Upload
Login or register
Back to the content 'Brobama' Leave a comment Refresh Comments (358)
[ 358 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#122 - douthit
Reply +3
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well I can only thank God that we have a cool president rather than a good one. inb4 Romney sux. Yeah, he does too, and I didn't vote for him either.
#130 to #122 - lamaswithhats
Reply -18
(04/05/2013) [-]
You'd seriously have a "cool" president over a professional one? Wow you're so ignorant. Romney would have saved this country.
#131 to #130 - rhiaanor
Reply +10
(04/05/2013) [-]
by saved you mean thrown us into another war we dont need
#132 to #131 - lamaswithhats
Reply -14
(04/05/2013) [-]
Oh because Obama is definatly stopping the war.....not.

He is the worst president since Jimmy Carter
#133 to #132 - gaaay
Reply +8
(04/05/2013) [-]
Romney wanted to start war with China. War with China means nuclear war. nuclear war means you have seven feet... do you want seven feet?
#134 to #133 - lamaswithhats
Reply -11
(04/05/2013) [-]
Ok i'm guessing from your lack of "real" information that you watch a biest network like CNN, NBC, or ABC. If you want a fair and balanced news network. Try FOX. Otherwise you turn into an ignorant piece of **** like yourself
#141 to #134 - gaaay
Reply +8
(04/05/2013) [-]
Aside from the fact that FOX is about as conservative as Westboro Baptist Church, I have no access to those channels, so your point is moot.

Also, please refrain from calling any others an 'ignorant piece of ***** when you can't spell 'biased', and you believe that FOX is fair and balanced.
#139 to #134 - emptysuperman
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
7/10 troll. I was falling for it until that last obvious post.
#150 to #139 - lamaswithhats
Reply -7
(04/05/2013) [-]
Stupid ******* Liberals! You make me laugh!
Stupid ******* Liberals! You make me laugh!
#138 to #134 - garbagebrain
Reply +3
(04/05/2013) [-]
Don't even start with that "fair and balanced" ****. Fox News and most of the people that watch it are pathetic.
#197 to #138 - douthit
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
So is MSNBC. FOX is no more conservatively biased than MSNBC is liberally biased.
#162 to #138 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
All media hubs do that you ******* idiot.
#155 to #138 - swifterly
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Yes, the most known liberal insult, Fox News is pathetic. If Fox News was left leaning then you wouldn't care, but it's not left leaning. CNN is no better, as they suck Obama's dick and would rather report on Kim Kardashian instead of something important.
#283 to #155 - lamaswithhats
Reply -2
(04/05/2013) [-]
Fox leans to the right with programs like the O'Reily factor and Huckaby. But their overall news coverage is not biased. And I doubt you've even watched Fox in your life. You're just heard from other networks that it's the devils work.
#292 to #138 - lamaswithhats
Reply -2
(04/05/2013) [-]
**** YOU IGNORANT BASTARDS! I'M LEAVING!
#167 to #134 - dwarfman
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
I love when white trash thinks they can participate in political discussion.
I love when white trash thinks they can participate in political discussion.
#282 to #167 - lamaswithhats
Reply -2
(04/05/2013) [-]
Trust me, i'm anything but white trash. White trash discusts me. In fact the reason there is white trash is because your "wonderful" president supplies them with Welfare checks! No one is gonna go get a job when they know they can sit around and do nothing while TAXPAYERS pay for their food, medical bills, and belongings. Don't call me white trash, you're probably the one living off of other peoples hard earned money.
Trust me, i'm anything but white trash. White trash discusts me. In fact the reason there is white trash is because your "wonderful" president supplies them with Welfare checks! No one is gonna go get a job when they know they can sit around and do nothing while TAXPAYERS pay for their food, medical bills, and belongings. Don't call me white trash, you're probably the one living off of other peoples hard earned money.

