x
Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #237 - THEEGAME (04/07/2013) [-]
what they dont tell you is that pi may have these correct answers, but they will be covered in a infinite number of mistakes or lies. think of endless copies of romeo and juliet, but only one will be exactly as shakespear wrote it.
#229 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
Yeah except it will also contain retarded and meaningless **** because of its randomness
Also this so called 'property' is true for ANY imaginary number. Others like Eulers number and **** like 2^(0.5) will also have this so-called "property".
User avatar #226 - mechanichore (04/03/2013) [-]
This is the same for an infinite number of irrational numbers-Pi just happens to be an easily understood example.
#204 - gazajunk (04/03/2013) [-]
**gazajunk rolled a random image posted in comment #4511 at Shin Anime Social Board ** It's the circle of life, and it rules us all.
#183 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
I prefer Tau.
#180 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
WHat if a non-repeating decimal is something like
0.12112111211112111112...

That's non-repeating an not all number combination exist in it

so meh.
User avatar #202 to #180 - swiftblood (04/03/2013) [-]
he didn't say it existed in that, he said in pi, your dumb **** argument is void
#207 to #180 - abcdxyz (04/03/2013) [-]
pi theoretically could end up like that, but currently doesn't to the best of our knowledge. It appears that there are a roughly equal number of the numbers 0-9 so they are completely random
#155 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
Theoretically....
#142 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
wrong all combinations are not there, HA 99999999 doesnt exist in it!
User avatar #173 to #142 - anonymoose ONLINE (04/03/2013) [-]
pi to less than 800 d.p. has 999999, so 99999999 is not completely out of the question.
0
#139 - mooieveters **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#135 - dorklordrises (04/03/2013) [-]
http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2787#comic   
Also had a thing about this
http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2787#comic
Also had a thing about this
0
#134 - admiralamory **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#82 - benegative (04/03/2013) [-]
So? A monkey with a typewriter will eventually write hamlet. These discussions of infinity are dubious at best.
#78 - felixfj (04/03/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#73 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
This **** again?
No. Implying that a nonrepeating sucession of numbers contains every posible combination of numbers is the same as implying that there is only one kind of infinite.
This is falacious. We've alredy been through this, morons.
Only someone with very little mathematical knowledge can make these kind of assumptions, and even go around showing his own ignorance.
User avatar #89 to #73 - ronyx (04/03/2013) [-]
Listen to anon, he knows his **** .
#69 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
-_- <--- My retarded anon face when there are infinite numbers that do the exact same thing.
#65 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
That doesn't make sense, if a number doesn't ever repeat after itself then that can't possibly be true e.g. you die on the 11th of november.
User avatar #84 to #65 - susinfluenza (04/03/2013) [-]
That's not what it means by non-repeating. What it means is that there is no pattern to the numbers that repeats.
#52 - wearemarshall (04/03/2013) [-]
sooo its the circle of life?
#30 - anon (04/03/2013) [-]
Didn't they trace it down to a like 3 million or 3 billion decimal points?
#3 - doctorgolgo (04/02/2013) [-]
**doctorgolgo rolled a random image posted in comment #1320743 at Friendly **
Amazing analysis.
#63 - jwalton (04/03/2013) [-]
Wouldn't this be false? Infinite does not mean every, for example, there are an infinite amount of numbers in between 2 and 3 (2.4, 2.1125, 2.9999 etc.), yet none of them are 4. See what I mean?
0
#75 to #63 - abcdxyz has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)