Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #421 - isomeras (03/28/2013) [-]
Marriage is pointless. It was originally instated as a business deal between wealthy families - often involving slave trade and whatnot. Peasants never got married as there was nothing in it for them. To say marriage is love-based is laughable.

On a further note, if you need to make it "official" with paper and lawyers, you never loved each other in the first place.
User avatar #354 - sketchE ONLINE (03/28/2013) [-]
well to avoid the ********* below anyone know about squatters rights and if anyone thinks its possible to use those to get the house?
#345 - greensky (03/28/2013) [+] (1 reply)
What's with all that gay marriage content recently? I'm sick of it and it disgusts me so stop.
User avatar #360 to #345 - revorce (03/28/2013) [-]
How does it disgust you?
#344 - Womens Study Major (03/28/2013) [-]
not even close to the same thing
#343 - Womens Study Major (03/28/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Dont deny child's rights for your ******** pleasure. Marriage was meant to defend the rights of children to have both a father and mother. The issue is the right of children to have a mother and a father who represents their identity, lineage, and history, about the future equality of children who are motherless or fatherless compared to those who are raised by their father and mother. Today this right of the child can be bought on the market place by people who do not want to get married to someone of the complementary sex but rather who want access to children.
One Mama, One Papa, True Parents You should learn this from the French.
1. "The rights of children trump the right to children. As a society we should not be encouraging this. It’s not biologically natural.” Jean-Marc, a homosexual French mayor.
User avatar #310 - croski (03/28/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Actually, the women has a right as an owner to do that. If this is somewhere in the USA I don't see a problem, because its a country where you have a right to shoot at trespassers.

And the gay marriage part shall not receive my comment.
#322 to #310 - Womens Study Major (03/28/2013) [-]
unless it's private property, she has no say as to who can park on a public street ... and as for gay marriage, your a phaggut
#157 - valabigballs (03/28/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #105 - yamiyo (03/28/2013) [-]
I don't get why people would be upset about this. If someone needs a place to park and I'm not using my driveway, they can sure as hell use it. Better than taking up the ******* street. It's just logical. There's a space designed for a car to be parked and area on the street designed to be driven - not parked - on. It just makes sense to use the driveway that is not currently in use.
User avatar #85 - flamingpie (03/28/2013) [-]
Unless ya know.... you're gay
#301 - doyoulikeapizza (03/28/2013) [-]
**doyoulikeapizza rolled a random image posted in comment #138 at Cat Island **
#289 - potatonuggets **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#276 - myturntoevil has deleted their comment [-]
#42 - krispybananaz (03/28/2013) [-]
 Friends (0)