#307 to #282 - dwarfman
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Also taking anything an news organization feeds you shows your true ignorance. Each has their own backers, motivations and seeks to swing you to their side. You cannot judge others because you do not hold your peers to the same standard. I am a sodding catholic and criticize the church every time they **** up, I look down on "liberals" because they're bleeding hearts that do not see the big picture, and I look down on conservatives becasue they worship Reaganomics as the key to solving all life's problems. Anyone who gives themselves over to a political party is damning their country, I support democrats current because they further my goals/represent a lesser evil. When they cease to provide this I abandon them, loyalty only to your country never the backwards parties. Also your case is week if your response is to run away when people disagree with you. 15 year olds(AKA you) don't have a good grasp on reality sorry.
#302 to #282 - dwarfman
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
You're a riot. Welfare makes up less than 1% of the Federal budget. There's not massive hordes of governmental moochers as you claim, most of them work but receive food stamps. And yes you are white trash. You sit around judging others and claim they're "thieves" yet at most likely under your parent's roof sucking off their teets. I however pay my taxes, own firearms legally, and do something for society. Aka I am better than you and able to cast judgement. Sodding conservative white trash ruining my nation.
#176 to #132 - douthit
Reply -4
(04/05/2013) [-]
Don't thumb this guy down, Obama continued the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and started military actions in Libya. He's done just as much warmongering drone missile strikes in various other countries as Bush did!
#286 to #176 - lamaswithhats
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Thank you! Someone is educated here!!!
Thank you! Someone is educated here!!!
#336 to #286 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Too bad it's neither of you two.
#281 to #130 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
cool and professional? Why does everybody hate the guy for having the public appearance that EVERY SINGLE politician ever wished he could have?
#177 to #130 - douthit
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Sarcasm, dude. And Obama and Romney basically have the same positions on practically every issue. I voted Gary Johnson.
#124 to #122 - tehyanx
Reply -3
(04/05/2013) [-]
Right on!
#149 to #122 - markertemp
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
I would start voting for 3rd party candidates if I actually believed they had a chance in hell of winning.
#174 to #149 - douthit
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
People have to vote for them, for them to have a chance of winning. It's a chicken-and-egg thing.
#179 to #174 - markertemp
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
And there lies the problem. There are numerous third party candidates who had great potential, but we have what is mainly a two party system. The Democrats and Republicans do most of the campaigning and so they get most of the votes. It completely destroys all the chances of anyone else ever winning.
#96 - takesomemorewater
Reply +10
(04/05/2013) [-]
"Brobamas"
"Brobamas"
#86 - claytonb
Reply +10
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#38 - Soilwork
Reply +10
(04/05/2013) [-]
thanks obama
thanks obama
#92 to #38 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Pizza? Again mom?



I WANT SOME ****** RAVIOLI *****
#58 to #38 - Nutshell
Reply +3
(04/05/2013) [-]
I don't get it.
She brings them a giant pizza with their Asian food and they are mad?
I'd be so happy to have pizza and pot-stickers all in one sitting.

/ I know what I'm doing this weekend
// Why yes I am fat
#41 to #38 - dandamanzx
Reply +5
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#329 - HURLEYSURFERDUDE
Reply +8
(04/05/2013) [-]
Just saying this once, let the thumbs roll as they may.

It's not Obama's fault the US in in such a way. It has taken about FOUR presidencies to make it like it is. ONE isn't going to immediately fix everything and you're an idiot if you think it will. Let me break it down.

While obama IS the President, everything he tries to pass HAS to go through the two houses, one led the republicans and one led by democrats. And What are the two houses doing? Revising anything he tries to pass so that they each get something beneficial from it and then fighting over one side anting too much. Are they wondering about how the REST of America feels about it like they SHOULD BE? No they're not. It's like most (not all) of them forgot that they are there to represent the CONSTITUENTS (the people).

So anything The President does is eventually twisted and changed by the houses so much that it ends up not what the president wanted. And for your information, Obama has tried putting things through that actually help the PEOPLE of america, which is needed.

Faults:
1. Yes his nice guy routine wont get him very far with these old tempermental politicians
2. Yes his ideas are new and scry to most old people who are used to things being a certain way forever.
3. Yes politicians call him socialist.

But:
1. At least he's trying for the PEOPLE.
2. The "Old ways" that all of these politicians are used to are what is driving us into the ground. The "Old ways" dont work with our current time because things dont work the same way again.
3. They are lashing out because his ideas conflict with theirs.

solution?:

Maybe we need a complete system reboot. Just retire all of the politicians out and fill the seats with younger politicians with newer schooling and newer understanding of the nation. No more rivalries because some democrat did something in 1986 that the republicans wont forget. It's childish and it's tearing the nation apart.

