Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#33 - pappathethird (05/13/2013) [-]
*Help, I'm being raped!'
#10 - alltipswelcome (05/13/2013) [-]
Just shows that women can make an argument out of anything.
#196 to #10 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
And that men will pull as many strawmen to "prove" their dumbass theories about women.
#220 to #10 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
you mean the comic (that was written by a man) shows that a woman will make an argument out of anything, simply because the comic depicts it?

in that case, the Bible proves that Jesus really WAS the son of God, and Harry Potter proves that Hogwarts is real.

posting as anon because faggot OP blocked me
User avatar #29 to #10 - yunablade (05/13/2013) [-]
And strangely, they can't make a good argument.
#88 to #29 - broorb (05/14/2013) [-]
and now, you're being sexist, which is I'm afraid completely shooting yourself in the foot my dear boy
#103 to #88 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Found the feminazi sympathizer.
User avatar #133 to #103 - ilovehitler (05/14/2013) [-]
Or, and this is just a guess, maybe he actually believes in gender equality and sees no point in sexism?

Don't try and argue that you ain't being sexist. Saying women can't make any good arguments is sexist.
#237 to #133 - broorb (05/14/2013) [-]
cheers, man. I love that this came from a person with the username ilovehitler, too, hahahaha
User avatar #238 to #237 - ilovehitler (05/14/2013) [-]
That's why I love this name. When I actually choose to be sincere, it catches people off guard. When I try to joke around, my name fits right in with it all.
#130 to #103 - varrlegrimscythe (05/14/2013) [-]
#197 to #103 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Yeah, **** those women who keep poor men caged up in labor camps to be gassed after intense torture. Wait, they don't ******* exist. If anything, there's many more men who lock up others to rape them and kill them.
#106 to #103 - broorb (05/14/2013) [-]
ah grow up, kiddo
#43 - giuetta has deleted their comment [-]
#1 - blademontane (05/13/2013) [-]
In case anyone wants to check their privilege
User avatar #79 to #1 - wlflvr ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
wow. 145
User avatar #116 to #1 - popkornking (05/14/2013) [-]
lel I'm a 150
#202 to #1 - cfeuer has deleted their comment [-]
#281 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
"Black -100"
"Asian +10"

Chart is ******** . Everybody in this day and age knows that black people can do no wrong. And Asians aren't privileged at all.
User avatar #3 to #1 - icheatjews (05/13/2013) [-]
100+ reporting in
User avatar #24 to #1 - darthdingo (05/13/2013) [-]
10. Meh, not bad.
User avatar #41 to #1 - wtf man (05/13/2013) [-]
#296 to #1 - wolfblackfire **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #428 to #296 - expeditas (05/14/2013) [-]
-275, South Africa too.
#384 to #1 - CaptainKill (05/14/2013) [-]
mfw you guys are getting mad over a test that's supposed to be just for ****** and giggles.
#13 to #1 - srapture (05/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #14 to #13 - srapture (05/13/2013) [-]
By way, how the hell is deaf worse than immobile?
User avatar #393 to #14 - meganinja (05/14/2013) [-]
how is blind the worst thing on there? More than the other disabilities combined
User avatar #18 to #14 - flemsdfer ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
the second you hit any step like situation (anything raised up suddenly instead of at a gradual slope) just stop and realise you have reached your journey limit and you'll figure it out.
User avatar #20 to #18 - srapture (05/13/2013) [-]
It sounds like you thought I was asking the opposite question.
User avatar #21 to #20 - flemsdfer ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
Well I seem to have read that backasswards. Sorry.
#271 to #1 - tealkangaroo (05/14/2013) [-]
I find this pretty offensive, australia should be worth way more points than America
User avatar #481 to #271 - imnotkickthecat (05/14/2013) [-]
yea, you can say that when most of the natrual wildlife doesn't want to kill you.
User avatar #298 to #1 - ningyoaijin (05/14/2013) [-]
55, and why the hell is Engineer +10 when Scientist is -15?
User avatar #28 to #1 - koobzacc (05/13/2013) [-]
Whoa whoa whoa, being a doctor or an engineer or any job isnt a privilege. It's earned. Granted, being privileged helps you get a job, but thats covered by they other criteria
User avatar #229 to #28 - myrtille (05/14/2013) [-]
No, you are privilaged BECAUSE you have that job...
User avatar #486 to #28 - koobzacc (05/14/2013) [-]
Huh. That makes sense actually
#70 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
scored 155
User avatar #55 to #1 - odytoboman ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
#9 to #1 - teranin ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
70 on that arbitrary chart with dubious origins.
70 on that arbitrary chart with dubious origins.
User avatar #34 to #1 - awesomedewd (05/13/2013) [-]

