Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#303 - fourchaners
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
**fourchaners rolls 767**
#308 to #303 - lyokomaster
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
^----Your thought pattern was similar to mine.
#299 - fourchaners
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
**fourchaners rolled a random image posted in comment #15 at I'm so sorry... ** crackers
#277 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
On a side note: I realized why there are next to no white jokes. They're disguised as American/british/other country jokes, because there are too many damn white people.
#305 to #277 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
No because you can't offend a white guy, because white people don't get ******* butthurt about everything.
#306 to #305 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Neither do *******. Do you know how many black people are on this site? Do you know how many goddamn ****** jokes they hear on here every damn day?
And they still here. Honestly, Pretty much every black guy I know is chill as **** about racist jokes.
#309 to #306 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
no no, black people are cool about ****** jokes, but almost every black kid at my school are "thugs" and will go "ham" on your ass if you even say negro. i saw a kid almost get ******* choked do death in ******* geography when he mentioned the negro river.
#310 to #309 - srskate
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
I'm not gonna lie, that sounds hilarious as ****.
#311 to #310 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
it was ******* histarical cause the ****** was foaming at the mouth thats how retarded and pissed he was.
#323 to #311 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
I think the real problem with this argument is generalizations. They're never true.
#328 to #323 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
while that is true, a minority will always get offended before a white man does.
#338 to #328 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
You are american like me, correct?
#340 to #338 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Yeah, why?
#341 to #340 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
I've heard there is angry white people in Europe. They discriminate by country. We can't quite do that here in america.
#342 to #341 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Well, southerners are kind of aggressive towards northerners even thought they don't remember why.
#343 to #342 - srskate
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Yeah, we can only really discriminate against a general area.
#313 to #311 - crazyhindu
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
hysterical*
#270 - cakezs
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
To people that think "cracker" refers to a food, it actually refers to white people cracking whips: whip "crackers"
#272 to #270 - blarghagh
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
I thought it was because we're white like crack
#262 - ryuklovesapples
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
i used to get called 'sour cream' because i was so ******* pale   
   
 (i still am) woo for pale people c:
i used to get called 'sour cream' because i was so ******* pale

(i still am) woo for pale people c:
#273 to #262 - kaycie
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
have i found another ginger?
have i found another ginger?
#276 to #273 - dashapple
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Maybe.....
#274 to #273 - ryuklovesapples
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
No, I am sorry. My hair is light brown c:
No, I am sorry. My hair is light brown c:
#281 to #274 - darthdemise
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
that's what gingers in deniale say
#256 - foelkera
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
>Which is worse
>"******" censored
>African American Majority

not biased at all guise
#261 to #256 - I Am Monkey
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
Well we already have a "c word"
#192 - bandoslootshare
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
They would say N word vs C word if they really thought that . but then it would be cunt
#167 - thedungeonmaster
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
The face that they couldn't even use the word ****** on TV should imply that it's worse lol dumb *****
#222 to #167 - thedungeonmaster
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Why the **** did I say face? I meant fact. God damnit...
#162 - xredsoxmuffin
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
Neither is worse, it should be "Which word has more people overreacting"
#160 - nyawgga
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
If you censor the first word and not the second, guess which one is worse..
#164 to #160 - anon
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
They're both derogatory and hold the same intentions behind saying them. But one is censored because it has people that overreact more, but still use the word themselves to describe each other.
#205 to #160 - camerel
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
#158 - frenchrickastley
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
Gee what's ******* worse
Cracker or the one that we are too ******* scared to actually put on television for ***** sake
#136 - bowler
Reply +1
(07/03/2013) [-]
if you told a black person they cant say "cracker" they would accuse you of being racist.
#38 - Nightelfbane
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
>4 black people
>2 white people

are they even trying
#57 to #38 - plutarkus
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
>4 black people

just because they wear suits, doesn't mean they are educated.
Clearly, the white team is overpowered
#36 - ednakrababbal
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
well, apparently ****** is worse, otherwise it would say "n word vs c word"
#52 to #36 - sepheroth
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Cunt?
#33 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
******: Someone who is unedjucated.
Cracker: Someone who cracks a whip.

Between being called an idiot, and being called sadistic: it's easy to tell which is more offensive.
#34 to #33 - jimli
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
Not really; some people value scruples over brains
#41 to #33 - komandantmirkoo ONLINE
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
actually ****** comes from the word negro which means black. get your **** straight
#210 to #41 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
Well, aren't you quite the ******?

"****** - describes an ignorant, uneducated, foolish individual regardless of race, color, religion, sexual orientation, etc. "
#213 to #210 - komandantmirkoo ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
so basically every word ever invented has a different meaning? soup- a slow moving aquatic animal.

tree - a dance of the south american native tribes.

the word ****** has a description. if you want to use it by adding every derogatory statement to it then that's your right. but the meaning of the word is not that monstrously bad. ****** = negro = black
#216 to #213 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
I have heard from various different people from various different sites, and in real life, that what I posted is the actual definition of ******.
#221 to #216 - komandantmirkoo ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
just because people use a word that has a derogatory message doesn't change the definition of the word. take for example products from the early 20th century. like ****** hair tobacco. does it imply a stupid or uneducated person? no. it implies that the person is a negro (black)
#331 to #221 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
I'm not saying that it doesn't refer to black people in a derogatory way, but it also means uneducated. Words having multiple meanings is quite common.
#335 to #331 - meanings
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
this is the worst username ever! .___. i regret everything...
#339 to #335 - Nihatclodra
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
lol
#333 to #331 - komandantmirkoo ONLINE
Reply 0
(07/03/2013) [-]
in colloquial language yes. but the strict term from the dictionary is still ******=negro=black
#14 - lincolnpenis
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
We brought the whole double standards thing on with all that slave trade jazz in the 1800s. Coloured folks are never going to be the same as whites now. Not that they aren't human, not that they don't deserve the same treatment as any ethnicity. The people of white skin colour have just never had to experience anything that horrific. That's always going to be a playing card in their deck that saves the game.

These people just went ahead on with their debate and no one bats an eyelid to the fact that Cracker is just Cracker and ****** is 'The N Word'.
#16 to #14 - imthepunkkid
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Jews went through slavery a lot, And a lot of them are white
#17 to #16 - lincolnpenis
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
It wasn't discriminate when it came to the white skin colour, just the jews and some of the other races, Black folk were targeted at some camps back then. They've constantly had a hard time because of genetics, not because of their choice of religion or anything else.
#20 to #17 - imthepunkkid
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
In southern Africa white Europeans were sold into slavery quite often as well
#60 to #14 - demonicstphenson
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
>people of white skin colour have just never had to experience anything that horrific.


You really need to brush up on your world history you tard
#42 to #14 - ctenop
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
Well, I dunno, we have had some **** done to us, I.e. white genocide in Africa, and treatment in other countries. But that's beside the point. I never experienced it, and neither has the black kids I know. None of them experienced slavery, nor I the slave owner. They should just get over it, it happened a long time ago, and to none of them.
#12 - quazyjash ONLINE
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
"Studies show 1 out of 6 people find the word '******* to be less offensive then the word 'Cracker'. All whites proved to be racist."
#117 - IloveWAFFLES
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Cracker is more of a Spanish thing.

See when the Spanish were in Florida. They had their own cowboys now these cowboys cracked whips and were called "Crackers" because of the sound of the whip.

TL;DR
Cracker is a spanish cowboy in Florida.
#115 - anon
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Guy in the middle on top row, looks like he doesn't give a ****. He has better places to be
#32 - anon
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
apprently cracked is based on the cracking of the whip