Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#12 - sirfistalot (05/03/2013) [-]
****** is lucky he ended just with tattoo on his forehead

I hope he will be repeatably raped by the rest of his life by booty warriors in masks of Willem Dafoe rape face.
User avatar #562 to #12 - lecherouslad (05/04/2013) [-]
So you think we should all be tremendously excited about... prison rape? When did Prison Rape become socially acceptable? Is only "OK" if it happens to someone YOU don't like, or can I rape anyone in prison?
#706 to #562 - crim (05/04/2013) [-]
if you rape a little girl the prisoners need their dicks to be barbed..... and on fire.
User avatar #820 to #706 - lecherouslad (05/05/2013) [-]
Then why don't we just sentence them to "dicks to be barbed..... and on fire", and not prevaricate? Why don't we sentence him to prison rape?
User avatar #738 to #562 - sealman (05/04/2013) [-]
Eh, vengeance is often indistinguishable from justice.
User avatar #680 to #562 - LaBarata (05/04/2013) [-]
#19 to #12 - taurusguy (05/03/2013) [-]
That face makes it funny as ****
#460 to #12 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Thank you sir,I never knew that was Willem Dafoe.
#663 to #12 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Cutie mark!
User avatar #735 to #12 - spankyy (05/04/2013) [-]
I heard he actually killed himself.
#749 to #735 - jettom ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
How lame.
User avatar #421 to #12 - lamadrama (05/04/2013) [-]
You are too negative, stay positive -Lil B
User avatar #412 to #12 - lmaopwnt (05/04/2013) [-]
Child molesters, rapists, and domestic abusers are raped practically daily in prison.
Inmates may not care what the law says, but they know what's ****** up, and believe me, they don't keep it to themselves.
User avatar #165 to #12 - popkornking (05/03/2013) [-]
Is Willem Dafoe capable of making a non-rape face?
#27 to #12 - isolotop (05/03/2013) [-]
It was a branding, hot iron on his head searing letters into his skin, but yeah he deserves worse
User avatar #198 to #27 - danniegurl (05/03/2013) [-]
well, tattooing can be called "branding" as well.
User avatar #452 to #198 - lolbutts (05/04/2013) [-]
No, it can't
User avatar #627 to #452 - Mecryte (05/04/2013) [-]
Sure it can.
User avatar #129 to #12 - admiralen ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
>implying getting raped by people with willem dafoes face is a bad thing
#256 to #129 - SHAMU (05/03/2013) [-]
Awww Yiss Defoe, the slightly creepier version of Kevin Bacon.
Awww Yiss Defoe, the slightly creepier version of Kevin Bacon.
#418 to #256 - powellrebecca (05/04/2013) [-]
awww yiss
awww yiss
User avatar #541 to #256 - charderpizard (05/04/2013) [-]
what movie is this?
User avatar #556 to #541 - thatniggerguy (05/04/2013) [-]
The Boondock Saints.
User avatar #95 - Maroon ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
Inmates do this a lot to rapists and child molesters. It's a strange honor among thieves type thing they got going. "We may be bad but we wouldn't do that"
#273 to #95 - Rascal (05/03/2013) [-]
tbh, i think it's more like: "Hey, if we do horrible stuff to this persaon, we look like we have a moral"... It' not about honor, it's about finding someone worse than yourself... dont get cheated into respecting them...
User avatar #219 to #95 - vampireinarm (05/03/2013) [-]
i think its more about not ******* with kids, no matter what.
User avatar #223 to #219 - spazzin (05/03/2013) [-]
Maybe some of the inmates have kids, and wouldn't want the same thing happening to their children.
User avatar #365 to #223 - linktheherooftime (05/04/2013) [-]
It's true. A lot of inmates have wives and children. Those inmates know that that little girl was somebodies daughter, and they felt obligated to do what they knew the courts and the system wouldn't.
User avatar #226 to #223 - vampireinarm (05/03/2013) [-]
maybe something about the child's innocence. idk man people are weird in good and bad ways.
User avatar #395 to #95 - miniwilliam (05/04/2013) [-]
It's a fun thing to think about

Even amongst criminals, there is an unwritten rule with "You do NOT harm children" which, if you ask me, is kinda cool.
User avatar #406 to #395 - daviid (05/04/2013) [-]
children and old people are pretty much off limits since children are innocent and have no idea whats going on, and old people because they're gonna die soon anyway

(or so i heard)
User avatar #808 to #395 - peggscott (05/04/2013) [-]
It's weird... If someone can defend them self then they are fair game, but kids and the elderly are off limits...
User avatar #572 to #395 - spartusee (05/04/2013) [-]
I don't think it's a rule, just morals. The elderly is just so fragile.
User avatar #26 - chunkytomtom (05/03/2013) [-]
I bet that was the funniest conversation of 'does it have an apostrophe in?'ever.
#29 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
I heard that in prison, there's a 'hierarchy' for criminals. Murderers being the top, thieves, drunk drivers, etc. in middle and rapists and child molesters at bottom.   
Anyway, justice has been done.
I heard that in prison, there's a 'hierarchy' for criminals. Murderers being the top, thieves, drunk drivers, etc. in middle and rapists and child molesters at bottom.

Anyway, justice has been done.
#66 to #29 - anonefgtwo (05/03/2013) [-]
How the **** is that justice? He's already in prison for life, and other murderers are at the top of some 'hierarchy' and they benefit the most, and beat him up every day. **** off idiot
#69 to #66 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
In my opinion, molesting and murdering a young child isn't a light offense.
#73 to #69 - anonefgtwo (05/03/2013) [-]
That's true, but it isn't 'justice' if there are other murderers that don't get **** done to them
User avatar #75 to #73 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
They're already in prison. In prison, EVERYBODY gets something done to them at least once.
By the way, what did you mean by 'benefit'? How did the other murderers benefit, and from what?
#80 to #75 - anonefgtwo (05/03/2013) [-]
They rape him/beat him the **** up every day, with nothing happening to them, while eating 3 meals a day and not having to do ****
User avatar #82 to #80 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
For as far as I know, in American prisons, it happens all the time. People get raped, sometimes even killed. Doesn't make it any less bad, though. It's not just him getting beat/raped, and I'm sure the prison gaurds protect him, even though they probably wouldn't want to.

