x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#96 - takesomemorewater (04/05/2013) [-]
"Brobamas"
"Brobamas"
#86 - claytonb (04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #329 - HURLEYSURFERDUDE ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
Just saying this once, let the thumbs roll as they may.

It's not Obama's fault the US in in such a way. It has taken about FOUR presidencies to make it like it is. ONE isn't going to immediately fix everything and you're an idiot if you think it will. Let me break it down.

While obama IS the President, everything he tries to pass HAS to go through the two houses, one led the republicans and one led by democrats. And What are the two houses doing? Revising anything he tries to pass so that they each get something beneficial from it and then fighting over one side anting too much. Are they wondering about how the REST of America feels about it like they SHOULD BE? No they're not. It's like most (not all) of them forgot that they are there to represent the CONSTITUENTS (the people).

So anything The President does is eventually twisted and changed by the houses so much that it ends up not what the president wanted. And for your information, Obama has tried putting things through that actually help the PEOPLE of america, which is needed.

Faults:
1. Yes his nice guy routine wont get him very far with these old tempermental politicians
2. Yes his ideas are new and scry to most old people who are used to things being a certain way forever.
3. Yes politicians call him socialist.

But:
1. At least he's trying for the PEOPLE.
2. The "Old ways" that all of these politicians are used to are what is driving us into the ground. The "Old ways" dont work with our current time because things dont work the same way again.
3. They are lashing out because his ideas conflict with theirs.

solution?:

Maybe we need a complete system reboot. Just retire all of the politicians out and fill the seats with younger politicians with newer schooling and newer understanding of the nation. No more rivalries because some democrat did something in 1986 that the republicans wont forget. It's childish and it's tearing the nation apart.