Kind of stupid thing to make.
User avatar #478 to #1 - icameheretotroll (05/14/2013) [-]

yes because a blind person would totally read this thing
User avatar #11 to #1 - areandara (05/13/2013) [-]
#413 to #1 - SilentRaver (05/14/2013) [-]
I'm a 5'11" heterosexual white male with blond hair and blue eyes born into a comfortable middle class family in the northern U.S. with my supportive parents both still alive and living together, and I inherited a channelopathic genetic mutation that causes muscular hypertrophy and hypertonia without negative side affects.
Society says I'm not allowed to complain about a goddamn thing.
And I'm throwing away all of my privileges to enjoy the internet 24/7.
User avatar #491 to #413 - doodler (05/14/2013) [-]
Internet is a privilege.
#190 to #1 - zombiefied (05/14/2013) [-]
**** off i like short girls
#300 to #1 - diegotan (05/14/2013) [-]
This is retarded.
This is retarded.
#454 to #300 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
found the short black intersex gay trans blind muslim scientist
User avatar #246 to #1 - kiratheunholy ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
I have 70 privilege
User avatar #260 to #1 - buttinspecter (05/14/2013) [-]
What exactly is the "Gender" section? It doesn't make any sense to me.
User avatar #153 to #1 - linktheherooftime (05/14/2013) [-]
Being Latino, and Non-Religious living in the U.S. really brought me down.
#346 to #1 - seantheprawn (05/14/2013) [-]
Earn $1,000,000 a year +100
gay -150
Seems accurate to me...
#104 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Inaccurate and a complete load of crap.

There is not a more oppressed people in America today than the white heterosexual male.
User avatar #325 to #104 - akkere (05/14/2013) [-]
No one knows the struggle of a plutocrat.

I still have yet to construct my own gold plated replica of the Titanic.
#193 to #104 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
By oppressed you mean people say bad things about you sometimes and that hurts your feelings right? Meanwhile the oppressors are being treated like **** everywhere else and denied basic rights. Poor you.
#154 to #104 - stormtrooperface (05/14/2013) [-]
yep white dude in college, lost my job that was how I was paying my way through college and I am not able to receive any help from the government also I can't get any scholarships. so how the **** am I supposed to have a future? I don't, I sacrifice it to student loans to get a mediocre job. at this job an under qualified person who is not white or male or a white male will get a promotion instead of me, when I have a perfect record and they come to work late, high, get arrested at work what have you.
tl;dr political correctness is racist
User avatar #47 to #1 - Nightelfbane (05/13/2013) [-]
Black only scholarships
#75 to #1 - sebsebsebh (05/14/2013) [-]
165... I feel powerful.
User avatar #26 to #1 - arkytior (05/13/2013) [-]
Where in Europe does Slovenia go to? Meh or **** ?
User avatar #27 to #26 - arkytior (05/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #63 to #1 - eeveeisbestpoke (05/13/2013) [-]
-40. ._.
#452 to #1 - lillamy (05/14/2013) [-]
55 ...
55 ...
User avatar #46 to #1 - vigilum ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
#422 to #1 - mcwachner (05/14/2013) [-]
Holy 			****		! I'm alpha as 			****		!
Holy **** ! I'm alpha as **** !
User avatar #497 to #422 - newposterintown (05/14/2013) [-]
privileged =/= alpha
User avatar #39 to #1 - vilememory ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
I'm a 15...
User avatar #31 to #1 - slaykingftw (05/13/2013) [-]
155 ....well shiet
User avatar #331 to #1 - MetalGirafe (05/14/2013) [-]

**** me right?
User avatar #332 to #331 - MetalGirafe (05/14/2013) [-]
I need a Jewish GIF for this
#350 to #332 - rokkarokkaali ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #512 to #350 - MetalGirafe (05/16/2013) [-]
User avatar #17 to #1 - muchasmarcos (05/13/2013) [-]
95 is still good considering that only have the drawback of living in a relativley **** country.
User avatar #171 to #1 - matthewfuckingmain (05/14/2013) [-]
135. Where are my complementary slaves?
#7 to #1 - brohio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #30 to #1 - reyden (05/13/2013) [-]
~170. i feel accomplished. that feeling will go away tomorrow i bet
User avatar #23 to #1 - Nihatclodra (05/13/2013) [-]
25, though a lot of options weren't there for me:
I'm Pansexual, so I went with bisexual.
I'm an Agnostic Omnist, so I went with no religion (since I don't belong to any one religion)
I have a genetic heart disorder, so I went with Disease.
I'm in Canada, so I didn't count the -20 for no religion in the US.
#479 to #23 - edmundicon (05/14/2013) [-]
lol "agnostic omnist" really? you don't believe in god, okay. Neither do I. but really? how can being an atheist have so many names
User avatar #494 to #479 - Nihatclodra (05/14/2013) [-]
Atheism means you don't believe it's possible for any sort of God to exist, ever.
Agnosticism means you believe a god can exist, but you won't believe it unless there's definite proof.
Omnism means you're part of every religion, period.
Agnostim Omnism means that you believe every religion (including Atheism) is possible, but won't believe any one (or combination) of them unless there is definite proof.

Basically: I won't believe there is a god unless there is definite proof, and I won't believe there is no god unless there is definite proof.
User avatar #16 to #1 - SRsoccerstar (05/13/2013) [-]
First time being Jewish has paid off.