Done with the rant. Thank you and goodnight.
#341 to #329 - ronyx
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
I agree.
#345 to #329 - Zanowrath
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#340 to #329 - appleboom
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
I like how you admit that Clinton wasn't perfect. That's disappointingly rare.
#344 to #340 - HURLEYSURFERDUDE
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
He had a great way of doing things. Getting both ehads of houses together to make laws. But he did make mistakes. It's sad but nobody is perfect. I still like the man though.
#355 to #344 - appleboom
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
At least your a democrat (or so it seems by what you post). I agree with what the republican party says they stand for, but the people that represent me are just like how I'm a brony, but most of the internet knows ponies for the overabundance of R34.
#373 to #355 - HURLEYSURFERDUDE
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well I try to thinkk of what would benefit the nation. Republicans AND democrats have good views. Im just sick of them fighting over petty turf wars when the nation is dying.
#349 to #329 - notcummingham
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Thumb for you
#187 - fukkyes
Reply +8
(04/05/2013) [-]
I'm about 180 too.
#264 to #187 - ninootendoo
Reply +2
(04/05/2013) [-]
I see what you did there
#144 - philliyoMLB
Reply -5
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well it's a good thing we have a cool president rather than a good one who doesn't **** us constantly.
#145 to #144 - markertemp
Reply +8
(04/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, because saving the auto industry and passing a healthcare law that every other developed country uses is totally ******* us over.
#151 to #145 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
he didn't save ****. You must be a democrat!
#153 to #151 - markertemp
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
You say that like it's a bad thing. I'm sorry, tell me what Romney would have done better. Raise taxes on the poor and give money to the rich? Yeah, that would have saved our economy!
#158 to #153 - swifterly
Reply -11
(04/05/2013) [-]
Romney is a business man and he knows how the economy works, unlike Obama. Obama would rather take money from the rich and give to the poor, but the "poor" didn't earn that money. No, he'd steal from those who earned and give it to those on welfare. From Washington to Bush we accumulated about 6 Trillion in Debt. In Obama first 4 years he doubled that.
#165 to #158 - shazmothree
Reply +8
(04/05/2013) [-]
He wouldn't be stealing from them he'd be taxing them fairly like everyone else
#161 to #158 - markertemp
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
Romney never revealed **** about his tax plan. He sidestepped the topic every single time it was brought up, and told people to "just trust him."

Also, Obama did not double the debt, that is a complete lie spun by people who watch FOX.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/politicians/nationaldebt.asp
#164 to #161 - swifterly
Reply -9
(04/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. When Bush left office we had about 8 Trillion in debt. When Obama's first time was over we have about 15 or 16 trillion in debt. And I sure do love how Liberals always resort to Fox News, wether or not someone watches it. Is it in the Liberal mind to assume someone that disagrees with you watches Fox News?
#168 to #164 - markertemp
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well, they sure do like to claim absolute ******** about Obama. They have no idea what "two sources" means, and they call themselves "fair and balanced", which is a joke in and of itself. Find me solid proof that Obama doubled the debt, and I'll actually bother listening to what you have to say.
#184 to #164 - tomthehippie
Reply +4
(04/05/2013) [-]
Wong, it was at 11 trillion before Obama got into office, another three trillion was because of the rebuilding of Iraq and Afghanistan (which, sense we invaded those countries, is required by the Geneva Convention), as well as cost associated with our troops being in those countries, there for you can blame up to 14 trillion on Bush. So in saving the auto industry, preventing a complete collapse of our economy, and FINALLY bringing our healthcare to the same standards EVERY other first world nation enjoys, Obama added 2 trillion to the national debt.   
   
Of course this does not touch on the FACT that we have a multi billion dollar surplus before Bush got his hands on the government.   
   
Try some facts next time, it helps you not look like a little conservitard drone who spouts out what ever ******** Fox, Limbaugh, and the other leaders of your little cult are spouting.
Wong, it was at 11 trillion before Obama got into office, another three trillion was because of the rebuilding of Iraq and Afghanistan (which, sense we invaded those countries, is required by the Geneva Convention), as well as cost associated with our troops being in those countries, there for you can blame up to 14 trillion on Bush. So in saving the auto industry, preventing a complete collapse of our economy, and FINALLY bringing our healthcare to the same standards EVERY other first world nation enjoys, Obama added 2 trillion to the national debt.