Also, what's wrong with them having 3 meals? And for not having to do **** : they often work in jail, and when they don't, they are most of the time in their jail, nog being able to do anything, rather than not wanting to do anything.
#87 to #82 - anonefgtwo (05/03/2013) [-]
I know it happens all the time, I really just wish murderers would just get a death penalty instead of getting free food/lodging and everything else without having some stupid prison hierarchy
User avatar #97 to #87 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
Well, one of the reasons murderers don't get death penalty is because they could be innocent. Imprisoning an innocent man can be reversed, while killing an innocent man can't be reversed.
#99 to #97 - anonefgtwo (05/03/2013) [-]
Yeah, but there are a lot more murderers who get out of prison, then kill a lot more innocent people than there are people who are actually innocent that go to prison
#104 to #99 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
True. But American prisons are only for punishment, ot for 're-educating' the criminals. In prison, people become even worse criminals, because of all the killing, raping and so on. For a part, the prison system is wrong.
User avatar #354 to #99 - xzynth (05/03/2013) [-]
you can turn a murderer into a civilized person. It may not be easy, but many countries opperates this way with good results. Drawbacks: it's expensive
#83 to #66 - Rascal (05/03/2013) [-]
Yes, with a nice roof over his head, daily meals, and plenty of tax-money to support the long life he'll lead, you know, a long life as in the one that child will now never have
#41 to #29 - Rascal (05/03/2013) [-]
Where are white collar criminals? Not being sarcastic, honestly wondering.
User avatar #48 to #41 - silverzepher (05/03/2013) [-]
house arrest in their 3.5 million dollar "home"
User avatar #72 to #48 - srskate (05/03/2013) [-]
So if I embezzle money from my job they have to give me a 3.5 million dollar home?
User avatar #587 to #48 - failtolawl (05/04/2013) [-]
it's because they pay tons of money to do it. besides... did they really ruin anybodies day besides the governments?
#153 to #29 - Rascal (05/03/2013) [-]
not quite true.

It depends on how ******* hardcore the person in question is, the kind of connections they can rack up in prison, the kind of people they know on the outside, any contraband they can get in, their charisma.

The original offence can help, but is by no means the only criteria.
User avatar #159 to #153 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
Thank you, anon, for the aditional information.
#160 to #29 - Rascal (05/03/2013) [-]
not quite true.

It depends on how ******* hardcore the person in question is, the kind of connections they can rack up in prison, the kind of people they know on the outside, any contraband they can get in, their charisma.

The original offence can help, but is by no means the only criteria.
User avatar #39 to #29 - skeetonamber (05/03/2013) [-]
not sure if the child molesting murderer is at top or bottom....
User avatar #49 to #39 - silverzepher (05/03/2013) [-]
#116 to #39 - stimtheone (05/03/2013) [-]
As you can see it is a scale for crimes, the ones at the top being the most benevolent, deliberately ending another life to the advancement of the human race.   
In the middle are those of selfish and irresponsible nature, causing harm without caring or thinking.   
And at the bottom we have those of truly evil demeanor, causing pain and suffering for their own pleasure.
As you can see it is a scale for crimes, the ones at the top being the most benevolent, deliberately ending another life to the advancement of the human race.

In the middle are those of selfish and irresponsible nature, causing harm without caring or thinking.

And at the bottom we have those of truly evil demeanor, causing pain and suffering for their own pleasure.
User avatar #166 to #116 - clockworkmage (05/03/2013) [-]
...murders are benevolent now? k.
User avatar #185 to #166 - stimtheone (05/03/2013) [-]
Less people suffer in the aftermath than in the other cases.

And which of us haven't thought about killing those who are a burden on everyone they come in contact with?
User avatar #187 to #185 - clockworkmage (05/03/2013) [-]
Me, because I don't see death as the best alternative. Christ....
#694 to #185 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I'm pretty sure they're at the top of the heiarchy because they're seen as the toughest, not because they're considered heralds of justice and good tidings. Even if you argue that sometimes killing is justified, I'm pretty sure more than 90% of murders are for the pleasure of the murderer, not because they intended to better the world. And the 10% remaining are criminally insane.
User avatar #581 to #116 - spartusee (05/04/2013) [-]
I would put them like this, Thievery, Cold blooded murder, Rape

I mean, really now. thievery is worse than cold blooded murder? I say cold blooded because revenge murder is another thing.
User avatar #53 to #39 - crazyolitis (05/03/2013) [-]
He's lucky to be alive.
#37 - jaergerjaquez **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#369 to #37 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
mainly because most of them have children, and to all all of them it would be the worst thing to happen to them.
User avatar #650 to #37 - niggerlips (05/04/2013) [-]
the child molesters and people that attack old people will be hurt badly in prison also if you steal from another inmate you get **** stomped by a couple people
#345 to #37 - hillbillypowpow (05/03/2013) [-]
who is least hated?
User avatar #363 to #345 - hitlersoneballsack (05/04/2013) [-]
evil teddy bears
#368 to #363 - hillbillypowpow (05/04/2013) [-]
Well that goes without saying.
User avatar #503 to #345 - Hreidmar (05/04/2013) [-]
Murderers and higher-end thieves, I believe. I think they're not least hated, they're just the most respected/feared. The lower end of the scale is much more definite. Even criminals have a morality of sorts, and child molesters are hated with a passion across the board.
#120 - Cleavland Steamer (05/03/2013) [-]
"I'm gonna give you a little somethin' you can't take off..."
User avatar #801 to #120 - jetpistol (05/04/2013) [-]
fight club
User avatar #123 to #120 - thekinganon (05/03/2013) [-]
What movie is that from? I've forgotten.
User avatar #128 to #123 - thebitcher (05/03/2013) [-]
#127 to #123 - dafogman (05/03/2013) [-]
Inglourious Basterds
User avatar #126 to #123 - Cleavland Steamer (05/03/2013) [-]
Beverly Hills Chihuahua
User avatar #163 to #123 - thebritishguy (05/03/2013) [-]
Big Butt, Little slut 5
User avatar #762 to #163 - jonjor (05/04/2013) [-]
haha, if you google Big Butt, Little slut 5 you get a picture of Brad Pitt