Done with the rant. Thank you and goodnight.
User avatar #341 to #329 - ronyx ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
I agree.
User avatar #340 to #329 - appleboom (04/05/2013) [-]
I like how you admit that Clinton wasn't perfect. That's disappointingly rare.
User avatar #344 to #340 - HURLEYSURFERDUDE ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
He had a great way of doing things. Getting both ehads of houses together to make laws. But he did make mistakes. It's sad but nobody is perfect. I still like the man though.
User avatar #355 to #344 - appleboom (04/05/2013) [-]
At least your a democrat (or so it seems by what you post). I agree with what the republican party says they stand for, but the people that represent me are just like how I'm a brony, but most of the internet knows ponies for the overabundance of R34.
User avatar #373 to #355 - HURLEYSURFERDUDE ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
Well I try to thinkk of what would benefit the nation. Republicans AND democrats have good views. Im just sick of them fighting over petty turf wars when the nation is dying.
#349 to #329 - notcummingham (04/05/2013) [-]
Thumb for you
#187 - fukkyes (04/05/2013) [-]
I'm about 180 too.
#264 to #187 - ninootendoo (04/05/2013) [-]
I see what you did there
#271 - paulthehero (04/05/2013) [-]
Even if I don't agree with Obama's decisions, I can agree that he's a really cool dude.
Even if I don't agree with Obama's decisions, I can agree that he's a really cool dude.
User avatar #279 to #271 - luckydane (04/05/2013) [-]
what movie is that from?
User avatar #309 to #279 - corzy (04/05/2013) [-]
Episode IV: A New Hope
User avatar #103 - zakaizer (04/05/2013) [-]
Hell, I'm English and I want to be mates with Obama, he's pretty much the only reason I have any interest in US politics at the moment.
#209 - ninjabunnygo ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
#123 - furryflava (04/05/2013) [-]
>Brobamas
>Brobamas
User avatar #110 - thexxtalonxx (04/05/2013) [-]
Filmed with no studio audience...
User avatar #39 - captainwow ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
Cause he's more of a celebrity than a president.
User avatar #216 to #213 - Leopard (04/05/2013) [-]
Looks like some DBZ **** right there
User avatar #217 to #216 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
street fighter, if it was dbz theyd have to power up for a good 3 episodes.
User avatar #238 to #217 - bromosexual (04/05/2013) [-]
Don't even get tekken mixed up with streetfighter, It's like comparing GT to the rest of dragon ball Z
User avatar #221 to #217 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
Have you ever seen DBZ? O.o
User avatar #224 to #221 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
why yes i've seen both series. gt doesnt ******* count
User avatar #226 to #224 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
Same here....from my experience they spent most of the time talking
User avatar #232 to #226 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
if i recall the power up to ss3 took literally a whole episode.
User avatar #233 to #232 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
When? I remember him training an entire episode
User avatar #234 to #233 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
when he is showing buu the power up. one whole episode
User avatar #236 to #234 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
That took less than 5 mins O.o he showed him all three in less than 5 mins. Then they fought.
User avatar #242 to #240 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
Sokay. I grew up with DBZ
User avatar #244 to #242 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
i did too but its been a long ass time since i touched it.
User avatar #245 to #244 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
Well, my girlfriends lil brother has gotten interested in anime so i startes him off with dbz and hes lovin it. were at the end of the cell saga
#247 to #245 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
cell saga is the best. take this. dbz is a good starter anime and for the younger audience who doesn't like horribly in depth plot. nostalgia kicks in for us but heres some other good ones. Just please god don't watch gt.
User avatar #270 to #247 - synapse (04/05/2013) [-]
Hell ******* yes FMAB has the highest rating. Well deserved.
#248 to #247 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
Never gonna touch it.
Never gonna touch it.
User avatar #249 to #248 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
good. good. also make sure he watches dragon ball. I liked that one more honestly
User avatar #251 to #249 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
Not till hes older. I think Goku's naked baby ass would be a lil too much for him. That and the constant crotch slapping.
User avatar #252 to #251 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
wait, how old is he then. if you don't mind me asking. I believe if you watch the english dub they took a lot out.
User avatar #253 to #252 - nirvananerd (04/05/2013) [-]
12. I watched the english dub not to long ago. its all still there.
User avatar #255 to #253 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
welllllll **** give him like two three years. if he can drive he can handle that stuff
User avatar #241 to #213 - ultimatepowah (04/05/2013) [-]
Is that a cinematic from a game or a movie?
User avatar #243 to #241 - facetiousrunner (04/05/2013) [-]
no idea
User avatar #326 to #243 - certifiedidiot (04/05/2013) [-]
That's god damn Paul and Bryan from Tekken.
#63 - corundum (04/05/2013) [-]
it's time
User avatar #122 - douthit (04/05/2013) [-]
Well I can only thank God that we have a cool president rather than a good one. inb4 Romney sux. Yeah, he does too, and I didn't vote for him either.
#130 to #122 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
You'd seriously have a "cool" president over a professional one? Wow you're so ignorant. Romney would have saved this country.
User avatar #131 to #130 - rhiaanor ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
by saved you mean thrown us into another war we dont need
User avatar #132 to #131 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
Oh because Obama is definatly stopping the war.....not.

He is the worst president since Jimmy Carter
#133 to #132 - gaaay (04/05/2013) [-]
Romney wanted to start war with China. War with China means nuclear war. nuclear war means you have seven feet... do you want seven feet?
#134 to #133 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
Ok i'm guessing from your lack of "real" information that you watch a biest network like CNN, NBC, or ABC. If you want a fair and balanced news network. Try FOX. Otherwise you turn into an ignorant piece of **** like yourself
#141 to #134 - gaaay (04/05/2013) [-]
Aside from the fact that FOX is about as conservative as Westboro Baptist Church, I have no access to those channels, so your point is moot.

