113 to #110 - spoogeyboi
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
#95 - thunderbritchesdan
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
Yeah equality is the only way to go love everyone!.....
except those gross ass Koreans
#93 - kaycie
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
And in the next post, a 'get back to the kitchen and make me a sandwich' joke
#156 to #93 - ryderjamesbudde **User deleted account**
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#79 - godhatesmaggots
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
its all about context
its all about context
#148 to #79 - alltimetens
Reply 0
(07/29/2013) [-]
He looks like a frog.
#80 to #79 - kingoflulzfool
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
lmfao , wot
#62 - capnwetnipples
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#47 - spceinvdr
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
you just got told *******.
#38 - shreddykickflip
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
DAS RAYCIST!
#31 - litobahamas
Reply +1
(07/29/2013) [-]
Or maybe it's all context? The first one in my opinion doesn't mention race at all, therefore it's not racist. In the second situation, both statements are gross generalizations but they aren't specifically offensive enough to be called sexist.

TL;DR it's more complex than this post makes it seem, but the overall idea is one i can agree with.
#14 - plutoo
Reply -5
(07/28/2013) [-]
OR JUST STOP ALL RELIGION AND PREPARE FOR THE ******* ALIEN/ZOMBIE ATTACKS!!!
#24 to #14 - teenytinyspider
Reply +1
(07/28/2013) [-]
It's time for your pills dude.