#525 to #163 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #140 to #123 - Thevaultboy (05/03/2013) [-]
Turner and Hooch.
User avatar #137 to #123 - thegamegestapo ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
Scream 2
User avatar #147 to #123 - synapse (05/03/2013) [-]
Lion King
User avatar #248 to #123 - darrensankari ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
The Room
User avatar #367 to #123 - garymotherfingoak (05/04/2013) [-]
dafogman is the only one that gace a real answer
#170 - herecomesjohnny ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
i find that poetic how instead of just branding "pedo 			****		" or any other typical humiliation they kinda honored the girl in their own way   
it's brutally altruistic
i find that poetic how instead of just branding "pedo **** " or any other typical humiliation they kinda honored the girl in their own way

it's brutally altruistic
User avatar #211 to #170 - beatmasterz (05/03/2013) [-]
Not completely altruistic, I'm sure the inmates had a blast.
#86 - johnpoppy (05/03/2013) [-]
What nice guys.
What nice guys.
User avatar #493 to #221 - boydaranga (05/04/2013) [-]
****** love MaxwellTV
#594 to #493 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #682 to #594 - boydaranga (05/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #57 - narlydude (05/03/2013) [-]
Is a child's life worth more than an adult's?
User avatar #772 to #57 - anomypingas (05/04/2013) [-]
No human life is worth anything from what we have done to everything else.
User avatar #63 to #57 - existacne (05/03/2013) [-]
Why not both.jpg
#459 to #57 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Perhaps not their life, but by nature, children are damned near vulnerable to just about everything. Taking advantage of someone in that predicament is low, so while the crime is the same, it is a new level of cowardice. Like. . .taking candy from a baby.
#550 to #57 - Yesitsme has deleted their comment [-]
#787 to #550 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
what about killing a kid who is a raised around violence, has killed and shows no signs of stopping, but he really has no idea the consequences of his actions and doesn't see the problem with it?
#783 to #57 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
No, no they aren't anything anyone else says is just sentimental ******** . People care more for kids than adults, so that's what it comes down to.
User avatar #89 to #57 - sparkieemae (05/03/2013) [-]
Well lets see, Katie was little and could not fight off an adult attacker and did not solicit or deserve being molested and murdered.

This asshat molested someone smaller than them because they where bigger and could, then, he took away the rest of her life. She only lived ten years and he took away every single year she had left.

So yeah, maybe her life was worth slightly more than his. Maybe, yeah he deserves to be forcibly branded with the name of the human being he destroyed.
User avatar #133 to #89 - admiralen ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
thats not what he asked though, he asked if a childs life is worth more then an adults, not if a raped child is worth more then a pedofile
User avatar #118 to #57 - vatra (05/03/2013) [-]
It is more the molestation, rape is just generally frowned upon by the criminal community, but to defile a child is the lowest of the low. If a child molester values his or her life, they will tell the other inmates that they did something else. Guards often "let it slip" that an inmate is a child molester, then look the other way when the inmates in act their revenge.
#788 to #57 - pukingrainbows (05/04/2013) [-]
Consider Ben from the Walking Dead comics. walkingdead.wikia.com/wiki/Ben_(Comic_Series)
He slaughtered his brother but he still had his innocence. He didn't realize what a horrible thing he did. He was growing up around people being killed left and right, and really had no concept of what was right? Innocence can sometimes lead a kid down a wrong path.
#796 to #788 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
**** you, faggot
User avatar #797 to #796 - pukingrainbows (05/04/2013) [-]
wow, didn't expect THAT much butthurt
User avatar #91 to #57 - lupepush (05/03/2013) [-]
If this hits the front page, than your comment is gonna create ********* .
#171 to #57 - theoriginaltwat (05/03/2013) [-]
In my opinion it's something to do with the innocence and the vulnerability of a child that makes crimes against them so abhorrent
#61 to #57 - Killveous (05/03/2013) [-]
I would say yes because they have more life to live. They have more years to live then the older person? So there for they should be saved.
I duno
#149 to #57 - greenstrongworld (05/03/2013) [-]
I'd say yes. Humans aren't eternal beings. Each one dies and one takes over their place. However, when each one is born, they start making their own choices and accomplishing things they've never felt before. In terms of experience and not-yet-created memories, I think children are much more valuable than older people. For example, I would probably bet that Katie has not yet been married, made friends that last forever, experienced the joys of being in high school, driven a car or anything you guys here at FJ have experienced in your life. So many things have been taken away from her that she didn't even know about. She could've enjoyed life for so much longer. And it's not just her. Her parents probably mourned for their daughter because every child born seems like a miracle of life to their parents. They probably have planned a vacation the coming summer to go to DisneyWorld or something that she would've enjoyed. Thanks for listening to my opinion.(rather, reading it) GSW out.
User avatar #59 to #57 - GhandisPimpCane (05/03/2013) [-]
Yes but mainly due to the innocence and vulnerability of childhood
User avatar #60 to #59 - narlydude (05/03/2013) [-]
An adult can be just as innocent and vulnerable as a child
User avatar #121 to #60 - vatra (05/03/2013) [-]
Maybe if the adult has Downs Syndrome.
User avatar #770 to #121 - bluedwarf (05/04/2013) [-]
Hey dude, don't be mean to him. If he believes in some hard to imagine ideals I think that's rather amazing, and not something that needs to be put down.
User avatar #815 to #770 - vatra (05/04/2013) [-]
Fair, enough, I clash with Idealists, I'm a realist and it annoys me when people try to claim something is better or worse than it actually is.
#786 to #121 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
People like you are the reason people like that don't exist. If you try to be an idealist, innocent and righteous for your whole life, people like you are there to slap them down and tell them that's wrong.
User avatar #814 to #786 - vatra (05/04/2013) [-]
By all means he can be however he likes, but as a whole, adults are not innocent, the world is imperfect and tends to corrupt anything that has been here awhile.
#816 to #814 - bluedwarf (05/04/2013) [-]
Perhaps you have heard of those powerful families that exist even today, and I assure you there is at least one who is sheltering their daughter/son from the outer world, and actually another example came in my mind, are you by any chance familiar with that comedian that said something along the lines: I will masturbate tonight, tonight and I will think of you when I do it; to that hard core christian activist.

Remember there was a lot of content about him here on fj. That girl I honestly believe is as clean as a child. She might not be the brightest but that's not what we are discussing here anyways and in my opinon this trait contributes to the whole innocence picture that we have of kids.

Funny enough, since you already mentioned Downs syndrome, I think in an attempt to beat your point I actually helped you prove it .
User avatar #817 to #816 - vatra (05/04/2013) [-]
To your last point, a little bit yes lol.

As for the sheltering, all that accomplishes is not allowing the child to become properly prepared to deal with the real world, I have a friend that was sheltered her whole life, she hates her parents for it.