100+ whoot whoot
User avatar #299 to #1 - cadencee (05/14/2013) [-]
hmmm... got 95 lol
User avatar #4 to #1 - blademontane (05/13/2013) [-]
100+ master race
User avatar #279 to #1 - cescaxx (05/14/2013) [-]
105 here.
#514 to #1 - Rascal (05/28/2013) [-]
145 points but still sad
#222 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
being a scientist is now underprivileged?
User avatar #506 to #1 - grantika (05/15/2013) [-]
User avatar #177 to #1 - waaw (05/14/2013) [-]
190. Privilege status: ✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
#318 to #177 - adplum has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #502 to #1 - sefyu (05/14/2013) [-]

white, male, straight muslim european without disabilites, living in a middleclass family, being more or less attractive, a bit over the median height and studying engineering.
I guess I'm fine.
#149 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
perfect zero. hooray for being black and otherwise average!
#496 to #1 - newposterintown (05/14/2013) [-]
45. i guess i'm not very surprised.   
also, the only thing that bothers me about these things are the profession parts.
45. i guess i'm not very surprised.

also, the only thing that bothers me about these things are the profession parts.
User avatar #110 to #1 - brettyoke (05/14/2013) [-]
What if my income is between 65k and 100k?
User avatar #493 to #1 - larsravn (05/14/2013) [-]
195 .... And im just a kid..

Thank god that im tall!
User avatar #83 to #1 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/14/2013) [-]
For the first half I was going up and up and up but then it dropped to 55.
#490 to #1 - infernis has deleted their comment [-]
#78 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #489 to #1 - studbeefpile (05/14/2013) [-]
I am a:

White +25
Male +25
Straight +20
Cis +20
U.S. citizen +20
Christian +5
Middle 0
Able-bodied +25
(people have told me I have a good face, but I don't know) +10?
Tall +10
Musician (other) 0


I am okay with this.
User avatar #71 to #1 - mexicandudeinsd ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
55 im a slightly overweight mexican teen in the us and im poor but im still good 55 is good right?
#487 to #1 - genoman (05/14/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #68 to #1 - nyanllama (05/14/2013) [-]
-60 because i think my mom drank while pregnant with me, thanks mom
#485 to #1 - genoman has deleted their comment [-]
#57 to #1 - Rascal (05/13/2013) [-]
because profession is totally a "privelage" and not something you ******* earn
#482 to #1 - himyouknowwho (05/14/2013) [-]
not bad
not bad
User avatar #53 to #1 - thegayman ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
-150. Would be worse but I decided not to add the problems with my legs, as I'm almost better
User avatar #451 to #1 - butterisgood (05/14/2013) [-]
How does weather i'm doing this on a friday or saturday night count?
User avatar #45 to #1 - bossmanholms (05/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #447 to #1 - parrotey (05/14/2013) [-]
-245.........well f*ck.
User avatar #40 to #1 - violentpixi (05/13/2013) [-]
-5 because I'm a poor lady who can't add. Considering all the far worse things that can happen to a person, I don't really feel like I belong within the disprivileged section.
#434 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
How privileged are you?

Blind -750

Unlucky for all the blind people doing this test then.

User avatar #37 to #1 - chaossniper (05/13/2013) [-]
-700 **** wut
User avatar #429 to #1 - babyanalraper (05/14/2013) [-]
What's check it daily supposed to mean?
User avatar #446 to #429 - blademontane (05/14/2013) [-]
Since Check your privileged is used by feminazis to say that men are privileged and don't know their suffering, check it daily probably means that you should be reminded daily of how little you know about women's pain
User avatar #468 to #446 - babyanalraper (05/14/2013) [-]
**babyanalraper rolls 37**
Checking it
#32 to #1 - najrath (05/13/2013) [-]
165... bow down to me peasants
User avatar #139 to #32 - icytime ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
185, bow down to ME.
#142 to #139 - najrath (05/14/2013) [-]
**** ..
#390 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
10...I'm very dispriviledged
User avatar #25 to #1 - xxbutthurtxx (05/13/2013) [-]
How is US better than Germany?
inb4 *********
User avatar #51 to #25 - blaazen (05/13/2013) [-]
It's just that there are a lot more opportunities within the US, not that Germany is worse or that the US is better. Plus, this chart is rather biased, so it hardly counts.
User avatar #387 to #1 - dashdashdash (05/14/2013) [-]
holy **** ! I'm -670!
User avatar #19 to #1 - flemsdfer ONLINE (05/13/2013) [-]
#364 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
155, but I dont feel like it at all..
User avatar #12 to #1 - willcutting (05/13/2013) [-]
Ok I'm 130.
#362 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
130. **** yeah. Now where are my bitc... I mean nice weather.
User avatar #8 to #1 - mewsh (05/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #358 to #1 - hokeymon ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
got 120 and I live in a 3rd world country.
User avatar #6 to #1 - Faz (05/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #336 to #1 - indeedaleedoo (05/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #301 to #1 - minnyebruger (05/14/2013) [-]
155. But its not accurate. In denmark for example, you arent priviliged just because youre christian.
User avatar #316 to #1 - androanomaly (05/14/2013) [-]
-70. This didn't make me feel very good.
#80 to #1 - heartlessrobot (05/14/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I hope that's sarcastic, because Whites can't do anything to empower themselves without being called racist, men can't without being called sexist, the poor/unemployed are raping the middle class with taxes feeding their welfare, it's pretty much illegal to fire anyone that isn't able bodied because of laws protecting the disabled, anyone that's attractive is apparently stupid, a whore, and/or a douchbag regardless of who they are and you're not allowed to make fun of anyone that isn't attractive, and again, unemployed are raping the employed with taxes feeding welfare. But I'm hoping this is sarcastic.
User avatar #90 to #80 - ThatsSoFunnyHeHe (05/14/2013) [-]
This is a joke, right?
You think able bodied people have less privilege than retards?
You think doctors have less privilege than a jobless person?
You think being poor gives you more privilege than being middle class?