Of course this does not touch on the FACT that we have a multi billion dollar surplus before Bush got his hands on the government.

Try some facts next time, it helps you not look like a little conservitard drone who spouts out what ever ******** Fox, Limbaugh, and the other leaders of your little cult are spouting.
#191 to #184 - swifterly
Reply -9
(04/05/2013) [-]
Sure call it a cult when in fact Liberalism is horrific cancer among this nation. And no, I'm pretty sure Obama added an extra 8 trillion debt. Face it, people only elected him because they wanted a "black" president. Don't forget about that amazing job he's done with all or new jobs and his Obama care and the Middle East.
#198 to #191 - redeadhunter
Reply +5
(04/05/2013) [-]
"Pretty sure" doesn't hold a candle to facts.
"Pretty sure" doesn't hold a candle to facts.
#195 to #191 - tomthehippie
Reply +2
(04/05/2013) [-]
I like how you provide no facts, just go on the same conservitard rant that it is liberals who are to blame for everything, ignoring that Bush spent more in his eight years than Obama, but no, it has to be the black guy's fault.

No, the reason Obama won is that Mcain was ******* insane, and Romney's plan for the economy was "Give everyone a 20% tax cut and raise military spending by billions that the military has said they DON'T NEED, and with my Mormon magic it'll all balance!"
#266 to #195 - psydoc
Reply -4
(04/05/2013) [-]
Romney's plan was to get rid of loopholes and offset that with lower tax rates on the money being taxed with the goal of lowering the tax rates by 20% across the board. The question is why expand the tax base and lower the rate if it's revenue neutral. Well the reasoning is that a lot of people pay that rate on their small business income, and increasing the rewards would increase the incentive for small businesses to start or expand.

So the real question is whether or not you believe all the government loopholes, tax breaks and such are better for the economy than the billions of small, personal economic choices made by millions of Americans every day. If you truly believe government knows better, then fine, but then you wouldn't be questioning a politicians plan to begin with would you?
#317 to #266 - tomthehippie
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
>cut tax rates by 20%
>raise spending by hundreds of billions
>this will somehow balance the budget.

that was the point I was making. which you completely ignored.

Thank you for proving you are completely ignorant. Now to mention your "small business" point, you ignore the fact that economic growth is NOT driven by businesses, it is driven by workers. We have a demand side economy, that means people buying, power the economy. Republican tactics have lead to a stagnating middle class (who spend most of the money in our economy), which is what Obama has tried to fight.

Yet again, try to know what you are talking about before you shoot off your mouth.
#392 to #317 - psydoc
Reply -3
(04/09/2013) [-]
I gave a fairly even-handed explanation of the 20% tax rate cut, and you responded in a really duche-like fashion. I don't have an obligation to respond to everything you say, but since you insist I'll speak on the increase in military spending. It would have brought non-war military spending to about even with historic levels as a percent of GDP, which might not be a bad idea as we draw down in Iraq (I don't have a strong opinion on the matter, because I would want to see more data). It wasn't beyond the norm. Also you can't point at one budget item and say it will break the budget, you have to look at it as a whole. If any single thing will break the budget though it will be mandatory or "entitlement" spending.

Take a look at a basic supply/demand graph, and you're realize that if you artificially increase demand (as democrats often want), then you get some more production but higher costs. If you increase supply, you get more production, and lower prices.

If we want to improve our economy, then we need to either do what we're doing better/faster/cheaper, or we need to innovate new ways of doing things (new products/services). Government overspending as Obama has done (trillions over budget) to stimulate "demand" doesn't do a great job at bringing about innovations or goods & services that can increase our international trade.

Traditionally a recession lasts about a year and a half with deeper recessions actually showing recovery quicker. This recession lasted much longer than would have normally been expected and serves as evidence that Obama's economic plan (which is a very demand side plan) is ineffective. To me Obama uses old economic ideas, and frankly often contradicts himself.