Also, please refrain from calling any others an 'ignorant piece of ***** when you can't spell 'biased', and you believe that FOX is fair and balanced.
User avatar #139 to #134 - emptysuperman (04/05/2013) [-]
7/10 troll. I was falling for it until that last obvious post.
#150 to #139 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
Stupid 			*******		 Liberals! You make me laugh!
Stupid ******* Liberals! You make me laugh!
#138 to #134 - garbagebrain (04/05/2013) [-]
Don't even start with that "fair and balanced" **** . Fox News and most of the people that watch it are pathetic.
User avatar #197 to #138 - douthit (04/05/2013) [-]
So is MSNBC. FOX is no more conservatively biased than MSNBC is liberally biased.
#162 to #138 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
All media hubs do that you ******* idiot.
User avatar #155 to #138 - swifterly (04/05/2013) [-]
Yes, the most known liberal insult, Fox News is pathetic. If Fox News was left leaning then you wouldn't care, but it's not left leaning. CNN is no better, as they suck Obama's dick and would rather report on Kim Kardashian instead of something important.
User avatar #283 to #155 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
Fox leans to the right with programs like the O'Reily factor and Huckaby. But their overall news coverage is not biased. And I doubt you've even watched Fox in your life. You're just heard from other networks that it's the devils work.
#292 to #138 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
**** YOU IGNORANT BASTARDS! I'M LEAVING!
#167 to #134 - dwarfman ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
I love when white trash thinks they can participate in political discussion.
I love when white trash thinks they can participate in political discussion.
#282 to #167 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
Trust me, i'm anything but white trash. White trash discusts me. In fact the reason there is white trash is because your "wonderful" president supplies them with Welfare checks! No one is gonna go get a job when they know they can sit around and do nothing while TAXPAYERS pay for their food, medical bills, and belongings. Don't call me white trash, you're probably the one living off of other peoples hard earned money.
Trust me, i'm anything but white trash. White trash discusts me. In fact the reason there is white trash is because your "wonderful" president supplies them with Welfare checks! No one is gonna go get a job when they know they can sit around and do nothing while TAXPAYERS pay for their food, medical bills, and belongings. Don't call me white trash, you're probably the one living off of other peoples hard earned money.

#307 to #282 - dwarfman ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
Also taking anything an news organization feeds you shows your true ignorance. Each has their own backers, motivations and seeks to swing you to their side. You cannot judge others because you do not hold your peers to the same standard. I am a sodding catholic and criticize the church every time they **** up, I look down on "liberals" because they're bleeding hearts that do not see the big picture, and I look down on conservatives becasue they worship Reaganomics as the key to solving all life's problems. Anyone who gives themselves over to a political party is damning their country, I support democrats current because they further my goals/represent a lesser evil. When they cease to provide this I abandon them, loyalty only to your country never the backwards parties. Also your case is week if your response is to run away when people disagree with you. 15 year olds(AKA you) don't have a good grasp on reality sorry.
#302 to #282 - dwarfman ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
You're a riot. Welfare makes up less than 1% of the Federal budget. There's not massive hordes of governmental moochers as you claim, most of them work but receive food stamps. And yes you are white trash. You sit around judging others and claim they're "thieves" yet at most likely under your parent's roof sucking off their teets. I however pay my taxes, own firearms legally, and do something for society. Aka I am better than you and able to cast judgement. Sodding conservative white trash ruining my nation.
User avatar #176 to #132 - douthit (04/05/2013) [-]
Don't thumb this guy down, Obama continued the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and started military actions in Libya. He's done just as much warmongering drone missile strikes in various other countries as Bush did!
#286 to #176 - lamaswithhats (04/05/2013) [-]
Thank you! Someone is educated here!!!
Thank you! Someone is educated here!!!
#336 to #286 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
Too bad it's neither of you two.
#281 to #130 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
cool and professional? Why does everybody hate the guy for having the public appearance that EVERY SINGLE politician ever wished he could have?
User avatar #177 to #130 - douthit (04/05/2013) [-]
Sarcasm, dude. And Obama and Romney basically have the same positions on practically every issue. I voted Gary Johnson.
User avatar #124 to #122 - tehyanx (04/05/2013) [-]
Right on!
User avatar #149 to #122 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
I would start voting for 3rd party candidates if I actually believed they had a chance in hell of winning.
User avatar #174 to #149 - douthit (04/05/2013) [-]
People have to vote for them, for them to have a chance of winning. It's a chicken-and-egg thing.
User avatar #179 to #174 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
And there lies the problem. There are numerous third party candidates who had great potential, but we have what is mainly a two party system. The Democrats and Republicans do most of the campaigning and so they get most of the votes. It completely destroys all the chances of anyone else ever winning.
#188 - mikaelkid (04/05/2013) [-]
**mikaelkid rolls 91**
User avatar #237 to #199 - ihaveakeyboard ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
nobody ever replaces their own name
it got me so bad when dawe actually did this the first time
User avatar #274 to #237 - synapse (04/05/2013) [-]
DAVVE, I SUMMON THEE
#391 to #385 - synapse (04/07/2013) [-]
HE'S REAL
HE'S REAL
#146 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
Obama is a ******* retard. Few more years and we will be rid of that jackass
User avatar #154 to #146 - theturkeyburger (04/05/2013) [-]
Shut the **** up, anon.
#22 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
gonna sound dumb but what show is this?
#24 to #22 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
Salo. You can download it from The Pirate Bay.
User avatar #33 to #22 - Hreidmar ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
I'm half certain that it's the Tonight Show, and certain that David Letterman is the host.