I don't understand how you can legitimately believe these things, I really, really don't.
User avatar #93 to #90 - heartlessrobot (05/14/2013) [-]
Did you even read the comment? Companies are not allowed to fire people or not hire them based on disabilities, welfare welfare welfare. There's no taxes on welfare because it comes from taxes, and doctors have to work for their money, people on welfare don't. A doctor can **** up and lose his job, people on welfare don't have a job to **** up. Free money shouldn't be more than what is earned on minimum wage, yet people in middle class often struggle to get by while welfare recipients can buy brand new cars and all the food they can shove in their face. The system is broken and no one's going to fix it because all the people benefiting from the broken system don't want to work, because they receive less money working than they do if they don't work.
#380 to #93 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Yeah man, this people who can't walk, who can't hear or see, or have any mental disabilities... they just have a good life with no dificults at all and they should die because **** , they aren't useful for the system or the economy.

This is how it is? I'm saying it the right way?

#241 to #93 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
I am casually guessing that you do not have a job
User avatar #157 to #93 - darkfuzion (05/14/2013) [-]
For the not hiring based on disabilities, what if the job requires lifting to high places and the person is in a wheelchair, or is put into one after being hired?
User avatar #503 to #157 - heartlessrobot (05/14/2013) [-]
Then the company is ****** if they fire the person who in turn decides to press charges.
User avatar #507 to #503 - darkfuzion (05/15/2013) [-]
But he literally cannot do the job, this legal system is ****** .
User avatar #508 to #507 - heartlessrobot (05/15/2013) [-]
I know it is. Things need to change but the loud minority is benefiting short term from the broken system and the oppressed majority cannot do anything about it without being called ignorant or "unfair", so the system will remain broken until the majority stops giving a **** about "decency" and "fairness" and does what is needed to get us out of the ******* .
#307 to #1 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
165, I'm pretty privileged
User avatar #38 to #1 - dakkenly (05/13/2013) [-]
-2585... Being a short black intersex gay trans blind muslim scientist who lives on the streets of iran and can't into math really sucks
User avatar #399 to #38 - amsel (05/14/2013) [-]
"and can't into math"

#87 - inoland (05/14/2013) [-]
My now-ex used to always tell me to "check my privilege."
It always pissed me off when she would say it then refuse to explain it to me, then say it again. Like really, I just told you I dont get it, stop saying it or explain it. *whisper* otherwise I wont get what youre trying to communicate.

still dont know what it means.
User avatar #98 to #87 - simplescience (05/14/2013) [-]
Allow me to help you out.

Based on feminist discussion boards I occasionally lurk and on discussions I've had with feminists and feminism defenders, here's what "Check your privilege" means.

According to feminist theory, you are pre-disposed towards getting favorable treatment in many, if not all, facets of society, such as consideration for jobs, better education, and a more lax view for certain actions (like not getting as bad of a name for yourself if you sleep with a lot of people than if a woman had slept with alot of men).

Therefore, men will often be told to "check their privilege" if they complain about something, basically saying that their claims of unhappiness hold no merit due to the automatic "male privilege" men are claimed to enjoy in day to day life.

TLR If I have it right, you're basically being told "Don't complain. You have it good enough already".
User avatar #125 to #98 - guymandude (05/14/2013) [-]
Every time I get in an argument about the social perceptions of rape, sexual relations/situations, and general public perception of genders with a feminist theory supporter, I always use one foolproof example:

Imagine a woman who is drunk in a foreign environment. She is drugged, and then penetrated while still in a drugged state. She wakes up the next morning completely unaware of what happened the night before. Upon finding out, she is disgusted and horrified. She knows she would never have agreed to something like that if she were sober, but all evidence points to her having been a willing participant at the time. Under current public opinion, this is considered rape. Do you undoubtedly believe this to be rape? (99.99% of time the response is a "yes")


Because in the popular movie The Hangover 2, this exact scenario happens to a male. other than the gender, everything else is exactly the same - even the penetration part. And you know what? Everyone considered his realization of this event to be hilarious. Everyone laughed along to what was supposed to be one of the funniest parts of the movie.