Lastly at least in my opinion, innocence is synonymous with lack of experience. So in essence that would mean you aren't truly living. Of course children get a free pass on that as they haven't had the opportunity to live yet.
User avatar #818 to #817 - bluedwarf (05/04/2013) [-]
I was to lead this into a heavy discussion but decided to delete what I wrote. I'll end it with taking my hat off to you, and stating that your comment of them all, (more or less) encaptured the essence of the reason behind murdering children repulsiveness.
User avatar #819 to #818 - vatra (05/04/2013) [-]
Thanks mate. Guess it all worked out then!
User avatar #278 to #57 - haunterbrony (05/03/2013) [-]
Define what you mean by worth.
User avatar #135 to #57 - admiralen ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
i cant say i agree, if a child dies it didnt have much to lose, but if an old person dies, every experience they had, all their knowledge and memories will die with them
User avatar #201 to #135 - danniegurl (05/03/2013) [-]
they lose so much more. they lose their entire future.
an old person has already experienced life.
User avatar #778 to #201 - Omegashenron (05/04/2013) [-]
I kinda agree with both of the points I mean by danniegurl's logic that means a 25 year old should give his life to save a 24 year old regardless of circumstances.

Heres a question for you(I just woke up btw so it will proably be a little hazy.)
Let's say theres a man and his child and theyre trapped in this room and the only way out is to feed the door a life so basically you have to either kill yourself or kill ur child. Of course the dad would kill himself right? But there's a long walk out of the rest of the tunnel to the outside world and even then the dad has no clue where they are. So what does he do? Sacrifice himself and save his baby?(at least for a while)Keep in mind the baby would just lie in the room screaming and unless someone finds the utnnel and walks in to find the baby screaming it will die of starvation or dehydration take your pick. Or does he kill his son to leave the room and most likely escape and live his life?
These are the things that pop into my head when philosophy comes to question. Im sorry lol. Please respond anyone who cares to answer.
User avatar #214 to #201 - admiralen ONLINE (05/03/2013) [-]
the future is an abstract thing, and besides, theres no shortage on either old or young people, babies are replacable, old people are not
User avatar #216 to #214 - danniegurl (05/03/2013) [-]
"babies are replaceable"?
are you ******* kidding me?
they're human beings, not a t shirt.
they're no more replaceable than an old person.
no one is replaceable.
User avatar #760 to #216 - admiralen ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
thats an ideal, comming from emotions, you might think what you will, but thats just ****** instincts from the past, a baby is a blank slate, when lost, nothing much is lost, an old person is a book, when lost their entire story is too, just cause the baby will develop into a book eventually doesnt mean its worth more then the actual books
#811 to #760 - captnpl (05/04/2013) [-]
The old have already left their impact on the world, its up to the next generation to fix what they did wrong and improve what they did right. That's how progress happens. People look for better ways to do things, but once they find them they stop looking. It takes a new life, devoid of the old habits and concepts , to take things to new levels.
User avatar #812 to #811 - admiralen ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
yeah, but theyre replacable, theyre easy to make and replace
#684 to #214 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
i wish your mom would have decided to replace you. Obviously you have no wisdom to pass on to future generations.
User avatar #761 to #684 - admiralen ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
neither does babies faggot
#809 to #761 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Thats so stupid. Its like saying killing you right now is way better then killing a 90year old. Compared you have less then a quarter of life experience they have, so that makes you worthless in the terms of life.
User avatar #810 to #809 - admiralen ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
maybe, ive got less to lose then them
User avatar #167 to #135 - ICEDgrunge (05/03/2013) [-]
It's the value of the opportunities that the children have to experience moreso than what actually has been experienced that is put on the scale in this case.
#141 to #57 - samoaspider (05/03/2013) [-]
Yes. When Titanic sunk into the ocean they saved the women and children first. Think about it.
Yes. When Titanic sunk into the ocean they saved the women and children first. Think about it.
User avatar #67 to #57 - thephantur (05/03/2013) [-]
I think it's the fact that they are innocent and pure and have done nothing wrong. We are animals and we protect our young. Adults have spent many years on this earth and experienced their lives. Children have not. Killing a child is like taking away their chance at experiencing life. Not only that, but a child is defenseless. Killing a man who is bad, but killing a small child who can't do much more than scream is millions of times worse.
User avatar #68 to #67 - thephantur (05/03/2013) [-]
I just realized everything I said was worthless because of my profile picture...
User avatar #383 to #68 - ilovehitler (05/04/2013) [-]
I know this feel. Whenever I try to say anything nice or serious at all, people like to bring my username up...
#767 to #383 - iamnotacleverman (05/04/2013) [-]
How would you know that feel? Look at your username!
User avatar #483 to #383 - psykobear ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
If that bothers you, don't make your username "ilovehitler"
thephantur, you could always change your profile pick to something less... rapey.
User avatar #490 to #483 - ilovehitler (05/04/2013) [-]
I like my name. You have no idea how useful it is when a nazi post comes up.
User avatar #499 to #490 - psykobear ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
Oh, I'm not criticizing,
#596 to #68 - jakeattack (05/04/2013) [-]
its the internet, we understand the difference between pedobear profile pics and actually molesting a 10 year old girl. hes just ****** up
#670 to #68 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I have a dream
A dream where all funnyjunkers can be judged by their content and not by the picture on their avatar
#795 to #670 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
**** off, ******
#777 to #67 - larryqa **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #102 to #67 - fightforfate (05/03/2013) [-]
your avatar doesn't help
#776 to #67 - iAmAWizard (05/04/2013) [-]
>This comment   
>Your profile picture is pedobear
>This comment
>Your profile picture is pedobear
User avatar #109 to #67 - jessieqwertyu (05/03/2013) [-]
Your avatar gives me conflicting emotions
#405 to #67 - teekanne (05/04/2013) [-]
said by the guy with the pedobear ava
User avatar #707 to #67 - imyourdaddy (05/04/2013) [-]
says the guy with pedo-bear as his profile picture
User avatar #748 to #67 - daentraya (05/04/2013) [-]
And if it's not killing, terrible events like rape can traumatize a kid for the rest of it's life..
User avatar #599 to #67 - addia (05/04/2013) [-]
Although I agree with this. A person with a pedobear avatar defending a child who was molested is hard to take seriously.
#552 to #67 - irokk (05/04/2013) [-]
Mad respect, Socrates
#813 to #67 - finni (05/04/2013) [-]
That's kind of how I feel about abortion. I know it's a touchy subject, and I know I'll probably get thumbed down for it, but yeah, even if it isn't considered life by doctors it would evolve into one and you're taking away the chance of somebody to have a life.   
I know it's a lot more complicated than that. The mother might not be capable of taking care of the child, the mother might be too young or she just don't want the burden of the child etc. but that's how I feel about it. Ain't got nothing to do with God ot anything, it's just about the life that never got a chance
That's kind of how I feel about abortion. I know it's a touchy subject, and I know I'll probably get thumbed down for it, but yeah, even if it isn't considered life by doctors it would evolve into one and you're taking away the chance of somebody to have a life.