The lad below me is recommending to you hardcore Italian exploitation film...
#36 to #22 - mrdrface (04/05/2013) [-]
battletoads
User avatar #44 - suddenlypotatoes (04/05/2013) [-]
Great person. Not so great president.
#46 to #44 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
Just know suddenlypotatoes, that this anon agrees with you
#55 to #44 - Alchemyst (04/05/2013) [-]
While I disagree, that is your opinion and I respect it.
User avatar #220 to #55 - suddenlypotatoes (04/05/2013) [-]
Do you support Obamacare?
User avatar #144 - philliyoMLB (04/05/2013) [-]
Well it's a good thing we have a cool president rather than a good one who doesn't **** us constantly.
User avatar #145 to #144 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, because saving the auto industry and passing a healthcare law that every other developed country uses is totally ******* us over.
#151 to #145 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
he didn't save **** . You must be a democrat!
User avatar #153 to #151 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
You say that like it's a bad thing. I'm sorry, tell me what Romney would have done better. Raise taxes on the poor and give money to the rich? Yeah, that would have saved our economy!
User avatar #158 to #153 - swifterly (04/05/2013) [-]
Romney is a business man and he knows how the economy works, unlike Obama. Obama would rather take money from the rich and give to the poor, but the "poor" didn't earn that money. No, he'd steal from those who earned and give it to those on welfare. From Washington to Bush we accumulated about 6 Trillion in Debt. In Obama first 4 years he doubled that.
User avatar #165 to #158 - shazmothree (04/05/2013) [-]
He wouldn't be stealing from them he'd be taxing them fairly like everyone else
User avatar #161 to #158 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
Romney never revealed **** about his tax plan. He sidestepped the topic every single time it was brought up, and told people to "just trust him."

Also, Obama did not double the debt, that is a complete lie spun by people who watch FOX.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/politicians/nationaldebt.asp
User avatar #164 to #161 - swifterly (04/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. When Bush left office we had about 8 Trillion in debt. When Obama's first time was over we have about 15 or 16 trillion in debt. And I sure do love how Liberals always resort to Fox News, wether or not someone watches it. Is it in the Liberal mind to assume someone that disagrees with you watches Fox News?
User avatar #168 to #164 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
Well, they sure do like to claim absolute ******** about Obama. They have no idea what "two sources" means, and they call themselves "fair and balanced", which is a joke in and of itself. Find me solid proof that Obama doubled the debt, and I'll actually bother listening to what you have to say.
#184 to #164 - tomthehippie (04/05/2013) [-]
Wong, it was at 11 trillion before Obama got into office, another three trillion was because of the rebuilding of Iraq and Afghanistan (which, sense we invaded those countries, is required by the Geneva Convention), as well as cost associated with our troops being in those countries, there for you can blame up to 14 trillion on Bush. So in saving the auto industry, preventing a complete collapse of our economy, and FINALLY bringing our healthcare to the same standards EVERY other first world nation enjoys, Obama added 2 trillion to the national debt.   
   
Of course this does not touch on the FACT that we have a multi billion dollar surplus before Bush got his hands on the government.   
   