And he didn't even press rape charges.
#132 to #125 - Wumbologist (05/14/2013) [-]
That's actually a really interesting point. I mean, the first case is definitely rape, but people don't get nearly as touchy about raping a man.
That's actually a really interesting point. I mean, the first case is definitely rape, but people don't get nearly as touchy about raping a man.
#163 to #132 - taintedangel (05/14/2013) [-]
cus a man is 'Supposed to be strong enough to fend of his rapist(s)".
cus a man is 'Supposed to be strong enough to fend of his rapist(s)".
#408 to #163 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
May I have the source of the anime?
User avatar #510 to #408 - taintedangel (05/15/2013) [-]
Highschool of the Dead
User avatar #423 to #125 - hellproof (05/14/2013) [-]
I really doubt everyone laughed, especially since that movie sucked. Your logic is flawed.
#201 to #125 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
But that doesn't have anything to do with the viewpoint of feminists on rape because the reason why people believe it's not as bad that the dude was raped is because society believes men are supposed to be strong and women weak. Feminism seeks to rid of those assumptions and thus would too be working towards getting more recognition for male rape victims.
#204 to #98 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
It's not that you can't complain about anything. It's only when you guys try to pretend you have the solution to feminist concerns or if you do happen to be white, believe that you know how to fix racism that you need to shut up and let their voices be heard. I don't like the whole "check your privilege" thing either because it's a complete mockery now, but the base idea is just that when someone else is actually going through that **** , you have no say in how they feel or at least you have no place to try and overpower their opinions on that subject.
User avatar #141 to #98 - inoland (05/14/2013) [-]
Okay that makes sense. Thanks mate.

****** nicole. She would always say it if I was teasing her (sexually), she would slap my hand and tell me to check my privilege. You could see my confusion. Thanks for the clear up mate, have a thumb.
User avatar #124 to #98 - kwanzalord (05/14/2013) [-]
feminism at its finest
User avatar #206 to #185 - jaymeelu (05/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #216 to #185 - krasnogvardiech (05/14/2013) [-]
Yours is the drill that will pierce the hymens.
#275 to #185 - europe (05/14/2013) [-]
That reminds me of a game by zone.
Two, to be exact
User avatar #386 to #378 - bandal (05/14/2013) [-]
Mr Jones?
#280 - shfiftyfive (05/14/2013) [-]
Pic of a guy who flashed his dick at a womyns rights convention, dat face
#284 to #280 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Guy just makes a complete ass of himself, and he's got a look on his face like he just provided the perfect argument to destroy feminism. Or, that he's just really turned on by doing something that, under other circumstances, most people on this site would agree is sexual harassment.
User avatar #314 to #284 - thechosentroll (05/14/2013) [-]
I see it more as the "I can die happy now" expression you get after you do something incredibly stupid that you've always dreamt of doing. Like base jumping off the Eifel tower or something.
#329 to #284 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #320 to #280 - binomancha (05/14/2013) [-]
someone pelase photoshop his body and put brazzers
User avatar #349 to #280 - Sorrowscythe ONLINE (05/14/2013) [-]
What happened there?
User avatar #355 to #280 - lorkhan (05/14/2013) [-]
One day I will make a Mans right convention, and women won't be let in because they make me feel violated by my rights.
#333 to #280 - fedegon (05/14/2013) [-]
Just look at the sorrow in this man's eyes.
#342 to #280 - skinless (05/14/2013) [-]
that dudes an asshole   
but god damn is he funny
that dudes an asshole

but god damn is he funny
#2 - icheatjews (05/13/2013) [-]
I just spit up my coffee
I just spit up my coffee
#48 - Nightelfbane (05/13/2013) [-]
The guy who wrote that article (and yes, it was a man...it says "By Chris Illumanati" right there...on a website called "askmen") must be really shallow.
I don't think he understands that not all guys are motivated purely by sex.

Yes, I want sex. I also want to be in an emotional relationship.
So no, I'm not going to stop paying attention to my hygiene just because I have a sexbot. I do have people to impress that aren't female.
Do you even realize how primitive that robot is compared to the real thing?
Do you really?
While robots can completely imitate the physical side of sex (although that one probably can't.), they will never be able to respond to the sweet nothings that you say during sex.
So that "Do you like it?" will be met with utter an awkward silence.

Any robot made today that could completely imitate the physical side of things would probably be so bulky and fragile that nobody could, or would want to, plug in their USB. If you catch my drift.
User avatar #49 to #48 - royalwerewolf (05/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #52 to #48 - whycanticaps (05/13/2013) [-]
sweet nothings could probably be programmed into the bot.

I know these aren't robots, but the sex dolls are getting creepily more realistic
You need to login to view this link
User avatar #54 to #48 - whycanticaps (05/13/2013) [-]
also, I just thought this was hilarious, from the synopsis of the different body types the dolls have

Slender, Sexy and very seductive.

The A.I doll promotes a more slender, defined body structure.

Soft stomach and thighs and a very realistic hipline.

The body type is lightweight, designed to balance the body with it's natural features.

The A.I Dolls vagina has the ever more natural curve structure. The A.I Dolls leg motion is far more wider than other models.

This is the ultimate silicone love doll with advanced technology and a body to lust after.
User avatar #97 to #96 - whycanticaps (05/14/2013) [-]
Hey man I'm just the messenger
#323 to #48 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Well that severely gay.
#84 to #48 - Willhelm (05/14/2013) [-]
A big sexual motivator for me is making damn well sure she's satisfied. Replace her with a robot, and that's all meaningless.
User avatar #89 to #48 - Nightelfbane (05/14/2013) [-]
I would like to clarify some ******* I made.
Robots cannot, as yet, completely imitate the physical side of sex.
And "they will never be able to respond to the sweet nothings that you say during sex" isn't exactly true either.
We just don't have the software.
#91 to #48 - deathofnight (05/14/2013) [-]

That is where that image came from, I give the comic 9/10 for being so ******* adorable.
User avatar #99 to #91 - whycanticaps (05/14/2013) [-]
and here I was thinking that this was a full blown hentai, but it's just got a lot of boobs
User avatar #107 to #48 - octavia (05/14/2013) [-]
oh hai dere
#108 to #107 - Nightelfbane (05/14/2013) [-]
Hi tavi!
come back to us
User avatar #109 to #108 - octavia (05/14/2013) [-]
I was just scrolling by and saw this and then saw who posted and was like "I know that guy!"