I know it's a lot more complicated than that. The mother might not be capable of taking care of the child, the mother might be too young or she just don't want the burden of the child etc. but that's how I feel about it. Ain't got nothing to do with God ot anything, it's just about the life that never got a chance
User avatar #742 to #67 - ieatbengay (05/04/2013) [-]
im just saiyan the thing about animals protecting their young isnt the best metaphor because in nature a lot of animals choose the stronger children to raise and leave the others to die
User avatar #539 to #67 - grimgrey (05/04/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, but its really difficult taking your comment seriously while looking at you profile picture.
User avatar #250 to #67 - theqwertyops (05/03/2013) [-]
your profile picture is strangely relevent
User avatar #805 to #67 - babyanalraper (05/04/2013) [-]
I think that you and I would be great friends
#804 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Hi friend
#784 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
i bet you support abortion
#768 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I think you are having a romanticised view on kids. Well, of the top of my head I could throw that honey booboo thing out, and neighbours kids (all around 9 years) gathered around and kicked my brother while he was on the floor.
I can see myself breaking those bastards necks, kids aren't different then adults, there is not reason in anything there is just what you do that defines you
#765 to #67 - mastercolossus (05/04/2013) [-]
the reason inmates do this is because of how they see their own families and how they believe a person like that shouldnt go unpunished. also the main reason why women and children are protected like this is because of survival. all it takes is a few men surviving a cataclysm to continue the human race but you need alot more women to have variety in the genes. the practice is still in place so that any particular group of humans can have a better chance to survive versus other groups of humans.
User avatar #741 to #67 - ferbisboy (05/04/2013) [-]
hitler did nothing wrong either
#736 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I was expecting you to finish as "Which makes it a lot more fun"
User avatar #693 to #67 - cadencee (05/04/2013) [-]
How many adult lives would it take to justify a childs death?
User avatar #610 to #67 - superafromanxd (05/04/2013) [-]
i agree with you , if you're going to kill someone or something it should be able to defend itself. Its the same reason I can blankly watch someone gettin their head chopped off but cringe at seeing some kid torturing a puppy
User avatar #653 to #610 - swalshy (05/04/2013) [-]
Chicken, cow, pig, sheep, meat..
User avatar #672 to #653 - superafromanxd (05/04/2013) [-]
ok vegan, theres an emotional difference between the animals. When you see a pig its associated with filth and bacon. When you see a cat or dog you associate it with cuteness and innocence since they are pet animals.
#586 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Says the guy with a Pedobear icon.
User avatar #532 to #67 - gardenjustice (05/04/2013) [-]
Your beautiful comment was ruined by your icon.
User avatar #481 to #67 - pleuradispensor (05/04/2013) [-]
i feel obligated to point out your fapping pedobear gif right next to your speach about protecting children
#477 to #67 - kaguradragon has deleted their comment [-]
#458 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
So do you think abortion is wrong, given killing a child is like taking away their chance at experiencing life?
#449 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I would take your post a lot more seriously if your avatar wasn't pedobear.
#402 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Pedobear why would you say something like that
#392 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
Because of your picture i can't take that seriously at all.
User avatar #389 to #67 - RepostDetective (05/04/2013) [-]
I donĀ“t know why but your avatar is kinda ruining the message of what your trying to say...
#366 to #67 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
your defending children against rape when your picture is of pedo bear?
User avatar #262 to #67 - alucord (05/03/2013) [-]
The best part of this was your avatar
#257 to #67 - Rascal (05/03/2013) [-]
lol pedo bear
User avatar #155 to #67 - secretlysuperman (05/03/2013) [-]
I'm sorry but your picture takes away from the sad words about the murder of children.
User avatar #122 - craaabs (05/03/2013) [-]
There are serious problems with the jail system, I agree. But when I hear about what inmates do to pedophiles i just smile and want to thank them.
#624 to #122 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
it's funny how your charlie chaplin is your avatar and he was a pedo...loloolol
User avatar #144 to #122 - justanotherzombie (05/03/2013) [-]
Sadly in jail (at least in Canadian jails) there is a cell block call P.C (Protective custody) its for pedos and rapists so they don't get killed.
User avatar #172 to #144 - jonnyfunk (05/03/2013) [-]
god damn it, canada, take it down a notch!
User avatar #192 to #172 - theseventhalias (05/03/2013) [-]
we're sorry...
User avatar #131 to #122 - CaptainWaffles (05/03/2013) [-]
Yup. There's a pecking order in prison. Child-molesters are at the absolute bottom and despised by all.
#158 to #131 - Spikeydeath (05/03/2013) [-]
and serial killers are usually respected if i remember right
User avatar #658 to #158 - CaptainWaffles (05/04/2013) [-]
Kind of. Copkillers the most.
#247 - jackalcureofprusia (05/03/2013) [-]
Even prison systems have rules.
Child molesters and anyone who mistreats a child is treated like scum by the guards and the inmates.
It pleases me knowing their experience is even worst
User avatar #717 to #247 - potrsr (05/04/2013) [-]
i think in prison they have better morals then outside(not all but some). Prison can change you in so many ways. But no metter what your crime was-brutaly killed some one and raped the corpse or just robbery, every one hates pedos.
User avatar #263 to #247 - littlenish (05/03/2013) [-]
Even inmates have morals. And those are some pretty ****** good morals.
User avatar #387 to #263 - ilovehitler (05/04/2013) [-]
Because most inmates aren't all that bad or evil. A lot of them just got caught up in drugs, or had to become a thief to try and get by, or accidentally killed someone (including being drunk and killing someone).
Whereas they would see someone who raped and murdered a child, an act that you don't just accidentally do/ do it to try and get by, and they hate them.