BTW, I have a degree in business from a school consistently ranked in the top 10. I didn't just one day decide I'd read enough blogs to know what I'm talking about.
#228 to #191 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
No, polarized idiots like you who hate based on a label rather than working toward the common good is the cancer.
#148 to #145 - philliyoMLB
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
"Saving the auto industry" because GM represents all of the auto industry right? Let the invisible hand do it's work, also Obamacare is not completely alike other countries that use this system, because of the difference of governments, so no one really knows how this system is going to work out. Hopefully it works out just fine.
#152 to #148 - markertemp
Reply +3
(04/05/2013) [-]
GM plays a big part in the auto industry, but I see your point there. But Obama gets alot of **** from the far right, who constantly like to spin lies about his actions and make him seem like a demon. These are the same people who said if you don't support Bush, you're unamerican, and now they say if you support Obama, you're unamerican.
#156 to #152 - philliyoMLB
Reply -5
(04/05/2013) [-]
I've seen it from both sides to be completely honest, left and right, it completely disgusts me. I think Bush did the best he could in a situation no president should ever be in, and yet he was still attacked for a decisions he had to make in a short amount of time, I liked Bush, I wanna like Obama, but the guy just does too much of his own mud-slinging for my tastes including the liberal media and the conservative media.
#192 to #156 - tomthehippie
Reply +3
(04/05/2013) [-]
Bush did the best he could?

So starting two wars with out raising taxes (which we have done in EVERY OTHER WAR WE'VE FOUGHT), that was the best he could?

Deregulating the stock market to allow speculation, that was the best he could do? (For those who don't know, speculation is where you buy "futures", for instance, oil futures are amounts of oil that haven't been drilled yet, you then sell these futures for a profit, which is why we are paying more than DOUBLE what we were before Bush got into office)

Lets not forget Guantanamo Bay, or the water boarding, or the fact that he assigned an Attorney General who claimed that the Geneva Convention didn't apply to us any more, so torturing prisoners was ok.

Yes, please tell me about how Bush did the best he could.
#157 to #156 - markertemp
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
So I take it you're generally independent?
#159 to #157 - philliyoMLB
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well, I lean mor on the conservative side with an Adam Smith type of attitude but I don't enjoy calling myself any sort of party nor do I like taking sides, so I guess you can call me independent.
#160 to #159 - markertemp
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
I mainly lean to the left because so many of the politicians on the right absolutely appall me. I mean look at who was running in the primaries this time around. Bachmann, Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, all morons.
#194 to #160 - philliyoMLB
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Yeah, wasn't a very good group of people besides Cain maybe, but that's it, I would have taken McCain over all of those.
#202 to #194 - markertemp
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
McCain couldn't have won only because no one wanted another Republican for four years. He made it worse for himself by picking Palin, though.
#203 to #202 - philliyoMLB
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
True, but no more voting, just watching.
#211 to #203 - markertemp
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
At least for another 3 years. Then.... well, I don't really know.
#208 to #148 - iamkagji
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Don't know why you are getting downthumbed for this. It seems to be the only unbiased comment in this thread.
#308 to #208 - markertemp
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Because this is Funnyjunk, and Funnyjunk hates all forms of opinions.
#312 to #308 - iamkagji
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
True that
#271 - paulthehero
Reply +7
(04/05/2013) [-]
Even if I don't agree with Obama's decisions, I can agree that he's a really cool dude.
Even if I don't agree with Obama's decisions, I can agree that he's a really cool dude.
#279 to #271 - luckydane
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
what movie is that from?
#309 to #279 - corzy
Reply +5
(04/05/2013) [-]
Episode IV: A New Hope
#379 to #271 - princeofbrokensoul
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
holy ****.
#193 - Cleavland Steamer
Reply +7
(04/05/2013) [-]
#146 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Obama is a ******* retard. Few more years and we will be rid of that jackass
#183 to #146 - jimmynutz
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#154 to #146 - theturkeyburger
Reply +7
(04/05/2013) [-]
Shut the **** up, anon.
#103 - zakaizer
Reply +7
(04/05/2013) [-]
Hell, I'm English and I want to be mates with Obama, he's pretty much the only reason I have any interest in US politics at the moment.
#76 - mrgoodlove
Reply -22
(04/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Obama's so chill because he smokes weed!!
#87 to #76 - felex
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#381 to #87 - mrgoodlove
Reply -1
(04/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
#79 to #76 - icefried
Reply +7
(04/05/2013) [-]
Shut the **** up.
Shut the **** up.
#84 to #79 - ianus
Reply +4
(04/05/2013) [-]
that gif is....i can't....what?
that gif is....i can't....what?
#382 to #79 - mrgoodlove
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Suck a dick HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH
#383 to #382 - icefried
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
k
k
#213 - facetiousrunner
Reply +4
(04/05/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#216 to #213 - Leopard
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Looks like some DBZ **** right there
#217 to #216 - facetiousrunner
Reply +4
(04/05/2013) [-]
street fighter, if it was dbz theyd have to power up for a good 3 episodes.
#238 to #217 - bromosexual
Reply +2
(04/05/2013) [-]
Don't even get tekken mixed up with streetfighter, It's like comparing GT to the rest of dragon ball Z
#239 to #238 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
oops
#221 to #217 - nirvananerd
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
Have you ever seen DBZ? O.o
#224 to #221 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
why yes i've seen both series. gt doesnt ******* count
#226 to #224 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Same here....from my experience they spent most of the time talking
#232 to #226 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
if i recall the power up to ss3 took literally a whole episode.
#233 to #232 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
When? I remember him training an entire episode
#234 to #233 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
when he is showing buu the power up. one whole episode
#236 to #234 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
That took less than 5 mins O.o he showed him all three in less than 5 mins. Then they fought.
#240 to #236 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
**** you were right my bad oops