Well, I'm glad someone wants me back
#112 to #109 - Nightelfbane (05/14/2013) [-]
*tsundere reply*

no, seriously, come back
User avatar #122 to #112 - octavia (05/14/2013) [-]
For what? To have all my posts ignored all the time again?
#123 to #122 - Nightelfbane (05/14/2013) [-]
i dont remember you being ignored
User avatar #128 to #123 - octavia (05/14/2013) [-]
I was. Less so on regular than friendly, but since the vast majority of responses on regular was chosen and xang rolling quints to try and get my to delete my account, I don't count those.
#115 - alucord (05/14/2013) [-]
...I'd **** it
User avatar #126 to #115 - varrlegrimscythe (05/14/2013) [-]
The cold heartless robot or Miku Chan?
User avatar #134 to #126 - desiduratum (05/14/2013) [-]
alucord said "it". I assume the robot.
User avatar #135 to #134 - varrlegrimscythe (05/14/2013) [-]
I was under the assumption that Feminazis weren't human.
User avatar #138 to #135 - desiduratum (05/14/2013) [-]
Oh yeah, my bad! Good perception, brother.
#144 to #134 - alucord (05/14/2013) [-]
Damn straight.   
And thanks for being observant
Damn straight.

And thanks for being observant
#143 to #126 - alucord (05/14/2013) [-]
I see what you did there,

And Miku Chan. If I said "Hi" to the cunt I might get arrested for rape or some **** .
#111 - alucord (05/14/2013) [-]
"I' m a strong independent woman
who don' t need no man"

You can be whatever you want to be light bulb but "I made a sex bat"
User avatar #176 to #111 - spoogle (05/14/2013) [-]
sex bat
User avatar #343 to #111 - fukkendragonite (05/14/2013) [-]
#295 - jalthelas (05/14/2013) [-]
Rape, you say?
Rape, you say?
User avatar #366 to #295 - ffx (05/14/2013) [-]
**** yo creepy moon.
User avatar #297 to #295 - zplatter (05/14/2013) [-]
look, he wants to hug =D
User avatar #305 to #295 - zerosonaku (05/14/2013) [-]
It's ok dude. I didn't want to sleep anyways.
User avatar #302 to #295 - takesomemorewater (05/14/2013) [-]
Well...that totally isn't creepy at all...
User avatar #312 to #295 - thechosentroll (05/14/2013) [-]
The way the gif's broken only makes it better.
User avatar #509 to #312 - jalthelas (05/15/2013) [-]
Maybe the gif is supposed to be that way.
User avatar #250 to #215 - electrozz (05/14/2013) [-]
So that's how android 18 died. Damnit Krillin!
User avatar #304 - tacomanofthenorth (05/14/2013) [-]
Well i say dildos are "Objects of inequality " . What am i just a penis for women ? I say to ban all the dildoes, because it makes me butthurt
#315 to #304 - hoffmeisterh (05/14/2013) [-]
Dildos make you butthurt...
User avatar #58 - brockyboi (05/13/2013) [-]
Holy **** . FunnyJunk seriously hates women.
#59 to #58 - jakegiggs (05/13/2013) [-]
ya thats become abundantly clear recently
User avatar #60 to #59 - brockyboi (05/13/2013) [-]
I mean I've laughed at plenty of the stuff, but it just seems so one-sided and just kind of mean at this point. I mean, we all want to have a girl friend and have a good relationship, so why would we do this?
#62 to #60 - jakegiggs (05/13/2013) [-]
"Cuz women are stpuoid and should go back to the kitchen ad make us sandwiches!"
and then people started thinking this wasnt a joke, couple that with the bitter resentment of the more commonly socially introverted personality of your average internet male and he will start blaming others for the lack of female attention he receives.

