Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'It isn't mine' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (135)
[ 135 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#51 - thenoodleking **User deleted account**
Reply +2
(07/02/2013) [-]
#93
My mom still tucks me in at night.
#130 - drulludanni
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
#88 oh boy that's a horribly small time window to make phone calls, only being able to call at 9 am and 9 pm would be pretty difficult
#85 - alucord
Reply -3
(07/02/2013) [-]
#94: "how much your feet kill"   
   
wat?
#94: "how much your feet kill"

wat?
#95 to #85 - mcnizzlezz
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
It meant kill as in hurt. "My hands are killing me right now"
#48 - taxideataxus
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
Thank you for this post.
Thank you for this post.
#32 - beldum
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
>Don't dumb it down   
   
literally every english and research course I've taken says we should simplify it as much as we can, so even the laymen could understand. Using unnecessary jargon and deep words often come across as pretentious.
>Don't dumb it down

literally every english and research course I've taken says we should simplify it as much as we can, so even the laymen could understand. Using unnecessary jargon and deep words often come across as pretentious.
#57 to #32 - neutrino
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
My thoughts on the matter:
For people you don't know / will never talk to again, dumb it down.
For people you do know, don't dumb it down -- let them improve their understanding until they can keep up. And if they are not willing to do so, then they are clearly not interested.
#16 - gremlinbfg
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
ah, that triple digit piece of art.
#14 - bphamtastic
Reply -3
(07/02/2013) [-]
number 36 is false. Ive had friends call me different nicknames such as B-ri, bobby, and phamster in hs and they asked me which i'd perfer. i went with b-ri.
#42 to #14 - pphuckingh
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#29 to #14 - spankyy
Reply +1
(07/02/2013) [-]
Phamster?
#39 to #29 - pridefulmatthew
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Phanact and a Hamster had a love child?

Thats what it made me think any how..
#55 to #39 - spankyy
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Works for me.
#91 - vritzka
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
I loved these. Thank you
#80 - anon
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
"buy the orange properties in Monopoly." the most important thing in this post.
#74 - robertolee
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
Don't agree with "Just because you can doesn't mean you should". I live my life by "If you can, why not?"
#77 to #74 - heartlessrobot
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
When people ask "Why?" I answer "Why not?".
#81 to #77 - robertolee
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
Good answer.
#87 to #74 - bobthedilder
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Can you run into oncoming traffic?
#88 to #87 - robertolee
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Now you ask yourself, why not?. Then if the answer is "I am potentially putting my life and the life of others in danger through pure stupidity".. You don't do it.
#89 to #88 - bobthedilder
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
That is pretty much the same thing as, "Just because you can doesn't mean you should".
#92 to #89 - robertolee
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
See, if you can, why not? doesn't apply to deliberately putting yourself and others in harms way, only someone with mental issues would do that. It has the same meaning as Carpe Diem. "Just because you can doesn't mean you should" has more of a negative connotation in my view, kind of stifling you from taking a potentially worthwhile risk.

For me its more of a pessimistic vs optimistic view. with "if you can" being the optimistic.
#115 to #74 - anon
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
All I have to say to you is fat chicks with skimpy clothes.
#117 to #115 - robertolee
Reply -1
(07/02/2013) [-]
They can do as they please. Doesn't mean I have to look at them.
#119 to #74 - randtherrin
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Bullies: If I can beat up that kid why not?
#122 to #119 - robertolee
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Are you even reading the rest of the comments, I don't want to have to explain this again
#124 to #122 - randtherrin
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
I did read the other comments. and while you have a valid point. "if you can, why not" AND "just because you can doesn't mean you should" are both equally valid. Being specific with the Bullies, they aren't mentally disabled they are just jackasses, "why not" is a challenge not a reason to think. It may have a more negative tone but "just because you can doesn't mean you should" applies to more situations
#126 to #124 - robertolee
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Its not a competition with which phrase applies to the most situations. I just find my phrase is more appropriate due to the fact that its has an optimistic undertone and I prefer it over the pessimistic "Just because you can". Also I actually said mental issues, not a disability, and psychologists would argue directly that people who deliberately cause harm to others for no reason do have mental issues, ranging from an underdeveloped brain to insecurity issues.
#127 to #126 - randtherrin
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Mental issues** <-- Agreed and thanks for the correction. As for the quote, I see it not as a negative/pessimistic dont take risks statment. its a warning, don't be stupid. I can take risks, and be the better for it, without being stupid
#129 to #127 - robertolee
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
I guess its all just down to a matter of perspective then. By the way I would just like to thank you, you're probably the first person that disagrees with me that hasn't led the discussion into an argument consisting of insults thrown back and forth needlessly. Nice to see there's people on here with a respectable level of maturity.
#131 to #129 - randtherrin
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
You're welcome. as for the mental issues, can we send the senate and congress to those doctors you mentioned? Enjoy your day sir.
#132 to #131 - robertolee
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
I'm from the UK so I will be sending all of Parliament and all 3 major political parties and some of the minors along with the senate and congress.
#72 - naruchu
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
#22 Apparently they never had the Cinnamon Butter Rolls at Texas Roadhouse
#75 to #72 - heartlessrobot
Reply -2
(07/02/2013) [-]
Cheddar bay biscuits at Red Lobster are the greatest. No competition.
#71 - goobyman
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
#9 is probably invented by you so we give you green toombles.
#70 - rfkilbuck
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
#54 and #100 are my fave
#54 - linktheherooftime
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
My ancestors are some of the most feared people where I live. Me, I'm not scary at all.
#41 - aliksander
Reply -2
(07/02/2013) [-]
I stopped at #5. With that kind of collectivist mindset he must be a Keynesian.
#49 to #41 - anon
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Too bad Keynes theory's is way more efficient than Smith's...
#104 to #49 - aliksander
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
If by efficient you mean good at creating government debt that will slow the economy and damage future economic prospects to temporarily alleviate a small portion of current hardship, then yeah Keynes was right on the money.

Adam Smith's theories had some flaws but the later Austrians did a good job of plugging the holes. Read "Human Action" by Ludwig Von Mises for a complete understanding.
#40 - Animefreake
0
has deleted their comment [-]
#36 - anon
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
#80 means.... If you like the same sex, don't shower?
#33 - chevah
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
#100 isn't that good
#4 - ssurtrebor **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
#3: You're right. I've never jumped off a cliff or gotten shot. I should probably do that so I know what it's like.
#3 - biembobo
Reply 0
(07/01/2013) [-]
love this list but come on, everyone likes gloating once in a while, don't be a party pooper.
#21 to #3 - Esplosions
Reply 0
(07/02/2013) [-]
Don't gloat, but being too humble is weird.