x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #842 - matthewfuckingmain (04/22/2013) [-]
>Implying that there are gangs of children walking around with semi-automatic rifles.
User avatar #852 to #842 - bigbeaufort ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
I'd be ******* terrifed
#810 - iTzKitteh (04/22/2013) [-]
I wasn't aware that children could buy guns.
User avatar #813 to #810 - vivapinatapro (04/22/2013) [-]
Only white kids can afford them, obviously.
User avatar #827 to #813 - iTzKitteh (04/22/2013) [-]
**** , even buy them without proper training, which I'm assuming happened because she's sitting there with her finger on the trigger.

That's...BASIC firearm handling.

The ad should be against ****** parents/parenting. Or against gun stores that sell children AR-15s. But, according to people like the ones that made this ******** ad, they assume ALL gunstores would sell to kids.
User avatar #831 to #813 - iTzKitteh (04/22/2013) [-]
Plus, that's a ******* .22.

The **** can you do with a .22?
User avatar #652 - marooned (04/22/2013) [-]
Because, assault weapons AREN'T FOR ******* KIDS.
#656 to #652 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Assault weapons is not a factual classification of firearms. It is a catch catch phrase term used by gun grabbers as a blanket term for guns that they want banned, many of which share NO functional or mechanical similarities.
User avatar #672 to #656 - hoodyninja ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
THANK YOU
User avatar #658 to #656 - marooned (04/22/2013) [-]
Weapons aren't for kids*
#665 to #658 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Fair enough, I disagree. A kid behind the wheel supervised in a close course is no less dangerous then a kid with a firearm on a closed range with a trained range master. They will never learn to respect the car OR the firearm unless you teach them about it.
#693 to #665 - anon (04/22/2013) [-]
Someones upset, What's the matter don't like facts so you need to thumb down?
#644 - brisineo ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Here's a little thing to think about...   
   
ALL "mass shootings" (where the assailant was carrying a firearm of some sort, with a total of 4+ civilian casualties as a result) since 1950 were in labeled Gun Free Zones.  (Meaning that it is illegal for a civilian to carry a firearm into that zone, licensed or not)   
   
There have been several more attempts at mass shootings that fail to be recorded in the statistics that gun control advocates use, because they tried shooting up a place where their targets could shoot back.   
   
Also, I'd just want you to take note, the last time we tried to ban something that was a pretty large part of society, (ie the Prohibition amendment) the black market boomed and everyone was buying it illegally to the point where we had to stop because it only made things worse.  America, unfortunately, is in the unique position in being a black market central hub, where banning something as a whole (even something small such as high capacity magazines) is entirely ineffective, and the only true way proven to counter this is literally putting it at gunpoint of people who buy guns to defend themselves.
Here's a little thing to think about...

ALL "mass shootings" (where the assailant was carrying a firearm of some sort, with a total of 4+ civilian casualties as a result) since 1950 were in labeled Gun Free Zones. (Meaning that it is illegal for a civilian to carry a firearm into that zone, licensed or not)

There have been several more attempts at mass shootings that fail to be recorded in the statistics that gun control advocates use, because they tried shooting up a place where their targets could shoot back.

Also, I'd just want you to take note, the last time we tried to ban something that was a pretty large part of society, (ie the Prohibition amendment) the black market boomed and everyone was buying it illegally to the point where we had to stop because it only made things worse. America, unfortunately, is in the unique position in being a black market central hub, where banning something as a whole (even something small such as high capacity magazines) is entirely ineffective, and the only true way proven to counter this is literally putting it at gunpoint of people who buy guns to defend themselves.
User avatar #657 to #644 - secretdestroyers (04/22/2013) [-]
Every law gets broken at at some point so, by your own logic, why bother having laws at all?

Law enforcement exists for a reason....not all cops screw people over.
#686 to #657 - brisineo ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
I'd rather have armed citizens to prevent an attack than to rely on police to stop the shooter after he's killed several people.