P.S. wanna see red thumbs fly fast? defend a feminist viewpoint on the intenet.
User avatar #66 to #62 - brockyboi (05/13/2013) [-]
You're not defending a feminist though, you're just pointing out flawed logic. You're in the right here. I don't agree with feminists, but it seems as though FunnyJunk depicts almost every woman as a feminist, and for a lack of better words, it is just rude. Can't we push for some equality around here? Us men aren't exactly perfect ourselves.
User avatar #172 to #66 - matthewfuckingmain (05/14/2013) [-]
This is a ******* site called Funnyjunk. Not Politically Active Junk.
User avatar #180 to #172 - brockyboi (05/14/2013) [-]
No, you are right in that sense certainly, but there still are plenty of female viewers on this site that I feel would be polarized by it after a while. I'm not saying to get rid of the jokes all together, but I just think we should let up a bit.
User avatar #182 to #180 - matthewfuckingmain (05/14/2013) [-]
It's a site that has many offensive jokes. About minorities, about religions, about women. It's comedy. Ignore the **** you don't like, laugh at the **** you do. Not that hard.
User avatar #186 to #182 - brockyboi (05/14/2013) [-]
I know, and I'm ok with that. I'm Jewish and I'm fine with all the jokes made about the Holocaust and whatnot, but I'm just saying that people get so worked up whenever a woman is mentioned. I'm not saying stop, I just want people to be a bit nicer to everyone. I understand that this is a site about jokes and it's never politically correct, I'm just saying that I feel that it is a bit much at this point, that's all.
User avatar #187 to #186 - matthewfuckingmain (05/14/2013) [-]
I see a joke about women a day, and I see a joke about religion a day. No cares about the religious feelings. They say it's a joke, deal with it. But suddenly a few women are acting like the jokes are too much. People are people. They won't let up on religious jokes, and they won't let up on jokes about women.
#69 to #66 - jakegiggs (05/14/2013) [-]
Ya I think that The Fj community can do it, it just needs to change the way it thinks a little bit is all. I think its are smarter than this and more accepting.
#114 to #69 - winglit (05/14/2013) [-]
***** chill the **** out
#113 to #69 - winglit has deleted their comment [-]
#65 to #62 - jakegiggs (05/13/2013) [-]
Do not mistake me this is not to say this is all of the people on the internet. its just the more vocal
User avatar #76 to #58 - heartlessrobot (05/14/2013) [-]
No, just the radical feminists.
#64 to #58 - aludin (05/13/2013) [-]
Not women, just Feminazi's.
User avatar #120 to #64 - popkornking (05/14/2013) [-]
Not all girls, just feminists, girls who like swagfags, girls who put them in the friendzone, girls who make bad arguments, girls who are bad at driving, and girls who do just about anything
User avatar #169 to #120 - RandomAnonGuy (05/14/2013) [-]
Laughing at =/= hatred of. We make jokes about ourselves on occasion too.
#5 - Rascal (05/13/2013) [-]
They'll be banned before they can take hold. Canada is already moving to ban them because they promote 'gender inequality' and make women look like 'sex objects'
#22 to #5 - Rascal (05/13/2013) [-]
what about ******* dildos? they sex bots are basically smarter fleshlights.
#205 to #5 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Honestly, I think real feminists would be cool with this. Then, it could keep you bros away from them and everything is fine. A male model would be awesome too.
#257 to #5 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
They've been making dildos for years but if you make a sex toy modeled after a woman it promotes "gender inequality".
#330 to #257 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
yes because that's exactly the same thing.
nice logic there mong.
#430 to #5 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Then they should ban dildos & vibrators too. It makes men seem like sex objects! Q_Q
User avatar #321 to #5 - tekoronia (05/14/2013) [-]
Hey, make a male sex robot and it'll fix everything.
User avatar #50 to #5 - crewbie (05/13/2013) [-]
because it's impossible to make one of a male as well right?
User avatar #74 to #5 - nexu (05/14/2013) [-]
**** ! anyone have a source for this? I don't want to not have a sex robot, I hope this isn't true
User avatar #223 to #5 - nervaaurelius (05/14/2013) [-]
Don't feminists love to embrace their sexuality and call it liberation? Why can't a man do the same in his own way?
#226 to #223 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
Its the retarded logic of the outspoken minorities, the "if Im offended, i deserve to be compensated" mentality.
User avatar #383 to #5 - lightninghedgehog (05/14/2013) [-]
and dildos don't make men look like "sex objects"?
User avatar #391 to #383 - kevinspacey **User deleted account** (05/14/2013) [-]
yeah but if you ban dildos then you will also have ton ban cucumbers. After that they will all start using other stuff such as the handle of hairbrushes
User avatar #77 to #5 - heartlessrobot (05/14/2013) [-]
I doubt it. Then there'll be an outcry against dildos.
User avatar #44 to #5 - lube (05/13/2013) [-]
One could argue that dildos make men look like sex objects,
but you don't see us ******* complaining!
#392 to #44 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
well, if there weren`t dildos it would probably be easier to please chicks in the sack so i might complain
User avatar #95 to #5 - jinjo (05/14/2013) [-]
I'm Canadian and have never heard this.
#15 to #5 - Kairyuka (05/13/2013) [-]
So the creation of ACTUAL sex objects make women seem like sex objects?
#199 to #15 - comentator (05/14/2013) [-]
It's called women logic
User avatar #230 to #15 - patchesdacrazy (05/14/2013) [-]
**** I think I just found my spirit animal.
#287 to #230 - deadrifler (05/14/2013) [-]
Spirit animal has a message for you.
#341 to #287 - annadewitt (05/14/2013) [-]
they never sleep.
#450 to #15 - cthumoo (05/14/2013) [-]
you are what you **** ?
#498 to #15 - imadeanaccforthis **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #499 to #498 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
Well women are already using sex robots, so I kinda fail to see the issue. It's just because this case is shaped like a woman, the opposite wouldn't be complained about.
#500 to #499 - imadeanaccforthis **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#224 to #15 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
creating a woman to be treated literally as a sex object, would in fact make the implication that women are sex objects.

so yes.