User avatar #52 - creepingquincy (05/03/2013) [-]
Prisons, delivering justice more than the legal system
I could be wrong...
User avatar #208 to #52 - arborday (05/03/2013) [-]
yeah they rape or beat you up even for nonviolent / nonrapey crimes
#357 - tomanydiscos (05/03/2013) [-]
I appreciate that it's grammatically correct...
I appreciate that it's grammatically correct...
#695 to #357 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I keep seeing gifs from this movie, asking what it's from, mentally adding it to my list of movies to watch, then forgetting it. So, hopefully, for the last time, what movie is this? (If no one has replied within 5 minutes, feel no need to reply, I probably won't return to this comment anywho.)
#822 to #695 - tomanydiscos (05/05/2013) [-]
The Road to El Dorado. You wont be disappointed
User avatar #484 to #357 - psykobear ONLINE (05/04/2013) [-]
I appreciate that gif..
That's ******* awesome.
User avatar #419 to #357 - gothdino (05/04/2013) [-]
Think if they misspelled something. "Hey, that's not right; guess we'll have to scratch it out and do it again."
User avatar #51 - sircool (05/03/2013) [-]
this is why rapists and child molesters should be locked up with hardcore criminals. they'd be to scared to go to prison to try anything.
User avatar #101 to #51 - PubLandlord (05/03/2013) [-]
I am not saying that I think molesting children is ok, but in the same way that we view homosexuality as being "not a choice" I think pedophiles should get give more support and therapy in overcoming their sexual urges, in Ancient Greece it was considered normal to have younger sexual relations.

Countries have different sexual ages of consent so what could land you in jail in America could be fine in Mexico
#113 to #101 - angelusprimus (05/03/2013) [-]
They do, if they go into therapy before they rape a child, they get FREE therapy because their condition is potential danger, and they don't get judged because they are protected by doctor-patient confidentiality.
But if the CHOSE not to get therapy, if they CHOSE to harm a child. **** them, they deserve hell while alive and to burn in hell once gone.
User avatar #176 to #113 - PubLandlord (05/03/2013) [-]
My point is that this current culture demonises people pedophiles instead of looking at it as a mental condition.

The same way homosexuals were considered disgusting when gay sex was illegal, or in the same way that African Americans were persecuted.

I don't think that a prison is a suitable place for a pedophile who downloads child porn but instead is in a facility to rehabilitate.
User avatar #498 to #176 - boydaranga (05/04/2013) [-]
the only difference is that homosexuality is mutual. whereas pedophilia and rape is harming You need to login to view this link it ok if a homosexual man went out and raped another man because of his homosexual urge? i mean it's understandable if the homosexual man was having dirty thoughts, because he obviously liked a guy, the same way a pedophile would like a child, the same way a straight person would like a woman. But rape is Unacceptable either way, and to a child, it's even worse.
User avatar #740 to #498 - PubLandlord (05/04/2013) [-]
I am not talking about instances of rape, but for instance in the UK , sex with someone under the age of 12 , even if consensual is considered rape, however in Mexico and Ancient Greece you are permitted to have sex with a 13 year old.

I'm not condoning Rape, and I think there needs to be a change in the approach, instead of deamonising pedophiles we are essentially making it a taboo subject, I think a person who found children attractive would be scared to go to a doctor or psychiatrist for fear of the law.

It seems to easy to take the stance that these peoples (people with sexual urges towards children) are disgusting and completely void of any help, understandably the criminal in this post had to be imprisoned, but if we don't try and rehabilitate or reach out to these people they will be driven underground which is much more dangerous

#598 to #176 - angelusprimus (05/04/2013) [-]
Don't compare pedophilia with homosexuality or prosecution of them to prosecution of minorities.
Pedophiles can be compared to people who find sexual attraction with animals. In a way that animal like a child can't give consent.
Problem with people who look for and download child porn is that they create a demand. When there is a demand there will always be people who will step up to provide to the demand, and in this case it means someone will exploit the children.

You compared it to ancient greece pederasty. Two things with that, while it was a grown man and a child by today's standard, boy had to be atleast 11 years old. 11 years was age of becoming a man then. You could vote and go to war at that age. And those relationships while sexual, were more then that, they were mentoriships to teach a boy how to think, fight, run property. Don't forget, they didn't have formal education then.
#604 to #101 - jakeattack (05/04/2013) [-]
ehh you have a good point. but at the same time its just ****** up, like the human body should not even behave like that, homosexuality is a lot more prevalent, but its different. they are old enough to make their own decisions, but the child cant, so even if he like lured her somehow and convinced her she wanted it, still ****** up. plus killing her, didnt need to take the innocence of a child twice
User avatar #504 to #101 - Hreidmar (05/04/2013) [-]
Well, in Greece, the public relationships with younger people were 'proper' though. As in, the older man (it was usually a man) had to woo the younger boy/girl, and court them as you would an equal. Rape did happen in Greece, and fairly often, but excluding war prizes, it was about as acceptable as it is now. At least in most city states that's how it was.
#521 - osusuckeyes (05/04/2013) [-]
When you get out of prison, I suppose you're gonna take off the prison jumpsuit. Well I'm gonna give you something you can't off.
User avatar #533 to #521 - bottleofrum (05/04/2013) [-]
can't off?
#568 to #533 - sanbichemabob (05/04/2013) [-]
mentally filled in the blank anyway
User avatar #543 to #521 - karson (05/04/2013) [-]
well he got life...
#522 - Reldinrostiare (05/04/2013) [-]
Far as im concerned, **** human rights, pedophiles should be ****** castrated, and sent to live in a colony by themselves. Murderers, rapists, and thieves aside, they are the lowest of the LOW of society and should be treated like the mongrel ***** they are. Thumbs up for sharing this. It made me happy.
User avatar #566 to #522 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
> **** human rights
You let your emotions get in the way of your thinking and that's why you'll never do anything productive in your entire life. Well done promoting fascism though
User avatar #570 to #566 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
Actually has a point, if those mongrels can't act right in society they don't deserve their rights. After all there's a difference between a Robin Hood-esq criminal and a John Wayne Gacy.
User avatar #571 to #570 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
And who exactly are you to determine when somebody "doesn't deserve their rights"?
#573 to #571 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
When something can be considered vile such as murder of the 2nd and 1st degree I would say and also risking many innocent lives on purpose(such as making a bomb and placing it in a crowded place).
User avatar #578 to #573 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
And who are you to determine what is "vile"? You realize that Hitler thought he was putting "vile" people in concentration camps, right?
#665 to #578 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I find it laughable that you hold Hitler as the ultimate wrong when really he was simply infamous. Infamy does not equal ultimate evil, was he bad? Perhaps, but claiming that he was the worst human being in history, as you are implying by holding him up as picture to shock andriod shows your scope of human history. As for the "Who are you" well he is very simply a person who holds an opinion, an opinion he is free to act upon and speak whatever he wants as his 1 real universal right as long as he realizes there are consequences to this. But what really makes my skin crawl is people like you who claim other peoples opinions are absolute in the wrong and should be changed to the "correct" and "enlightened" way as you no doubt think yourself as. If you had the chance I have no doubt you would reprogram the whole of humanities soul to follow your views, your ideas and your values since you've shown nothing but abhorrence for the "barbarians" shown here. Who's the true fascist?
User avatar #699 to #665 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
I never said I held Hitler as the ultimate wrong. If you actually read my ******* posts, you'd realize that I said he thought he was in the right and did things that we consider abhorrent, but his intentions were to better his own people.
And yes, I am ******* aware of the fact that he has the right to give his opinion, that doesn't AT ALL mean that his opinion is valid.
And yes, I consider my opinions to be correct. That's kind of the point of why I hold them. Would I call them "enlightening"? No, I think it's common ******* sense.
And yes, if I had it my way, I would love to have everybody agree with me, that's kind of the whole reason why I try to argue my point. Would I "force" them to do it? No, because that would automatically make my points moot.