But I'm not saying all laws are hindrances. Law maintains order and productivity in society, and of course, a criminal disrupts that because laws are irrelevant to them. We stopped the prohibition act because we couldn't know where the alcohol was going and who was making/owning it, and that was a severe risk.

All I'm trying to say is that it shouldn't be outrageously difficult for a legal citizen to obtain a higher capacity weapon when outlaws can get them with ease or simply steal it from a legal citizen. It provides a distinct disadvantage, and more casualties would be the result. (Refer to post #649)
User avatar #696 to #657 - ponyfcker (04/22/2013) [-]
>not all cops screw people over

You're true on some occasions. My friend was caught smoking weed, this is in Idaho so the cops are strict about that, and the cop give him a lecture on drug abuse and how it can ruin your life, then he asked for a joint and dropped him off at his house telling him to stay in school and get his work done, then have time for weed.
#654 to #644 - superblargh (04/22/2013) [-]
I didn't even read the comment; your gif was just awesome.
I didn't even read the comment; your gif was just awesome.
#480 - wernstrom (04/22/2013) [-]
**wernstrom rolled a random comment #4135824 posted by trollins at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. ** :
 < relevant
**wernstrom rolled a random comment #4135824 posted by trollins at My Little Pony fanfiction, backgrounds, songs, lyrics, and GIFs. ** :
< relevant
User avatar #479 - ritzrules ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
it's a bad idea to ban either one.

kindersurprise is delicious and wonderful, AR-15's make excellent home defense weapons.

and teaching kids how to handle firearms SAFELY is a very practical skill and teaches them a lot about responsibility outside of the realm of guns, too.

sillies...
User avatar #492 to #479 - omfgitsstsix (04/22/2013) [-]
*Fixed

AR-15 is delicious and wonderful, KinderSurprises make excellent home defense weapons.
User avatar #504 to #492 - ritzrules ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
**** . why am i giggling.
#442 - hypnotoad stare ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
I didn't know that guns killed people. Because they don't, people kill people. Background checks, I agree with, banning assault weapons? No, and comparing chocolate to a gun totally is the most similar thing ever!
#237 - akatsukipain (04/21/2013) [-]
shes gonna need that when zombies come......
#226 - rattymanbryden (04/21/2013) [-]
How about we teach kids to be safe with guns and food? To start she needs to take her finger off the ******* trigger and learn how to handle a weapon properly.
#216 - mikeW (04/21/2013) [-]
How about we just let them both be legal?
How about we just let them both be legal?
#739 - joelalmonte (04/22/2013) [-]
Honestly, whenever one of these things that say guess which one of  these blah, blah, blah Everyone automatically guesses the one that is supposed to be suprising, or unexpected but its not because that sort of &quot;shocking&quot; answer stuff has  been done so many times. it wouldve been more suprising if the gun was the right answer.
Honestly, whenever one of these things that say guess which one of these blah, blah, blah Everyone automatically guesses the one that is supposed to be suprising, or unexpected but its not because that sort of "shocking" answer stuff has been done so many times. it wouldve been more suprising if the gun was the right answer.
#733 - bluelight (04/22/2013) [-]
well we have Kinder here and there Great
User avatar #667 - LeifEricson (04/22/2013) [-]
WHY WONT IT LET ME POST PICTURES!!!!
User avatar #699 to #667 - PhuckingPhreak (04/22/2013) [-]
i got you bro
User avatar #752 to #699 - LeifEricson (04/22/2013) [-]
i thumbed both of yall thank you for the thumbs!
User avatar #679 to #667 - merkdox (04/22/2013) [-]
because you are new and you need enough thumbs to do it, here have one
User avatar #461 - nightmarecorpse (04/22/2013) [-]
I see no reason to ban guns. But what practical reason could anyone have for wanting an assault rifle. I mean I can get a handgun for self defense, or a rifle/shotgun for hunting. But why does anyone need an assault rifle? They were literally designed to be able to kill as many human beings possible, as fast as possible. That's it. I think that's just asking for trouble. Just my 2 cents.
#463 to #461 - hjujug (04/22/2013) [-]
So that in the event that the government becomes tyrannical that we can rise against them and restore our inalienable rights endowed to us by our creator. Such rights as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
#465 to #463 - Chubs (04/22/2013) [-]
because assault rifles are badass   
&lt;----(yes i know this is the wrong gun.
because assault rifles are badass
<----(yes i know this is the wrong gun.
User avatar #470 to #461 - andriod (04/22/2013) [-]
With that being the case however, Most criminals still uses handguns as there weapon of choice.
#496 to #461 - harryblazer (04/22/2013) [-]
I remeber living in a bad section of new jersey (or you know, just the state of new jersey) and the cops raided this house down the street. it ended up being a crack house, and I could see them pulling out uzis, tech 9s, a ******* desert eagle, ect. All of which were SUPPOSED to be illegal for the common citizen to own. This store owner that i was friends with had a shotgun sitting across his lap and said "if could have anything more powerful I would, but THATS ILLEGAL"
#500 to #461 - ritzrules ONLINE (04/22/2013) [-]
Y'know, as a Republican and an avid supporter of the 2nd Amendment, you DO make a valid point. But handguns are usually harder to purchase just because they're so much easier to conceal. Nothing short of a trench coat is going to cover up a bulky AR-15, but you can hide a .45 pretty easily under a hoodie or something. And even now, assault weapons are usually restricted to licensed owners.

