x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+1
#159 - deadmeme **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #11 - backupclover (04/18/2013) [-]
This is funny because I just finished watching the Notebook.
User avatar #231 - thegrimreaver (04/19/2013) [-]
True, but thing is, the car isn't actively trying to get her to drive it.
"Hey baby, c'mon. Let's go for a ride. You're cool for it. You're totally not impaired. Who's gonna find out?"
#227 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
How can the comment debate be taken seriously when there are no women on the internet
User avatar #223 - darksideofthebeast (04/19/2013) [-]
Same rules apply to guns.
#191 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
You know this is just sad. You guys go around proclaim like women falsely accusing men of rape is a problem. Does it happen? Yeah. Is it a social problem? No. The number is extremely low, unlike rape and the number of rapists that never get punished. Rape culture is running rampant and this is a damn fine example of it.
User avatar #220 to #191 - mayormilkman (04/19/2013) [-]
Go back to Tumblr. How do we know of all these unreported cases/rapists?
User avatar #189 - thezillis (04/19/2013) [-]
This is so true. If you **** a guy because you're drunk, he didnt rape you. Don't belittle rape.
#194 to #189 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
Drunk people can't give consent. Don't have sex with someone that's drunk. If you do and you aren't also intoxicated you're a rapist. Plain and simple.
User avatar #203 to #194 - thezillis (04/19/2013) [-]
It's a dick thing to do, but its not rape.
User avatar #212 to #203 - theexo (04/19/2013) [-]
actually anon is right, if you take advantage of someone while they're drunk and you're sober then it is technically rape. especially if you were getting the girl drunk on purpose
#216 to #212 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
"technically rape"

More like undoubtedly rape in every sense of the word
User avatar #219 to #216 - theexo (04/19/2013) [-]
i mean technically as in "how the law defines it"
#206 to #203 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
No it's literally rape. And you'd literally be a rapist. And should be arrested as one.
User avatar #207 to #206 - thezillis (04/19/2013) [-]
It's not and shouldn't be a punishable crime.
#213 to #207 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
Nope. It's rape. Argue all you want, the law is at least decent enough to understand this simple concept even if you don't. And it won't ever change.
User avatar #198 to #194 - mjjrussell **User deleted account** (04/19/2013) [-]
The problem with that is if you are drunk too you can still be charged with rape.
#208 to #198 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
Please do some research on how hard it is to convict rapists in the first place, much less in a situation like you described. Don't spread bad information please.
User avatar #214 to #208 - mjjrussell **User deleted account** (04/19/2013) [-]
It isn't bad information if it can happen.
#221 to #214 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
The number is so low that it's hardly existent. I know the internet wants to believe oh so badly women are evil creatures that can send you to jail without trail with just one accusation but it isn't true at all. It's exactly the exact opposite. The number of rapists who will never get punished is astronomically high. But between the problem running rampant and the problem that is hardly existent, guess which one funnyjunk will choose?
User avatar #237 to #221 - mjjrussell **User deleted account** (04/19/2013) [-]
I never said that woman were evil creatures. You are putting words into my mouth. All I said is that just because both parties are drunk doesn't mean that people are exempt from being charged with rape. It doesn't matter that the number is so low because it has happened in the past. You are just assuming the worst in people that have a slight contradiction to what you said. I think rape is horrible and that especially if someone has sex with someone who is drunk and they aren't that they should be charged. I was pretty much getting at that make sure you know who you are sleeping with and that they want the same thing.
#188 - kingosiris (04/19/2013) [-]
I don't know why Ryan Glosing is in this picture, but it seems more legit with him in it.
#204 to #188 - SgtObvious (04/19/2013) [-]
Ryan Glosing
#154 - mummyslittlebitch (04/19/2013) [-]
Did he really say that? Must have references
#150 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
Regrettable sex? Cry rape!
User avatar #135 - anonymoose (04/19/2013) [-]
To everyone in the comments, this post isn't about having sex with a drunk girl who's passed out.

It's about the fact that if 2 drunk people have sex and the girl wakes up the next day sober, she can claim it was rape.
User avatar #103 - mouthwash (04/19/2013) [-]
I thought this would be something about gun control
#96 - architectakadongus (04/19/2013) [-]
Ryan Gosling never said this. You are such a neckbeard piece of **** .
User avatar #77 - fuzzlefeenix (04/19/2013) [-]
but the car didn't attempt to make her drive it, whereas it's very possible a man could make a girl sleep with him... Also a man can still **** a woman if she's too drunk to move or resist, which can't happen with driving.
#91 to #77 - giggitygantz (04/19/2013) [-]
what about if both parties are drunk is the man more accountable because he is a man?
User avatar #85 to #77 - Zarakima (04/19/2013) [-]
Valid points both, however that's the difference between real rape and 'oh I regret my drunken actions, I was raped' rape, something. Of course those who commit real rape deserve punishment, but this whole thing of calling a drunken mistake 'rape' is just plain disrespectful to real rape victims as well as having massive repercussions on the life of an accused innocent, and it is women who use this 'false victimhood' not men. It is a terrible problem especially since you're pretty much taking either person's word for it, and it's more a situation of 'are they telling the truth or are they just a good actor', and the female 'victim' is often given the benefit of the doubt, despite the consequences for the accused being arguably equally impacting on their life as being raped.
User avatar #86 to #85 - Zarakima (04/19/2013) [-]
disregard the 'something' at the end of the first sentence
#75 - avatarsarefornoobs (04/19/2013) [-]
this is stupid, both parties are at fault...
why do i even bother? this post sucks, where's the funny?
-1
#78 to #75 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#185 to #78 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
He literally said "BOTH parties are at fault." Meaning the male AND the female.
+1
#202 to #185 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#50 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
Uh, well, the difference is that an automobile isn't a ******* conscious human being taking advantage of a drunk female.
#42 - mrmamric (04/19/2013) [-]
I don't know about you, but I've never run over three people and drove into an elementary school with my cock.   
   
