Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#358 - xcat
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
the question is, who they are?
#330 - chrillemeister
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
An old youtube video of mine, got 81k views. It's a ****** slideshow of Half-life zombies...
#324 - cazabrow
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
When i saw this I immediately heard Gimli in my head yelling:

"THAT STILL ONLY COUNTS AS ONE!"
#308 - helion
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
600.000 people have seen my content all together.. some of them is problably the same but the number would still be high... wow
600.000 people have seen my content all together.. some of them is problably the same but the number would still be high... wow
#315 to #308 - zomaru
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
This is what happens when you try and make a Gif of a PNG.
#318 to #315 - helion
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
it*
#317 to #315 - helion
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
i think i looks great
#320 to #317 - zomaru
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
I guess everyone has to have that "****** up" gif.
#321 to #320 - helion
Reply 0
(04/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#305 - greenjester
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Hold F5 for some seconds, and you represent some hundreds of people.
No, seriously. I hate it when people (especially the media) say that a video on YouTube has been watched by 1 million people, just because it says 1 million on the view count. If you really like a video, and/or find it enjoyable to watch, then it is much likely you will view it again. Heck, you might even watch the video five or more times. Now, there is a good chance that a video on YouTube has been watched by people equal to half, or even less the viewer count. Most of this applies to FJ pictures too.
What I'm trying to say, is: Views does not represent people correcly. It only shows how many times people have opened the page. Which is, on FunnyJunk, a picture that you might stumble upon multiple times as you have been browsing the front page.
#303 - greenjester
+1
has deleted their comment [-]
#288 - tealkangaroo
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
I like this post
#261 - noahz
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
and 100,000 people saw this content
#255 - kamehamehanurd
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Makes me feel good about my ******, sad excuse for a life.
#230 - wrocky
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
what if the same people viewed it more than once
#221 - xorangex
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#187 - buthow
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
"Feel free to share this OC"    
   
unless this a repost
"Feel free to share this OC"

unless this a repost
#186 - leobreacker
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
91010 views on this content.
#154 - cfeuer
Reply +1
(04/09/2013) [-]
I am pleased with my views.(uploaded on green FJ, when it was a star system.)
#133 - Scorchtwentyfour
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
Wow...I'm never good with understanding quantity of things.
#112 - Leopard
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
People view content more then once..
#119 to #112 - theawkwardbros
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
But each view is only given to the ip address one time. If it's viewed from the same computer more than one time, there are no views added one. Still just the one.
#122 to #119 - Leopard
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
Nope.
There was one a post where OP asked everyone to refresh the content many times. It resulted in millions of views.
#126 to #122 - theawkwardbros
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
Oh, I wasn't aware you meant on THIS site. I thought, maybe, YouTube..

Yes, on this site, you get a view for every view given, you're right.

My apologies.
#129 to #126 - microdude [OP]
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
*whispers* Saaaaaveeeeed....
#83 - azijay
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
That definitely isn't 1,000 people.
#82 - tomatoesauce
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
wait, why is his name microman?
wait, why is his name microman?
#69 - IANDESTROY
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
The top picture has only 46 people!
#72 to #69 - allanenraged
Reply -5
(04/08/2013) [-]
shut up meg
#70 to #69 - IANDESTROY
Reply 0
(04/08/2013) [-]
And the second one only has 99!
#73 to #70 - hatemountain
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
But who was camera?    
   
   
.gif related
But who was camera?


.gif related
#68 - shredznot
Reply +1
(04/08/2013) [-]
I just realized there is a lot  of **** i dont care about.
I just realized there is a lot of **** i dont care about.