The thing that gives me a big ol' boner is the fact that you fell victim to the exact thing that you just accused me of doing - considering your own opinions as "enlightening", calling people fascists to "shock" them, assuming things with no basis in fact (ie claiming I think hitler is the ultimate wrong), and yes, I have absolutely no doubt that you'd change everybody's views to your own if given the chance. Also, you clearly have no respect for other people's opinions, either, and you intentionally set up strawmen to knock them down and make yourself look superior. Nice job, you managed to accomplish nothing but a hypocritical circlejerk with your post.
User avatar #590 to #578 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
That's not the same matter. We aren't controlling the world, and you know damn well Hitler would have been jailed and executed for war crimes. What we are talking about is crime and punishment, and as I previously stated, the obvious successful or attempt on people's lives should be considered vile. I'm not trying to argue man, I'm just saying that someone who clearly committed a major crime should not be treated as an average man or woman.
User avatar #600 to #590 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
Exactly. People who commit a major crime are not "average people". It is not normal human behavior to molest and kill toddlers, but it happens anyway. Why? Because the people that do it AREN'T NORMAL. This isn't 1870 any more, we know a lot about the human brain and how it works and why people do what they do. Your basic urges, and your basic emotions, like anger - you might be able to control it or you might not be able to, but some people absolutely cannot and when their emotions take over they snap and do things that you want to put them to death for. What makes you any better than the murderers if you are willing to kill to satisfy your own desires?

And I don't understand how you can say "hitler would have been jailed and executed for war crimes", because, you know, he kind of wasn't. It actually ******* happened, it's not just a neat story. Hitler thought he was purifying Germany, and that he was making his nation a paradise for everyone that was "worthy" by getting rid of, in your words, "vile" people. You might have different ideas as to what constitutes a "vile" person, but to Hitler, all the people he killed were absolute threats to his country and to his people. He didn't sit around being proud of being evil - the thought probably never even crossed his mind that he might be the bad guy, just like it clearly has never crossed yours.
User avatar #612 to #600 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
Ah, but they weren't vile people. They were anyone who wasn't Aryan. Criminal or not. As well as homosexuals, the mentally disabled, gypsies, and also Jehovah's witnesses. So really it wasn't much of his opinon on those who were vile, it was more raising a group over any other until they seemed vile. That issue is more of the idea of master races. We are talking about killers here, they did do something to deserve punishment.
Any way, those who are mental and those who are murderers are different. Those who are mental would just kind of go crazy one day and kill or attempt to kill any thing or one they can. A murder, I find, is someone who kills and knows what they are doing. Yes they are twisted in a very sick sadistic way, and you could call them metally unstable, but they have an idea on how to get away with this and what goals they want to accomplish.
And I do not consider myself to be good or evil, in reality most people are Neutral until a certain moment when they take a side then and forever.
User avatar #620 to #612 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
And why exactly do you think that these people who are "twisted in a very sick sadistic way" deserve these things? They have no control of their desires, just like you have no control over yours. You get turned on by hot women and "very sick sadistic twisted" people get turned on by kids, and you may or may not act on your desires. You claim to want to kill these people because they "deserve punishment", but guess what - in the psychopath's mind, EVERYBODY DESERVES PUNISHMENT. In a killer's mind, there is not a single innocent person on this planet and literally everybody has done something to justify their death. Call them "mentally unstable" all you want, they're still people, they can be helped and if you don't understand that then you have no place in this discussion.
User avatar #635 to #620 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
I don't "claim I want to kill them" I say that they really shouldn't get as many of these rights as other prisoners. And if these people are truly ill, they will never be cured. For all the hours and days and months and years you invest in their well being, if they are released and are truly ill-minded, they will repeat their actions. And you keep implying I care for the life of one who took another's. In my mind it's the idea of balance. You stole a life, therefore yours must be taken as well. And don't give me that "An eye for an Eye leaves the whole world blind" ******** because in the end there's always one who started the argument and backs out until the end. I understand that you don't agree whit this idea but it encourages balance, and in our modern world we need more balance than ever before.
While these debates are interesting I tire of them, and I would like to proceed with my day good sir. I see your ideals but I simply cannot agree with you. Your opinions on me are your own. I bid you adieu.
User avatar #642 to #635 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
Karma doesn't exist and "balance" is a childish concept. You get a punishment for what you did but you will absolutely be treated the same way any other person would be, otherwise you're no better than the one being punished.
User avatar #651 to #642 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
The idea of equality is just as childish, no one is truly equal.
User avatar #652 to #651 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
And there's the Hitler in you I knew was there all along.
#683 to #652 - bigrog (05/04/2013) [-]
don't be a condescending asshole. And he's right. Equality is an impossible and foolish goal.
User avatar #666 to #652 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
Oh you really think there's such a thing as equality? Social status, race, gender, opinions, beliefs. There are many things that make us unequal. Is this a problem? In some cases yes, but inequality is what makes us different. You might see it bad as being unequal but really it's not. It's simply foolish to think equality is possibles, human nature itself detours equality.
User avatar #696 to #666 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
Do you really think that when I say "equality" I mean it literally, with social status, race, gender, opinions and belief? No, I mean that every single person gets the same underlying rights as the rest of society and everybody gets a fitting punishment for their crimes. None of your emotional ******** .
User avatar #781 to #696 - sirbutterballs (05/04/2013) [-]
Well I do wish to apologize for being rude at the end of this debate. I do not wish to make an enemy over different opinions. I apologize for my rudeness and wish you a good day.
User avatar #592 to #578 - andriod (05/04/2013) [-]
The majority of people decide. If for some reason everybody was against this idea, they could choose to elect a leader who would undo it.