Really for me, it's not a question over what guns should be banned. A lot of the bad news you hear about guns is the result of irresponsibility on the owner's part. Even the Sandy Hook shooting. The firearms used in the shooting actually belonged to...was it his mother? Something like that. She didn't keep them properly locked up or stored away. And as such they fell into the wrong hands. Happens all the time. Especially with children.

And on that note, I think it would actually be a lot easier for a child to hurt themselves with a handgun than with a longrifle. Yes the rifles can carry a heavier punch, but to get that thing pointed at yourself takes a good deal of work. You have to be trying if you shoot yourself with a rifle. With a handgun? It's a lot easier for a small child to pick one up and go "Hey, what's in this hole at the end?"

But in all sincerity, I do see where you're coming from. It's a matter of "I am an upstanding American citizen, how come I don't get the right to own whatever firearm I want?" Are they necessary? No. Not really. But neither is a car that is capable of doing faster than 80 mph. Just another right that the citizens of this great nation are entitled to.

And dammit, they're just so ******* COOL.
User avatar #426 to #421 - bitchitroll (04/22/2013) [-]
i like how /k/ cared enough to shop her finger off the trigger
User avatar #443 to #426 - amishparadise (04/22/2013) [-]
If you're gonna fix one thing, fix it all.
User avatar #420 - Laddie (04/22/2013) [-]
I don't know where you live, but I've never seen a child try to eat an assault rifle.


But in all seriousness, this is a pretty ****** argument.
#266 - ogloko (04/21/2013) [-]
"Assault weapon" is a political term designed to mislead. the real solution here is education. you cant legislate common sense. these moms demanding action are misguided fear mongers. its sickening how they use their children as billboards to further their own agenda.
User avatar #247 - justadude (04/21/2013) [-]
You can't choke on an AR
#253 to #247 - rprol (04/21/2013) [-]
true but you can't riddle your body with holes from a kinder egg. at least i don't think you can.
User avatar #838 to #253 - random asshole (04/22/2013) [-]
With the proper tools you can!
User avatar #271 to #253 - stealthpsybeast (04/21/2013) [-]
What if you throw it at someone at breakneck speed?
#274 to #271 - rprol (04/21/2013) [-]
maybe if you froze it first. ok then. I'LL NEED A VOLUNTEER FROM THE AUDIENCE.
User avatar #278 to #274 - stealthpsybeast (04/21/2013) [-]
This is Jackass!
#186 - Fasitano (04/21/2013) [-]
fair enough
 Friends (0)