Try some facts next time, it helps you not look like a little conservitard drone who spouts out what ever 			********		 Fox, Limbaugh, and the other leaders of your little cult are spouting.
Wong, it was at 11 trillion before Obama got into office, another three trillion was because of the rebuilding of Iraq and Afghanistan (which, sense we invaded those countries, is required by the Geneva Convention), as well as cost associated with our troops being in those countries, there for you can blame up to 14 trillion on Bush. So in saving the auto industry, preventing a complete collapse of our economy, and FINALLY bringing our healthcare to the same standards EVERY other first world nation enjoys, Obama added 2 trillion to the national debt.

Of course this does not touch on the FACT that we have a multi billion dollar surplus before Bush got his hands on the government.

Try some facts next time, it helps you not look like a little conservitard drone who spouts out what ever ******** Fox, Limbaugh, and the other leaders of your little cult are spouting.
User avatar #191 to #184 - swifterly (04/05/2013) [-]
Sure call it a cult when in fact Liberalism is horrific cancer among this nation. And no, I'm pretty sure Obama added an extra 8 trillion debt. Face it, people only elected him because they wanted a "black" president. Don't forget about that amazing job he's done with all or new jobs and his Obama care and the Middle East.
#198 to #191 - redeadhunter ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
"Pretty sure" doesn't hold a candle to facts.
"Pretty sure" doesn't hold a candle to facts.
#195 to #191 - tomthehippie (04/05/2013) [-]
I like how you provide no facts, just go on the same conservitard rant that it is liberals who are to blame for everything, ignoring that Bush spent more in his eight years than Obama, but no, it has to be the black guy's fault.

No, the reason Obama won is that Mcain was ******* insane, and Romney's plan for the economy was "Give everyone a 20% tax cut and raise military spending by billions that the military has said they DON'T NEED, and with my Mormon magic it'll all balance!"
User avatar #266 to #195 - psydoc (04/05/2013) [-]
Romney's plan was to get rid of loopholes and offset that with lower tax rates on the money being taxed with the goal of lowering the tax rates by 20% across the board. The question is why expand the tax base and lower the rate if it's revenue neutral. Well the reasoning is that a lot of people pay that rate on their small business income, and increasing the rewards would increase the incentive for small businesses to start or expand.

So the real question is whether or not you believe all the government loopholes, tax breaks and such are better for the economy than the billions of small, personal economic choices made by millions of Americans every day. If you truly believe government knows better, then fine, but then you wouldn't be questioning a politicians plan to begin with would you?
#317 to #266 - tomthehippie (04/05/2013) [-]
>cut tax rates by 20%
>raise spending by hundreds of billions
>this will somehow balance the budget.

that was the point I was making. which you completely ignored.

Thank you for proving you are completely ignorant. Now to mention your "small business" point, you ignore the fact that economic growth is NOT driven by businesses, it is driven by workers. We have a demand side economy, that means people buying, power the economy. Republican tactics have lead to a stagnating middle class (who spend most of the money in our economy), which is what Obama has tried to fight.

Yet again, try to know what you are talking about before you shoot off your mouth.
User avatar #392 to #317 - psydoc (04/09/2013) [-]
I gave a fairly even-handed explanation of the 20% tax rate cut, and you responded in a really duche-like fashion. I don't have an obligation to respond to everything you say, but since you insist I'll speak on the increase in military spending. It would have brought non-war military spending to about even with historic levels as a percent of GDP, which might not be a bad idea as we draw down in Iraq (I don't have a strong opinion on the matter, because I would want to see more data). It wasn't beyond the norm. Also you can't point at one budget item and say it will break the budget, you have to look at it as a whole. If any single thing will break the budget though it will be mandatory or "entitlement" spending.

Take a look at a basic supply/demand graph, and you're realize that if you artificially increase demand (as democrats often want), then you get some more production but higher costs. If you increase supply, you get more production, and lower prices.

If we want to improve our economy, then we need to either do what we're doing better/faster/cheaper, or we need to innovate new ways of doing things (new products/services). Government overspending as Obama has done (trillions over budget) to stimulate "demand" doesn't do a great job at bringing about innovations or goods & services that can increase our international trade.