Well, I have, but that's beside the point.
I don't know about you, but I've never run over three people and drove into an elementary school with my cock.

Well, I have, but that's beside the point.
#36 - pappathethird (04/19/2013) [-]
Did the Gos really say that?
#73 to #36 - bitchpleas (04/19/2013) [-]
Dunno.. but like i said, I found this some place a long time ago. I do not have a source, but this is the internett
#8 - anon (04/18/2013) [-]
Actually Ryan Gosling is a moderate feminist so highly unlikely that he said this.

As for the statement, there is a difference between claiming rape when the drunk sex was consensual and claiming rape when a woman could not say yes or no.
#16 to #8 - fuckyouto (04/19/2013) [-]
I do not believe in man taking advantage of a women. I also do not believe a lady should get so drunk she could not say no.
User avatar #62 to #16 - greatboobya (04/19/2013) [-]
Women - plural of woman.
#59 to #8 - anon (04/19/2013) [-]
If he is truely out to help women be taken more seriously, then i can totally under why he would say this. Because the situation he described is degrading to women.

Basicly you are giving in to the idea that women are delicate little flowers who's judgement cannot be trusted and need special protection from the more powerful men. All cool and dandy if you want to yell rape at everything, but you cant turn around and expect to be taken seriously.

thats why women have to work much harder to get higher up, and into positions of power and authority. Because they have to work their ass off to proof they are not the delicate little flowers who cant take responsibility that society is portraying them to be.
#30 to #8 - jurkowski (04/19/2013) [-]
Feminism is not about empowering women. It's about equalizing the genders. On this subject, the current schism is that drunk chicks may claim rape after a drunk one-night stand, while men, while I would not say cannot, do not. A true Feminist would want to either force women to accept their irresponsible actions while drunk a bit more rather than fall back on rape charges after they sober up, or make it more socially acceptable for men to claim rape charges as well, or possibly both.
#164 to #30 - unikornking (04/19/2013) [-]
Feminism is not about equalizing genders. Every single feminist believes that EVERY single unequality between genders is female unequality, and that there is absolutely NO unequalities for men. Even if you bring up stuff like harsher sentences for crimes and less rights as a parent and child support stuff, the smarter feminists will say it's apart of the patriarchy, but retards ie tumblr feminists will just deny it and give no reason and be disgusted that someone even try to argue that men have unequalities
User avatar #193 to #164 - coolcalx (04/19/2013) [-]
every single feminist? EVERY single one?

really? are you sure about that? You claim to be omniscient?
User avatar #205 to #193 - unikornking (04/19/2013) [-]
Find a feminist that doesn't believe this. Like seriously this is the base of feminism, it's called patriarchy.
#210 to #205 - coolcalx (04/19/2013) [-]
okay.

oh wow! now your entire argument is invalidated!

maybe you should have chosen language that wasn't so harsh and adamant about "absolute truth"

A great thing to learn is that "you don't know everything."
don't act like you do.
User avatar #228 to #210 - unikornking (04/19/2013) [-]
Thats like saying you're a christian but don't believe in God. A feminist that doesn't believe in partriarchy isn't a feminist. I don't remember the name of people who want equality in both genders and accept that there are unequalites for both genders, but it's not a feminist. In the image you posted she doesn't say anything about men having unequalites, therefore I fail to see how my argument is invalid. I do however apologize for my ignorance in my first statement I wasn't really thinking.
User avatar #244 to #228 - mayormilkman (04/19/2013) [-]
Egalitarians are for gender equality.
#246 to #244 - jurkowski (04/19/2013) [-]
I figure I'd throw this link in here, since so far this has all been conjecture formed from opinions. www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evolutionary-entertainment/201205/giving-feminism-bad-name
User avatar #250 to #246 - mayormilkman (04/19/2013) [-]
Fasntnig. Like the other guy, though, I don't really want to associate with feminism. I'll just have an "independent" stance on the subject.
User avatar #248 to #246 - unikornking (04/19/2013) [-]
I really don't think one person can simply "define" feminism. It's a majority of man hating women who are ridiculously stupid. Even though there are logical ones who do want equality I don't think they should call themselves feminists. It's tainted, like the article states some women were even offended at being called a feminist. That's why I think there's Egalitarianism, it's for people who truly want to be equals.
User avatar #259 to #248 - coolcalx (04/20/2013) [-]
someone can't define feminism, yet you're attempting to do so.

You haven't formed a single logical thought in quite a while.
#249 to #248 - jurkowski (04/19/2013) [-]
True enough. I consider myself an egalitarian under these circumstances, but what I'm more annoyed by is the twisting of the English language's definitions over time due to fanatics.
User avatar #64 - weenieandthebutt (04/19/2013) [-]
The guy is a sleazebag, not a rapist. There's a difference. When you're ********* , you just tend to act upon your subconscious and do things that you secretly wanted to do without those morals getting in the way. If it's not forced or against her will, it's not rape; as simple as that. As a drunk, I've been banned from a town, I've madeout with munters and even one old woman (don't ask), I'd gotten myself into silly accidents where I'd broken my teeth but those were all my mistakes to live with. Problem with this god damn women is that they love to abuse the notion of feminism and falsely implement it as their sanctuary of innocence.
User avatar #67 to #64 - basilbrush (04/19/2013) [-]
The guy could be pissed too. Is he still a sleazebag?
User avatar #68 to #67 - weenieandthebutt (04/19/2013) [-]
in that case, no
 Friends (0)