I personally would support it.
User avatar #601 to #592 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
Just like how the majority of people wanted Hitler as their leader. Right.
User avatar #607 to #601 - andriod (05/04/2013) [-]
No, Hitler started out as a elected official but gradually became a tyrant.

It wouldn't happen in the US today. Pres. and Congress have limited terms and the Military branch are quite capable of thinking for themselves.
Even If all that failed, and the desire was great enough, People would revolt and topple the government because of the second amendment.

I honestly think the more important question is, Who are you to decide on this issue?
User avatar #615 to #607 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
Who am I? I'm somebody arguing for giving every person basic human rights no matter what in absolutely every single circumstance. That is crucial, no matter what they have done and no matter how much, in your eyes, they don't "deserve" them because YOU don't get to decide what freedoms people deserve. If you get to decide that, everybody gets to decide that, including the most hateful, bigoted people you know.

Like I explained earlier - You seem to think that the present is "invulnerable" to those types of things, that history will never repeat itself and we've learned from our mistakes. Newsflash - it isn't, it will and we haven't. All it takes is for one man, a charismatic person to gain power and gradually strip away your freedoms one by one and before you know it you're in prison because of your religion, or your skin color, or your actions that you never even thought were worthy of a crime. And people will absolutely support him because he's making the country "better" by getting rid of the "vile" people.

Remember, Hitler didn't run on the platform of "I'm going to literally massacre as many Jews as I possibly can and start a world war that will obliterate our entire country and leave it in ruins for decades", it was "Hey, you know those problems that are plaguing us right now, like a **** economy, mass unemployment and the falling-apart of our society? I can fix that easily".
User avatar #641 to #615 - andriod (05/04/2013) [-]
But that supports anarchy.
Who are we to decide what he is entitled to? Who are we to decide what is illegal?
The structure of all modern law and government is decided by popular sovereignty.
So all im trying to say is that WE THE PEOPLE can do anything. WE are allowed to decide whether extreme criminals deserve basic human rights. I mean hell, the prisoners themself's are a perfect example of this. If the majority thought that this was to cruel a punishment, they would have stopped the guys who did it.

And yes history is doomed to repeat. I was never saying it wouldn't. I just don't see it happening anytime soon to the US. This however is a completely separate issue which I would prefer not to discuss.
User avatar #645 to #641 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
How is what I'm saying supporting anarchy? Do you know what that word means? In fact it's precisely what you're arguing for - "whoever is the most powerful gets their way". Just because a majority wants something doesn't mean they should get it - human rights comes first in absolutely every case. It doesn't matter if there's a crowd of screaming morons calling for his blood, he gets the same rights just as you would.

The day we let your emotions run the world is the day society collapses.
User avatar #654 to #645 - andriod (05/04/2013) [-]
Your mistaking Anarchy for Social Darwinism. Anarchy means you don't have to follow any rules. The majority decides what human rights are considered. Its not like its written on the side of a mountain what is and is not acceptable.
If the minority can do whatever they wanted, then that very same Prisoner could make it a "Law" that you have to rape and murder children. Because the majority couldn't have its way, that guy would be free to do as he pleases. this is an extreme example but its valid none the less.

You seem to forget the fact that WE are human. Literally everything that we do in our life's is because of our emotions. All of our technology is based on our emotions. As long as we exist on this planet, our emotions will run this world of ours.

And I can't help but chuckle that Im the one telling you this and my name is android.
User avatar #659 to #654 - gammajk (05/04/2013) [-]
No, you don't get what I mean when I say "emotions". I mean how somebody does something you disapprove of and you immediately scream and cry and demand a punishment so that at the end of the way you can grasp to your childish worldview that every tale has a happy ending and that karma is a thing. Doing something to somebody that they don't want you to do for the sole purpose of satisfying your own desires is exactly what a murderer does and you would be no better than them if you allow this to happen.

Your idea that people can make laws that you must "rape and murderer children" is complete strawman. No, the minority isn't able to do what they want either. There isn't one group of people that can just do whatever they want, why is that so hard to understand? The "majority" decides what is and isn't acceptable, but guess what, the majority is very often blatantly wrong, just like Nazi Germany. If you don't have basic human rights clearly defined and protected, then you are no better than the German citizens who stood back and allowed the Holocaust to happen and you clearly have learned nothing from history. We will NEVER progress as a society if there is still a group of people that dictates who is worthy of having rights and who is not and they get away with it.
#723 to #522 - awesomanium has deleted their comment [-]
#790 to #522 - Rascal (05/04/2013) [-]
I really hope you never breed, you're the kind of sick individual whom you are describing.
#724 to #522 - awesomanium (05/04/2013) [-]

Why are criminals criminals?
Because they're breaking laws.
Laws are made for the good of the people, and are pretty much moulded around human rights. Therefore, murderers are taking away someone's right to live, etc. By YOU taking AWAY their human rights, you're just as bad as them, or in your words, "the lowest of the LOW of society". The government would never do anything remotely as extreme as that, because it infringes on human rights, something that separates us from them.
User avatar #528 to #522 - asasqw (05/04/2013) [-]
Sounds like Australia all over again
User avatar #527 to #522 - kafudamapla (05/04/2013) [-]
And all the sexy children that seduce them
#529 to #527 - Reldinrostiare (05/04/2013) [-]
I hope that was a joke. If not....
User avatar #530 to #529 - kafudamapla (05/04/2013) [-]
I thought it was obvious, evidently not :/
#537 to #530 - Reldinrostiare (05/04/2013) [-]
Huh. Well personal opinion, not funny. Guess the other junkers can make their own verdicts.
#538 to #537 - kafudamapla has deleted their comment [-]
#689 - rambopotato (05/04/2013) [-]
Imagine if he molested an indian girl .
Anandavenkatakrishnan 's Revenge
User avatar #112 - DiabloStrawhat (05/03/2013) [-]
There is indeed honor among criminals.
#634 - walkingdisaster (05/04/2013) [-]
#638 to #634 - acar (05/04/2013) [-]
This gave me a chuckle, green thumb for you good sir.
This gave me a chuckle, green thumb for you good sir.
 Friends (0)