Traditionally a recession lasts about a year and a half with deeper recessions actually showing recovery quicker. This recession lasted much longer than would have normally been expected and serves as evidence that Obama's economic plan (which is a very demand side plan) is ineffective. To me Obama uses old economic ideas, and frankly often contradicts himself.

BTW, I have a degree in business from a school consistently ranked in the top 10. I didn't just one day decide I'd read enough blogs to know what I'm talking about.
#228 to #191 - anon (04/05/2013) [-]
No, polarized idiots like you who hate based on a label rather than working toward the common good is the cancer.
User avatar #148 to #145 - philliyoMLB (04/05/2013) [-]
"Saving the auto industry" because GM represents all of the auto industry right? Let the invisible hand do it's work, also Obamacare is not completely alike other countries that use this system, because of the difference of governments, so no one really knows how this system is going to work out. Hopefully it works out just fine.
User avatar #152 to #148 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
GM plays a big part in the auto industry, but I see your point there. But Obama gets alot of **** from the far right, who constantly like to spin lies about his actions and make him seem like a demon. These are the same people who said if you don't support Bush, you're unamerican, and now they say if you support Obama, you're unamerican.
User avatar #156 to #152 - philliyoMLB (04/05/2013) [-]
I've seen it from both sides to be completely honest, left and right, it completely disgusts me. I think Bush did the best he could in a situation no president should ever be in, and yet he was still attacked for a decisions he had to make in a short amount of time, I liked Bush, I wanna like Obama, but the guy just does too much of his own mud-slinging for my tastes including the liberal media and the conservative media.
#192 to #156 - tomthehippie (04/05/2013) [-]
Bush did the best he could?

So starting two wars with out raising taxes (which we have done in EVERY OTHER WAR WE'VE FOUGHT), that was the best he could?

Deregulating the stock market to allow speculation, that was the best he could do? (For those who don't know, speculation is where you buy "futures", for instance, oil futures are amounts of oil that haven't been drilled yet, you then sell these futures for a profit, which is why we are paying more than DOUBLE what we were before Bush got into office)

Lets not forget Guantanamo Bay, or the water boarding, or the fact that he assigned an Attorney General who claimed that the Geneva Convention didn't apply to us any more, so torturing prisoners was ok.

Yes, please tell me about how Bush did the best he could.
User avatar #157 to #156 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
So I take it you're generally independent?
User avatar #159 to #157 - philliyoMLB (04/05/2013) [-]
Well, I lean mor on the conservative side with an Adam Smith type of attitude but I don't enjoy calling myself any sort of party nor do I like taking sides, so I guess you can call me independent.
User avatar #160 to #159 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
I mainly lean to the left because so many of the politicians on the right absolutely appall me. I mean look at who was running in the primaries this time around. Bachmann, Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, all morons.
User avatar #194 to #160 - philliyoMLB (04/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, wasn't a very good group of people besides Cain maybe, but that's it, I would have taken McCain over all of those.
User avatar #202 to #194 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
McCain couldn't have won only because no one wanted another Republican for four years. He made it worse for himself by picking Palin, though.
User avatar #203 to #202 - philliyoMLB (04/05/2013) [-]
True, but no more voting, just watching.
User avatar #211 to #203 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
At least for another 3 years. Then.... well, I don't really know.
User avatar #208 to #148 - iamkagji ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
Don't know why you are getting downthumbed for this. It seems to be the only unbiased comment in this thread.
User avatar #308 to #208 - markertemp (04/05/2013) [-]
Because this is Funnyjunk, and Funnyjunk hates all forms of opinions.
User avatar #312 to #308 - iamkagji ONLINE (04/05/2013) [-]
True that
#76 - mrgoodlove (04/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Obama's so chill because he smokes weed!!
#87 to #76 - felex (04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#79 to #76 - icefried (04/05/2013) [-]
Shut the 			****		 up.
Shut the **** up.
#84 to #79 - ianus (04/05/2013) [-]
that gif is....i can't....what?
that gif is....i can't....what?
User avatar #382 to #79 - mrgoodlove (04/05/2013) [-]
Suck a dick HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
#383 to #382 - icefried (04/05/2013) [-]
k
k
 Friends (0)