You need to login to view this link
#242 to #240 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Sokay. I grew up with DBZ
#244 to #242 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
i did too but its been a long ass time since i touched it.
#245 to #244 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Well, my girlfriends lil brother has gotten interested in anime so i startes him off with dbz and hes lovin it. were at the end of the cell saga
#247 to #245 - facetiousrunner
Reply +2
(04/05/2013) [-]
cell saga is the best. take this. dbz is a good starter anime and for the younger audience who doesn't like horribly in depth plot. nostalgia kicks in for us but heres some other good ones. Just please god don't watch gt.
#270 to #247 - synapse
Reply +2
(04/05/2013) [-]
Hell ******* yes FMAB has the highest rating. Well deserved.
#248 to #247 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Never gonna touch it.
Never gonna touch it.
#249 to #248 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
good. good. also make sure he watches dragon ball. I liked that one more honestly
#251 to #249 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Not till hes older. I think Goku's naked baby ass would be a lil too much for him. That and the constant crotch slapping.
#252 to #251 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
wait, how old is he then. if you don't mind me asking. I believe if you watch the english dub they took a lot out.
#253 to #252 - nirvananerd
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
12. I watched the english dub not to long ago. its all still there.
#256 to #253 - carnageboy [OP]
+6
(04/05/2013) [-]
#255 to #253 - facetiousrunner
0
(04/05/2013) [-]
welllllll **** give him like two three years. if he can drive he can handle that stuff
#241 to #213 - ultimatepowah
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Is that a cinematic from a game or a movie?
#243 to #241 - facetiousrunner
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
no idea
#326 to #243 - certifiedidiot
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
That's god damn Paul and Bryan from Tekken.
#209 - ninjabunnygo
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
#123 - furryflava
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
>Brobamas
>Brobamas
#110 - thexxtalonxx
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
Filmed with no studio audience...
#39 - captainwow
Reply +6
(04/05/2013) [-]
Cause he's more of a celebrity than a president.
#44 - suddenlypotatoes
Reply -3
(04/05/2013) [-]
Great person. Not so great president.
#46 to #44 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Just know suddenlypotatoes, that this anon agrees with you
#48 to #46 - suddenlypotatoes
Reply -3
(04/05/2013) [-]
#55 to #44 - Alchemyst
Reply +5
(04/05/2013) [-]
While I disagree, that is your opinion and I respect it.
#220 to #55 - suddenlypotatoes
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Do you support Obamacare?
#22 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
gonna sound dumb but what show is this?
#24 to #22 - anon
Reply 0
(04/05/2013) [-]
Salo. You can download it from The Pirate Bay.
#33 to #22 - Hreidmar
Reply +1
(04/05/2013) [-]
I'm half certain that it's the Tonight Show, and certain that David Letterman is the host.

The lad below me is recommending to you hardcore Italian exploitation film...
#36 to #22 - mrdrface
Reply +5
(04/05/2013) [-]
battletoads
#330 - shrinemaiden **User deleted account**
+4
has deleted their comment [-]