User avatar #225 to #224 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
"Creating a woman"
Nooo, creating a robot shaped like a woman. It's going to be difficult for you, if you can't differentiate between fantasy and reality.
#234 to #225 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
it's designed to be a woman. regardless of whether it's real or not, the implication is still there.
User avatar #254 to #234 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
It's designed to look like a woman. So are many other things. It is not in fact, a woman, but an object. I don't understand what's so hard about this.
#263 to #254 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
are you really so arrogant as to imply that I'm not aware that it's an object?

designing something intending to be a woman which is to be used solely for sex IMPLIES that women are to be treated as sex objects BECAUSE it's designed to look like a woman.

"I don't understand what's so hard about this."
User avatar #264 to #263 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
Nope, it implies that the sex object is to be treated as a sex object instead of the women. It's really not hard once you learn to understand the difference between fantasy and reality
#272 to #264 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
it's not an issue of fantasy and reality, it's implications made by defining the image of a woman as an object purely for sexual gratification. that is sexist, regardless of the fact that it is merely an object. when you represent a person as something, you don't just transfer the connotations associated with it, they become intertwined. If I make a lifesize model of you and take a knife to it repeatedly, you would find that offensive, and that would in fact be grounds for you to press legal charges, as my actions to an object designed to portray you represents my feelings towards you, which in this case would be threatening. in the same way, portraying a woman as nothing more than a sex object is offensive because it portrays the connotation that women ought to be used solely for sexual gratification.

for the record, your condescending attitude doesn't make you sound more intelligent, it just makes you sound like a pretentious cunt.
User avatar #274 to #272 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
Well what about other sex toys? Do you dislike those too? To be perfectly honest, you can stab a copy of me all you want or **** it or what you want to do. It doesn't affect me in the slightest.
#352 to #274 - tacoflavoredcondom (05/14/2013) [-]
Not saying I totally agree with either of you, but what about child sex robots. From your logic they are okay. I just want to know your opinion and how it conflicts with everyoe and blah blah...(I just wanted to make things interesting without starting a ********* ..)
User avatar #373 to #352 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
If it makes child molesters use robots instead of children, is that not a good thing?
User avatar #445 to #373 - oodlesandoodles (05/14/2013) [-]
Not really, because it'll only feed their bad habits and encourage them.
User avatar #474 to #445 - Kairyuka (05/14/2013) [-]
Maybe it will, but I don't think so. Either way, if you have any studies to prove your point, you're more well-supported in your arguments than me, but if not, this is just a battle of opinion
User avatar #466 to #445 - yipkendu (05/14/2013) [-]
The problem with all of this is that there is no evidence. It's just like the "don't teach our children about sex because they will go off to **** like rabbits" myth that parents love to toss at schools that try to better society.

We can't say for sure it will encourage them to commit felonies, but we can't say it won't either.
User avatar #471 to #466 - oodlesandoodles (05/14/2013) [-]
Teaching children about sex is one thing. Giving a child molester a child sex-bot and saying: "Here, **** this." is another matter entirely.
The point is that teaching is not the same as enabling, but you're right. Most parents don't understand the difference
#361 to #272 - mmajunkie (05/14/2013) [-]
Women have far more sex robots than men, you idiotic douche.
Women have far more sex robots than men, you idiotic douche.
User avatar #276 to #272 - baaltomekk (05/14/2013) [-]
Your example is pretty bad. In this example, it wouldn't be a lifesize model of a specific person, but just a lifesize model of a human without face. Guess what? People are doing this every day (not last to mention the military). And noone ist offended by this.
User avatar #464 to #272 - takesomemorewater (05/14/2013) [-]
You are an anonymous user, because you knew you were gonna get those red thumbs and because you know you are wrong, you halfwit of a twaddlecock...
User avatar #334 to #234 - indeedaleedoo (05/14/2013) [-]
A dildo is designed to be a dick, that ''implies'' men are sex objects. Should we ban them?
User avatar #253 to #234 - huszti (05/14/2013) [-]
so, would it be okay to design it to be a man?
User avatar #256 to #253 - karvarausku (05/14/2013) [-]
If you are ok about man how bout pandas? Where do we put the line?
User avatar #258 to #256 - huszti (05/14/2013) [-]
i don't think we need a line at all; we could design it to be or look like anything; it's still just an object and not a sentient being.
User avatar #262 to #258 - karvarausku (05/14/2013) [-]
Yes... When you think about it there are many good reasons for it to be free product that it could look like anything, but only thing wrong is how people would see it... Soon would brake out the riots "robot sex is destroying human population" and "humans were ment for each other" such things...
User avatar #395 to #256 - rugmaster (05/14/2013) [-]
What about dragon dildos?
User avatar #476 to #256 - kamusioso (05/14/2013) [-]
you can **** your own hand, you can **** your couch, you can **** a goat, you can **** a sock, but suddenly if you make a robot you are inmoral... **** logic!
#261 to #253 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
that would be just as wrong.
User avatar #488 to #470 - rapsuskiller (05/14/2013) [-]
Source is "Mortadelo y Filemón", an spanish movie based on the comics from Francisco Ibañez.
#375 to #224 - Rascal (05/14/2013) [-]
by your amazing logic so would dildo roght so who the sexist now ?
#462 to #375 - takesomemorewater (05/14/2013) [-]
I have no realistic comments or opinions to the matter at hand...I just have no idea what you said...
I have no realistic comments or opinions to the matter at hand...I just have no idea what you said...
 Friends (0)